[release/7.0-rc1] Improve performance of Tar library - #74305

Closed
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 21 commits into
release/7.0-rc1from
backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1
Closed

[release/7.0-rc1] Improve performance of Tar library#74305
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 21 commits into
release/7.0-rc1from
backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Aug 21, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #74281 to release/7.0-rc1

/cc @carlossanlop@stephentoub

Customer Impact

This is a new feature for 7.0. Customer impact should be minimal but they will get considerable performance improvements. See description in original PR.

Testing

The CI passed.

Risk

Low, new feature in 7.0.

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghostghost added the area-System.IO label Aug 21, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-io
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #74281 to release/7.0-rc1

/cc @carlossanlop@stephentoub

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.IO

Milestone:-

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop self-assigned this Aug 21, 2022
@danmoseley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This change is relatively large and mostly optional (if current performance is considered shippable). As last time, we will have essentially no time to react to RC1 feedback before GA.

Is there a subset (including the functional fixes) that would get most of the benefit with less risk of introducing a bug?

I'm not necessarily opposed to taking it all, if the risk/value is there. But polishing a new feature does not meet the bar in itself.

@danmoseley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm going to close this per above. It is too late for this kind of change. If there are functional fixes in here that meet the bar please extract those to port them.

@danmoseley
danmoseley deleted the backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1 branch August 21, 2022 15:56
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 20, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@danmoseley@carlossanlop@stephentoub
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[release/7.0-rc1] Improve performance of Tar library - #74305

Closed
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 21 commits into
release/7.0-rc1from
backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1
Closed

[release/7.0-rc1] Improve performance of Tar library#74305
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 21 commits into
release/7.0-rc1from
backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Aug 21, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #74281 to release/7.0-rc1

/cc @carlossanlop@stephentoub

Customer Impact

This is a new feature for 7.0. Customer impact should be minimal but they will get considerable performance improvements. See description in original PR.

Testing

The CI passed.

Risk

Low, new feature in 7.0.

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghostghost added the area-System.IO label Aug 21, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-io
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #74281 to release/7.0-rc1

/cc @carlossanlop@stephentoub

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.IO

Milestone:-

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop self-assigned this Aug 21, 2022
@danmoseley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This change is relatively large and mostly optional (if current performance is considered shippable). As last time, we will have essentially no time to react to RC1 feedback before GA.

Is there a subset (including the functional fixes) that would get most of the benefit with less risk of introducing a bug?

I'm not necessarily opposed to taking it all, if the risk/value is there. But polishing a new feature does not meet the bar in itself.

@danmoseley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm going to close this per above. It is too late for this kind of change. If there are functional fixes in here that meet the bar please extract those to port them.

@danmoseley
danmoseley deleted the backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1 branch August 21, 2022 15:56
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 20, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@danmoseley@carlossanlop@stephentoub
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[release/7.0-rc1] Improve performance of Tar library - #74305

Closed
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 21 commits into
release/7.0-rc1from
backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1
Closed

[release/7.0-rc1] Improve performance of Tar library#74305
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 21 commits into
release/7.0-rc1from
backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Aug 21, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #74281 to release/7.0-rc1

/cc @carlossanlop@stephentoub

Customer Impact

This is a new feature for 7.0. Customer impact should be minimal but they will get considerable performance improvements. See description in original PR.

Testing

The CI passed.

Risk

Low, new feature in 7.0.

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghostghost added the area-System.IO label Aug 21, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-io
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #74281 to release/7.0-rc1

/cc @carlossanlop@stephentoub

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.IO

Milestone:-

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop self-assigned this Aug 21, 2022
@danmoseley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This change is relatively large and mostly optional (if current performance is considered shippable). As last time, we will have essentially no time to react to RC1 feedback before GA.

Is there a subset (including the functional fixes) that would get most of the benefit with less risk of introducing a bug?

I'm not necessarily opposed to taking it all, if the risk/value is there. But polishing a new feature does not meet the bar in itself.

@danmoseley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm going to close this per above. It is too late for this kind of change. If there are functional fixes in here that meet the bar please extract those to port them.

@danmoseley
danmoseley deleted the backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1 branch August 21, 2022 15:56
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 20, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@danmoseley@carlossanlop@stephentoub
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[release/7.0-rc1] Improve performance of Tar library - #74305

Closed
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 21 commits into
release/7.0-rc1from
backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1
Closed

[release/7.0-rc1] Improve performance of Tar library#74305
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 21 commits into
release/7.0-rc1from
backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Aug 21, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #74281 to release/7.0-rc1

/cc @carlossanlop@stephentoub

Customer Impact

This is a new feature for 7.0. Customer impact should be minimal but they will get considerable performance improvements. See description in original PR.

Testing

The CI passed.

Risk

Low, new feature in 7.0.

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghostghost added the area-System.IO label Aug 21, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-io
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #74281 to release/7.0-rc1

/cc @carlossanlop@stephentoub

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.IO

Milestone:-

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop self-assigned this Aug 21, 2022
@danmoseley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This change is relatively large and mostly optional (if current performance is considered shippable). As last time, we will have essentially no time to react to RC1 feedback before GA.

Is there a subset (including the functional fixes) that would get most of the benefit with less risk of introducing a bug?

I'm not necessarily opposed to taking it all, if the risk/value is there. But polishing a new feature does not meet the bar in itself.

@danmoseley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm going to close this per above. It is too late for this kind of change. If there are functional fixes in here that meet the bar please extract those to port them.

@danmoseley
danmoseley deleted the backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1 branch August 21, 2022 15:56
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 20, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@danmoseley@carlossanlop@stephentoub
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[release/7.0-rc1] Improve performance of Tar library - #74305

Closed
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 21 commits into
release/7.0-rc1from
backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1
Closed

[release/7.0-rc1] Improve performance of Tar library#74305
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 21 commits into
release/7.0-rc1from
backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Aug 21, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #74281 to release/7.0-rc1

/cc @carlossanlop@stephentoub

Customer Impact

This is a new feature for 7.0. Customer impact should be minimal but they will get considerable performance improvements. See description in original PR.

Testing

The CI passed.

Risk

Low, new feature in 7.0.

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghostghost added the area-System.IO label Aug 21, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-io
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #74281 to release/7.0-rc1

/cc @carlossanlop@stephentoub

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.IO

Milestone:-

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop self-assigned this Aug 21, 2022
@danmoseley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This change is relatively large and mostly optional (if current performance is considered shippable). As last time, we will have essentially no time to react to RC1 feedback before GA.

Is there a subset (including the functional fixes) that would get most of the benefit with less risk of introducing a bug?

I'm not necessarily opposed to taking it all, if the risk/value is there. But polishing a new feature does not meet the bar in itself.

@danmoseley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm going to close this per above. It is too late for this kind of change. If there are functional fixes in here that meet the bar please extract those to port them.

@danmoseley
danmoseley deleted the backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1 branch August 21, 2022 15:56
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 20, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@danmoseley@carlossanlop@stephentoub
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[release/7.0-rc1] Improve performance of Tar library - #74305

Closed
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 21 commits into
release/7.0-rc1from
backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1
Closed

[release/7.0-rc1] Improve performance of Tar library#74305
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 21 commits into
release/7.0-rc1from
backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Aug 21, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #74281 to release/7.0-rc1

/cc @carlossanlop@stephentoub

Customer Impact

This is a new feature for 7.0. Customer impact should be minimal but they will get considerable performance improvements. See description in original PR.

Testing

The CI passed.

Risk

Low, new feature in 7.0.

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghostghost added the area-System.IO label Aug 21, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-io
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #74281 to release/7.0-rc1

/cc @carlossanlop@stephentoub

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.IO

Milestone:-

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop self-assigned this Aug 21, 2022
@danmoseley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This change is relatively large and mostly optional (if current performance is considered shippable). As last time, we will have essentially no time to react to RC1 feedback before GA.

Is there a subset (including the functional fixes) that would get most of the benefit with less risk of introducing a bug?

I'm not necessarily opposed to taking it all, if the risk/value is there. But polishing a new feature does not meet the bar in itself.

@danmoseley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm going to close this per above. It is too late for this kind of change. If there are functional fixes in here that meet the bar please extract those to port them.

@danmoseley
danmoseley deleted the backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1 branch August 21, 2022 15:56
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 20, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@danmoseley@carlossanlop@stephentoub
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[release/7.0-rc1] Improve performance of Tar library - #74305

Closed
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 21 commits into
release/7.0-rc1from
backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1
Closed

[release/7.0-rc1] Improve performance of Tar library#74305
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 21 commits into
release/7.0-rc1from
backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Aug 21, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #74281 to release/7.0-rc1

/cc @carlossanlop@stephentoub

Customer Impact

This is a new feature for 7.0. Customer impact should be minimal but they will get considerable performance improvements. See description in original PR.

Testing

The CI passed.

Risk

Low, new feature in 7.0.

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghostghost added the area-System.IO label Aug 21, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-io
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #74281 to release/7.0-rc1

/cc @carlossanlop@stephentoub

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.IO

Milestone:-

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop self-assigned this Aug 21, 2022
@danmoseley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This change is relatively large and mostly optional (if current performance is considered shippable). As last time, we will have essentially no time to react to RC1 feedback before GA.

Is there a subset (including the functional fixes) that would get most of the benefit with less risk of introducing a bug?

I'm not necessarily opposed to taking it all, if the risk/value is there. But polishing a new feature does not meet the bar in itself.

@danmoseley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm going to close this per above. It is too late for this kind of change. If there are functional fixes in here that meet the bar please extract those to port them.

@danmoseley
danmoseley deleted the backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1 branch August 21, 2022 15:56
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 20, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@danmoseley@carlossanlop@stephentoub
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

[release/7.0-rc1] Improve performance of Tar library - #74305

Closed
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 21 commits into
release/7.0-rc1from
backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1
Closed

[release/7.0-rc1] Improve performance of Tar library#74305
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 21 commits into
release/7.0-rc1from
backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Aug 21, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #74281 to release/7.0-rc1

/cc @carlossanlop@stephentoub

Customer Impact

This is a new feature for 7.0. Customer impact should be minimal but they will get considerable performance improvements. See description in original PR.

Testing

The CI passed.

Risk

Low, new feature in 7.0.

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghostghost added the area-System.IO label Aug 21, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-io
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #74281 to release/7.0-rc1

/cc @carlossanlop@stephentoub

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.IO

Milestone:-

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop self-assigned this Aug 21, 2022
@danmoseley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This change is relatively large and mostly optional (if current performance is considered shippable). As last time, we will have essentially no time to react to RC1 feedback before GA.

Is there a subset (including the functional fixes) that would get most of the benefit with less risk of introducing a bug?

I'm not necessarily opposed to taking it all, if the risk/value is there. But polishing a new feature does not meet the bar in itself.

@danmoseley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm going to close this per above. It is too late for this kind of change. If there are functional fixes in here that meet the bar please extract those to port them.

@danmoseley
danmoseley deleted the backport/pr-74281-to-release/7.0-rc1 branch August 21, 2022 15:56
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 20, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@danmoseley@carlossanlop@stephentoub