Skip to content

Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference - #79240

Merged
sbomer merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:fixPackageWarning
Dec 6, 2022
Merged

Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference#79240
sbomer merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:fixPackageWarning

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ghost

ghost commented Dec 5, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Fixes dotnet/sdk#28823.

Author:sbomer
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@sbomer
sbomer requested review from LakshanF and agockeDecember 5, 2022 18:02

@LakshanFLakshanF left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@sbomer
sbomer merged commit 7ac78d2 into dotnet:mainDec 6, 2022
@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We only want to produce this on TFM mismatches, right? So users can get patches?

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I thought about it some and I think we should be encouraging people to set RuntimeFrameworkVersion to get patches, instead of adding a packagereference. Otherwise the packagereference can specify a different version than the target runtime patch version. That's unlikely to cause issues, but when it does it could be confusing, and I'm pretty sure RuntimeFrameworkVersion is a better replacement. Thoughts?

@sbomer

sbomer commented Dec 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mangod9 how do we typically deliver patch updates to crossgen when customers hit bugs? Do we tell customers to set RuntimeFrameworkVersion for that?

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If the fix has been released, we tell people to update the SDK that is going to update the runtime too. If we want people to try daily build before the fix is released, https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/docs/project/dogfooding.md#advanced-scenario---using-a-daily-build-of-microsoftnetcoreapp has the instructions. These instructions apply to any runtime fix, they are not crossgen specific.

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

That’s a good point, I forgot we could recommend using nighties.

I’m fine with that approach instead.

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3745285250

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sbomer backporting to release/7.0 failed, the patch most likely resulted in conflicts:

$ git am --3way --ignore-whitespace --keep-non-patch changes.patch
Applying: Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
Error: The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

Please backport manually!

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sbomer an error occurred while backporting to release/7.0, please check the run log for details!

Error: git am failed, most likely due to a merge conflict.

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 20, 2023
@sbomer
sbomer deleted the fixPackageWarning branch November 3, 2023 18:37
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PublishAot warning with net8.0

4 participants

@sbomer@agocke@jkotas@LakshanF
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference by sbomer · Pull Request #79240 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference - #79240

Merged
sbomer merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:fixPackageWarning
Dec 6, 2022
Merged

Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference#79240
sbomer merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:fixPackageWarning

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ghost

ghost commented Dec 5, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Fixes dotnet/sdk#28823.

Author:sbomer
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@sbomer
sbomer requested review from LakshanF and agockeDecember 5, 2022 18:02

@LakshanFLakshanF left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@sbomer
sbomer merged commit 7ac78d2 into dotnet:mainDec 6, 2022
@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We only want to produce this on TFM mismatches, right? So users can get patches?

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I thought about it some and I think we should be encouraging people to set RuntimeFrameworkVersion to get patches, instead of adding a packagereference. Otherwise the packagereference can specify a different version than the target runtime patch version. That's unlikely to cause issues, but when it does it could be confusing, and I'm pretty sure RuntimeFrameworkVersion is a better replacement. Thoughts?

@sbomer

sbomer commented Dec 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mangod9 how do we typically deliver patch updates to crossgen when customers hit bugs? Do we tell customers to set RuntimeFrameworkVersion for that?

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If the fix has been released, we tell people to update the SDK that is going to update the runtime too. If we want people to try daily build before the fix is released, https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/docs/project/dogfooding.md#advanced-scenario---using-a-daily-build-of-microsoftnetcoreapp has the instructions. These instructions apply to any runtime fix, they are not crossgen specific.

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

That’s a good point, I forgot we could recommend using nighties.

I’m fine with that approach instead.

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3745285250

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sbomer backporting to release/7.0 failed, the patch most likely resulted in conflicts:

$ git am --3way --ignore-whitespace --keep-non-patch changes.patch
Applying: Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
Error: The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

Please backport manually!

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sbomer an error occurred while backporting to release/7.0, please check the run log for details!

Error: git am failed, most likely due to a merge conflict.

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 20, 2023
@sbomer
sbomer deleted the fixPackageWarning branch November 3, 2023 18:37
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PublishAot warning with net8.0

4 participants

@sbomer@agocke@jkotas@LakshanF
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference by sbomer · Pull Request #79240 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference - #79240

Merged
sbomer merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:fixPackageWarning
Dec 6, 2022
Merged

Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference#79240
sbomer merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:fixPackageWarning

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ghost

ghost commented Dec 5, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Fixes dotnet/sdk#28823.

Author:sbomer
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@sbomer
sbomer requested review from LakshanF and agockeDecember 5, 2022 18:02

@LakshanFLakshanF left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@sbomer
sbomer merged commit 7ac78d2 into dotnet:mainDec 6, 2022
@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We only want to produce this on TFM mismatches, right? So users can get patches?

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I thought about it some and I think we should be encouraging people to set RuntimeFrameworkVersion to get patches, instead of adding a packagereference. Otherwise the packagereference can specify a different version than the target runtime patch version. That's unlikely to cause issues, but when it does it could be confusing, and I'm pretty sure RuntimeFrameworkVersion is a better replacement. Thoughts?

@sbomer

sbomer commented Dec 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mangod9 how do we typically deliver patch updates to crossgen when customers hit bugs? Do we tell customers to set RuntimeFrameworkVersion for that?

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If the fix has been released, we tell people to update the SDK that is going to update the runtime too. If we want people to try daily build before the fix is released, https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/docs/project/dogfooding.md#advanced-scenario---using-a-daily-build-of-microsoftnetcoreapp has the instructions. These instructions apply to any runtime fix, they are not crossgen specific.

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

That’s a good point, I forgot we could recommend using nighties.

I’m fine with that approach instead.

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3745285250

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sbomer backporting to release/7.0 failed, the patch most likely resulted in conflicts:

$ git am --3way --ignore-whitespace --keep-non-patch changes.patch
Applying: Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
Error: The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

Please backport manually!

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sbomer an error occurred while backporting to release/7.0, please check the run log for details!

Error: git am failed, most likely due to a merge conflict.

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 20, 2023
@sbomer
sbomer deleted the fixPackageWarning branch November 3, 2023 18:37
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PublishAot warning with net8.0

4 participants

@sbomer@agocke@jkotas@LakshanF
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference by sbomer · Pull Request #79240 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference - #79240

Merged
sbomer merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:fixPackageWarning
Dec 6, 2022
Merged

Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference#79240
sbomer merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:fixPackageWarning

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ghost

ghost commented Dec 5, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Fixes dotnet/sdk#28823.

Author:sbomer
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@sbomer
sbomer requested review from LakshanF and agockeDecember 5, 2022 18:02

@LakshanFLakshanF left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@sbomer
sbomer merged commit 7ac78d2 into dotnet:mainDec 6, 2022
@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We only want to produce this on TFM mismatches, right? So users can get patches?

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I thought about it some and I think we should be encouraging people to set RuntimeFrameworkVersion to get patches, instead of adding a packagereference. Otherwise the packagereference can specify a different version than the target runtime patch version. That's unlikely to cause issues, but when it does it could be confusing, and I'm pretty sure RuntimeFrameworkVersion is a better replacement. Thoughts?

@sbomer

sbomer commented Dec 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mangod9 how do we typically deliver patch updates to crossgen when customers hit bugs? Do we tell customers to set RuntimeFrameworkVersion for that?

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If the fix has been released, we tell people to update the SDK that is going to update the runtime too. If we want people to try daily build before the fix is released, https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/docs/project/dogfooding.md#advanced-scenario---using-a-daily-build-of-microsoftnetcoreapp has the instructions. These instructions apply to any runtime fix, they are not crossgen specific.

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

That’s a good point, I forgot we could recommend using nighties.

I’m fine with that approach instead.

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3745285250

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sbomer backporting to release/7.0 failed, the patch most likely resulted in conflicts:

$ git am --3way --ignore-whitespace --keep-non-patch changes.patch
Applying: Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
Error: The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

Please backport manually!

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sbomer an error occurred while backporting to release/7.0, please check the run log for details!

Error: git am failed, most likely due to a merge conflict.

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 20, 2023
@sbomer
sbomer deleted the fixPackageWarning branch November 3, 2023 18:37
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PublishAot warning with net8.0

4 participants

@sbomer@agocke@jkotas@LakshanF
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference by sbomer · Pull Request #79240 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference - #79240

Merged
sbomer merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:fixPackageWarning
Dec 6, 2022
Merged

Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference#79240
sbomer merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:fixPackageWarning

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ghost

ghost commented Dec 5, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Fixes dotnet/sdk#28823.

Author:sbomer
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@sbomer
sbomer requested review from LakshanF and agockeDecember 5, 2022 18:02

@LakshanFLakshanF left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@sbomer
sbomer merged commit 7ac78d2 into dotnet:mainDec 6, 2022
@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We only want to produce this on TFM mismatches, right? So users can get patches?

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I thought about it some and I think we should be encouraging people to set RuntimeFrameworkVersion to get patches, instead of adding a packagereference. Otherwise the packagereference can specify a different version than the target runtime patch version. That's unlikely to cause issues, but when it does it could be confusing, and I'm pretty sure RuntimeFrameworkVersion is a better replacement. Thoughts?

@sbomer

sbomer commented Dec 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mangod9 how do we typically deliver patch updates to crossgen when customers hit bugs? Do we tell customers to set RuntimeFrameworkVersion for that?

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If the fix has been released, we tell people to update the SDK that is going to update the runtime too. If we want people to try daily build before the fix is released, https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/docs/project/dogfooding.md#advanced-scenario---using-a-daily-build-of-microsoftnetcoreapp has the instructions. These instructions apply to any runtime fix, they are not crossgen specific.

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

That’s a good point, I forgot we could recommend using nighties.

I’m fine with that approach instead.

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3745285250

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sbomer backporting to release/7.0 failed, the patch most likely resulted in conflicts:

$ git am --3way --ignore-whitespace --keep-non-patch changes.patch
Applying: Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
Error: The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

Please backport manually!

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sbomer an error occurred while backporting to release/7.0, please check the run log for details!

Error: git am failed, most likely due to a merge conflict.

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 20, 2023
@sbomer
sbomer deleted the fixPackageWarning branch November 3, 2023 18:37
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PublishAot warning with net8.0

4 participants

@sbomer@agocke@jkotas@LakshanF
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference by sbomer · Pull Request #79240 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference - #79240

Merged
sbomer merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:fixPackageWarning
Dec 6, 2022
Merged

Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference#79240
sbomer merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:fixPackageWarning

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ghost

ghost commented Dec 5, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Fixes dotnet/sdk#28823.

Author:sbomer
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@sbomer
sbomer requested review from LakshanF and agockeDecember 5, 2022 18:02

@LakshanFLakshanF left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@sbomer
sbomer merged commit 7ac78d2 into dotnet:mainDec 6, 2022
@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We only want to produce this on TFM mismatches, right? So users can get patches?

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I thought about it some and I think we should be encouraging people to set RuntimeFrameworkVersion to get patches, instead of adding a packagereference. Otherwise the packagereference can specify a different version than the target runtime patch version. That's unlikely to cause issues, but when it does it could be confusing, and I'm pretty sure RuntimeFrameworkVersion is a better replacement. Thoughts?

@sbomer

sbomer commented Dec 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mangod9 how do we typically deliver patch updates to crossgen when customers hit bugs? Do we tell customers to set RuntimeFrameworkVersion for that?

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If the fix has been released, we tell people to update the SDK that is going to update the runtime too. If we want people to try daily build before the fix is released, https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/docs/project/dogfooding.md#advanced-scenario---using-a-daily-build-of-microsoftnetcoreapp has the instructions. These instructions apply to any runtime fix, they are not crossgen specific.

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

That’s a good point, I forgot we could recommend using nighties.

I’m fine with that approach instead.

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3745285250

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sbomer backporting to release/7.0 failed, the patch most likely resulted in conflicts:

$ git am --3way --ignore-whitespace --keep-non-patch changes.patch
Applying: Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
Error: The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

Please backport manually!

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sbomer an error occurred while backporting to release/7.0, please check the run log for details!

Error: git am failed, most likely due to a merge conflict.

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 20, 2023
@sbomer
sbomer deleted the fixPackageWarning branch November 3, 2023 18:37
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PublishAot warning with net8.0

4 participants

@sbomer@agocke@jkotas@LakshanF
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference by sbomer · Pull Request #79240 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference - #79240

Merged
sbomer merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:fixPackageWarning
Dec 6, 2022
Merged

Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference#79240
sbomer merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:fixPackageWarning

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ghost

ghost commented Dec 5, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Fixes dotnet/sdk#28823.

Author:sbomer
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@sbomer
sbomer requested review from LakshanF and agockeDecember 5, 2022 18:02

@LakshanFLakshanF left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@sbomer
sbomer merged commit 7ac78d2 into dotnet:mainDec 6, 2022
@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We only want to produce this on TFM mismatches, right? So users can get patches?

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I thought about it some and I think we should be encouraging people to set RuntimeFrameworkVersion to get patches, instead of adding a packagereference. Otherwise the packagereference can specify a different version than the target runtime patch version. That's unlikely to cause issues, but when it does it could be confusing, and I'm pretty sure RuntimeFrameworkVersion is a better replacement. Thoughts?

@sbomer

sbomer commented Dec 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mangod9 how do we typically deliver patch updates to crossgen when customers hit bugs? Do we tell customers to set RuntimeFrameworkVersion for that?

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If the fix has been released, we tell people to update the SDK that is going to update the runtime too. If we want people to try daily build before the fix is released, https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/docs/project/dogfooding.md#advanced-scenario---using-a-daily-build-of-microsoftnetcoreapp has the instructions. These instructions apply to any runtime fix, they are not crossgen specific.

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

That’s a good point, I forgot we could recommend using nighties.

I’m fine with that approach instead.

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3745285250

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sbomer backporting to release/7.0 failed, the patch most likely resulted in conflicts:

$ git am --3way --ignore-whitespace --keep-non-patch changes.patch
Applying: Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
Error: The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

Please backport manually!

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sbomer an error occurred while backporting to release/7.0, please check the run log for details!

Error: git am failed, most likely due to a merge conflict.

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 20, 2023
@sbomer
sbomer deleted the fixPackageWarning branch November 3, 2023 18:37
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PublishAot warning with net8.0

4 participants

@sbomer@agocke@jkotas@LakshanF
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference by sbomer · Pull Request #79240 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference - #79240

Merged
sbomer merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:fixPackageWarning
Dec 6, 2022
Merged

Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference#79240
sbomer merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:fixPackageWarning

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ghost

ghost commented Dec 5, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Fixes dotnet/sdk#28823.

Author:sbomer
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@sbomer
sbomer requested review from LakshanF and agockeDecember 5, 2022 18:02

@LakshanFLakshanF left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@sbomer
sbomer merged commit 7ac78d2 into dotnet:mainDec 6, 2022
@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We only want to produce this on TFM mismatches, right? So users can get patches?

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I thought about it some and I think we should be encouraging people to set RuntimeFrameworkVersion to get patches, instead of adding a packagereference. Otherwise the packagereference can specify a different version than the target runtime patch version. That's unlikely to cause issues, but when it does it could be confusing, and I'm pretty sure RuntimeFrameworkVersion is a better replacement. Thoughts?

@sbomer

sbomer commented Dec 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mangod9 how do we typically deliver patch updates to crossgen when customers hit bugs? Do we tell customers to set RuntimeFrameworkVersion for that?

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If the fix has been released, we tell people to update the SDK that is going to update the runtime too. If we want people to try daily build before the fix is released, https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/docs/project/dogfooding.md#advanced-scenario---using-a-daily-build-of-microsoftnetcoreapp has the instructions. These instructions apply to any runtime fix, they are not crossgen specific.

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

That’s a good point, I forgot we could recommend using nighties.

I’m fine with that approach instead.

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

/backport to release/7.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/7.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/3745285250

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sbomer backporting to release/7.0 failed, the patch most likely resulted in conflicts:

$ git am --3way --ignore-whitespace --keep-non-patch changes.patch
Applying: Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coreclr/nativeaot/BuildIntegration/Microsoft.DotNet.ILCompiler.SingleEntry.targets
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 Prevent warning for implicit ILCompiler reference
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
Error: The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

Please backport manually!

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sbomer an error occurred while backporting to release/7.0, please check the run log for details!

Error: git am failed, most likely due to a merge conflict.

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 20, 2023
@sbomer
sbomer deleted the fixPackageWarning branch November 3, 2023 18:37
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PublishAot warning with net8.0

4 participants

@sbomer@agocke@jkotas@LakshanF