Implement new QuicException proposal - #71432

Merged
rzikm merged 16 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rzikm:70669-QuicException
Jul 12, 2022
Merged

Implement new QuicException proposal#71432
rzikm merged 16 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rzikm:70669-QuicException

Conversation

@rzikm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#70669.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

@ghostghost assigned rzikmJun 29, 2022
@rzikm
rzikm marked this pull request as draft June 29, 2022 13:58
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Closes #70669.

Author:rzikm
Assignees:-
Labels:

new-api-needs-documentation, area-System.Net.Quic

Milestone:-

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Quic/ref/System.Net.Quic.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Quic/ref/System.Net.Quic.cs Outdated
@ManickaPManickaP mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2022
@rzikm
rzikm marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2022 18:51

@ManickaPManickaP left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good modulo comments, thanks!
:shipit:

// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.
// The .NET Foundation licenses this file to you under the MIT license.

using Microsoft.Quic;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, could you just move the file to System/Net/Quic/Internal so it doesn't wreak complete havoc on my PRs 😄

namespace System.Net.Quic
{
public class QuicException : Exception
public sealed class QuicException : IOException

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will need XML comments as well since we generate docs from them.

HttpRequestException ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<HttpRequestException>(() => client.SendAsync(request).WaitAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10)));
Assert.Contains("ALPN_NEG_FAILURE", ex.Message);
AuthenticationException authEx = Assert.IsType<AuthenticationException>(ex.InnerException);
Assert.Contains("Application layer protocol negotiation", authEx.Message);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just wonder, is it ok to check like that? what if exception message gets localized?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know of any other way to check for this specific type of error, so the alternative is to check just for the exception type.

I think I have seen some other test elsewhere that depends on the English localization of the exception messages, but I am not sure where.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked and there is precious few of such cases in runtime sources (e.g. https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/70669-QuicException/src/libraries/System.Text.Json/tests/System.Text.Json.Tests/Serialization/ExceptionTests.cs#L495).

So I will remove the assert

@antonfirsov

antonfirsov commented Jul 12, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What's the plan about the adaption of HttpProtocolException? Wasn't the goal to add it in this PR?

@rzikm
rzikm merged commit aa156db into dotnet:mainJul 12, 2022
@rzikm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

What's the plan about the adaption of HttpProtocolException? Wasn't the goal to add it in this PR?

Good catch, I will put up a follow-up tomorrow

@karelzkarelz added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Jul 19, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 18, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[API Proposal]: [QUIC] QuicException

8 participants

@rzikm@antonfirsov@stephentoub@CarnaViire@bartonjs@ManickaP@wfurt@karelz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Implement new QuicException proposal - #71432

Merged
rzikm merged 16 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rzikm:70669-QuicException
Jul 12, 2022
Merged

Implement new QuicException proposal#71432
rzikm merged 16 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rzikm:70669-QuicException

Conversation

@rzikm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#70669.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

@ghostghost assigned rzikmJun 29, 2022
@rzikm
rzikm marked this pull request as draft June 29, 2022 13:58
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Closes #70669.

Author:rzikm
Assignees:-
Labels:

new-api-needs-documentation, area-System.Net.Quic

Milestone:-

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Quic/ref/System.Net.Quic.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Quic/ref/System.Net.Quic.cs Outdated
@ManickaPManickaP mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2022
@rzikm
rzikm marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2022 18:51

@ManickaPManickaP left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good modulo comments, thanks!
:shipit:

// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.
// The .NET Foundation licenses this file to you under the MIT license.

using Microsoft.Quic;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, could you just move the file to System/Net/Quic/Internal so it doesn't wreak complete havoc on my PRs 😄

namespace System.Net.Quic
{
public class QuicException : Exception
public sealed class QuicException : IOException

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will need XML comments as well since we generate docs from them.

HttpRequestException ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<HttpRequestException>(() => client.SendAsync(request).WaitAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10)));
Assert.Contains("ALPN_NEG_FAILURE", ex.Message);
AuthenticationException authEx = Assert.IsType<AuthenticationException>(ex.InnerException);
Assert.Contains("Application layer protocol negotiation", authEx.Message);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just wonder, is it ok to check like that? what if exception message gets localized?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know of any other way to check for this specific type of error, so the alternative is to check just for the exception type.

I think I have seen some other test elsewhere that depends on the English localization of the exception messages, but I am not sure where.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked and there is precious few of such cases in runtime sources (e.g. https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/70669-QuicException/src/libraries/System.Text.Json/tests/System.Text.Json.Tests/Serialization/ExceptionTests.cs#L495).

So I will remove the assert

@antonfirsov

antonfirsov commented Jul 12, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What's the plan about the adaption of HttpProtocolException? Wasn't the goal to add it in this PR?

@rzikm
rzikm merged commit aa156db into dotnet:mainJul 12, 2022
@rzikm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

What's the plan about the adaption of HttpProtocolException? Wasn't the goal to add it in this PR?

Good catch, I will put up a follow-up tomorrow

@karelzkarelz added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Jul 19, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 18, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[API Proposal]: [QUIC] QuicException

8 participants

@rzikm@antonfirsov@stephentoub@CarnaViire@bartonjs@ManickaP@wfurt@karelz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Implement new QuicException proposal - #71432

Merged
rzikm merged 16 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rzikm:70669-QuicException
Jul 12, 2022
Merged

Implement new QuicException proposal#71432
rzikm merged 16 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rzikm:70669-QuicException

Conversation

@rzikm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#70669.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

@ghostghost assigned rzikmJun 29, 2022
@rzikm
rzikm marked this pull request as draft June 29, 2022 13:58
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Closes #70669.

Author:rzikm
Assignees:-
Labels:

new-api-needs-documentation, area-System.Net.Quic

Milestone:-

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Quic/ref/System.Net.Quic.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Quic/ref/System.Net.Quic.cs Outdated
@ManickaPManickaP mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2022
@rzikm
rzikm marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2022 18:51

@ManickaPManickaP left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good modulo comments, thanks!
:shipit:

// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.
// The .NET Foundation licenses this file to you under the MIT license.

using Microsoft.Quic;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, could you just move the file to System/Net/Quic/Internal so it doesn't wreak complete havoc on my PRs 😄

namespace System.Net.Quic
{
public class QuicException : Exception
public sealed class QuicException : IOException

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will need XML comments as well since we generate docs from them.

HttpRequestException ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<HttpRequestException>(() => client.SendAsync(request).WaitAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10)));
Assert.Contains("ALPN_NEG_FAILURE", ex.Message);
AuthenticationException authEx = Assert.IsType<AuthenticationException>(ex.InnerException);
Assert.Contains("Application layer protocol negotiation", authEx.Message);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just wonder, is it ok to check like that? what if exception message gets localized?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know of any other way to check for this specific type of error, so the alternative is to check just for the exception type.

I think I have seen some other test elsewhere that depends on the English localization of the exception messages, but I am not sure where.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked and there is precious few of such cases in runtime sources (e.g. https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/70669-QuicException/src/libraries/System.Text.Json/tests/System.Text.Json.Tests/Serialization/ExceptionTests.cs#L495).

So I will remove the assert

@antonfirsov

antonfirsov commented Jul 12, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What's the plan about the adaption of HttpProtocolException? Wasn't the goal to add it in this PR?

@rzikm
rzikm merged commit aa156db into dotnet:mainJul 12, 2022
@rzikm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

What's the plan about the adaption of HttpProtocolException? Wasn't the goal to add it in this PR?

Good catch, I will put up a follow-up tomorrow

@karelzkarelz added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Jul 19, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 18, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[API Proposal]: [QUIC] QuicException

8 participants

@rzikm@antonfirsov@stephentoub@CarnaViire@bartonjs@ManickaP@wfurt@karelz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Implement new QuicException proposal - #71432

Merged
rzikm merged 16 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rzikm:70669-QuicException
Jul 12, 2022
Merged

Implement new QuicException proposal#71432
rzikm merged 16 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rzikm:70669-QuicException

Conversation

@rzikm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#70669.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

@ghostghost assigned rzikmJun 29, 2022
@rzikm
rzikm marked this pull request as draft June 29, 2022 13:58
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Closes #70669.

Author:rzikm
Assignees:-
Labels:

new-api-needs-documentation, area-System.Net.Quic

Milestone:-

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Quic/ref/System.Net.Quic.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Quic/ref/System.Net.Quic.cs Outdated
@ManickaPManickaP mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2022
@rzikm
rzikm marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2022 18:51

@ManickaPManickaP left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good modulo comments, thanks!
:shipit:

// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.
// The .NET Foundation licenses this file to you under the MIT license.

using Microsoft.Quic;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, could you just move the file to System/Net/Quic/Internal so it doesn't wreak complete havoc on my PRs 😄

namespace System.Net.Quic
{
public class QuicException : Exception
public sealed class QuicException : IOException

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will need XML comments as well since we generate docs from them.

HttpRequestException ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<HttpRequestException>(() => client.SendAsync(request).WaitAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10)));
Assert.Contains("ALPN_NEG_FAILURE", ex.Message);
AuthenticationException authEx = Assert.IsType<AuthenticationException>(ex.InnerException);
Assert.Contains("Application layer protocol negotiation", authEx.Message);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just wonder, is it ok to check like that? what if exception message gets localized?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know of any other way to check for this specific type of error, so the alternative is to check just for the exception type.

I think I have seen some other test elsewhere that depends on the English localization of the exception messages, but I am not sure where.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked and there is precious few of such cases in runtime sources (e.g. https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/70669-QuicException/src/libraries/System.Text.Json/tests/System.Text.Json.Tests/Serialization/ExceptionTests.cs#L495).

So I will remove the assert

@antonfirsov

antonfirsov commented Jul 12, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What's the plan about the adaption of HttpProtocolException? Wasn't the goal to add it in this PR?

@rzikm
rzikm merged commit aa156db into dotnet:mainJul 12, 2022
@rzikm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

What's the plan about the adaption of HttpProtocolException? Wasn't the goal to add it in this PR?

Good catch, I will put up a follow-up tomorrow

@karelzkarelz added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Jul 19, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 18, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[API Proposal]: [QUIC] QuicException

8 participants

@rzikm@antonfirsov@stephentoub@CarnaViire@bartonjs@ManickaP@wfurt@karelz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Implement new QuicException proposal - #71432

Merged
rzikm merged 16 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rzikm:70669-QuicException
Jul 12, 2022
Merged

Implement new QuicException proposal#71432
rzikm merged 16 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rzikm:70669-QuicException

Conversation

@rzikm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#70669.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

@ghostghost assigned rzikmJun 29, 2022
@rzikm
rzikm marked this pull request as draft June 29, 2022 13:58
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Closes #70669.

Author:rzikm
Assignees:-
Labels:

new-api-needs-documentation, area-System.Net.Quic

Milestone:-

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Quic/ref/System.Net.Quic.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Quic/ref/System.Net.Quic.cs Outdated
@ManickaPManickaP mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2022
@rzikm
rzikm marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2022 18:51

@ManickaPManickaP left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good modulo comments, thanks!
:shipit:

// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.
// The .NET Foundation licenses this file to you under the MIT license.

using Microsoft.Quic;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, could you just move the file to System/Net/Quic/Internal so it doesn't wreak complete havoc on my PRs 😄

namespace System.Net.Quic
{
public class QuicException : Exception
public sealed class QuicException : IOException

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will need XML comments as well since we generate docs from them.

HttpRequestException ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<HttpRequestException>(() => client.SendAsync(request).WaitAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10)));
Assert.Contains("ALPN_NEG_FAILURE", ex.Message);
AuthenticationException authEx = Assert.IsType<AuthenticationException>(ex.InnerException);
Assert.Contains("Application layer protocol negotiation", authEx.Message);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just wonder, is it ok to check like that? what if exception message gets localized?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know of any other way to check for this specific type of error, so the alternative is to check just for the exception type.

I think I have seen some other test elsewhere that depends on the English localization of the exception messages, but I am not sure where.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked and there is precious few of such cases in runtime sources (e.g. https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/70669-QuicException/src/libraries/System.Text.Json/tests/System.Text.Json.Tests/Serialization/ExceptionTests.cs#L495).

So I will remove the assert

@antonfirsov

antonfirsov commented Jul 12, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What's the plan about the adaption of HttpProtocolException? Wasn't the goal to add it in this PR?

@rzikm
rzikm merged commit aa156db into dotnet:mainJul 12, 2022
@rzikm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

What's the plan about the adaption of HttpProtocolException? Wasn't the goal to add it in this PR?

Good catch, I will put up a follow-up tomorrow

@karelzkarelz added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Jul 19, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 18, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[API Proposal]: [QUIC] QuicException

8 participants

@rzikm@antonfirsov@stephentoub@CarnaViire@bartonjs@ManickaP@wfurt@karelz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Implement new QuicException proposal - #71432

Merged
rzikm merged 16 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rzikm:70669-QuicException
Jul 12, 2022
Merged

Implement new QuicException proposal#71432
rzikm merged 16 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rzikm:70669-QuicException

Conversation

@rzikm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#70669.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

@ghostghost assigned rzikmJun 29, 2022
@rzikm
rzikm marked this pull request as draft June 29, 2022 13:58
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Closes #70669.

Author:rzikm
Assignees:-
Labels:

new-api-needs-documentation, area-System.Net.Quic

Milestone:-

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Quic/ref/System.Net.Quic.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Quic/ref/System.Net.Quic.cs Outdated
@ManickaPManickaP mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2022
@rzikm
rzikm marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2022 18:51

@ManickaPManickaP left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good modulo comments, thanks!
:shipit:

// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.
// The .NET Foundation licenses this file to you under the MIT license.

using Microsoft.Quic;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, could you just move the file to System/Net/Quic/Internal so it doesn't wreak complete havoc on my PRs 😄

namespace System.Net.Quic
{
public class QuicException : Exception
public sealed class QuicException : IOException

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will need XML comments as well since we generate docs from them.

HttpRequestException ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<HttpRequestException>(() => client.SendAsync(request).WaitAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10)));
Assert.Contains("ALPN_NEG_FAILURE", ex.Message);
AuthenticationException authEx = Assert.IsType<AuthenticationException>(ex.InnerException);
Assert.Contains("Application layer protocol negotiation", authEx.Message);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just wonder, is it ok to check like that? what if exception message gets localized?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know of any other way to check for this specific type of error, so the alternative is to check just for the exception type.

I think I have seen some other test elsewhere that depends on the English localization of the exception messages, but I am not sure where.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked and there is precious few of such cases in runtime sources (e.g. https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/70669-QuicException/src/libraries/System.Text.Json/tests/System.Text.Json.Tests/Serialization/ExceptionTests.cs#L495).

So I will remove the assert

@antonfirsov

antonfirsov commented Jul 12, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What's the plan about the adaption of HttpProtocolException? Wasn't the goal to add it in this PR?

@rzikm
rzikm merged commit aa156db into dotnet:mainJul 12, 2022
@rzikm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

What's the plan about the adaption of HttpProtocolException? Wasn't the goal to add it in this PR?

Good catch, I will put up a follow-up tomorrow

@karelzkarelz added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Jul 19, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 18, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[API Proposal]: [QUIC] QuicException

8 participants

@rzikm@antonfirsov@stephentoub@CarnaViire@bartonjs@ManickaP@wfurt@karelz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Implement new QuicException proposal - #71432

Merged
rzikm merged 16 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rzikm:70669-QuicException
Jul 12, 2022
Merged

Implement new QuicException proposal#71432
rzikm merged 16 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rzikm:70669-QuicException

Conversation

@rzikm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#70669.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

@ghostghost assigned rzikmJun 29, 2022
@rzikm
rzikm marked this pull request as draft June 29, 2022 13:58
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Closes #70669.

Author:rzikm
Assignees:-
Labels:

new-api-needs-documentation, area-System.Net.Quic

Milestone:-

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Quic/ref/System.Net.Quic.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Quic/ref/System.Net.Quic.cs Outdated
@ManickaPManickaP mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2022
@rzikm
rzikm marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2022 18:51

@ManickaPManickaP left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good modulo comments, thanks!
:shipit:

// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.
// The .NET Foundation licenses this file to you under the MIT license.

using Microsoft.Quic;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, could you just move the file to System/Net/Quic/Internal so it doesn't wreak complete havoc on my PRs 😄

namespace System.Net.Quic
{
public class QuicException : Exception
public sealed class QuicException : IOException

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will need XML comments as well since we generate docs from them.

HttpRequestException ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<HttpRequestException>(() => client.SendAsync(request).WaitAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10)));
Assert.Contains("ALPN_NEG_FAILURE", ex.Message);
AuthenticationException authEx = Assert.IsType<AuthenticationException>(ex.InnerException);
Assert.Contains("Application layer protocol negotiation", authEx.Message);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just wonder, is it ok to check like that? what if exception message gets localized?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know of any other way to check for this specific type of error, so the alternative is to check just for the exception type.

I think I have seen some other test elsewhere that depends on the English localization of the exception messages, but I am not sure where.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked and there is precious few of such cases in runtime sources (e.g. https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/70669-QuicException/src/libraries/System.Text.Json/tests/System.Text.Json.Tests/Serialization/ExceptionTests.cs#L495).

So I will remove the assert

@antonfirsov

antonfirsov commented Jul 12, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What's the plan about the adaption of HttpProtocolException? Wasn't the goal to add it in this PR?

@rzikm
rzikm merged commit aa156db into dotnet:mainJul 12, 2022
@rzikm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

What's the plan about the adaption of HttpProtocolException? Wasn't the goal to add it in this PR?

Good catch, I will put up a follow-up tomorrow

@karelzkarelz added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Jul 19, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 18, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[API Proposal]: [QUIC] QuicException

8 participants

@rzikm@antonfirsov@stephentoub@CarnaViire@bartonjs@ManickaP@wfurt@karelz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Implement new QuicException proposal - #71432

Merged
rzikm merged 16 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rzikm:70669-QuicException
Jul 12, 2022
Merged

Implement new QuicException proposal#71432
rzikm merged 16 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rzikm:70669-QuicException

Conversation

@rzikm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes#70669.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

@ghostghost assigned rzikmJun 29, 2022
@rzikm
rzikm marked this pull request as draft June 29, 2022 13:58
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Closes #70669.

Author:rzikm
Assignees:-
Labels:

new-api-needs-documentation, area-System.Net.Quic

Milestone:-

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Quic/ref/System.Net.Quic.cs Outdated
Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Quic/ref/System.Net.Quic.cs Outdated
@ManickaPManickaP mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2022
@rzikm
rzikm marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2022 18:51

@ManickaPManickaP left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good modulo comments, thanks!
:shipit:

// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.
// The .NET Foundation licenses this file to you under the MIT license.

using Microsoft.Quic;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, could you just move the file to System/Net/Quic/Internal so it doesn't wreak complete havoc on my PRs 😄

namespace System.Net.Quic
{
public class QuicException : Exception
public sealed class QuicException : IOException

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will need XML comments as well since we generate docs from them.

HttpRequestException ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<HttpRequestException>(() => client.SendAsync(request).WaitAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10)));
Assert.Contains("ALPN_NEG_FAILURE", ex.Message);
AuthenticationException authEx = Assert.IsType<AuthenticationException>(ex.InnerException);
Assert.Contains("Application layer protocol negotiation", authEx.Message);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just wonder, is it ok to check like that? what if exception message gets localized?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know of any other way to check for this specific type of error, so the alternative is to check just for the exception type.

I think I have seen some other test elsewhere that depends on the English localization of the exception messages, but I am not sure where.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked and there is precious few of such cases in runtime sources (e.g. https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/70669-QuicException/src/libraries/System.Text.Json/tests/System.Text.Json.Tests/Serialization/ExceptionTests.cs#L495).

So I will remove the assert

@antonfirsov

antonfirsov commented Jul 12, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What's the plan about the adaption of HttpProtocolException? Wasn't the goal to add it in this PR?

@rzikm
rzikm merged commit aa156db into dotnet:mainJul 12, 2022
@rzikm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

What's the plan about the adaption of HttpProtocolException? Wasn't the goal to add it in this PR?

Good catch, I will put up a follow-up tomorrow

@karelzkarelz added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Jul 19, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 18, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[API Proposal]: [QUIC] QuicException

8 participants

@rzikm@antonfirsov@stephentoub@CarnaViire@bartonjs@ManickaP@wfurt@karelz