Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well - #79920

Merged
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
akoeplinger:tarreader
Dec 23, 2022
Merged

Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well#79920
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
akoeplinger:tarreader

Conversation

@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Same as #79899 but for the async dispose method.

In the System.Formats.Tar WriteEntry_LongFileSize/WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync tests the stream passed to WrappedStream was also not disposed, causing it to stick around longer (see #79907). While looking at adding that I found out we have two nearly identical copies of the helper class in both System.Formats.Tar and System.IO.Compression, but a test in the latter one relies on WrappedStream not disposing the stream internally so I just consolidated to a single source file and and separately dispose of the stream passed to WrappedStream in the System.Formats.Tar tests.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-io
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Same as #79899 but for the async dispose method.

In the System.Formats.Tar WriteEntry_LongFileSize/WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync tests the stream passed to WrappedStream was also not disposed, causing it to stick around longer (see #79907). While looking at adding that I found out we have two nearly identical copies of the helper class in both System.Formats.Tar and System.IO.Compression, but a test in the latter one relies on WrappedStream not disposing the stream internally so I just consolidated to a single source file and and separately dispose of the stream passed to WrappedStream in the System.Formats.Tar tests.

Author:akoeplinger
Assignees:akoeplinger
Labels:

area-System.IO

Milestone:-

@build-analysisbuild-analysisBot mentioned this pull request Dec 23, 2022
namespace System.Formats.Tar
namespace System.IO
{
public class WrappedStream : Stream

@akoeplingerakoeplingerDec 23, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@carlossanlop do you remember which changes you meant back in #67883 (comment) ?

It seems to work with the consolidated version.

@adamsitnikadamsitnik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, big thanks for your help and the fix @akoeplinger !

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp list

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CI/CD Pipelines for this repository:

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop-linux

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Some of the outerloops tests have failed due to timeouts:

 Discovering: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (method display = ClassAndMethod, method display options = None)
Discovered: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (found 2 of 635 test cases)
Starting: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (parallel test collections = on, max threads = 2)
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:03:59
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:06:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:08:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:10:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntryAsync_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync', Elapsed: 00:02:08
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntryAsync_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync', Elapsed: 00:04:08
['System.Formats.Tar.Tests' END OF WORK ITEM LOG: Command timed out, and was killed]

I am going to merge this PR as it's fixing a product bug and reopen #77012 to keep track of the required test changes.

@adamsitnik
adamsitnik merged commit 372adbf into dotnet:mainDec 23, 2022
@akoeplinger
akoeplinger deleted the tarreader branch December 23, 2022 16:59
jozkee pushed a commit to jozkee/runtime that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
…#79920)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well
Same as dotnet#79899
* Consolidate duplicated WrappedStream test helpers to Common sources
* Dispose stream passed to WrappedStream
carlossanlop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
… is false (#80598)
* TarReader should dispose underlying stream if leaveOpen is false (#79899)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well (#79920)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well
Same as #79899
* Consolidate duplicated WrappedStream test helpers to Common sources
* Dispose stream passed to WrappedStream
* Dispose archive stream after the list of DataStreams (#80572)
* Dispose archive stream after the list of DataStreams
* Add tests for TarReader.DisposeAsync properly disposing underlying stream
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 22, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@akoeplinger@adamsitnik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well - #79920

Merged
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
akoeplinger:tarreader
Dec 23, 2022
Merged

Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well#79920
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
akoeplinger:tarreader

Conversation

@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Same as #79899 but for the async dispose method.

In the System.Formats.Tar WriteEntry_LongFileSize/WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync tests the stream passed to WrappedStream was also not disposed, causing it to stick around longer (see #79907). While looking at adding that I found out we have two nearly identical copies of the helper class in both System.Formats.Tar and System.IO.Compression, but a test in the latter one relies on WrappedStream not disposing the stream internally so I just consolidated to a single source file and and separately dispose of the stream passed to WrappedStream in the System.Formats.Tar tests.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-io
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Same as #79899 but for the async dispose method.

In the System.Formats.Tar WriteEntry_LongFileSize/WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync tests the stream passed to WrappedStream was also not disposed, causing it to stick around longer (see #79907). While looking at adding that I found out we have two nearly identical copies of the helper class in both System.Formats.Tar and System.IO.Compression, but a test in the latter one relies on WrappedStream not disposing the stream internally so I just consolidated to a single source file and and separately dispose of the stream passed to WrappedStream in the System.Formats.Tar tests.

Author:akoeplinger
Assignees:akoeplinger
Labels:

area-System.IO

Milestone:-

@build-analysisbuild-analysisBot mentioned this pull request Dec 23, 2022
namespace System.Formats.Tar
namespace System.IO
{
public class WrappedStream : Stream

@akoeplingerakoeplingerDec 23, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@carlossanlop do you remember which changes you meant back in #67883 (comment) ?

It seems to work with the consolidated version.

@adamsitnikadamsitnik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, big thanks for your help and the fix @akoeplinger !

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp list

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CI/CD Pipelines for this repository:

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop-linux

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Some of the outerloops tests have failed due to timeouts:

 Discovering: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (method display = ClassAndMethod, method display options = None)
Discovered: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (found 2 of 635 test cases)
Starting: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (parallel test collections = on, max threads = 2)
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:03:59
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:06:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:08:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:10:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntryAsync_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync', Elapsed: 00:02:08
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntryAsync_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync', Elapsed: 00:04:08
['System.Formats.Tar.Tests' END OF WORK ITEM LOG: Command timed out, and was killed]

I am going to merge this PR as it's fixing a product bug and reopen #77012 to keep track of the required test changes.

@adamsitnik
adamsitnik merged commit 372adbf into dotnet:mainDec 23, 2022
@akoeplinger
akoeplinger deleted the tarreader branch December 23, 2022 16:59
jozkee pushed a commit to jozkee/runtime that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
…#79920)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well
Same as dotnet#79899
* Consolidate duplicated WrappedStream test helpers to Common sources
* Dispose stream passed to WrappedStream
carlossanlop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
… is false (#80598)
* TarReader should dispose underlying stream if leaveOpen is false (#79899)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well (#79920)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well
Same as #79899
* Consolidate duplicated WrappedStream test helpers to Common sources
* Dispose stream passed to WrappedStream
* Dispose archive stream after the list of DataStreams (#80572)
* Dispose archive stream after the list of DataStreams
* Add tests for TarReader.DisposeAsync properly disposing underlying stream
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 22, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@akoeplinger@adamsitnik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well - #79920

Merged
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
akoeplinger:tarreader
Dec 23, 2022
Merged

Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well#79920
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
akoeplinger:tarreader

Conversation

@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Same as #79899 but for the async dispose method.

In the System.Formats.Tar WriteEntry_LongFileSize/WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync tests the stream passed to WrappedStream was also not disposed, causing it to stick around longer (see #79907). While looking at adding that I found out we have two nearly identical copies of the helper class in both System.Formats.Tar and System.IO.Compression, but a test in the latter one relies on WrappedStream not disposing the stream internally so I just consolidated to a single source file and and separately dispose of the stream passed to WrappedStream in the System.Formats.Tar tests.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-io
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Same as #79899 but for the async dispose method.

In the System.Formats.Tar WriteEntry_LongFileSize/WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync tests the stream passed to WrappedStream was also not disposed, causing it to stick around longer (see #79907). While looking at adding that I found out we have two nearly identical copies of the helper class in both System.Formats.Tar and System.IO.Compression, but a test in the latter one relies on WrappedStream not disposing the stream internally so I just consolidated to a single source file and and separately dispose of the stream passed to WrappedStream in the System.Formats.Tar tests.

Author:akoeplinger
Assignees:akoeplinger
Labels:

area-System.IO

Milestone:-

@build-analysisbuild-analysisBot mentioned this pull request Dec 23, 2022
namespace System.Formats.Tar
namespace System.IO
{
public class WrappedStream : Stream

@akoeplingerakoeplingerDec 23, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@carlossanlop do you remember which changes you meant back in #67883 (comment) ?

It seems to work with the consolidated version.

@adamsitnikadamsitnik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, big thanks for your help and the fix @akoeplinger !

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp list

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CI/CD Pipelines for this repository:

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop-linux

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Some of the outerloops tests have failed due to timeouts:

 Discovering: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (method display = ClassAndMethod, method display options = None)
Discovered: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (found 2 of 635 test cases)
Starting: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (parallel test collections = on, max threads = 2)
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:03:59
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:06:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:08:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:10:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntryAsync_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync', Elapsed: 00:02:08
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntryAsync_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync', Elapsed: 00:04:08
['System.Formats.Tar.Tests' END OF WORK ITEM LOG: Command timed out, and was killed]

I am going to merge this PR as it's fixing a product bug and reopen #77012 to keep track of the required test changes.

@adamsitnik
adamsitnik merged commit 372adbf into dotnet:mainDec 23, 2022
@akoeplinger
akoeplinger deleted the tarreader branch December 23, 2022 16:59
jozkee pushed a commit to jozkee/runtime that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
…#79920)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well
Same as dotnet#79899
* Consolidate duplicated WrappedStream test helpers to Common sources
* Dispose stream passed to WrappedStream
carlossanlop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
… is false (#80598)
* TarReader should dispose underlying stream if leaveOpen is false (#79899)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well (#79920)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well
Same as #79899
* Consolidate duplicated WrappedStream test helpers to Common sources
* Dispose stream passed to WrappedStream
* Dispose archive stream after the list of DataStreams (#80572)
* Dispose archive stream after the list of DataStreams
* Add tests for TarReader.DisposeAsync properly disposing underlying stream
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 22, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@akoeplinger@adamsitnik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well - #79920

Merged
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
akoeplinger:tarreader
Dec 23, 2022
Merged

Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well#79920
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
akoeplinger:tarreader

Conversation

@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Same as #79899 but for the async dispose method.

In the System.Formats.Tar WriteEntry_LongFileSize/WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync tests the stream passed to WrappedStream was also not disposed, causing it to stick around longer (see #79907). While looking at adding that I found out we have two nearly identical copies of the helper class in both System.Formats.Tar and System.IO.Compression, but a test in the latter one relies on WrappedStream not disposing the stream internally so I just consolidated to a single source file and and separately dispose of the stream passed to WrappedStream in the System.Formats.Tar tests.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-io
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Same as #79899 but for the async dispose method.

In the System.Formats.Tar WriteEntry_LongFileSize/WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync tests the stream passed to WrappedStream was also not disposed, causing it to stick around longer (see #79907). While looking at adding that I found out we have two nearly identical copies of the helper class in both System.Formats.Tar and System.IO.Compression, but a test in the latter one relies on WrappedStream not disposing the stream internally so I just consolidated to a single source file and and separately dispose of the stream passed to WrappedStream in the System.Formats.Tar tests.

Author:akoeplinger
Assignees:akoeplinger
Labels:

area-System.IO

Milestone:-

@build-analysisbuild-analysisBot mentioned this pull request Dec 23, 2022
namespace System.Formats.Tar
namespace System.IO
{
public class WrappedStream : Stream

@akoeplingerakoeplingerDec 23, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@carlossanlop do you remember which changes you meant back in #67883 (comment) ?

It seems to work with the consolidated version.

@adamsitnikadamsitnik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, big thanks for your help and the fix @akoeplinger !

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp list

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CI/CD Pipelines for this repository:

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop-linux

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Some of the outerloops tests have failed due to timeouts:

 Discovering: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (method display = ClassAndMethod, method display options = None)
Discovered: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (found 2 of 635 test cases)
Starting: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (parallel test collections = on, max threads = 2)
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:03:59
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:06:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:08:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:10:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntryAsync_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync', Elapsed: 00:02:08
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntryAsync_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync', Elapsed: 00:04:08
['System.Formats.Tar.Tests' END OF WORK ITEM LOG: Command timed out, and was killed]

I am going to merge this PR as it's fixing a product bug and reopen #77012 to keep track of the required test changes.

@adamsitnik
adamsitnik merged commit 372adbf into dotnet:mainDec 23, 2022
@akoeplinger
akoeplinger deleted the tarreader branch December 23, 2022 16:59
jozkee pushed a commit to jozkee/runtime that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
…#79920)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well
Same as dotnet#79899
* Consolidate duplicated WrappedStream test helpers to Common sources
* Dispose stream passed to WrappedStream
carlossanlop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
… is false (#80598)
* TarReader should dispose underlying stream if leaveOpen is false (#79899)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well (#79920)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well
Same as #79899
* Consolidate duplicated WrappedStream test helpers to Common sources
* Dispose stream passed to WrappedStream
* Dispose archive stream after the list of DataStreams (#80572)
* Dispose archive stream after the list of DataStreams
* Add tests for TarReader.DisposeAsync properly disposing underlying stream
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 22, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@akoeplinger@adamsitnik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well - #79920

Merged
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
akoeplinger:tarreader
Dec 23, 2022
Merged

Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well#79920
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
akoeplinger:tarreader

Conversation

@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Same as #79899 but for the async dispose method.

In the System.Formats.Tar WriteEntry_LongFileSize/WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync tests the stream passed to WrappedStream was also not disposed, causing it to stick around longer (see #79907). While looking at adding that I found out we have two nearly identical copies of the helper class in both System.Formats.Tar and System.IO.Compression, but a test in the latter one relies on WrappedStream not disposing the stream internally so I just consolidated to a single source file and and separately dispose of the stream passed to WrappedStream in the System.Formats.Tar tests.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-io
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Same as #79899 but for the async dispose method.

In the System.Formats.Tar WriteEntry_LongFileSize/WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync tests the stream passed to WrappedStream was also not disposed, causing it to stick around longer (see #79907). While looking at adding that I found out we have two nearly identical copies of the helper class in both System.Formats.Tar and System.IO.Compression, but a test in the latter one relies on WrappedStream not disposing the stream internally so I just consolidated to a single source file and and separately dispose of the stream passed to WrappedStream in the System.Formats.Tar tests.

Author:akoeplinger
Assignees:akoeplinger
Labels:

area-System.IO

Milestone:-

@build-analysisbuild-analysisBot mentioned this pull request Dec 23, 2022
namespace System.Formats.Tar
namespace System.IO
{
public class WrappedStream : Stream

@akoeplingerakoeplingerDec 23, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@carlossanlop do you remember which changes you meant back in #67883 (comment) ?

It seems to work with the consolidated version.

@adamsitnikadamsitnik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, big thanks for your help and the fix @akoeplinger !

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp list

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CI/CD Pipelines for this repository:

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop-linux

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Some of the outerloops tests have failed due to timeouts:

 Discovering: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (method display = ClassAndMethod, method display options = None)
Discovered: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (found 2 of 635 test cases)
Starting: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (parallel test collections = on, max threads = 2)
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:03:59
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:06:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:08:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:10:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntryAsync_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync', Elapsed: 00:02:08
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntryAsync_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync', Elapsed: 00:04:08
['System.Formats.Tar.Tests' END OF WORK ITEM LOG: Command timed out, and was killed]

I am going to merge this PR as it's fixing a product bug and reopen #77012 to keep track of the required test changes.

@adamsitnik
adamsitnik merged commit 372adbf into dotnet:mainDec 23, 2022
@akoeplinger
akoeplinger deleted the tarreader branch December 23, 2022 16:59
jozkee pushed a commit to jozkee/runtime that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
…#79920)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well
Same as dotnet#79899
* Consolidate duplicated WrappedStream test helpers to Common sources
* Dispose stream passed to WrappedStream
carlossanlop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
… is false (#80598)
* TarReader should dispose underlying stream if leaveOpen is false (#79899)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well (#79920)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well
Same as #79899
* Consolidate duplicated WrappedStream test helpers to Common sources
* Dispose stream passed to WrappedStream
* Dispose archive stream after the list of DataStreams (#80572)
* Dispose archive stream after the list of DataStreams
* Add tests for TarReader.DisposeAsync properly disposing underlying stream
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 22, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@akoeplinger@adamsitnik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well - #79920

Merged
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
akoeplinger:tarreader
Dec 23, 2022
Merged

Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well#79920
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
akoeplinger:tarreader

Conversation

@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Same as #79899 but for the async dispose method.

In the System.Formats.Tar WriteEntry_LongFileSize/WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync tests the stream passed to WrappedStream was also not disposed, causing it to stick around longer (see #79907). While looking at adding that I found out we have two nearly identical copies of the helper class in both System.Formats.Tar and System.IO.Compression, but a test in the latter one relies on WrappedStream not disposing the stream internally so I just consolidated to a single source file and and separately dispose of the stream passed to WrappedStream in the System.Formats.Tar tests.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-io
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Same as #79899 but for the async dispose method.

In the System.Formats.Tar WriteEntry_LongFileSize/WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync tests the stream passed to WrappedStream was also not disposed, causing it to stick around longer (see #79907). While looking at adding that I found out we have two nearly identical copies of the helper class in both System.Formats.Tar and System.IO.Compression, but a test in the latter one relies on WrappedStream not disposing the stream internally so I just consolidated to a single source file and and separately dispose of the stream passed to WrappedStream in the System.Formats.Tar tests.

Author:akoeplinger
Assignees:akoeplinger
Labels:

area-System.IO

Milestone:-

@build-analysisbuild-analysisBot mentioned this pull request Dec 23, 2022
namespace System.Formats.Tar
namespace System.IO
{
public class WrappedStream : Stream

@akoeplingerakoeplingerDec 23, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@carlossanlop do you remember which changes you meant back in #67883 (comment) ?

It seems to work with the consolidated version.

@adamsitnikadamsitnik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, big thanks for your help and the fix @akoeplinger !

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp list

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CI/CD Pipelines for this repository:

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop-linux

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Some of the outerloops tests have failed due to timeouts:

 Discovering: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (method display = ClassAndMethod, method display options = None)
Discovered: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (found 2 of 635 test cases)
Starting: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (parallel test collections = on, max threads = 2)
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:03:59
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:06:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:08:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:10:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntryAsync_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync', Elapsed: 00:02:08
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntryAsync_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync', Elapsed: 00:04:08
['System.Formats.Tar.Tests' END OF WORK ITEM LOG: Command timed out, and was killed]

I am going to merge this PR as it's fixing a product bug and reopen #77012 to keep track of the required test changes.

@adamsitnik
adamsitnik merged commit 372adbf into dotnet:mainDec 23, 2022
@akoeplinger
akoeplinger deleted the tarreader branch December 23, 2022 16:59
jozkee pushed a commit to jozkee/runtime that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
…#79920)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well
Same as dotnet#79899
* Consolidate duplicated WrappedStream test helpers to Common sources
* Dispose stream passed to WrappedStream
carlossanlop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
… is false (#80598)
* TarReader should dispose underlying stream if leaveOpen is false (#79899)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well (#79920)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well
Same as #79899
* Consolidate duplicated WrappedStream test helpers to Common sources
* Dispose stream passed to WrappedStream
* Dispose archive stream after the list of DataStreams (#80572)
* Dispose archive stream after the list of DataStreams
* Add tests for TarReader.DisposeAsync properly disposing underlying stream
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 22, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@akoeplinger@adamsitnik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well - #79920

Merged
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
akoeplinger:tarreader
Dec 23, 2022
Merged

Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well#79920
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
akoeplinger:tarreader

Conversation

@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Same as #79899 but for the async dispose method.

In the System.Formats.Tar WriteEntry_LongFileSize/WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync tests the stream passed to WrappedStream was also not disposed, causing it to stick around longer (see #79907). While looking at adding that I found out we have two nearly identical copies of the helper class in both System.Formats.Tar and System.IO.Compression, but a test in the latter one relies on WrappedStream not disposing the stream internally so I just consolidated to a single source file and and separately dispose of the stream passed to WrappedStream in the System.Formats.Tar tests.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-io
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Same as #79899 but for the async dispose method.

In the System.Formats.Tar WriteEntry_LongFileSize/WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync tests the stream passed to WrappedStream was also not disposed, causing it to stick around longer (see #79907). While looking at adding that I found out we have two nearly identical copies of the helper class in both System.Formats.Tar and System.IO.Compression, but a test in the latter one relies on WrappedStream not disposing the stream internally so I just consolidated to a single source file and and separately dispose of the stream passed to WrappedStream in the System.Formats.Tar tests.

Author:akoeplinger
Assignees:akoeplinger
Labels:

area-System.IO

Milestone:-

@build-analysisbuild-analysisBot mentioned this pull request Dec 23, 2022
namespace System.Formats.Tar
namespace System.IO
{
public class WrappedStream : Stream

@akoeplingerakoeplingerDec 23, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@carlossanlop do you remember which changes you meant back in #67883 (comment) ?

It seems to work with the consolidated version.

@adamsitnikadamsitnik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, big thanks for your help and the fix @akoeplinger !

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp list

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CI/CD Pipelines for this repository:

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop-linux

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Some of the outerloops tests have failed due to timeouts:

 Discovering: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (method display = ClassAndMethod, method display options = None)
Discovered: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (found 2 of 635 test cases)
Starting: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (parallel test collections = on, max threads = 2)
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:03:59
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:06:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:08:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:10:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntryAsync_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync', Elapsed: 00:02:08
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntryAsync_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync', Elapsed: 00:04:08
['System.Formats.Tar.Tests' END OF WORK ITEM LOG: Command timed out, and was killed]

I am going to merge this PR as it's fixing a product bug and reopen #77012 to keep track of the required test changes.

@adamsitnik
adamsitnik merged commit 372adbf into dotnet:mainDec 23, 2022
@akoeplinger
akoeplinger deleted the tarreader branch December 23, 2022 16:59
jozkee pushed a commit to jozkee/runtime that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
…#79920)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well
Same as dotnet#79899
* Consolidate duplicated WrappedStream test helpers to Common sources
* Dispose stream passed to WrappedStream
carlossanlop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
… is false (#80598)
* TarReader should dispose underlying stream if leaveOpen is false (#79899)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well (#79920)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well
Same as #79899
* Consolidate duplicated WrappedStream test helpers to Common sources
* Dispose stream passed to WrappedStream
* Dispose archive stream after the list of DataStreams (#80572)
* Dispose archive stream after the list of DataStreams
* Add tests for TarReader.DisposeAsync properly disposing underlying stream
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 22, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@akoeplinger@adamsitnik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well - #79920

Merged
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
akoeplinger:tarreader
Dec 23, 2022
Merged

Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well#79920
adamsitnik merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
akoeplinger:tarreader

Conversation

@akoeplinger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Same as #79899 but for the async dispose method.

In the System.Formats.Tar WriteEntry_LongFileSize/WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync tests the stream passed to WrappedStream was also not disposed, causing it to stick around longer (see #79907). While looking at adding that I found out we have two nearly identical copies of the helper class in both System.Formats.Tar and System.IO.Compression, but a test in the latter one relies on WrappedStream not disposing the stream internally so I just consolidated to a single source file and and separately dispose of the stream passed to WrappedStream in the System.Formats.Tar tests.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-io
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Same as #79899 but for the async dispose method.

In the System.Formats.Tar WriteEntry_LongFileSize/WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync tests the stream passed to WrappedStream was also not disposed, causing it to stick around longer (see #79907). While looking at adding that I found out we have two nearly identical copies of the helper class in both System.Formats.Tar and System.IO.Compression, but a test in the latter one relies on WrappedStream not disposing the stream internally so I just consolidated to a single source file and and separately dispose of the stream passed to WrappedStream in the System.Formats.Tar tests.

Author:akoeplinger
Assignees:akoeplinger
Labels:

area-System.IO

Milestone:-

@build-analysisbuild-analysisBot mentioned this pull request Dec 23, 2022
namespace System.Formats.Tar
namespace System.IO
{
public class WrappedStream : Stream

@akoeplingerakoeplingerDec 23, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@carlossanlop do you remember which changes you meant back in #67883 (comment) ?

It seems to work with the consolidated version.

@adamsitnikadamsitnik left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, big thanks for your help and the fix @akoeplinger !

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp list

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CI/CD Pipelines for this repository:

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop-linux

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@adamsitnik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Some of the outerloops tests have failed due to timeouts:

 Discovering: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (method display = ClassAndMethod, method display options = None)
Discovered: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (found 2 of 635 test cases)
Starting: System.Formats.Tar.Tests (parallel test collections = on, max threads = 2)
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:03:59
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:06:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:08:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntry_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSize', Elapsed: 00:10:00
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntryAsync_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync', Elapsed: 00:02:08
System.Formats.Tar.Tests: [Long Running Test] 'System.Formats.Tar.Tests.TarWriter_WriteEntryAsync_LongFile_Tests.WriteEntry_LongFileSizeAsync', Elapsed: 00:04:08
['System.Formats.Tar.Tests' END OF WORK ITEM LOG: Command timed out, and was killed]

I am going to merge this PR as it's fixing a product bug and reopen #77012 to keep track of the required test changes.

@adamsitnik
adamsitnik merged commit 372adbf into dotnet:mainDec 23, 2022
@akoeplinger
akoeplinger deleted the tarreader branch December 23, 2022 16:59
jozkee pushed a commit to jozkee/runtime that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
…#79920)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well
Same as dotnet#79899
* Consolidate duplicated WrappedStream test helpers to Common sources
* Dispose stream passed to WrappedStream
carlossanlop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
… is false (#80598)
* TarReader should dispose underlying stream if leaveOpen is false (#79899)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well (#79920)
* Dispose underlying stream in TarReader.DisposeAsync() as well
Same as #79899
* Consolidate duplicated WrappedStream test helpers to Common sources
* Dispose stream passed to WrappedStream
* Dispose archive stream after the list of DataStreams (#80572)
* Dispose archive stream after the list of DataStreams
* Add tests for TarReader.DisposeAsync properly disposing underlying stream
Co-authored-by: Alexander Köplinger <alex.koeplinger@outlook.com>
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 22, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@akoeplinger@adamsitnik