Skip to content

Make special_sweep_p a per heap member - #74625

Merged
cshung merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
cshung:public/special-sweep-per-heap
Sep 7, 2022
Merged

Make special_sweep_p a per heap member#74625
cshung merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
cshung:public/special-sweep-per-heap

Conversation

@cshung

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In process_last_np_surv_region, we set the special_sweep_p flag when we don't have a region after next_region = heap_segment_next (alloc_region) is null together with some other conditions that is irrelevant here.

Later, in process_remaining_regions, we assert that heap_segment_next_rw (current_region) == 0. I assume that it is checking the same thing, which is okay.

But special_sweep_p is a PER_HEAP_ISOLATED member, which means if one heap has that condition, it will set the flag for other heaps. On the other heaps, it is possible that the corresponding next_region is not null, thus triggering the assert.

Changing the flag from PER_HEAP_ISOLATED to a PER_HEAP member solved the issue.

@cshungcshung self-assigned this Aug 26, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/gc
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

In process_last_np_surv_region, we set the special_sweep_p flag when we don't have a region after next_region = heap_segment_next (alloc_region) is null together with some other conditions that is irrelevant here.

Later, in process_remaining_regions, we assert that heap_segment_next_rw (current_region) == 0. I assume that it is checking the same thing, which is okay.

But special_sweep_p is a PER_HEAP_ISOLATED member, which means if one heap has that condition, it will set the flag for other heaps. On the other heaps, it is possible that the corresponding next_region is not null, thus triggering the assert.

Changing the flag from PER_HEAP_ISOLATED to a PER_HEAP member solved the issue.

Author:cshung
Assignees:cshung
Labels:

area-GC-coreclr

Milestone:-

@cshung
cshung merged commit 8d03644 into dotnet:mainSep 7, 2022
@cshung
cshung deleted the public/special-sweep-per-heap branch September 7, 2022 20:40
@cshungcshung mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2022
cshung added a commit to cshung/runtime that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2022
carlossanlop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2022
* Make special_sweep_p a per heap member (#74625)
* Low memory fixes
* Make sure the initial mark list size is capped (#76083)
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 8, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@cshung@Maoni0
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Make special_sweep_p a per heap member by cshung · Pull Request #74625 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Make special_sweep_p a per heap member - #74625

Merged
cshung merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
cshung:public/special-sweep-per-heap
Sep 7, 2022
Merged

Make special_sweep_p a per heap member#74625
cshung merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
cshung:public/special-sweep-per-heap

Conversation

@cshung

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In process_last_np_surv_region, we set the special_sweep_p flag when we don't have a region after next_region = heap_segment_next (alloc_region) is null together with some other conditions that is irrelevant here.

Later, in process_remaining_regions, we assert that heap_segment_next_rw (current_region) == 0. I assume that it is checking the same thing, which is okay.

But special_sweep_p is a PER_HEAP_ISOLATED member, which means if one heap has that condition, it will set the flag for other heaps. On the other heaps, it is possible that the corresponding next_region is not null, thus triggering the assert.

Changing the flag from PER_HEAP_ISOLATED to a PER_HEAP member solved the issue.

@cshungcshung self-assigned this Aug 26, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/gc
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

In process_last_np_surv_region, we set the special_sweep_p flag when we don't have a region after next_region = heap_segment_next (alloc_region) is null together with some other conditions that is irrelevant here.

Later, in process_remaining_regions, we assert that heap_segment_next_rw (current_region) == 0. I assume that it is checking the same thing, which is okay.

But special_sweep_p is a PER_HEAP_ISOLATED member, which means if one heap has that condition, it will set the flag for other heaps. On the other heaps, it is possible that the corresponding next_region is not null, thus triggering the assert.

Changing the flag from PER_HEAP_ISOLATED to a PER_HEAP member solved the issue.

Author:cshung
Assignees:cshung
Labels:

area-GC-coreclr

Milestone:-

@cshung
cshung merged commit 8d03644 into dotnet:mainSep 7, 2022
@cshung
cshung deleted the public/special-sweep-per-heap branch September 7, 2022 20:40
@cshungcshung mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2022
cshung added a commit to cshung/runtime that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2022
carlossanlop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2022
* Make special_sweep_p a per heap member (#74625)
* Low memory fixes
* Make sure the initial mark list size is capped (#76083)
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 8, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@cshung@Maoni0
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Make special_sweep_p a per heap member by cshung · Pull Request #74625 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Make special_sweep_p a per heap member - #74625

Merged
cshung merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
cshung:public/special-sweep-per-heap
Sep 7, 2022
Merged

Make special_sweep_p a per heap member#74625
cshung merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
cshung:public/special-sweep-per-heap

Conversation

@cshung

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In process_last_np_surv_region, we set the special_sweep_p flag when we don't have a region after next_region = heap_segment_next (alloc_region) is null together with some other conditions that is irrelevant here.

Later, in process_remaining_regions, we assert that heap_segment_next_rw (current_region) == 0. I assume that it is checking the same thing, which is okay.

But special_sweep_p is a PER_HEAP_ISOLATED member, which means if one heap has that condition, it will set the flag for other heaps. On the other heaps, it is possible that the corresponding next_region is not null, thus triggering the assert.

Changing the flag from PER_HEAP_ISOLATED to a PER_HEAP member solved the issue.

@cshungcshung self-assigned this Aug 26, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/gc
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

In process_last_np_surv_region, we set the special_sweep_p flag when we don't have a region after next_region = heap_segment_next (alloc_region) is null together with some other conditions that is irrelevant here.

Later, in process_remaining_regions, we assert that heap_segment_next_rw (current_region) == 0. I assume that it is checking the same thing, which is okay.

But special_sweep_p is a PER_HEAP_ISOLATED member, which means if one heap has that condition, it will set the flag for other heaps. On the other heaps, it is possible that the corresponding next_region is not null, thus triggering the assert.

Changing the flag from PER_HEAP_ISOLATED to a PER_HEAP member solved the issue.

Author:cshung
Assignees:cshung
Labels:

area-GC-coreclr

Milestone:-

@cshung
cshung merged commit 8d03644 into dotnet:mainSep 7, 2022
@cshung
cshung deleted the public/special-sweep-per-heap branch September 7, 2022 20:40
@cshungcshung mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2022
cshung added a commit to cshung/runtime that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2022
carlossanlop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2022
* Make special_sweep_p a per heap member (#74625)
* Low memory fixes
* Make sure the initial mark list size is capped (#76083)
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 8, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@cshung@Maoni0
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Make special_sweep_p a per heap member by cshung · Pull Request #74625 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Make special_sweep_p a per heap member - #74625

Merged
cshung merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
cshung:public/special-sweep-per-heap
Sep 7, 2022
Merged

Make special_sweep_p a per heap member#74625
cshung merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
cshung:public/special-sweep-per-heap

Conversation

@cshung

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In process_last_np_surv_region, we set the special_sweep_p flag when we don't have a region after next_region = heap_segment_next (alloc_region) is null together with some other conditions that is irrelevant here.

Later, in process_remaining_regions, we assert that heap_segment_next_rw (current_region) == 0. I assume that it is checking the same thing, which is okay.

But special_sweep_p is a PER_HEAP_ISOLATED member, which means if one heap has that condition, it will set the flag for other heaps. On the other heaps, it is possible that the corresponding next_region is not null, thus triggering the assert.

Changing the flag from PER_HEAP_ISOLATED to a PER_HEAP member solved the issue.

@cshungcshung self-assigned this Aug 26, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/gc
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

In process_last_np_surv_region, we set the special_sweep_p flag when we don't have a region after next_region = heap_segment_next (alloc_region) is null together with some other conditions that is irrelevant here.

Later, in process_remaining_regions, we assert that heap_segment_next_rw (current_region) == 0. I assume that it is checking the same thing, which is okay.

But special_sweep_p is a PER_HEAP_ISOLATED member, which means if one heap has that condition, it will set the flag for other heaps. On the other heaps, it is possible that the corresponding next_region is not null, thus triggering the assert.

Changing the flag from PER_HEAP_ISOLATED to a PER_HEAP member solved the issue.

Author:cshung
Assignees:cshung
Labels:

area-GC-coreclr

Milestone:-

@cshung
cshung merged commit 8d03644 into dotnet:mainSep 7, 2022
@cshung
cshung deleted the public/special-sweep-per-heap branch September 7, 2022 20:40
@cshungcshung mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2022
cshung added a commit to cshung/runtime that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2022
carlossanlop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2022
* Make special_sweep_p a per heap member (#74625)
* Low memory fixes
* Make sure the initial mark list size is capped (#76083)
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 8, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@cshung@Maoni0
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Make special_sweep_p a per heap member by cshung · Pull Request #74625 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Make special_sweep_p a per heap member - #74625

Merged
cshung merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
cshung:public/special-sweep-per-heap
Sep 7, 2022
Merged

Make special_sweep_p a per heap member#74625
cshung merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
cshung:public/special-sweep-per-heap

Conversation

@cshung

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In process_last_np_surv_region, we set the special_sweep_p flag when we don't have a region after next_region = heap_segment_next (alloc_region) is null together with some other conditions that is irrelevant here.

Later, in process_remaining_regions, we assert that heap_segment_next_rw (current_region) == 0. I assume that it is checking the same thing, which is okay.

But special_sweep_p is a PER_HEAP_ISOLATED member, which means if one heap has that condition, it will set the flag for other heaps. On the other heaps, it is possible that the corresponding next_region is not null, thus triggering the assert.

Changing the flag from PER_HEAP_ISOLATED to a PER_HEAP member solved the issue.

@cshungcshung self-assigned this Aug 26, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/gc
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

In process_last_np_surv_region, we set the special_sweep_p flag when we don't have a region after next_region = heap_segment_next (alloc_region) is null together with some other conditions that is irrelevant here.

Later, in process_remaining_regions, we assert that heap_segment_next_rw (current_region) == 0. I assume that it is checking the same thing, which is okay.

But special_sweep_p is a PER_HEAP_ISOLATED member, which means if one heap has that condition, it will set the flag for other heaps. On the other heaps, it is possible that the corresponding next_region is not null, thus triggering the assert.

Changing the flag from PER_HEAP_ISOLATED to a PER_HEAP member solved the issue.

Author:cshung
Assignees:cshung
Labels:

area-GC-coreclr

Milestone:-

@cshung
cshung merged commit 8d03644 into dotnet:mainSep 7, 2022
@cshung
cshung deleted the public/special-sweep-per-heap branch September 7, 2022 20:40
@cshungcshung mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2022
cshung added a commit to cshung/runtime that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2022
carlossanlop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2022
* Make special_sweep_p a per heap member (#74625)
* Low memory fixes
* Make sure the initial mark list size is capped (#76083)
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 8, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@cshung@Maoni0
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Make special_sweep_p a per heap member by cshung · Pull Request #74625 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Make special_sweep_p a per heap member - #74625

Merged
cshung merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
cshung:public/special-sweep-per-heap
Sep 7, 2022
Merged

Make special_sweep_p a per heap member#74625
cshung merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
cshung:public/special-sweep-per-heap

Conversation

@cshung

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In process_last_np_surv_region, we set the special_sweep_p flag when we don't have a region after next_region = heap_segment_next (alloc_region) is null together with some other conditions that is irrelevant here.

Later, in process_remaining_regions, we assert that heap_segment_next_rw (current_region) == 0. I assume that it is checking the same thing, which is okay.

But special_sweep_p is a PER_HEAP_ISOLATED member, which means if one heap has that condition, it will set the flag for other heaps. On the other heaps, it is possible that the corresponding next_region is not null, thus triggering the assert.

Changing the flag from PER_HEAP_ISOLATED to a PER_HEAP member solved the issue.

@cshungcshung self-assigned this Aug 26, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/gc
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

In process_last_np_surv_region, we set the special_sweep_p flag when we don't have a region after next_region = heap_segment_next (alloc_region) is null together with some other conditions that is irrelevant here.

Later, in process_remaining_regions, we assert that heap_segment_next_rw (current_region) == 0. I assume that it is checking the same thing, which is okay.

But special_sweep_p is a PER_HEAP_ISOLATED member, which means if one heap has that condition, it will set the flag for other heaps. On the other heaps, it is possible that the corresponding next_region is not null, thus triggering the assert.

Changing the flag from PER_HEAP_ISOLATED to a PER_HEAP member solved the issue.

Author:cshung
Assignees:cshung
Labels:

area-GC-coreclr

Milestone:-

@cshung
cshung merged commit 8d03644 into dotnet:mainSep 7, 2022
@cshung
cshung deleted the public/special-sweep-per-heap branch September 7, 2022 20:40
@cshungcshung mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2022
cshung added a commit to cshung/runtime that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2022
carlossanlop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2022
* Make special_sweep_p a per heap member (#74625)
* Low memory fixes
* Make sure the initial mark list size is capped (#76083)
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 8, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@cshung@Maoni0
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Make special_sweep_p a per heap member by cshung · Pull Request #74625 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Make special_sweep_p a per heap member - #74625

Merged
cshung merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
cshung:public/special-sweep-per-heap
Sep 7, 2022
Merged

Make special_sweep_p a per heap member#74625
cshung merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
cshung:public/special-sweep-per-heap

Conversation

@cshung

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In process_last_np_surv_region, we set the special_sweep_p flag when we don't have a region after next_region = heap_segment_next (alloc_region) is null together with some other conditions that is irrelevant here.

Later, in process_remaining_regions, we assert that heap_segment_next_rw (current_region) == 0. I assume that it is checking the same thing, which is okay.

But special_sweep_p is a PER_HEAP_ISOLATED member, which means if one heap has that condition, it will set the flag for other heaps. On the other heaps, it is possible that the corresponding next_region is not null, thus triggering the assert.

Changing the flag from PER_HEAP_ISOLATED to a PER_HEAP member solved the issue.

@cshungcshung self-assigned this Aug 26, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/gc
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

In process_last_np_surv_region, we set the special_sweep_p flag when we don't have a region after next_region = heap_segment_next (alloc_region) is null together with some other conditions that is irrelevant here.

Later, in process_remaining_regions, we assert that heap_segment_next_rw (current_region) == 0. I assume that it is checking the same thing, which is okay.

But special_sweep_p is a PER_HEAP_ISOLATED member, which means if one heap has that condition, it will set the flag for other heaps. On the other heaps, it is possible that the corresponding next_region is not null, thus triggering the assert.

Changing the flag from PER_HEAP_ISOLATED to a PER_HEAP member solved the issue.

Author:cshung
Assignees:cshung
Labels:

area-GC-coreclr

Milestone:-

@cshung
cshung merged commit 8d03644 into dotnet:mainSep 7, 2022
@cshung
cshung deleted the public/special-sweep-per-heap branch September 7, 2022 20:40
@cshungcshung mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2022
cshung added a commit to cshung/runtime that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2022
carlossanlop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2022
* Make special_sweep_p a per heap member (#74625)
* Low memory fixes
* Make sure the initial mark list size is capped (#76083)
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 8, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@cshung@Maoni0
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Make special_sweep_p a per heap member by cshung · Pull Request #74625 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Make special_sweep_p a per heap member - #74625

Merged
cshung merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
cshung:public/special-sweep-per-heap
Sep 7, 2022
Merged

Make special_sweep_p a per heap member#74625
cshung merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
cshung:public/special-sweep-per-heap

Conversation

@cshung

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In process_last_np_surv_region, we set the special_sweep_p flag when we don't have a region after next_region = heap_segment_next (alloc_region) is null together with some other conditions that is irrelevant here.

Later, in process_remaining_regions, we assert that heap_segment_next_rw (current_region) == 0. I assume that it is checking the same thing, which is okay.

But special_sweep_p is a PER_HEAP_ISOLATED member, which means if one heap has that condition, it will set the flag for other heaps. On the other heaps, it is possible that the corresponding next_region is not null, thus triggering the assert.

Changing the flag from PER_HEAP_ISOLATED to a PER_HEAP member solved the issue.

@cshungcshung self-assigned this Aug 26, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/gc
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

In process_last_np_surv_region, we set the special_sweep_p flag when we don't have a region after next_region = heap_segment_next (alloc_region) is null together with some other conditions that is irrelevant here.

Later, in process_remaining_regions, we assert that heap_segment_next_rw (current_region) == 0. I assume that it is checking the same thing, which is okay.

But special_sweep_p is a PER_HEAP_ISOLATED member, which means if one heap has that condition, it will set the flag for other heaps. On the other heaps, it is possible that the corresponding next_region is not null, thus triggering the assert.

Changing the flag from PER_HEAP_ISOLATED to a PER_HEAP member solved the issue.

Author:cshung
Assignees:cshung
Labels:

area-GC-coreclr

Milestone:-

@cshung
cshung merged commit 8d03644 into dotnet:mainSep 7, 2022
@cshung
cshung deleted the public/special-sweep-per-heap branch September 7, 2022 20:40
@cshungcshung mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2022
cshung added a commit to cshung/runtime that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2022
carlossanlop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2022
* Make special_sweep_p a per heap member (#74625)
* Low memory fixes
* Make sure the initial mark list size is capped (#76083)
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 8, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@cshung@Maoni0