Skip to content

[release/6.0] Build a new version of System.Runtime.Experimental with the correct assembly version - #65733

Merged
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/6.0from
ReleaseRuntimeExperimental
Mar 8, 2022
Merged

[release/6.0] Build a new version of System.Runtime.Experimental with the correct assembly version#65733
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/6.0from
ReleaseRuntimeExperimental

Conversation

@safern

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes: #65018

We already merged the fix to generate the correct assembly version for this package in: 826c3d7

@safernsafern added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Feb 22, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this PR. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

@ghostghost assigned safernFeb 22, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-runtime
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Fixes: #65018

We already merged the fix to generate the correct assembly version for this package in: 826c3d7

Author:safern
Assignees:safern
Labels:

Servicing-consider, area-System.Runtime

Milestone:-

@rbhandarbhanda added this to the 6.0.4 milestone Feb 24, 2022
@rbhandarbhanda added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Feb 24, 2022
@ericstjericstj assigned carlossanlop and unassigned safernMar 3, 2022
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 21ec8d3 into release/6.0Mar 8, 2022
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the ReleaseRuntimeExperimental branch March 8, 2022 21:42
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 8, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.RuntimeServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@safern@tannergooding@carlossanlop@jeffschwMSFT@rbhanda