Fix startingStackpos tracking for loop in loop - #79382

Merged
stephentoub merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
stephentoub:fixemitloopinloop
Dec 8, 2022
Merged

Fix startingStackpos tracking for loop in loop#79382
stephentoub merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
stephentoub:fixemitloopinloop

Conversation

@stephentoub

@stephentoubstephentoub commented Dec 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This extends the fix made earlier in #79353 around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iteration's startingStackpos and restore the local's value. We already do this for the other locals that impact iterations, but we should also be doing so for startingStackpos.

This extends the fix made earlier around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iterations startingStackpos and restore its value.
@ghost

ghost commented Dec 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-text-regularexpressions
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

This extends the fix made earlier in #79353 around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iterations startingStackpos and restore the local's value. We already do this for the other locals that impact iterations, but we should also be doing so for startingStackpos.

Author:stephentoub
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Text.RegularExpressions

Milestone:-

@stephentoub
stephentoub merged commit 41eab87 into dotnet:mainDec 8, 2022
@stephentoub
stephentoub deleted the fixemitloopinloop branch December 8, 2022 18:54
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 7, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@stephentoub@joperezr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Fix startingStackpos tracking for loop in loop - #79382

Merged
stephentoub merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
stephentoub:fixemitloopinloop
Dec 8, 2022
Merged

Fix startingStackpos tracking for loop in loop#79382
stephentoub merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
stephentoub:fixemitloopinloop

Conversation

@stephentoub

@stephentoubstephentoub commented Dec 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This extends the fix made earlier in #79353 around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iteration's startingStackpos and restore the local's value. We already do this for the other locals that impact iterations, but we should also be doing so for startingStackpos.

This extends the fix made earlier around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iterations startingStackpos and restore its value.
@ghost

ghost commented Dec 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-text-regularexpressions
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

This extends the fix made earlier in #79353 around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iterations startingStackpos and restore the local's value. We already do this for the other locals that impact iterations, but we should also be doing so for startingStackpos.

Author:stephentoub
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Text.RegularExpressions

Milestone:-

@stephentoub
stephentoub merged commit 41eab87 into dotnet:mainDec 8, 2022
@stephentoub
stephentoub deleted the fixemitloopinloop branch December 8, 2022 18:54
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 7, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@stephentoub@joperezr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix startingStackpos tracking for loop in loop - #79382

Merged
stephentoub merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
stephentoub:fixemitloopinloop
Dec 8, 2022
Merged

Fix startingStackpos tracking for loop in loop#79382
stephentoub merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
stephentoub:fixemitloopinloop

Conversation

@stephentoub

@stephentoubstephentoub commented Dec 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This extends the fix made earlier in #79353 around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iteration's startingStackpos and restore the local's value. We already do this for the other locals that impact iterations, but we should also be doing so for startingStackpos.

This extends the fix made earlier around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iterations startingStackpos and restore its value.
@ghost

ghost commented Dec 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-text-regularexpressions
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

This extends the fix made earlier in #79353 around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iterations startingStackpos and restore the local's value. We already do this for the other locals that impact iterations, but we should also be doing so for startingStackpos.

Author:stephentoub
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Text.RegularExpressions

Milestone:-

@stephentoub
stephentoub merged commit 41eab87 into dotnet:mainDec 8, 2022
@stephentoub
stephentoub deleted the fixemitloopinloop branch December 8, 2022 18:54
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 7, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@stephentoub@joperezr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix startingStackpos tracking for loop in loop - #79382

Merged
stephentoub merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
stephentoub:fixemitloopinloop
Dec 8, 2022
Merged

Fix startingStackpos tracking for loop in loop#79382
stephentoub merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
stephentoub:fixemitloopinloop

Conversation

@stephentoub

@stephentoubstephentoub commented Dec 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This extends the fix made earlier in #79353 around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iteration's startingStackpos and restore the local's value. We already do this for the other locals that impact iterations, but we should also be doing so for startingStackpos.

This extends the fix made earlier around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iterations startingStackpos and restore its value.
@ghost

ghost commented Dec 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-text-regularexpressions
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

This extends the fix made earlier in #79353 around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iterations startingStackpos and restore the local's value. We already do this for the other locals that impact iterations, but we should also be doing so for startingStackpos.

Author:stephentoub
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Text.RegularExpressions

Milestone:-

@stephentoub
stephentoub merged commit 41eab87 into dotnet:mainDec 8, 2022
@stephentoub
stephentoub deleted the fixemitloopinloop branch December 8, 2022 18:54
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 7, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@stephentoub@joperezr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Fix startingStackpos tracking for loop in loop - #79382

Merged
stephentoub merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
stephentoub:fixemitloopinloop
Dec 8, 2022
Merged

Fix startingStackpos tracking for loop in loop#79382
stephentoub merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
stephentoub:fixemitloopinloop

Conversation

@stephentoub

@stephentoubstephentoub commented Dec 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This extends the fix made earlier in #79353 around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iteration's startingStackpos and restore the local's value. We already do this for the other locals that impact iterations, but we should also be doing so for startingStackpos.

This extends the fix made earlier around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iterations startingStackpos and restore its value.
@ghost

ghost commented Dec 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-text-regularexpressions
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

This extends the fix made earlier in #79353 around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iterations startingStackpos and restore the local's value. We already do this for the other locals that impact iterations, but we should also be doing so for startingStackpos.

Author:stephentoub
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Text.RegularExpressions

Milestone:-

@stephentoub
stephentoub merged commit 41eab87 into dotnet:mainDec 8, 2022
@stephentoub
stephentoub deleted the fixemitloopinloop branch December 8, 2022 18:54
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 7, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@stephentoub@joperezr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix startingStackpos tracking for loop in loop - #79382

Merged
stephentoub merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
stephentoub:fixemitloopinloop
Dec 8, 2022
Merged

Fix startingStackpos tracking for loop in loop#79382
stephentoub merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
stephentoub:fixemitloopinloop

Conversation

@stephentoub

@stephentoubstephentoub commented Dec 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This extends the fix made earlier in #79353 around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iteration's startingStackpos and restore the local's value. We already do this for the other locals that impact iterations, but we should also be doing so for startingStackpos.

This extends the fix made earlier around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iterations startingStackpos and restore its value.
@ghost

ghost commented Dec 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-text-regularexpressions
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

This extends the fix made earlier in #79353 around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iterations startingStackpos and restore the local's value. We already do this for the other locals that impact iterations, but we should also be doing so for startingStackpos.

Author:stephentoub
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Text.RegularExpressions

Milestone:-

@stephentoub
stephentoub merged commit 41eab87 into dotnet:mainDec 8, 2022
@stephentoub
stephentoub deleted the fixemitloopinloop branch December 8, 2022 18:54
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 7, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@stephentoub@joperezr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix startingStackpos tracking for loop in loop - #79382

Merged
stephentoub merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
stephentoub:fixemitloopinloop
Dec 8, 2022
Merged

Fix startingStackpos tracking for loop in loop#79382
stephentoub merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
stephentoub:fixemitloopinloop

Conversation

@stephentoub

@stephentoubstephentoub commented Dec 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This extends the fix made earlier in #79353 around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iteration's startingStackpos and restore the local's value. We already do this for the other locals that impact iterations, but we should also be doing so for startingStackpos.

This extends the fix made earlier around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iterations startingStackpos and restore its value.
@ghost

ghost commented Dec 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-text-regularexpressions
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

This extends the fix made earlier in #79353 around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iterations startingStackpos and restore the local's value. We already do this for the other locals that impact iterations, but we should also be doing so for startingStackpos.

Author:stephentoub
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Text.RegularExpressions

Milestone:-

@stephentoub
stephentoub merged commit 41eab87 into dotnet:mainDec 8, 2022
@stephentoub
stephentoub deleted the fixemitloopinloop branch December 8, 2022 18:54
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 7, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@stephentoub@joperezr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Fix startingStackpos tracking for loop in loop - #79382

Merged
stephentoub merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
stephentoub:fixemitloopinloop
Dec 8, 2022
Merged

Fix startingStackpos tracking for loop in loop#79382
stephentoub merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
stephentoub:fixemitloopinloop

Conversation

@stephentoub

@stephentoubstephentoub commented Dec 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This extends the fix made earlier in #79353 around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iteration's startingStackpos and restore the local's value. We already do this for the other locals that impact iterations, but we should also be doing so for startingStackpos.

This extends the fix made earlier around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iterations startingStackpos and restore its value.
@ghost

ghost commented Dec 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-text-regularexpressions
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

This extends the fix made earlier in #79353 around proper handling of the backtracking stack in EmitLoop. If this loop is inside of another loop, then we need to preserve the startingStackpos on the backtracking stack upon successfully completing the loop, as the outer loop might iterate and cause another occurrence of this loop to run, which will then overwrite our single startingStackpos local. If that iteration backtracks, we then need to be able to pop the previous iterations startingStackpos and restore the local's value. We already do this for the other locals that impact iterations, but we should also be doing so for startingStackpos.

Author:stephentoub
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Text.RegularExpressions

Milestone:-

@stephentoub
stephentoub merged commit 41eab87 into dotnet:mainDec 8, 2022
@stephentoub
stephentoub deleted the fixemitloopinloop branch December 8, 2022 18:54
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 7, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@stephentoub@joperezr