Skip to content

Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution - #78904

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:betterfailfast
Nov 28, 2022
Merged

Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution#78904
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:betterfailfast

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

@MichalStrehovskyMichalStrehovsky commented Nov 28, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If the program hits the conditions in #77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.

Instead of:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08

Generate:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])

The workaround is then:

<Directives>
<Application>
<AssemblyName="repro">
<TypeName="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<MethodName="Serialize"Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgumentName="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib expedited code review would be appreciated. I'd like service this into the January update.

If the program hits the conditions in dotnet#77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.
Instead of:
```
Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08
```
Generate:
```
Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])
```
The workaround is then:
```xml
<Directives>
<Application>
<Assembly Name="repro">
<Type Name="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<Method Name="Serialize" Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgument Name="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>
```
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

If the program hits the conditions in #77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.

Instead of:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08

Generate:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])

The workaround is then:

<Directives>
<Application>
<AssemblyName="repro">
<TypeName="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<MethodName="Serialize"Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgumentName="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>
Author:MichalStrehovsky
Assignees:MichalStrehovsky
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit c3d1d75 into dotnet:mainNov 28, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the betterfailfast branch November 28, 2022 22:23
@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release 7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3569164394

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3569166116

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MichalStrehovsky an error occurred while backporting to release, please check the run log for details!

Error: The specified backport target branch release wasn't found in the repo.

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM. Looks like there's a little more info needed in the workaround than provided in the message, namely the assembly of the type argument. Is that right?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

LGTM. Looks like there's a little more info needed in the workaround than provided in the message, namely the assembly of the type argument. Is that right?

Yep, that's correct. Is probably fixable. Ideally people shouldn't see these in the first place :/

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 29, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@agocke@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution by MichalStrehovsky · Pull Request #78904 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution - #78904

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:betterfailfast
Nov 28, 2022
Merged

Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution#78904
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:betterfailfast

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

@MichalStrehovskyMichalStrehovsky commented Nov 28, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If the program hits the conditions in #77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.

Instead of:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08

Generate:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])

The workaround is then:

<Directives>
<Application>
<AssemblyName="repro">
<TypeName="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<MethodName="Serialize"Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgumentName="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib expedited code review would be appreciated. I'd like service this into the January update.

If the program hits the conditions in dotnet#77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.
Instead of:
```
Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08
```
Generate:
```
Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])
```
The workaround is then:
```xml
<Directives>
<Application>
<Assembly Name="repro">
<Type Name="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<Method Name="Serialize" Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgument Name="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>
```
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

If the program hits the conditions in #77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.

Instead of:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08

Generate:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])

The workaround is then:

<Directives>
<Application>
<AssemblyName="repro">
<TypeName="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<MethodName="Serialize"Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgumentName="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>
Author:MichalStrehovsky
Assignees:MichalStrehovsky
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit c3d1d75 into dotnet:mainNov 28, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the betterfailfast branch November 28, 2022 22:23
@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release 7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3569164394

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3569166116

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MichalStrehovsky an error occurred while backporting to release, please check the run log for details!

Error: The specified backport target branch release wasn't found in the repo.

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM. Looks like there's a little more info needed in the workaround than provided in the message, namely the assembly of the type argument. Is that right?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

LGTM. Looks like there's a little more info needed in the workaround than provided in the message, namely the assembly of the type argument. Is that right?

Yep, that's correct. Is probably fixable. Ideally people shouldn't see these in the first place :/

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 29, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@agocke@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution by MichalStrehovsky · Pull Request #78904 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution - #78904

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:betterfailfast
Nov 28, 2022
Merged

Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution#78904
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:betterfailfast

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

@MichalStrehovskyMichalStrehovsky commented Nov 28, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If the program hits the conditions in #77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.

Instead of:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08

Generate:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])

The workaround is then:

<Directives>
<Application>
<AssemblyName="repro">
<TypeName="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<MethodName="Serialize"Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgumentName="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib expedited code review would be appreciated. I'd like service this into the January update.

If the program hits the conditions in dotnet#77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.
Instead of:
```
Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08
```
Generate:
```
Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])
```
The workaround is then:
```xml
<Directives>
<Application>
<Assembly Name="repro">
<Type Name="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<Method Name="Serialize" Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgument Name="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>
```
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

If the program hits the conditions in #77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.

Instead of:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08

Generate:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])

The workaround is then:

<Directives>
<Application>
<AssemblyName="repro">
<TypeName="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<MethodName="Serialize"Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgumentName="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>
Author:MichalStrehovsky
Assignees:MichalStrehovsky
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit c3d1d75 into dotnet:mainNov 28, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the betterfailfast branch November 28, 2022 22:23
@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release 7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3569164394

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3569166116

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MichalStrehovsky an error occurred while backporting to release, please check the run log for details!

Error: The specified backport target branch release wasn't found in the repo.

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM. Looks like there's a little more info needed in the workaround than provided in the message, namely the assembly of the type argument. Is that right?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

LGTM. Looks like there's a little more info needed in the workaround than provided in the message, namely the assembly of the type argument. Is that right?

Yep, that's correct. Is probably fixable. Ideally people shouldn't see these in the first place :/

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 29, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@agocke@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution by MichalStrehovsky · Pull Request #78904 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution - #78904

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:betterfailfast
Nov 28, 2022
Merged

Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution#78904
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:betterfailfast

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

@MichalStrehovskyMichalStrehovsky commented Nov 28, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If the program hits the conditions in #77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.

Instead of:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08

Generate:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])

The workaround is then:

<Directives>
<Application>
<AssemblyName="repro">
<TypeName="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<MethodName="Serialize"Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgumentName="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib expedited code review would be appreciated. I'd like service this into the January update.

If the program hits the conditions in dotnet#77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.
Instead of:
```
Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08
```
Generate:
```
Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])
```
The workaround is then:
```xml
<Directives>
<Application>
<Assembly Name="repro">
<Type Name="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<Method Name="Serialize" Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgument Name="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>
```
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

If the program hits the conditions in #77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.

Instead of:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08

Generate:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])

The workaround is then:

<Directives>
<Application>
<AssemblyName="repro">
<TypeName="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<MethodName="Serialize"Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgumentName="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>
Author:MichalStrehovsky
Assignees:MichalStrehovsky
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit c3d1d75 into dotnet:mainNov 28, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the betterfailfast branch November 28, 2022 22:23
@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release 7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3569164394

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3569166116

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MichalStrehovsky an error occurred while backporting to release, please check the run log for details!

Error: The specified backport target branch release wasn't found in the repo.

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM. Looks like there's a little more info needed in the workaround than provided in the message, namely the assembly of the type argument. Is that right?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

LGTM. Looks like there's a little more info needed in the workaround than provided in the message, namely the assembly of the type argument. Is that right?

Yep, that's correct. Is probably fixable. Ideally people shouldn't see these in the first place :/

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 29, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@agocke@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution by MichalStrehovsky · Pull Request #78904 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution - #78904

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:betterfailfast
Nov 28, 2022
Merged

Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution#78904
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:betterfailfast

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

@MichalStrehovskyMichalStrehovsky commented Nov 28, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If the program hits the conditions in #77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.

Instead of:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08

Generate:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])

The workaround is then:

<Directives>
<Application>
<AssemblyName="repro">
<TypeName="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<MethodName="Serialize"Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgumentName="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib expedited code review would be appreciated. I'd like service this into the January update.

If the program hits the conditions in dotnet#77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.
Instead of:
```
Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08
```
Generate:
```
Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])
```
The workaround is then:
```xml
<Directives>
<Application>
<Assembly Name="repro">
<Type Name="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<Method Name="Serialize" Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgument Name="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>
```
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

If the program hits the conditions in #77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.

Instead of:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08

Generate:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])

The workaround is then:

<Directives>
<Application>
<AssemblyName="repro">
<TypeName="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<MethodName="Serialize"Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgumentName="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>
Author:MichalStrehovsky
Assignees:MichalStrehovsky
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit c3d1d75 into dotnet:mainNov 28, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the betterfailfast branch November 28, 2022 22:23
@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release 7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3569164394

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3569166116

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MichalStrehovsky an error occurred while backporting to release, please check the run log for details!

Error: The specified backport target branch release wasn't found in the repo.

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM. Looks like there's a little more info needed in the workaround than provided in the message, namely the assembly of the type argument. Is that right?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

LGTM. Looks like there's a little more info needed in the workaround than provided in the message, namely the assembly of the type argument. Is that right?

Yep, that's correct. Is probably fixable. Ideally people shouldn't see these in the first place :/

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 29, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@agocke@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution by MichalStrehovsky · Pull Request #78904 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution - #78904

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:betterfailfast
Nov 28, 2022
Merged

Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution#78904
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:betterfailfast

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

@MichalStrehovskyMichalStrehovsky commented Nov 28, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If the program hits the conditions in #77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.

Instead of:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08

Generate:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])

The workaround is then:

<Directives>
<Application>
<AssemblyName="repro">
<TypeName="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<MethodName="Serialize"Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgumentName="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib expedited code review would be appreciated. I'd like service this into the January update.

If the program hits the conditions in dotnet#77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.
Instead of:
```
Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08
```
Generate:
```
Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])
```
The workaround is then:
```xml
<Directives>
<Application>
<Assembly Name="repro">
<Type Name="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<Method Name="Serialize" Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgument Name="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>
```
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

If the program hits the conditions in #77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.

Instead of:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08

Generate:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])

The workaround is then:

<Directives>
<Application>
<AssemblyName="repro">
<TypeName="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<MethodName="Serialize"Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgumentName="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>
Author:MichalStrehovsky
Assignees:MichalStrehovsky
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit c3d1d75 into dotnet:mainNov 28, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the betterfailfast branch November 28, 2022 22:23
@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release 7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3569164394

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3569166116

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MichalStrehovsky an error occurred while backporting to release, please check the run log for details!

Error: The specified backport target branch release wasn't found in the repo.

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM. Looks like there's a little more info needed in the workaround than provided in the message, namely the assembly of the type argument. Is that right?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

LGTM. Looks like there's a little more info needed in the workaround than provided in the message, namely the assembly of the type argument. Is that right?

Yep, that's correct. Is probably fixable. Ideally people shouldn't see these in the first place :/

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 29, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@agocke@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution by MichalStrehovsky · Pull Request #78904 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution - #78904

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:betterfailfast
Nov 28, 2022
Merged

Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution#78904
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:betterfailfast

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

@MichalStrehovskyMichalStrehovsky commented Nov 28, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If the program hits the conditions in #77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.

Instead of:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08

Generate:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])

The workaround is then:

<Directives>
<Application>
<AssemblyName="repro">
<TypeName="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<MethodName="Serialize"Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgumentName="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib expedited code review would be appreciated. I'd like service this into the January update.

If the program hits the conditions in dotnet#77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.
Instead of:
```
Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08
```
Generate:
```
Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])
```
The workaround is then:
```xml
<Directives>
<Application>
<Assembly Name="repro">
<Type Name="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<Method Name="Serialize" Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgument Name="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>
```
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

If the program hits the conditions in #77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.

Instead of:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08

Generate:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])

The workaround is then:

<Directives>
<Application>
<AssemblyName="repro">
<TypeName="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<MethodName="Serialize"Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgumentName="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>
Author:MichalStrehovsky
Assignees:MichalStrehovsky
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit c3d1d75 into dotnet:mainNov 28, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the betterfailfast branch November 28, 2022 22:23
@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release 7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3569164394

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3569166116

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MichalStrehovsky an error occurred while backporting to release, please check the run log for details!

Error: The specified backport target branch release wasn't found in the repo.

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM. Looks like there's a little more info needed in the workaround than provided in the message, namely the assembly of the type argument. Is that right?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

LGTM. Looks like there's a little more info needed in the workaround than provided in the message, namely the assembly of the type argument. Is that right?

Yep, that's correct. Is probably fixable. Ideally people shouldn't see these in the first place :/

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 29, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@agocke@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution by MichalStrehovsky · Pull Request #78904 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution - #78904

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:betterfailfast
Nov 28, 2022
Merged

Generate diagnosable failfast in GVM resolution#78904
MichalStrehovsky merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:betterfailfast

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

@MichalStrehovskyMichalStrehovsky commented Nov 28, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If the program hits the conditions in #77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.

Instead of:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08

Generate:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])

The workaround is then:

<Directives>
<Application>
<AssemblyName="repro">
<TypeName="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<MethodName="Serialize"Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgumentName="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib expedited code review would be appreciated. I'd like service this into the January update.

If the program hits the conditions in dotnet#77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.
Instead of:
```
Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08
```
Generate:
```
Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])
```
The workaround is then:
```xml
<Directives>
<Application>
<Assembly Name="repro">
<Type Name="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<Method Name="Serialize" Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgument Name="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>
```
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

If the program hits the conditions in #77070, generate a failfast message that makes it possible to create a workaround.

Instead of:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E8587B8
Target type handle: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E858810
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: MethodTable:0x00007FF66E85DA08

Generate:

Process terminated. Generic virtual method pointer lookup failure.
Declaring type handle: EETypeRva:0x005438B8(MemoryPackFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Target type handle: EETypeRva:0x00543910(MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[MemPackObject])
Method name: Serialize
Instantiation:
Argument 00000000: EETypeRva:0x00529B38(System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[System.Byte])

The workaround is then:

<Directives>
<Application>
<AssemblyName="repro">
<TypeName="MemoryPackableFormatter2`1[[MemPackObject]]">
<MethodName="Serialize"Dynamic="Required All">
<GenericArgumentName="System.Buffers.ArrayBufferWriter`1[[System.Byte, mscorlib]],System.Memory" />
</Method>
</Type>
</Assembly>
</Application>
</Directives>
Author:MichalStrehovsky
Assignees:MichalStrehovsky
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit c3d1d75 into dotnet:mainNov 28, 2022
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the betterfailfast branch November 28, 2022 22:23
@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release 7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3569164394

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3569166116

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MichalStrehovsky an error occurred while backporting to release, please check the run log for details!

Error: The specified backport target branch release wasn't found in the repo.

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM. Looks like there's a little more info needed in the workaround than provided in the message, namely the assembly of the type argument. Is that right?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

LGTM. Looks like there's a little more info needed in the workaround than provided in the message, namely the assembly of the type argument. Is that right?

Yep, that's correct. Is probably fixable. Ideally people shouldn't see these in the first place :/

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 29, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@agocke@jkotas