Avoid GetConstructors in constraint validation - #81068

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:constraintval
Jan 25, 2023
Merged

Avoid GetConstructors in constraint validation#81068
MichalStrehovsky merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:constraintval

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contributes to #80165.

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

This and whatever we do for #80896 is all that's left.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2023 05:06
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Contributes to #80165.

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

This and whatever we do for #80896 is all that's left.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

Author:MichalStrehovsky
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

Do simple apps call MakeGenericType? Or is the constraint validation brought in through other paths as well?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It's through the type resolution logic. We keep fields, including the ability to get/set them (due to the use in Attribute.GetHashCode/Equals). The field type could be generic. We need to call into the type loader to resolve the generic type in the signature. This does a constraint check.

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We assume that the program is valid. Would it be better to omit the constraint check completely in this case?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We assume that the program is valid. Would it be better to omit the constraint check completely in this case?

Done, looks better!


internal static RuntimeConstructedGenericTypeInfo GetRuntimeConstructedGenericTypeInfoNoConstraintCheck(RuntimeTypeInfo genericTypeDefinition, RuntimeTypeInfo[] genericTypeArguments)
{
RuntimeTypeHandle precomputedTypeHandle = GetRuntimeTypeHandleIfAny(genericTypeDefinition, genericTypeArguments, ReflectionCoreExecution.ExecutionEnvironment.TryGetConstructedGenericTypeForComponentsNoConstraintCheck);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does Roslyn generate delegate cache for this pattern? If not, it would be nice to tweak this to make the delegate cached.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😲 assumed it did, I was wrong. But I understand why. Fixed.

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this looks better. LGTM modulo comment.

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit c60a61c into dotnet:mainJan 25, 2023
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the constraintval branch January 25, 2023 05:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 24, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Avoid GetConstructors in constraint validation - #81068

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:constraintval
Jan 25, 2023
Merged

Avoid GetConstructors in constraint validation#81068
MichalStrehovsky merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:constraintval

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contributes to #80165.

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

This and whatever we do for #80896 is all that's left.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2023 05:06
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Contributes to #80165.

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

This and whatever we do for #80896 is all that's left.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

Author:MichalStrehovsky
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

Do simple apps call MakeGenericType? Or is the constraint validation brought in through other paths as well?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It's through the type resolution logic. We keep fields, including the ability to get/set them (due to the use in Attribute.GetHashCode/Equals). The field type could be generic. We need to call into the type loader to resolve the generic type in the signature. This does a constraint check.

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We assume that the program is valid. Would it be better to omit the constraint check completely in this case?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We assume that the program is valid. Would it be better to omit the constraint check completely in this case?

Done, looks better!


internal static RuntimeConstructedGenericTypeInfo GetRuntimeConstructedGenericTypeInfoNoConstraintCheck(RuntimeTypeInfo genericTypeDefinition, RuntimeTypeInfo[] genericTypeArguments)
{
RuntimeTypeHandle precomputedTypeHandle = GetRuntimeTypeHandleIfAny(genericTypeDefinition, genericTypeArguments, ReflectionCoreExecution.ExecutionEnvironment.TryGetConstructedGenericTypeForComponentsNoConstraintCheck);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does Roslyn generate delegate cache for this pattern? If not, it would be nice to tweak this to make the delegate cached.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😲 assumed it did, I was wrong. But I understand why. Fixed.

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this looks better. LGTM modulo comment.

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit c60a61c into dotnet:mainJan 25, 2023
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the constraintval branch January 25, 2023 05:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 24, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Avoid GetConstructors in constraint validation - #81068

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:constraintval
Jan 25, 2023
Merged

Avoid GetConstructors in constraint validation#81068
MichalStrehovsky merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:constraintval

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contributes to #80165.

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

This and whatever we do for #80896 is all that's left.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2023 05:06
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Contributes to #80165.

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

This and whatever we do for #80896 is all that's left.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

Author:MichalStrehovsky
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

Do simple apps call MakeGenericType? Or is the constraint validation brought in through other paths as well?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It's through the type resolution logic. We keep fields, including the ability to get/set them (due to the use in Attribute.GetHashCode/Equals). The field type could be generic. We need to call into the type loader to resolve the generic type in the signature. This does a constraint check.

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We assume that the program is valid. Would it be better to omit the constraint check completely in this case?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We assume that the program is valid. Would it be better to omit the constraint check completely in this case?

Done, looks better!


internal static RuntimeConstructedGenericTypeInfo GetRuntimeConstructedGenericTypeInfoNoConstraintCheck(RuntimeTypeInfo genericTypeDefinition, RuntimeTypeInfo[] genericTypeArguments)
{
RuntimeTypeHandle precomputedTypeHandle = GetRuntimeTypeHandleIfAny(genericTypeDefinition, genericTypeArguments, ReflectionCoreExecution.ExecutionEnvironment.TryGetConstructedGenericTypeForComponentsNoConstraintCheck);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does Roslyn generate delegate cache for this pattern? If not, it would be nice to tweak this to make the delegate cached.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😲 assumed it did, I was wrong. But I understand why. Fixed.

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this looks better. LGTM modulo comment.

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit c60a61c into dotnet:mainJan 25, 2023
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the constraintval branch January 25, 2023 05:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 24, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Avoid GetConstructors in constraint validation - #81068

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:constraintval
Jan 25, 2023
Merged

Avoid GetConstructors in constraint validation#81068
MichalStrehovsky merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:constraintval

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contributes to #80165.

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

This and whatever we do for #80896 is all that's left.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2023 05:06
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Contributes to #80165.

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

This and whatever we do for #80896 is all that's left.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

Author:MichalStrehovsky
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

Do simple apps call MakeGenericType? Or is the constraint validation brought in through other paths as well?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It's through the type resolution logic. We keep fields, including the ability to get/set them (due to the use in Attribute.GetHashCode/Equals). The field type could be generic. We need to call into the type loader to resolve the generic type in the signature. This does a constraint check.

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We assume that the program is valid. Would it be better to omit the constraint check completely in this case?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We assume that the program is valid. Would it be better to omit the constraint check completely in this case?

Done, looks better!


internal static RuntimeConstructedGenericTypeInfo GetRuntimeConstructedGenericTypeInfoNoConstraintCheck(RuntimeTypeInfo genericTypeDefinition, RuntimeTypeInfo[] genericTypeArguments)
{
RuntimeTypeHandle precomputedTypeHandle = GetRuntimeTypeHandleIfAny(genericTypeDefinition, genericTypeArguments, ReflectionCoreExecution.ExecutionEnvironment.TryGetConstructedGenericTypeForComponentsNoConstraintCheck);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does Roslyn generate delegate cache for this pattern? If not, it would be nice to tweak this to make the delegate cached.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😲 assumed it did, I was wrong. But I understand why. Fixed.

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this looks better. LGTM modulo comment.

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit c60a61c into dotnet:mainJan 25, 2023
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the constraintval branch January 25, 2023 05:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 24, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Avoid GetConstructors in constraint validation - #81068

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:constraintval
Jan 25, 2023
Merged

Avoid GetConstructors in constraint validation#81068
MichalStrehovsky merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:constraintval

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contributes to #80165.

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

This and whatever we do for #80896 is all that's left.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2023 05:06
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Contributes to #80165.

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

This and whatever we do for #80896 is all that's left.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

Author:MichalStrehovsky
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

Do simple apps call MakeGenericType? Or is the constraint validation brought in through other paths as well?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It's through the type resolution logic. We keep fields, including the ability to get/set them (due to the use in Attribute.GetHashCode/Equals). The field type could be generic. We need to call into the type loader to resolve the generic type in the signature. This does a constraint check.

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We assume that the program is valid. Would it be better to omit the constraint check completely in this case?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We assume that the program is valid. Would it be better to omit the constraint check completely in this case?

Done, looks better!


internal static RuntimeConstructedGenericTypeInfo GetRuntimeConstructedGenericTypeInfoNoConstraintCheck(RuntimeTypeInfo genericTypeDefinition, RuntimeTypeInfo[] genericTypeArguments)
{
RuntimeTypeHandle precomputedTypeHandle = GetRuntimeTypeHandleIfAny(genericTypeDefinition, genericTypeArguments, ReflectionCoreExecution.ExecutionEnvironment.TryGetConstructedGenericTypeForComponentsNoConstraintCheck);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does Roslyn generate delegate cache for this pattern? If not, it would be nice to tweak this to make the delegate cached.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😲 assumed it did, I was wrong. But I understand why. Fixed.

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this looks better. LGTM modulo comment.

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit c60a61c into dotnet:mainJan 25, 2023
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the constraintval branch January 25, 2023 05:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 24, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Avoid GetConstructors in constraint validation - #81068

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:constraintval
Jan 25, 2023
Merged

Avoid GetConstructors in constraint validation#81068
MichalStrehovsky merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:constraintval

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contributes to #80165.

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

This and whatever we do for #80896 is all that's left.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2023 05:06
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Contributes to #80165.

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

This and whatever we do for #80896 is all that's left.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

Author:MichalStrehovsky
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

Do simple apps call MakeGenericType? Or is the constraint validation brought in through other paths as well?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It's through the type resolution logic. We keep fields, including the ability to get/set them (due to the use in Attribute.GetHashCode/Equals). The field type could be generic. We need to call into the type loader to resolve the generic type in the signature. This does a constraint check.

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We assume that the program is valid. Would it be better to omit the constraint check completely in this case?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We assume that the program is valid. Would it be better to omit the constraint check completely in this case?

Done, looks better!


internal static RuntimeConstructedGenericTypeInfo GetRuntimeConstructedGenericTypeInfoNoConstraintCheck(RuntimeTypeInfo genericTypeDefinition, RuntimeTypeInfo[] genericTypeArguments)
{
RuntimeTypeHandle precomputedTypeHandle = GetRuntimeTypeHandleIfAny(genericTypeDefinition, genericTypeArguments, ReflectionCoreExecution.ExecutionEnvironment.TryGetConstructedGenericTypeForComponentsNoConstraintCheck);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does Roslyn generate delegate cache for this pattern? If not, it would be nice to tweak this to make the delegate cached.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😲 assumed it did, I was wrong. But I understand why. Fixed.

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this looks better. LGTM modulo comment.

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit c60a61c into dotnet:mainJan 25, 2023
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the constraintval branch January 25, 2023 05:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 24, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Avoid GetConstructors in constraint validation - #81068

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:constraintval
Jan 25, 2023
Merged

Avoid GetConstructors in constraint validation#81068
MichalStrehovsky merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:constraintval

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contributes to #80165.

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

This and whatever we do for #80896 is all that's left.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2023 05:06
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Contributes to #80165.

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

This and whatever we do for #80896 is all that's left.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

Author:MichalStrehovsky
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

Do simple apps call MakeGenericType? Or is the constraint validation brought in through other paths as well?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It's through the type resolution logic. We keep fields, including the ability to get/set them (due to the use in Attribute.GetHashCode/Equals). The field type could be generic. We need to call into the type loader to resolve the generic type in the signature. This does a constraint check.

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We assume that the program is valid. Would it be better to omit the constraint check completely in this case?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We assume that the program is valid. Would it be better to omit the constraint check completely in this case?

Done, looks better!


internal static RuntimeConstructedGenericTypeInfo GetRuntimeConstructedGenericTypeInfoNoConstraintCheck(RuntimeTypeInfo genericTypeDefinition, RuntimeTypeInfo[] genericTypeArguments)
{
RuntimeTypeHandle precomputedTypeHandle = GetRuntimeTypeHandleIfAny(genericTypeDefinition, genericTypeArguments, ReflectionCoreExecution.ExecutionEnvironment.TryGetConstructedGenericTypeForComponentsNoConstraintCheck);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does Roslyn generate delegate cache for this pattern? If not, it would be nice to tweak this to make the delegate cached.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😲 assumed it did, I was wrong. But I understand why. Fixed.

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this looks better. LGTM modulo comment.

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit c60a61c into dotnet:mainJan 25, 2023
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the constraintval branch January 25, 2023 05:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 24, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Avoid GetConstructors in constraint validation - #81068

Merged
MichalStrehovsky merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:constraintval
Jan 25, 2023
Merged

Avoid GetConstructors in constraint validation#81068
MichalStrehovsky merged 4 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
MichalStrehovsky:constraintval

Conversation

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contributes to #80165.

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

This and whatever we do for #80896 is all that's left.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2023 05:06
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Contributes to #80165.

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

This and whatever we do for #80896 is all that's left.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

Author:MichalStrehovsky
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Avoids bringing ConstructorInfo to simple apps.

Do simple apps call MakeGenericType? Or is the constraint validation brought in through other paths as well?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It's through the type resolution logic. We keep fields, including the ability to get/set them (due to the use in Attribute.GetHashCode/Equals). The field type could be generic. We need to call into the type loader to resolve the generic type in the signature. This does a constraint check.

@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We assume that the program is valid. Would it be better to omit the constraint check completely in this case?

@MichalStrehovsky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We assume that the program is valid. Would it be better to omit the constraint check completely in this case?

Done, looks better!


internal static RuntimeConstructedGenericTypeInfo GetRuntimeConstructedGenericTypeInfoNoConstraintCheck(RuntimeTypeInfo genericTypeDefinition, RuntimeTypeInfo[] genericTypeArguments)
{
RuntimeTypeHandle precomputedTypeHandle = GetRuntimeTypeHandleIfAny(genericTypeDefinition, genericTypeArguments, ReflectionCoreExecution.ExecutionEnvironment.TryGetConstructedGenericTypeForComponentsNoConstraintCheck);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does Roslyn generate delegate cache for this pattern? If not, it would be nice to tweak this to make the delegate cached.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😲 assumed it did, I was wrong. But I understand why. Fixed.

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this looks better. LGTM modulo comment.

@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky merged commit c60a61c into dotnet:mainJan 25, 2023
@MichalStrehovsky
MichalStrehovsky deleted the constraintval branch January 25, 2023 05:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 24, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MichalStrehovsky@jkotas