Skip to content

[metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides - #76323

Merged
lambdageek merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
lambdageek:fix-gh-76312
Sep 30, 2022
Merged

[metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides#76323
lambdageek merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
lambdageek:fix-gh-76312

Conversation

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

When there are covariant return overrides, we check the vtable slot in every parent class for signature compatibility with the proposed override.

However if one of the ancestor classes is abstract, it could have an abstract override for the method:

classBase{publicvirtualBaseMethod()=>this;}publicabstractIntermediate:Base{publicoverrideabstractBaseMethod();}publicLeaf:Intermediate{publicoverrideLeafMethod()=>this;}

In this case when we're checking that Leaf.Method is compatible with the vtable slot in Intermediate, we will see a null method (since Intermediate.Method is abstract). In such cases we can skip over the class and continue with its parent.

Fixes
#76312

When there are covariant return overrides, we check the vtable slot in every
parent class for signature compatability with the proposed override.
However if one of the ancestor classes is abstract, it could have an
abstract override for hte method:
class Base {
public virtual Base Method() => this;
}
public abstract Intermediate : Base {
public override abstract Base Method();
}
public Leaf : Intermediate {
public override Leaf Method() => this;
}
In this case when we're checking that Leaf.Method is compatible with
the vtable slot in Intermediate, we will see a null method (since
Intermediate is abstract). In such cases we can skip over the class
and continue with its parent.
Fixesdotnet#76312
@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I think we should backport this for net7 and net6

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3146190259

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/6.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/6.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3146255970

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

runtime-extra-platforms (Build tvOS arm64 Release AllSubsets_Mono) is failing repeatedly while trying to set up a tunnel to the device:

[10:39:13] dbug: [TCP tunnel] Xamarin.Hosting: Attempting USB tunnel between the port 61033 on the device and the port 61033 (27118) on the mac: 61

I think it's an infra problem, not my PR...

@lambdageek
lambdageek merged commit 90d9034 into dotnet:mainSep 30, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 31, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@lambdageek@vargaz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
[metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides by lambdageek · Pull Request #76323 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides - #76323

Merged
lambdageek merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
lambdageek:fix-gh-76312
Sep 30, 2022
Merged

[metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides#76323
lambdageek merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
lambdageek:fix-gh-76312

Conversation

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

When there are covariant return overrides, we check the vtable slot in every parent class for signature compatibility with the proposed override.

However if one of the ancestor classes is abstract, it could have an abstract override for the method:

classBase{publicvirtualBaseMethod()=>this;}publicabstractIntermediate:Base{publicoverrideabstractBaseMethod();}publicLeaf:Intermediate{publicoverrideLeafMethod()=>this;}

In this case when we're checking that Leaf.Method is compatible with the vtable slot in Intermediate, we will see a null method (since Intermediate.Method is abstract). In such cases we can skip over the class and continue with its parent.

Fixes
#76312

When there are covariant return overrides, we check the vtable slot in every
parent class for signature compatability with the proposed override.
However if one of the ancestor classes is abstract, it could have an
abstract override for hte method:
class Base {
public virtual Base Method() => this;
}
public abstract Intermediate : Base {
public override abstract Base Method();
}
public Leaf : Intermediate {
public override Leaf Method() => this;
}
In this case when we're checking that Leaf.Method is compatible with
the vtable slot in Intermediate, we will see a null method (since
Intermediate is abstract). In such cases we can skip over the class
and continue with its parent.
Fixesdotnet#76312
@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I think we should backport this for net7 and net6

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3146190259

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/6.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/6.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3146255970

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

runtime-extra-platforms (Build tvOS arm64 Release AllSubsets_Mono) is failing repeatedly while trying to set up a tunnel to the device:

[10:39:13] dbug: [TCP tunnel] Xamarin.Hosting: Attempting USB tunnel between the port 61033 on the device and the port 61033 (27118) on the mac: 61

I think it's an infra problem, not my PR...

@lambdageek
lambdageek merged commit 90d9034 into dotnet:mainSep 30, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 31, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@lambdageek@vargaz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides by lambdageek · Pull Request #76323 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides - #76323

Merged
lambdageek merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
lambdageek:fix-gh-76312
Sep 30, 2022
Merged

[metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides#76323
lambdageek merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
lambdageek:fix-gh-76312

Conversation

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

When there are covariant return overrides, we check the vtable slot in every parent class for signature compatibility with the proposed override.

However if one of the ancestor classes is abstract, it could have an abstract override for the method:

classBase{publicvirtualBaseMethod()=>this;}publicabstractIntermediate:Base{publicoverrideabstractBaseMethod();}publicLeaf:Intermediate{publicoverrideLeafMethod()=>this;}

In this case when we're checking that Leaf.Method is compatible with the vtable slot in Intermediate, we will see a null method (since Intermediate.Method is abstract). In such cases we can skip over the class and continue with its parent.

Fixes
#76312

When there are covariant return overrides, we check the vtable slot in every
parent class for signature compatability with the proposed override.
However if one of the ancestor classes is abstract, it could have an
abstract override for hte method:
class Base {
public virtual Base Method() => this;
}
public abstract Intermediate : Base {
public override abstract Base Method();
}
public Leaf : Intermediate {
public override Leaf Method() => this;
}
In this case when we're checking that Leaf.Method is compatible with
the vtable slot in Intermediate, we will see a null method (since
Intermediate is abstract). In such cases we can skip over the class
and continue with its parent.
Fixesdotnet#76312
@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I think we should backport this for net7 and net6

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3146190259

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/6.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/6.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3146255970

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

runtime-extra-platforms (Build tvOS arm64 Release AllSubsets_Mono) is failing repeatedly while trying to set up a tunnel to the device:

[10:39:13] dbug: [TCP tunnel] Xamarin.Hosting: Attempting USB tunnel between the port 61033 on the device and the port 61033 (27118) on the mac: 61

I think it's an infra problem, not my PR...

@lambdageek
lambdageek merged commit 90d9034 into dotnet:mainSep 30, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 31, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@lambdageek@vargaz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides by lambdageek · Pull Request #76323 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides - #76323

Merged
lambdageek merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
lambdageek:fix-gh-76312
Sep 30, 2022
Merged

[metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides#76323
lambdageek merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
lambdageek:fix-gh-76312

Conversation

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

When there are covariant return overrides, we check the vtable slot in every parent class for signature compatibility with the proposed override.

However if one of the ancestor classes is abstract, it could have an abstract override for the method:

classBase{publicvirtualBaseMethod()=>this;}publicabstractIntermediate:Base{publicoverrideabstractBaseMethod();}publicLeaf:Intermediate{publicoverrideLeafMethod()=>this;}

In this case when we're checking that Leaf.Method is compatible with the vtable slot in Intermediate, we will see a null method (since Intermediate.Method is abstract). In such cases we can skip over the class and continue with its parent.

Fixes
#76312

When there are covariant return overrides, we check the vtable slot in every
parent class for signature compatability with the proposed override.
However if one of the ancestor classes is abstract, it could have an
abstract override for hte method:
class Base {
public virtual Base Method() => this;
}
public abstract Intermediate : Base {
public override abstract Base Method();
}
public Leaf : Intermediate {
public override Leaf Method() => this;
}
In this case when we're checking that Leaf.Method is compatible with
the vtable slot in Intermediate, we will see a null method (since
Intermediate is abstract). In such cases we can skip over the class
and continue with its parent.
Fixesdotnet#76312
@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I think we should backport this for net7 and net6

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3146190259

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/6.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/6.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3146255970

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

runtime-extra-platforms (Build tvOS arm64 Release AllSubsets_Mono) is failing repeatedly while trying to set up a tunnel to the device:

[10:39:13] dbug: [TCP tunnel] Xamarin.Hosting: Attempting USB tunnel between the port 61033 on the device and the port 61033 (27118) on the mac: 61

I think it's an infra problem, not my PR...

@lambdageek
lambdageek merged commit 90d9034 into dotnet:mainSep 30, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 31, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@lambdageek@vargaz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' [metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides by lambdageek · Pull Request #76323 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides - #76323

Merged
lambdageek merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
lambdageek:fix-gh-76312
Sep 30, 2022
Merged

[metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides#76323
lambdageek merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
lambdageek:fix-gh-76312

Conversation

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

When there are covariant return overrides, we check the vtable slot in every parent class for signature compatibility with the proposed override.

However if one of the ancestor classes is abstract, it could have an abstract override for the method:

classBase{publicvirtualBaseMethod()=>this;}publicabstractIntermediate:Base{publicoverrideabstractBaseMethod();}publicLeaf:Intermediate{publicoverrideLeafMethod()=>this;}

In this case when we're checking that Leaf.Method is compatible with the vtable slot in Intermediate, we will see a null method (since Intermediate.Method is abstract). In such cases we can skip over the class and continue with its parent.

Fixes
#76312

When there are covariant return overrides, we check the vtable slot in every
parent class for signature compatability with the proposed override.
However if one of the ancestor classes is abstract, it could have an
abstract override for hte method:
class Base {
public virtual Base Method() => this;
}
public abstract Intermediate : Base {
public override abstract Base Method();
}
public Leaf : Intermediate {
public override Leaf Method() => this;
}
In this case when we're checking that Leaf.Method is compatible with
the vtable slot in Intermediate, we will see a null method (since
Intermediate is abstract). In such cases we can skip over the class
and continue with its parent.
Fixesdotnet#76312
@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I think we should backport this for net7 and net6

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3146190259

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/6.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/6.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3146255970

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

runtime-extra-platforms (Build tvOS arm64 Release AllSubsets_Mono) is failing repeatedly while trying to set up a tunnel to the device:

[10:39:13] dbug: [TCP tunnel] Xamarin.Hosting: Attempting USB tunnel between the port 61033 on the device and the port 61033 (27118) on the mac: 61

I think it's an infra problem, not my PR...

@lambdageek
lambdageek merged commit 90d9034 into dotnet:mainSep 30, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 31, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@lambdageek@vargaz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides by lambdageek · Pull Request #76323 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides - #76323

Merged
lambdageek merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
lambdageek:fix-gh-76312
Sep 30, 2022
Merged

[metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides#76323
lambdageek merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
lambdageek:fix-gh-76312

Conversation

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

When there are covariant return overrides, we check the vtable slot in every parent class for signature compatibility with the proposed override.

However if one of the ancestor classes is abstract, it could have an abstract override for the method:

classBase{publicvirtualBaseMethod()=>this;}publicabstractIntermediate:Base{publicoverrideabstractBaseMethod();}publicLeaf:Intermediate{publicoverrideLeafMethod()=>this;}

In this case when we're checking that Leaf.Method is compatible with the vtable slot in Intermediate, we will see a null method (since Intermediate.Method is abstract). In such cases we can skip over the class and continue with its parent.

Fixes
#76312

When there are covariant return overrides, we check the vtable slot in every
parent class for signature compatability with the proposed override.
However if one of the ancestor classes is abstract, it could have an
abstract override for hte method:
class Base {
public virtual Base Method() => this;
}
public abstract Intermediate : Base {
public override abstract Base Method();
}
public Leaf : Intermediate {
public override Leaf Method() => this;
}
In this case when we're checking that Leaf.Method is compatible with
the vtable slot in Intermediate, we will see a null method (since
Intermediate is abstract). In such cases we can skip over the class
and continue with its parent.
Fixesdotnet#76312
@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I think we should backport this for net7 and net6

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3146190259

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/6.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/6.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3146255970

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

runtime-extra-platforms (Build tvOS arm64 Release AllSubsets_Mono) is failing repeatedly while trying to set up a tunnel to the device:

[10:39:13] dbug: [TCP tunnel] Xamarin.Hosting: Attempting USB tunnel between the port 61033 on the device and the port 61033 (27118) on the mac: 61

I think it's an infra problem, not my PR...

@lambdageek
lambdageek merged commit 90d9034 into dotnet:mainSep 30, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 31, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@lambdageek@vargaz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides by lambdageek · Pull Request #76323 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides - #76323

Merged
lambdageek merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
lambdageek:fix-gh-76312
Sep 30, 2022
Merged

[metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides#76323
lambdageek merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
lambdageek:fix-gh-76312

Conversation

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

When there are covariant return overrides, we check the vtable slot in every parent class for signature compatibility with the proposed override.

However if one of the ancestor classes is abstract, it could have an abstract override for the method:

classBase{publicvirtualBaseMethod()=>this;}publicabstractIntermediate:Base{publicoverrideabstractBaseMethod();}publicLeaf:Intermediate{publicoverrideLeafMethod()=>this;}

In this case when we're checking that Leaf.Method is compatible with the vtable slot in Intermediate, we will see a null method (since Intermediate.Method is abstract). In such cases we can skip over the class and continue with its parent.

Fixes
#76312

When there are covariant return overrides, we check the vtable slot in every
parent class for signature compatability with the proposed override.
However if one of the ancestor classes is abstract, it could have an
abstract override for hte method:
class Base {
public virtual Base Method() => this;
}
public abstract Intermediate : Base {
public override abstract Base Method();
}
public Leaf : Intermediate {
public override Leaf Method() => this;
}
In this case when we're checking that Leaf.Method is compatible with
the vtable slot in Intermediate, we will see a null method (since
Intermediate is abstract). In such cases we can skip over the class
and continue with its parent.
Fixesdotnet#76312
@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I think we should backport this for net7 and net6

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3146190259

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/6.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/6.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3146255970

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

runtime-extra-platforms (Build tvOS arm64 Release AllSubsets_Mono) is failing repeatedly while trying to set up a tunnel to the device:

[10:39:13] dbug: [TCP tunnel] Xamarin.Hosting: Attempting USB tunnel between the port 61033 on the device and the port 61033 (27118) on the mac: 61

I think it's an infra problem, not my PR...

@lambdageek
lambdageek merged commit 90d9034 into dotnet:mainSep 30, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 31, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@lambdageek@vargaz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); [metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides by lambdageek · Pull Request #76323 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides - #76323

Merged
lambdageek merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
lambdageek:fix-gh-76312
Sep 30, 2022
Merged

[metadata] Skip null vtable entries when checking covariant return overrides#76323
lambdageek merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
lambdageek:fix-gh-76312

Conversation

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

When there are covariant return overrides, we check the vtable slot in every parent class for signature compatibility with the proposed override.

However if one of the ancestor classes is abstract, it could have an abstract override for the method:

classBase{publicvirtualBaseMethod()=>this;}publicabstractIntermediate:Base{publicoverrideabstractBaseMethod();}publicLeaf:Intermediate{publicoverrideLeafMethod()=>this;}

In this case when we're checking that Leaf.Method is compatible with the vtable slot in Intermediate, we will see a null method (since Intermediate.Method is abstract). In such cases we can skip over the class and continue with its parent.

Fixes
#76312

When there are covariant return overrides, we check the vtable slot in every
parent class for signature compatability with the proposed override.
However if one of the ancestor classes is abstract, it could have an
abstract override for hte method:
class Base {
public virtual Base Method() => this;
}
public abstract Intermediate : Base {
public override abstract Base Method();
}
public Leaf : Intermediate {
public override Leaf Method() => this;
}
In this case when we're checking that Leaf.Method is compatible with
the vtable slot in Intermediate, we will see a null method (since
Intermediate is abstract). In such cases we can skip over the class
and continue with its parent.
Fixesdotnet#76312
@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I think we should backport this for net7 and net6

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3146190259

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/6.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/6.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3146255970

@lambdageek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

runtime-extra-platforms (Build tvOS arm64 Release AllSubsets_Mono) is failing repeatedly while trying to set up a tunnel to the device:

[10:39:13] dbug: [TCP tunnel] Xamarin.Hosting: Attempting USB tunnel between the port 61033 on the device and the port 61033 (27118) on the mac: 61

I think it's an infra problem, not my PR...

@lambdageek
lambdageek merged commit 90d9034 into dotnet:mainSep 30, 2022
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 31, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@lambdageek@vargaz