Skip to content

[release/7.0] Disable gen 1 budget accounting fix for segments - #76412

Merged
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/7.0from
backport/pr-76365-to-release/7.0
Sep 30, 2022
Merged

[release/7.0] Disable gen 1 budget accounting fix for segments#76412
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/7.0from
backport/pr-76365-to-release/7.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 29, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #76365 to release/7.0

/cc @Maoni0@PeterSolMS

Customer Impact

Given that we expect some customers will see working set or performance regressions with regions, we want to make sure that clrgc.dll using segments performs just like .NET 6.0 did. So this change disables a gen 1 budget tuning change we did in the 7.0 time frame.

Testing

Ran GCPerfSim scenarios on both WKS and SVR, for both regions and segments.

Risk

Risk should be small because we are undoing a change introduced in 7.0. There is no change for regions, only for segments. Also change is minimal and straightforward.

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghostghost added the area-GC-coreclr label Sep 29, 2022
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/gc
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #76365 to release/7.0

/cc @Maoni0@PeterSolMS

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-GC-coreclr

Milestone:-

@PeterSolMSPeterSolMS added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 30, 2022

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approve. please get a code review and we can take for consideration in 7 ga.

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Sep 30, 2022
@Maoni0Maoni0 added the NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) label Sep 30, 2022
@carlossanlopcarlossanlop added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 30, 2022
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Approved by Tactics via email. Signed off. CI is green. This is fully baked and ready to merge. :shipit:

@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 15b4005 into release/7.0Sep 30, 2022
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-76365-to-release/7.0 branch September 30, 2022 21:33
@jeffschwMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@carlossanlop the 'no-merge' as on this one as we were still discussing. @Maoni0 with your signoff is it all good?

@Maoni0

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

all good, thanks!

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 31, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-GC-coreclrServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@carlossanlop@jeffschwMSFT@Maoni0@PeterSolMS