Keep members on Int128 and Half for testing - #70332

Merged
jkotas merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:operators
Jun 7, 2022
Merged

Keep members on Int128 and Half for testing#70332
jkotas merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:operators

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was hitting a lot of obscure failures in #70201 that look like this:

 [FAIL] System.Tests.Int128Tests.Parse_Span_Valid(value: "170141183460469231731687303715884105727", offset: 0, count: 1, style: Integer, provider: null, expected: 1)
System.ArgumentException : Object of type 'System.Int32' cannot be converted to type 'System.Int128'.
at System.InvokeUtils.CheckArgument(Object, EETypePtr, InvokeUtils.CheckArgumentSemantics, BinderBundle, InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&) + 0x1c0
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperCore(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamLookupType&, Int32&, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamType) + 0x228
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperIn(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle) + 0x1b
at System.Runtime.Tests!<BaseAddress>+0xffe015
at System.InvokeUtils.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x14d
at Internal.Runtime.Augments.RuntimeAugments.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x3e
at Internal.Reflection.Execution.MethodInvokers.StaticMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean) + 0x4e
at Internal.Reflection.Core.Execution.MethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], Binder, BindingFlags, CultureInfo) + 0x45
at System.Reflection.Runtime.MethodInfos.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object, BindingFlags, Binder, Object[], CultureInfo) + 0x58

This stack is showing a reflection invoke attempt by xunit (not by a test, but by xunit itself) to invoke a method taking Int128, but passing a boxed Int32 as an argument. The TestData is indeed doing that.

I was getting myself ready to debug xunit but I thought that maybe xunit has a custom binder that calls the operator methods using reflection to do the conversions. Sure enough the RD.XML fixed it, so the problem was with operators getting trimmed away.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

I was hitting a lot of obscure failures in dotnet#70201 that look like this:
```
[FAIL] System.Tests.Int128Tests.Parse_Span_Valid(value: "170141183460469231731687303715884105727", offset: 0, count:
1, style: Integer, provider: null, expected: 1)
System.ArgumentException : Object of type 'System.Int32' cannot be converted to type 'System.Int128'.
at System.InvokeUtils.CheckArgument(Object, EETypePtr, InvokeUtils.CheckArgumentSemantics, BinderBundle, InvokeUti
ls.ArgSetupState&) + 0x1c0
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperCore(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle, InvokeUtils.Dyna
micInvokeParamLookupType&, Int32&, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamType) + 0x228
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperIn(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle) + 0x1b
at System.Runtime.Tests!<BaseAddress>+0xffe015
at System.InvokeUtils.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Bool
ean, Boolean) + 0x14d
at Internal.Runtime.Augments.RuntimeAugments.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Objec
t[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x3e
at Internal.Reflection.Execution.MethodInvokers.StaticMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean
) + 0x4e
at Internal.Reflection.Core.Execution.MethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], Binder, BindingFlags, CultureInfo) +
0x45
at System.Reflection.Runtime.MethodInfos.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object, BindingFlags, Binder, Object[], CultureI
nfo) + 0x58
```
This stack is showing a reflection invoke attempt by xunit (not by a test, but by xunit itself) to invoke a method taking Int128, but passing a boxed Int32 as an argument. The TestData is indeed doing that.
I was getting myself ready to debug xunit but I thought that maybe xunit has a custom binder that calls the operator methods using reflection to do the conversions. Sure enough the RD.XML fixed it, so the problem was with operators getting trimmed away.
@ghost

ghost commented Jun 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this PR. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit 7532658 into dotnet:mainJun 7, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the operators branch June 8, 2022 00:18
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 8, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas@tannergooding
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Keep members on Int128 and Half for testing - #70332

Merged
jkotas merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:operators
Jun 7, 2022
Merged

Keep members on Int128 and Half for testing#70332
jkotas merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:operators

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was hitting a lot of obscure failures in #70201 that look like this:

 [FAIL] System.Tests.Int128Tests.Parse_Span_Valid(value: "170141183460469231731687303715884105727", offset: 0, count: 1, style: Integer, provider: null, expected: 1)
System.ArgumentException : Object of type 'System.Int32' cannot be converted to type 'System.Int128'.
at System.InvokeUtils.CheckArgument(Object, EETypePtr, InvokeUtils.CheckArgumentSemantics, BinderBundle, InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&) + 0x1c0
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperCore(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamLookupType&, Int32&, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamType) + 0x228
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperIn(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle) + 0x1b
at System.Runtime.Tests!<BaseAddress>+0xffe015
at System.InvokeUtils.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x14d
at Internal.Runtime.Augments.RuntimeAugments.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x3e
at Internal.Reflection.Execution.MethodInvokers.StaticMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean) + 0x4e
at Internal.Reflection.Core.Execution.MethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], Binder, BindingFlags, CultureInfo) + 0x45
at System.Reflection.Runtime.MethodInfos.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object, BindingFlags, Binder, Object[], CultureInfo) + 0x58

This stack is showing a reflection invoke attempt by xunit (not by a test, but by xunit itself) to invoke a method taking Int128, but passing a boxed Int32 as an argument. The TestData is indeed doing that.

I was getting myself ready to debug xunit but I thought that maybe xunit has a custom binder that calls the operator methods using reflection to do the conversions. Sure enough the RD.XML fixed it, so the problem was with operators getting trimmed away.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

I was hitting a lot of obscure failures in dotnet#70201 that look like this:
```
[FAIL] System.Tests.Int128Tests.Parse_Span_Valid(value: "170141183460469231731687303715884105727", offset: 0, count:
1, style: Integer, provider: null, expected: 1)
System.ArgumentException : Object of type 'System.Int32' cannot be converted to type 'System.Int128'.
at System.InvokeUtils.CheckArgument(Object, EETypePtr, InvokeUtils.CheckArgumentSemantics, BinderBundle, InvokeUti
ls.ArgSetupState&) + 0x1c0
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperCore(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle, InvokeUtils.Dyna
micInvokeParamLookupType&, Int32&, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamType) + 0x228
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperIn(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle) + 0x1b
at System.Runtime.Tests!<BaseAddress>+0xffe015
at System.InvokeUtils.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Bool
ean, Boolean) + 0x14d
at Internal.Runtime.Augments.RuntimeAugments.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Objec
t[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x3e
at Internal.Reflection.Execution.MethodInvokers.StaticMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean
) + 0x4e
at Internal.Reflection.Core.Execution.MethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], Binder, BindingFlags, CultureInfo) +
0x45
at System.Reflection.Runtime.MethodInfos.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object, BindingFlags, Binder, Object[], CultureI
nfo) + 0x58
```
This stack is showing a reflection invoke attempt by xunit (not by a test, but by xunit itself) to invoke a method taking Int128, but passing a boxed Int32 as an argument. The TestData is indeed doing that.
I was getting myself ready to debug xunit but I thought that maybe xunit has a custom binder that calls the operator methods using reflection to do the conversions. Sure enough the RD.XML fixed it, so the problem was with operators getting trimmed away.
@ghost

ghost commented Jun 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this PR. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit 7532658 into dotnet:mainJun 7, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the operators branch June 8, 2022 00:18
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 8, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas@tannergooding
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Keep members on Int128 and Half for testing - #70332

Merged
jkotas merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:operators
Jun 7, 2022
Merged

Keep members on Int128 and Half for testing#70332
jkotas merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:operators

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was hitting a lot of obscure failures in #70201 that look like this:

 [FAIL] System.Tests.Int128Tests.Parse_Span_Valid(value: "170141183460469231731687303715884105727", offset: 0, count: 1, style: Integer, provider: null, expected: 1)
System.ArgumentException : Object of type 'System.Int32' cannot be converted to type 'System.Int128'.
at System.InvokeUtils.CheckArgument(Object, EETypePtr, InvokeUtils.CheckArgumentSemantics, BinderBundle, InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&) + 0x1c0
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperCore(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamLookupType&, Int32&, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamType) + 0x228
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperIn(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle) + 0x1b
at System.Runtime.Tests!<BaseAddress>+0xffe015
at System.InvokeUtils.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x14d
at Internal.Runtime.Augments.RuntimeAugments.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x3e
at Internal.Reflection.Execution.MethodInvokers.StaticMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean) + 0x4e
at Internal.Reflection.Core.Execution.MethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], Binder, BindingFlags, CultureInfo) + 0x45
at System.Reflection.Runtime.MethodInfos.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object, BindingFlags, Binder, Object[], CultureInfo) + 0x58

This stack is showing a reflection invoke attempt by xunit (not by a test, but by xunit itself) to invoke a method taking Int128, but passing a boxed Int32 as an argument. The TestData is indeed doing that.

I was getting myself ready to debug xunit but I thought that maybe xunit has a custom binder that calls the operator methods using reflection to do the conversions. Sure enough the RD.XML fixed it, so the problem was with operators getting trimmed away.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

I was hitting a lot of obscure failures in dotnet#70201 that look like this:
```
[FAIL] System.Tests.Int128Tests.Parse_Span_Valid(value: "170141183460469231731687303715884105727", offset: 0, count:
1, style: Integer, provider: null, expected: 1)
System.ArgumentException : Object of type 'System.Int32' cannot be converted to type 'System.Int128'.
at System.InvokeUtils.CheckArgument(Object, EETypePtr, InvokeUtils.CheckArgumentSemantics, BinderBundle, InvokeUti
ls.ArgSetupState&) + 0x1c0
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperCore(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle, InvokeUtils.Dyna
micInvokeParamLookupType&, Int32&, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamType) + 0x228
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperIn(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle) + 0x1b
at System.Runtime.Tests!<BaseAddress>+0xffe015
at System.InvokeUtils.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Bool
ean, Boolean) + 0x14d
at Internal.Runtime.Augments.RuntimeAugments.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Objec
t[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x3e
at Internal.Reflection.Execution.MethodInvokers.StaticMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean
) + 0x4e
at Internal.Reflection.Core.Execution.MethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], Binder, BindingFlags, CultureInfo) +
0x45
at System.Reflection.Runtime.MethodInfos.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object, BindingFlags, Binder, Object[], CultureI
nfo) + 0x58
```
This stack is showing a reflection invoke attempt by xunit (not by a test, but by xunit itself) to invoke a method taking Int128, but passing a boxed Int32 as an argument. The TestData is indeed doing that.
I was getting myself ready to debug xunit but I thought that maybe xunit has a custom binder that calls the operator methods using reflection to do the conversions. Sure enough the RD.XML fixed it, so the problem was with operators getting trimmed away.
@ghost

ghost commented Jun 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this PR. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit 7532658 into dotnet:mainJun 7, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the operators branch June 8, 2022 00:18
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 8, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas@tannergooding
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Keep members on Int128 and Half for testing - #70332

Merged
jkotas merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:operators
Jun 7, 2022
Merged

Keep members on Int128 and Half for testing#70332
jkotas merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:operators

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was hitting a lot of obscure failures in #70201 that look like this:

 [FAIL] System.Tests.Int128Tests.Parse_Span_Valid(value: "170141183460469231731687303715884105727", offset: 0, count: 1, style: Integer, provider: null, expected: 1)
System.ArgumentException : Object of type 'System.Int32' cannot be converted to type 'System.Int128'.
at System.InvokeUtils.CheckArgument(Object, EETypePtr, InvokeUtils.CheckArgumentSemantics, BinderBundle, InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&) + 0x1c0
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperCore(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamLookupType&, Int32&, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamType) + 0x228
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperIn(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle) + 0x1b
at System.Runtime.Tests!<BaseAddress>+0xffe015
at System.InvokeUtils.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x14d
at Internal.Runtime.Augments.RuntimeAugments.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x3e
at Internal.Reflection.Execution.MethodInvokers.StaticMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean) + 0x4e
at Internal.Reflection.Core.Execution.MethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], Binder, BindingFlags, CultureInfo) + 0x45
at System.Reflection.Runtime.MethodInfos.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object, BindingFlags, Binder, Object[], CultureInfo) + 0x58

This stack is showing a reflection invoke attempt by xunit (not by a test, but by xunit itself) to invoke a method taking Int128, but passing a boxed Int32 as an argument. The TestData is indeed doing that.

I was getting myself ready to debug xunit but I thought that maybe xunit has a custom binder that calls the operator methods using reflection to do the conversions. Sure enough the RD.XML fixed it, so the problem was with operators getting trimmed away.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

I was hitting a lot of obscure failures in dotnet#70201 that look like this:
```
[FAIL] System.Tests.Int128Tests.Parse_Span_Valid(value: "170141183460469231731687303715884105727", offset: 0, count:
1, style: Integer, provider: null, expected: 1)
System.ArgumentException : Object of type 'System.Int32' cannot be converted to type 'System.Int128'.
at System.InvokeUtils.CheckArgument(Object, EETypePtr, InvokeUtils.CheckArgumentSemantics, BinderBundle, InvokeUti
ls.ArgSetupState&) + 0x1c0
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperCore(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle, InvokeUtils.Dyna
micInvokeParamLookupType&, Int32&, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamType) + 0x228
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperIn(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle) + 0x1b
at System.Runtime.Tests!<BaseAddress>+0xffe015
at System.InvokeUtils.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Bool
ean, Boolean) + 0x14d
at Internal.Runtime.Augments.RuntimeAugments.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Objec
t[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x3e
at Internal.Reflection.Execution.MethodInvokers.StaticMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean
) + 0x4e
at Internal.Reflection.Core.Execution.MethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], Binder, BindingFlags, CultureInfo) +
0x45
at System.Reflection.Runtime.MethodInfos.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object, BindingFlags, Binder, Object[], CultureI
nfo) + 0x58
```
This stack is showing a reflection invoke attempt by xunit (not by a test, but by xunit itself) to invoke a method taking Int128, but passing a boxed Int32 as an argument. The TestData is indeed doing that.
I was getting myself ready to debug xunit but I thought that maybe xunit has a custom binder that calls the operator methods using reflection to do the conversions. Sure enough the RD.XML fixed it, so the problem was with operators getting trimmed away.
@ghost

ghost commented Jun 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this PR. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit 7532658 into dotnet:mainJun 7, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the operators branch June 8, 2022 00:18
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 8, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas@tannergooding
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Keep members on Int128 and Half for testing - #70332

Merged
jkotas merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:operators
Jun 7, 2022
Merged

Keep members on Int128 and Half for testing#70332
jkotas merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:operators

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was hitting a lot of obscure failures in #70201 that look like this:

 [FAIL] System.Tests.Int128Tests.Parse_Span_Valid(value: "170141183460469231731687303715884105727", offset: 0, count: 1, style: Integer, provider: null, expected: 1)
System.ArgumentException : Object of type 'System.Int32' cannot be converted to type 'System.Int128'.
at System.InvokeUtils.CheckArgument(Object, EETypePtr, InvokeUtils.CheckArgumentSemantics, BinderBundle, InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&) + 0x1c0
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperCore(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamLookupType&, Int32&, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamType) + 0x228
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperIn(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle) + 0x1b
at System.Runtime.Tests!<BaseAddress>+0xffe015
at System.InvokeUtils.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x14d
at Internal.Runtime.Augments.RuntimeAugments.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x3e
at Internal.Reflection.Execution.MethodInvokers.StaticMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean) + 0x4e
at Internal.Reflection.Core.Execution.MethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], Binder, BindingFlags, CultureInfo) + 0x45
at System.Reflection.Runtime.MethodInfos.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object, BindingFlags, Binder, Object[], CultureInfo) + 0x58

This stack is showing a reflection invoke attempt by xunit (not by a test, but by xunit itself) to invoke a method taking Int128, but passing a boxed Int32 as an argument. The TestData is indeed doing that.

I was getting myself ready to debug xunit but I thought that maybe xunit has a custom binder that calls the operator methods using reflection to do the conversions. Sure enough the RD.XML fixed it, so the problem was with operators getting trimmed away.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

I was hitting a lot of obscure failures in dotnet#70201 that look like this:
```
[FAIL] System.Tests.Int128Tests.Parse_Span_Valid(value: "170141183460469231731687303715884105727", offset: 0, count:
1, style: Integer, provider: null, expected: 1)
System.ArgumentException : Object of type 'System.Int32' cannot be converted to type 'System.Int128'.
at System.InvokeUtils.CheckArgument(Object, EETypePtr, InvokeUtils.CheckArgumentSemantics, BinderBundle, InvokeUti
ls.ArgSetupState&) + 0x1c0
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperCore(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle, InvokeUtils.Dyna
micInvokeParamLookupType&, Int32&, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamType) + 0x228
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperIn(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle) + 0x1b
at System.Runtime.Tests!<BaseAddress>+0xffe015
at System.InvokeUtils.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Bool
ean, Boolean) + 0x14d
at Internal.Runtime.Augments.RuntimeAugments.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Objec
t[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x3e
at Internal.Reflection.Execution.MethodInvokers.StaticMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean
) + 0x4e
at Internal.Reflection.Core.Execution.MethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], Binder, BindingFlags, CultureInfo) +
0x45
at System.Reflection.Runtime.MethodInfos.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object, BindingFlags, Binder, Object[], CultureI
nfo) + 0x58
```
This stack is showing a reflection invoke attempt by xunit (not by a test, but by xunit itself) to invoke a method taking Int128, but passing a boxed Int32 as an argument. The TestData is indeed doing that.
I was getting myself ready to debug xunit but I thought that maybe xunit has a custom binder that calls the operator methods using reflection to do the conversions. Sure enough the RD.XML fixed it, so the problem was with operators getting trimmed away.
@ghost

ghost commented Jun 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this PR. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit 7532658 into dotnet:mainJun 7, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the operators branch June 8, 2022 00:18
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 8, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas@tannergooding
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Keep members on Int128 and Half for testing - #70332

Merged
jkotas merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:operators
Jun 7, 2022
Merged

Keep members on Int128 and Half for testing#70332
jkotas merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:operators

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was hitting a lot of obscure failures in #70201 that look like this:

 [FAIL] System.Tests.Int128Tests.Parse_Span_Valid(value: "170141183460469231731687303715884105727", offset: 0, count: 1, style: Integer, provider: null, expected: 1)
System.ArgumentException : Object of type 'System.Int32' cannot be converted to type 'System.Int128'.
at System.InvokeUtils.CheckArgument(Object, EETypePtr, InvokeUtils.CheckArgumentSemantics, BinderBundle, InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&) + 0x1c0
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperCore(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamLookupType&, Int32&, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamType) + 0x228
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperIn(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle) + 0x1b
at System.Runtime.Tests!<BaseAddress>+0xffe015
at System.InvokeUtils.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x14d
at Internal.Runtime.Augments.RuntimeAugments.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x3e
at Internal.Reflection.Execution.MethodInvokers.StaticMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean) + 0x4e
at Internal.Reflection.Core.Execution.MethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], Binder, BindingFlags, CultureInfo) + 0x45
at System.Reflection.Runtime.MethodInfos.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object, BindingFlags, Binder, Object[], CultureInfo) + 0x58

This stack is showing a reflection invoke attempt by xunit (not by a test, but by xunit itself) to invoke a method taking Int128, but passing a boxed Int32 as an argument. The TestData is indeed doing that.

I was getting myself ready to debug xunit but I thought that maybe xunit has a custom binder that calls the operator methods using reflection to do the conversions. Sure enough the RD.XML fixed it, so the problem was with operators getting trimmed away.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

I was hitting a lot of obscure failures in dotnet#70201 that look like this:
```
[FAIL] System.Tests.Int128Tests.Parse_Span_Valid(value: "170141183460469231731687303715884105727", offset: 0, count:
1, style: Integer, provider: null, expected: 1)
System.ArgumentException : Object of type 'System.Int32' cannot be converted to type 'System.Int128'.
at System.InvokeUtils.CheckArgument(Object, EETypePtr, InvokeUtils.CheckArgumentSemantics, BinderBundle, InvokeUti
ls.ArgSetupState&) + 0x1c0
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperCore(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle, InvokeUtils.Dyna
micInvokeParamLookupType&, Int32&, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamType) + 0x228
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperIn(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle) + 0x1b
at System.Runtime.Tests!<BaseAddress>+0xffe015
at System.InvokeUtils.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Bool
ean, Boolean) + 0x14d
at Internal.Runtime.Augments.RuntimeAugments.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Objec
t[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x3e
at Internal.Reflection.Execution.MethodInvokers.StaticMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean
) + 0x4e
at Internal.Reflection.Core.Execution.MethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], Binder, BindingFlags, CultureInfo) +
0x45
at System.Reflection.Runtime.MethodInfos.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object, BindingFlags, Binder, Object[], CultureI
nfo) + 0x58
```
This stack is showing a reflection invoke attempt by xunit (not by a test, but by xunit itself) to invoke a method taking Int128, but passing a boxed Int32 as an argument. The TestData is indeed doing that.
I was getting myself ready to debug xunit but I thought that maybe xunit has a custom binder that calls the operator methods using reflection to do the conversions. Sure enough the RD.XML fixed it, so the problem was with operators getting trimmed away.
@ghost

ghost commented Jun 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this PR. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit 7532658 into dotnet:mainJun 7, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the operators branch June 8, 2022 00:18
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 8, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas@tannergooding
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Keep members on Int128 and Half for testing - #70332

Merged
jkotas merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:operators
Jun 7, 2022
Merged

Keep members on Int128 and Half for testing#70332
jkotas merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:operators

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was hitting a lot of obscure failures in #70201 that look like this:

 [FAIL] System.Tests.Int128Tests.Parse_Span_Valid(value: "170141183460469231731687303715884105727", offset: 0, count: 1, style: Integer, provider: null, expected: 1)
System.ArgumentException : Object of type 'System.Int32' cannot be converted to type 'System.Int128'.
at System.InvokeUtils.CheckArgument(Object, EETypePtr, InvokeUtils.CheckArgumentSemantics, BinderBundle, InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&) + 0x1c0
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperCore(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamLookupType&, Int32&, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamType) + 0x228
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperIn(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle) + 0x1b
at System.Runtime.Tests!<BaseAddress>+0xffe015
at System.InvokeUtils.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x14d
at Internal.Runtime.Augments.RuntimeAugments.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x3e
at Internal.Reflection.Execution.MethodInvokers.StaticMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean) + 0x4e
at Internal.Reflection.Core.Execution.MethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], Binder, BindingFlags, CultureInfo) + 0x45
at System.Reflection.Runtime.MethodInfos.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object, BindingFlags, Binder, Object[], CultureInfo) + 0x58

This stack is showing a reflection invoke attempt by xunit (not by a test, but by xunit itself) to invoke a method taking Int128, but passing a boxed Int32 as an argument. The TestData is indeed doing that.

I was getting myself ready to debug xunit but I thought that maybe xunit has a custom binder that calls the operator methods using reflection to do the conversions. Sure enough the RD.XML fixed it, so the problem was with operators getting trimmed away.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

I was hitting a lot of obscure failures in dotnet#70201 that look like this:
```
[FAIL] System.Tests.Int128Tests.Parse_Span_Valid(value: "170141183460469231731687303715884105727", offset: 0, count:
1, style: Integer, provider: null, expected: 1)
System.ArgumentException : Object of type 'System.Int32' cannot be converted to type 'System.Int128'.
at System.InvokeUtils.CheckArgument(Object, EETypePtr, InvokeUtils.CheckArgumentSemantics, BinderBundle, InvokeUti
ls.ArgSetupState&) + 0x1c0
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperCore(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle, InvokeUtils.Dyna
micInvokeParamLookupType&, Int32&, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamType) + 0x228
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperIn(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle) + 0x1b
at System.Runtime.Tests!<BaseAddress>+0xffe015
at System.InvokeUtils.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Bool
ean, Boolean) + 0x14d
at Internal.Runtime.Augments.RuntimeAugments.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Objec
t[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x3e
at Internal.Reflection.Execution.MethodInvokers.StaticMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean
) + 0x4e
at Internal.Reflection.Core.Execution.MethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], Binder, BindingFlags, CultureInfo) +
0x45
at System.Reflection.Runtime.MethodInfos.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object, BindingFlags, Binder, Object[], CultureI
nfo) + 0x58
```
This stack is showing a reflection invoke attempt by xunit (not by a test, but by xunit itself) to invoke a method taking Int128, but passing a boxed Int32 as an argument. The TestData is indeed doing that.
I was getting myself ready to debug xunit but I thought that maybe xunit has a custom binder that calls the operator methods using reflection to do the conversions. Sure enough the RD.XML fixed it, so the problem was with operators getting trimmed away.
@ghost

ghost commented Jun 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this PR. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit 7532658 into dotnet:mainJun 7, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the operators branch June 8, 2022 00:18
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 8, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas@tannergooding
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Keep members on Int128 and Half for testing - #70332

Merged
jkotas merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:operators
Jun 7, 2022
Merged

Keep members on Int128 and Half for testing#70332
jkotas merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:operators

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was hitting a lot of obscure failures in #70201 that look like this:

 [FAIL] System.Tests.Int128Tests.Parse_Span_Valid(value: "170141183460469231731687303715884105727", offset: 0, count: 1, style: Integer, provider: null, expected: 1)
System.ArgumentException : Object of type 'System.Int32' cannot be converted to type 'System.Int128'.
at System.InvokeUtils.CheckArgument(Object, EETypePtr, InvokeUtils.CheckArgumentSemantics, BinderBundle, InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&) + 0x1c0
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperCore(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamLookupType&, Int32&, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamType) + 0x228
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperIn(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle) + 0x1b
at System.Runtime.Tests!<BaseAddress>+0xffe015
at System.InvokeUtils.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x14d
at Internal.Runtime.Augments.RuntimeAugments.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x3e
at Internal.Reflection.Execution.MethodInvokers.StaticMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean) + 0x4e
at Internal.Reflection.Core.Execution.MethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], Binder, BindingFlags, CultureInfo) + 0x45
at System.Reflection.Runtime.MethodInfos.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object, BindingFlags, Binder, Object[], CultureInfo) + 0x58

This stack is showing a reflection invoke attempt by xunit (not by a test, but by xunit itself) to invoke a method taking Int128, but passing a boxed Int32 as an argument. The TestData is indeed doing that.

I was getting myself ready to debug xunit but I thought that maybe xunit has a custom binder that calls the operator methods using reflection to do the conversions. Sure enough the RD.XML fixed it, so the problem was with operators getting trimmed away.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

I was hitting a lot of obscure failures in dotnet#70201 that look like this:
```
[FAIL] System.Tests.Int128Tests.Parse_Span_Valid(value: "170141183460469231731687303715884105727", offset: 0, count:
1, style: Integer, provider: null, expected: 1)
System.ArgumentException : Object of type 'System.Int32' cannot be converted to type 'System.Int128'.
at System.InvokeUtils.CheckArgument(Object, EETypePtr, InvokeUtils.CheckArgumentSemantics, BinderBundle, InvokeUti
ls.ArgSetupState&) + 0x1c0
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperCore(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle, InvokeUtils.Dyna
micInvokeParamLookupType&, Int32&, InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamType) + 0x228
at System.InvokeUtils.DynamicInvokeParamHelperIn(InvokeUtils.ArgSetupState&, RuntimeTypeHandle) + 0x1b
at System.Runtime.Tests!<BaseAddress>+0xffe015
at System.InvokeUtils.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Bool
ean, Boolean) + 0x14d
at Internal.Runtime.Augments.RuntimeAugments.CallDynamicInvokeMethod(Object, IntPtr, IntPtr, IntPtr, Object, Objec
t[], BinderBundle, Boolean, Boolean) + 0x3e
at Internal.Reflection.Execution.MethodInvokers.StaticMethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], BinderBundle, Boolean
) + 0x4e
at Internal.Reflection.Core.Execution.MethodInvoker.Invoke(Object, Object[], Binder, BindingFlags, CultureInfo) +
0x45
at System.Reflection.Runtime.MethodInfos.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object, BindingFlags, Binder, Object[], CultureI
nfo) + 0x58
```
This stack is showing a reflection invoke attempt by xunit (not by a test, but by xunit itself) to invoke a method taking Int128, but passing a boxed Int32 as an argument. The TestData is indeed doing that.
I was getting myself ready to debug xunit but I thought that maybe xunit has a custom binder that calls the operator methods using reflection to do the conversions. Sure enough the RD.XML fixed it, so the problem was with operators getting trimmed away.
@ghost

ghost commented Jun 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this PR. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit 7532658 into dotnet:mainJun 7, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the operators branch June 8, 2022 00:18
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 8, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas@tannergooding