Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Use Reference items instead of P2Ps for inbox libs - #64508
Conversation
ghost
commented
Jan 30, 2022
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-infrastructure-libraries Issue DetailsSome libraries still had ProjectReferences to libraries which refs
|
Some libraries still had ProjectReferences to libraries which refs were added to the targeting pack with the last release. Therefore these references can just be normal "Reference" items instead of P2Ps.
f08df56 to
6e03bdfCompare
ericstj
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. I wonder if we can catch this with a validation target so that folks don't introduce more?
ViktorHofer
commented
Jan 31, 2022
Such validation (either via a target or even without one) could be easily implemented. Ideally we would go the opposite way and use P2Ps everywhere which is why I'm a bit torn. |
Some libraries still had ProjectReferences to libraries which refs
were added to the targeting pack with the last release. Therefore these
references can just be normal "Reference" items instead of P2Ps.