Refine corerun instructions. Improve argument parsing in src/tests/build. - #81733

Merged
jeffhandley merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jeffhandley:jeffhandley/test-instructions
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

Refine corerun instructions. Improve argument parsing in src/tests/build.#81733
jeffhandley merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jeffhandley:jeffhandley/test-instructions

Conversation

@jeffhandley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

While working through the corerun instructions, I got tripped up in a few ways.

  1. Some of the instructions were confusing to me
  2. There were places where the path to corerun was unclear or misleading
  3. The argument parsing of src/tests/build.cmd was not behaving the same as src/tests/build.sh
    • There seemed to be a few bugs lurking in there too

This PR updates the instructions and also improves the argument parsing in src/tests/build based on these findings. For the argument parsing, I also introduced a mechanism for testing the results of the argument parsing for better maintainability going forward.

@ghostghost added the area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues label Feb 7, 2023
@ghostghost assigned jeffhandleyFeb 7, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Feb 7, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

While working through the corerun instructions, I got tripped up in a few ways.

  1. Some of the instructions were confusing to me
  2. There were places where the path to corerun was unclear or misleading
  3. The argument parsing of src/tests/build.cmd was not behaving the same as src/tests/build.sh
    • There seemed to be a few bugs lurking in there too

This PR updates the instructions and also improves the argument parsing in src/tests/build based on these findings. For the argument parsing, I also introduced a mechanism for testing the results of the argument parsing for better maintainability going forward.

Author:jeffhandley
Assignees:jeffhandley
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:-


```bash
./corerun /runtime/artifacts/bin/coreclr/Linux.x64.Release/crossgen2/crossgen2.dll
corerun /runtime/artifacts/bin/coreclr/Linux.x64.Release/crossgen2/crossgen2.dll

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

corerun is executed from $PATH, not from the current folder

```

Now, instead of running our app the usual way, we will use our newly built `corerun` to execute it using our build of the runtime. For this, we will follow the steps denoted below:
Now, instead of running our app the usual way, we will use `corerun` to execute it using our build of the runtime. The `corerun` executable is created as part of building the `clr` subset, and it will exist in the `<repo root>/artifacts/bin/coreclr/<OS>.<Arch>.<Configuration>` folder. For this, we will follow the steps denoted below:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Our newly built" was confusing to me. I removed that and aimed to add clarity that it should have been built already (and where it exists so that can be confirmed).

# Also, replace the ';' with ':' if on Linux or macOS.
$Env:PATH += ';<repo_root>\artifacts\tests\coreclr\windows.x64.Debug\Tests\Core_Root'
.\corerun HelloWorld.dll
corerun HelloWorld.dll

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

corerun is found via path, not from the current folder.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
set __Exclude=%__RepoRootDir%\src\tests\issues.targets

REM __UnprocessedBuildArgs are args that we pass to msbuild (e.g. /p:TargetArchitecture=x64)
set __commandName=%~nx0

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Down in Usage, we need to print the command name, but we've already shifted the args by then. This will grab the file name and extension before we do any shifting.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%1" == "-help" goto Usage
if /i "%1" == "--help" goto Usage
@REM All arguments following this tag will be passed directly to msbuild (as unprocessed arguments)
if /i "%1" == "--" (set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto ArgsDone)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, handling of -- seemed broken. It was just continuing the loop, which could then recognize and process arguments that were expected to be passed through. Chances are, such args were going unrecognized and by happenstance, they were still getting passed through. But this changes the behavior to match the Usage notes.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%arg%" == "skipgeneratelayout" (set __SkipGenerateLayout=1&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

if /i "%arg%" == "copynativeonly" (set __CopyNativeTestBinaries=1&set __SkipNative=1&set __CopyNativeProjectsAfterCombinedTestBuild=false&set __SkipGenerateLayout=1&set __SkipTestWrappers=1&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "generatelayoutonly" (set __GenerateLayoutOnly=1&set __SkipManaged=1&set __SkipNative=1&set __CopyNativeProjectsAfterCombinedTestBuild=false&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, the generatelayoutonly argument didn't set __GenerateLayoutOnly=1, which made it do more work than intended when specified.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
if /i "%arg%" == "tree" (set __BuildTestTree=!__BuildTestTree!%2%%3B&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "log" (set __BuildLogRootName=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "Exclude" (set __Exclude=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "priority" (set __Priority=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1=%2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Despite a comment about priority above that it needs special handling; it was still incorrect. It was shifting at the wrong place, and it was resulting in the processed/unprocessed args not being correct.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%arg%" == "priority" (set __Priority=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1=%2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

@REM The following arguments also consume two subsequent arguments
if /i "%arg%" == "cmakeargs" (set __CMakeArgs="%2=%3" %__CMakeArgs%&set "processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2 %3"&shift&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The cmakeargs argument was also not correctly shifting the arguments, so extra/incorrect arguments would end up flowing through to msbuild.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
@@ -130,7 +150,40 @@ if [!processedArgs!]==[] (
)
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This logic was unexpectedly above the :ArgsDone label and was being hit whenever there was an unrecognized argument (vs. when we were done processing arguments).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was working by coincidence that argument parsing aborts upon the first unrecognized argument. There are existing pipelines relying on that behavior.

Nonetheless, the logic is moved below the label now, even though we still exit processing upon the first unrecognized argument.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
@jkotas
jkotas requested review from a team and trylekFebruary 8, 2023 15:03

@trylektrylek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice, thanks Jeff for all the fixes, improvements and documentation updates!

@jeffhandley
jeffhandley merged commit 1166bba into dotnet:mainFeb 8, 2023
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley deleted the jeffhandley/test-instructions branch February 11, 2023 03:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 13, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jeffhandley@jkotas@trylek
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Refine corerun instructions. Improve argument parsing in src/tests/build. - #81733

Merged
jeffhandley merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jeffhandley:jeffhandley/test-instructions
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

Refine corerun instructions. Improve argument parsing in src/tests/build.#81733
jeffhandley merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jeffhandley:jeffhandley/test-instructions

Conversation

@jeffhandley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

While working through the corerun instructions, I got tripped up in a few ways.

  1. Some of the instructions were confusing to me
  2. There were places where the path to corerun was unclear or misleading
  3. The argument parsing of src/tests/build.cmd was not behaving the same as src/tests/build.sh
    • There seemed to be a few bugs lurking in there too

This PR updates the instructions and also improves the argument parsing in src/tests/build based on these findings. For the argument parsing, I also introduced a mechanism for testing the results of the argument parsing for better maintainability going forward.

@ghostghost added the area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues label Feb 7, 2023
@ghostghost assigned jeffhandleyFeb 7, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Feb 7, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

While working through the corerun instructions, I got tripped up in a few ways.

  1. Some of the instructions were confusing to me
  2. There were places where the path to corerun was unclear or misleading
  3. The argument parsing of src/tests/build.cmd was not behaving the same as src/tests/build.sh
    • There seemed to be a few bugs lurking in there too

This PR updates the instructions and also improves the argument parsing in src/tests/build based on these findings. For the argument parsing, I also introduced a mechanism for testing the results of the argument parsing for better maintainability going forward.

Author:jeffhandley
Assignees:jeffhandley
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:-


```bash
./corerun /runtime/artifacts/bin/coreclr/Linux.x64.Release/crossgen2/crossgen2.dll
corerun /runtime/artifacts/bin/coreclr/Linux.x64.Release/crossgen2/crossgen2.dll

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

corerun is executed from $PATH, not from the current folder

```

Now, instead of running our app the usual way, we will use our newly built `corerun` to execute it using our build of the runtime. For this, we will follow the steps denoted below:
Now, instead of running our app the usual way, we will use `corerun` to execute it using our build of the runtime. The `corerun` executable is created as part of building the `clr` subset, and it will exist in the `<repo root>/artifacts/bin/coreclr/<OS>.<Arch>.<Configuration>` folder. For this, we will follow the steps denoted below:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Our newly built" was confusing to me. I removed that and aimed to add clarity that it should have been built already (and where it exists so that can be confirmed).

# Also, replace the ';' with ':' if on Linux or macOS.
$Env:PATH += ';<repo_root>\artifacts\tests\coreclr\windows.x64.Debug\Tests\Core_Root'
.\corerun HelloWorld.dll
corerun HelloWorld.dll

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

corerun is found via path, not from the current folder.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
set __Exclude=%__RepoRootDir%\src\tests\issues.targets

REM __UnprocessedBuildArgs are args that we pass to msbuild (e.g. /p:TargetArchitecture=x64)
set __commandName=%~nx0

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Down in Usage, we need to print the command name, but we've already shifted the args by then. This will grab the file name and extension before we do any shifting.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%1" == "-help" goto Usage
if /i "%1" == "--help" goto Usage
@REM All arguments following this tag will be passed directly to msbuild (as unprocessed arguments)
if /i "%1" == "--" (set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto ArgsDone)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, handling of -- seemed broken. It was just continuing the loop, which could then recognize and process arguments that were expected to be passed through. Chances are, such args were going unrecognized and by happenstance, they were still getting passed through. But this changes the behavior to match the Usage notes.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%arg%" == "skipgeneratelayout" (set __SkipGenerateLayout=1&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

if /i "%arg%" == "copynativeonly" (set __CopyNativeTestBinaries=1&set __SkipNative=1&set __CopyNativeProjectsAfterCombinedTestBuild=false&set __SkipGenerateLayout=1&set __SkipTestWrappers=1&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "generatelayoutonly" (set __GenerateLayoutOnly=1&set __SkipManaged=1&set __SkipNative=1&set __CopyNativeProjectsAfterCombinedTestBuild=false&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, the generatelayoutonly argument didn't set __GenerateLayoutOnly=1, which made it do more work than intended when specified.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
if /i "%arg%" == "tree" (set __BuildTestTree=!__BuildTestTree!%2%%3B&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "log" (set __BuildLogRootName=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "Exclude" (set __Exclude=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "priority" (set __Priority=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1=%2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Despite a comment about priority above that it needs special handling; it was still incorrect. It was shifting at the wrong place, and it was resulting in the processed/unprocessed args not being correct.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%arg%" == "priority" (set __Priority=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1=%2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

@REM The following arguments also consume two subsequent arguments
if /i "%arg%" == "cmakeargs" (set __CMakeArgs="%2=%3" %__CMakeArgs%&set "processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2 %3"&shift&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The cmakeargs argument was also not correctly shifting the arguments, so extra/incorrect arguments would end up flowing through to msbuild.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
@@ -130,7 +150,40 @@ if [!processedArgs!]==[] (
)
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This logic was unexpectedly above the :ArgsDone label and was being hit whenever there was an unrecognized argument (vs. when we were done processing arguments).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was working by coincidence that argument parsing aborts upon the first unrecognized argument. There are existing pipelines relying on that behavior.

Nonetheless, the logic is moved below the label now, even though we still exit processing upon the first unrecognized argument.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
@jkotas
jkotas requested review from a team and trylekFebruary 8, 2023 15:03

@trylektrylek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice, thanks Jeff for all the fixes, improvements and documentation updates!

@jeffhandley
jeffhandley merged commit 1166bba into dotnet:mainFeb 8, 2023
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley deleted the jeffhandley/test-instructions branch February 11, 2023 03:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 13, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jeffhandley@jkotas@trylek
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Refine corerun instructions. Improve argument parsing in src/tests/build. - #81733

Merged
jeffhandley merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jeffhandley:jeffhandley/test-instructions
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

Refine corerun instructions. Improve argument parsing in src/tests/build.#81733
jeffhandley merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jeffhandley:jeffhandley/test-instructions

Conversation

@jeffhandley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

While working through the corerun instructions, I got tripped up in a few ways.

  1. Some of the instructions were confusing to me
  2. There were places where the path to corerun was unclear or misleading
  3. The argument parsing of src/tests/build.cmd was not behaving the same as src/tests/build.sh
    • There seemed to be a few bugs lurking in there too

This PR updates the instructions and also improves the argument parsing in src/tests/build based on these findings. For the argument parsing, I also introduced a mechanism for testing the results of the argument parsing for better maintainability going forward.

@ghostghost added the area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues label Feb 7, 2023
@ghostghost assigned jeffhandleyFeb 7, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Feb 7, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

While working through the corerun instructions, I got tripped up in a few ways.

  1. Some of the instructions were confusing to me
  2. There were places where the path to corerun was unclear or misleading
  3. The argument parsing of src/tests/build.cmd was not behaving the same as src/tests/build.sh
    • There seemed to be a few bugs lurking in there too

This PR updates the instructions and also improves the argument parsing in src/tests/build based on these findings. For the argument parsing, I also introduced a mechanism for testing the results of the argument parsing for better maintainability going forward.

Author:jeffhandley
Assignees:jeffhandley
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:-


```bash
./corerun /runtime/artifacts/bin/coreclr/Linux.x64.Release/crossgen2/crossgen2.dll
corerun /runtime/artifacts/bin/coreclr/Linux.x64.Release/crossgen2/crossgen2.dll

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

corerun is executed from $PATH, not from the current folder

```

Now, instead of running our app the usual way, we will use our newly built `corerun` to execute it using our build of the runtime. For this, we will follow the steps denoted below:
Now, instead of running our app the usual way, we will use `corerun` to execute it using our build of the runtime. The `corerun` executable is created as part of building the `clr` subset, and it will exist in the `<repo root>/artifacts/bin/coreclr/<OS>.<Arch>.<Configuration>` folder. For this, we will follow the steps denoted below:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Our newly built" was confusing to me. I removed that and aimed to add clarity that it should have been built already (and where it exists so that can be confirmed).

# Also, replace the ';' with ':' if on Linux or macOS.
$Env:PATH += ';<repo_root>\artifacts\tests\coreclr\windows.x64.Debug\Tests\Core_Root'
.\corerun HelloWorld.dll
corerun HelloWorld.dll

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

corerun is found via path, not from the current folder.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
set __Exclude=%__RepoRootDir%\src\tests\issues.targets

REM __UnprocessedBuildArgs are args that we pass to msbuild (e.g. /p:TargetArchitecture=x64)
set __commandName=%~nx0

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Down in Usage, we need to print the command name, but we've already shifted the args by then. This will grab the file name and extension before we do any shifting.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%1" == "-help" goto Usage
if /i "%1" == "--help" goto Usage
@REM All arguments following this tag will be passed directly to msbuild (as unprocessed arguments)
if /i "%1" == "--" (set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto ArgsDone)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, handling of -- seemed broken. It was just continuing the loop, which could then recognize and process arguments that were expected to be passed through. Chances are, such args were going unrecognized and by happenstance, they were still getting passed through. But this changes the behavior to match the Usage notes.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%arg%" == "skipgeneratelayout" (set __SkipGenerateLayout=1&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

if /i "%arg%" == "copynativeonly" (set __CopyNativeTestBinaries=1&set __SkipNative=1&set __CopyNativeProjectsAfterCombinedTestBuild=false&set __SkipGenerateLayout=1&set __SkipTestWrappers=1&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "generatelayoutonly" (set __GenerateLayoutOnly=1&set __SkipManaged=1&set __SkipNative=1&set __CopyNativeProjectsAfterCombinedTestBuild=false&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, the generatelayoutonly argument didn't set __GenerateLayoutOnly=1, which made it do more work than intended when specified.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
if /i "%arg%" == "tree" (set __BuildTestTree=!__BuildTestTree!%2%%3B&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "log" (set __BuildLogRootName=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "Exclude" (set __Exclude=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "priority" (set __Priority=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1=%2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Despite a comment about priority above that it needs special handling; it was still incorrect. It was shifting at the wrong place, and it was resulting in the processed/unprocessed args not being correct.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%arg%" == "priority" (set __Priority=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1=%2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

@REM The following arguments also consume two subsequent arguments
if /i "%arg%" == "cmakeargs" (set __CMakeArgs="%2=%3" %__CMakeArgs%&set "processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2 %3"&shift&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The cmakeargs argument was also not correctly shifting the arguments, so extra/incorrect arguments would end up flowing through to msbuild.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
@@ -130,7 +150,40 @@ if [!processedArgs!]==[] (
)
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This logic was unexpectedly above the :ArgsDone label and was being hit whenever there was an unrecognized argument (vs. when we were done processing arguments).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was working by coincidence that argument parsing aborts upon the first unrecognized argument. There are existing pipelines relying on that behavior.

Nonetheless, the logic is moved below the label now, even though we still exit processing upon the first unrecognized argument.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
@jkotas
jkotas requested review from a team and trylekFebruary 8, 2023 15:03

@trylektrylek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice, thanks Jeff for all the fixes, improvements and documentation updates!

@jeffhandley
jeffhandley merged commit 1166bba into dotnet:mainFeb 8, 2023
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley deleted the jeffhandley/test-instructions branch February 11, 2023 03:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 13, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jeffhandley@jkotas@trylek
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Refine corerun instructions. Improve argument parsing in src/tests/build. - #81733

Merged
jeffhandley merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jeffhandley:jeffhandley/test-instructions
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

Refine corerun instructions. Improve argument parsing in src/tests/build.#81733
jeffhandley merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jeffhandley:jeffhandley/test-instructions

Conversation

@jeffhandley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

While working through the corerun instructions, I got tripped up in a few ways.

  1. Some of the instructions were confusing to me
  2. There were places where the path to corerun was unclear or misleading
  3. The argument parsing of src/tests/build.cmd was not behaving the same as src/tests/build.sh
    • There seemed to be a few bugs lurking in there too

This PR updates the instructions and also improves the argument parsing in src/tests/build based on these findings. For the argument parsing, I also introduced a mechanism for testing the results of the argument parsing for better maintainability going forward.

@ghostghost added the area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues label Feb 7, 2023
@ghostghost assigned jeffhandleyFeb 7, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Feb 7, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

While working through the corerun instructions, I got tripped up in a few ways.

  1. Some of the instructions were confusing to me
  2. There were places where the path to corerun was unclear or misleading
  3. The argument parsing of src/tests/build.cmd was not behaving the same as src/tests/build.sh
    • There seemed to be a few bugs lurking in there too

This PR updates the instructions and also improves the argument parsing in src/tests/build based on these findings. For the argument parsing, I also introduced a mechanism for testing the results of the argument parsing for better maintainability going forward.

Author:jeffhandley
Assignees:jeffhandley
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:-


```bash
./corerun /runtime/artifacts/bin/coreclr/Linux.x64.Release/crossgen2/crossgen2.dll
corerun /runtime/artifacts/bin/coreclr/Linux.x64.Release/crossgen2/crossgen2.dll

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

corerun is executed from $PATH, not from the current folder

```

Now, instead of running our app the usual way, we will use our newly built `corerun` to execute it using our build of the runtime. For this, we will follow the steps denoted below:
Now, instead of running our app the usual way, we will use `corerun` to execute it using our build of the runtime. The `corerun` executable is created as part of building the `clr` subset, and it will exist in the `<repo root>/artifacts/bin/coreclr/<OS>.<Arch>.<Configuration>` folder. For this, we will follow the steps denoted below:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Our newly built" was confusing to me. I removed that and aimed to add clarity that it should have been built already (and where it exists so that can be confirmed).

# Also, replace the ';' with ':' if on Linux or macOS.
$Env:PATH += ';<repo_root>\artifacts\tests\coreclr\windows.x64.Debug\Tests\Core_Root'
.\corerun HelloWorld.dll
corerun HelloWorld.dll

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

corerun is found via path, not from the current folder.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
set __Exclude=%__RepoRootDir%\src\tests\issues.targets

REM __UnprocessedBuildArgs are args that we pass to msbuild (e.g. /p:TargetArchitecture=x64)
set __commandName=%~nx0

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Down in Usage, we need to print the command name, but we've already shifted the args by then. This will grab the file name and extension before we do any shifting.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%1" == "-help" goto Usage
if /i "%1" == "--help" goto Usage
@REM All arguments following this tag will be passed directly to msbuild (as unprocessed arguments)
if /i "%1" == "--" (set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto ArgsDone)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, handling of -- seemed broken. It was just continuing the loop, which could then recognize and process arguments that were expected to be passed through. Chances are, such args were going unrecognized and by happenstance, they were still getting passed through. But this changes the behavior to match the Usage notes.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%arg%" == "skipgeneratelayout" (set __SkipGenerateLayout=1&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

if /i "%arg%" == "copynativeonly" (set __CopyNativeTestBinaries=1&set __SkipNative=1&set __CopyNativeProjectsAfterCombinedTestBuild=false&set __SkipGenerateLayout=1&set __SkipTestWrappers=1&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "generatelayoutonly" (set __GenerateLayoutOnly=1&set __SkipManaged=1&set __SkipNative=1&set __CopyNativeProjectsAfterCombinedTestBuild=false&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, the generatelayoutonly argument didn't set __GenerateLayoutOnly=1, which made it do more work than intended when specified.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
if /i "%arg%" == "tree" (set __BuildTestTree=!__BuildTestTree!%2%%3B&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "log" (set __BuildLogRootName=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "Exclude" (set __Exclude=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "priority" (set __Priority=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1=%2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Despite a comment about priority above that it needs special handling; it was still incorrect. It was shifting at the wrong place, and it was resulting in the processed/unprocessed args not being correct.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%arg%" == "priority" (set __Priority=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1=%2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

@REM The following arguments also consume two subsequent arguments
if /i "%arg%" == "cmakeargs" (set __CMakeArgs="%2=%3" %__CMakeArgs%&set "processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2 %3"&shift&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The cmakeargs argument was also not correctly shifting the arguments, so extra/incorrect arguments would end up flowing through to msbuild.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
@@ -130,7 +150,40 @@ if [!processedArgs!]==[] (
)
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This logic was unexpectedly above the :ArgsDone label and was being hit whenever there was an unrecognized argument (vs. when we were done processing arguments).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was working by coincidence that argument parsing aborts upon the first unrecognized argument. There are existing pipelines relying on that behavior.

Nonetheless, the logic is moved below the label now, even though we still exit processing upon the first unrecognized argument.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
@jkotas
jkotas requested review from a team and trylekFebruary 8, 2023 15:03

@trylektrylek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice, thanks Jeff for all the fixes, improvements and documentation updates!

@jeffhandley
jeffhandley merged commit 1166bba into dotnet:mainFeb 8, 2023
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley deleted the jeffhandley/test-instructions branch February 11, 2023 03:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 13, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jeffhandley@jkotas@trylek
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Refine corerun instructions. Improve argument parsing in src/tests/build. - #81733

Merged
jeffhandley merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jeffhandley:jeffhandley/test-instructions
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

Refine corerun instructions. Improve argument parsing in src/tests/build.#81733
jeffhandley merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jeffhandley:jeffhandley/test-instructions

Conversation

@jeffhandley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

While working through the corerun instructions, I got tripped up in a few ways.

  1. Some of the instructions were confusing to me
  2. There were places where the path to corerun was unclear or misleading
  3. The argument parsing of src/tests/build.cmd was not behaving the same as src/tests/build.sh
    • There seemed to be a few bugs lurking in there too

This PR updates the instructions and also improves the argument parsing in src/tests/build based on these findings. For the argument parsing, I also introduced a mechanism for testing the results of the argument parsing for better maintainability going forward.

@ghostghost added the area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues label Feb 7, 2023
@ghostghost assigned jeffhandleyFeb 7, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Feb 7, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

While working through the corerun instructions, I got tripped up in a few ways.

  1. Some of the instructions were confusing to me
  2. There were places where the path to corerun was unclear or misleading
  3. The argument parsing of src/tests/build.cmd was not behaving the same as src/tests/build.sh
    • There seemed to be a few bugs lurking in there too

This PR updates the instructions and also improves the argument parsing in src/tests/build based on these findings. For the argument parsing, I also introduced a mechanism for testing the results of the argument parsing for better maintainability going forward.

Author:jeffhandley
Assignees:jeffhandley
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:-


```bash
./corerun /runtime/artifacts/bin/coreclr/Linux.x64.Release/crossgen2/crossgen2.dll
corerun /runtime/artifacts/bin/coreclr/Linux.x64.Release/crossgen2/crossgen2.dll

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

corerun is executed from $PATH, not from the current folder

```

Now, instead of running our app the usual way, we will use our newly built `corerun` to execute it using our build of the runtime. For this, we will follow the steps denoted below:
Now, instead of running our app the usual way, we will use `corerun` to execute it using our build of the runtime. The `corerun` executable is created as part of building the `clr` subset, and it will exist in the `<repo root>/artifacts/bin/coreclr/<OS>.<Arch>.<Configuration>` folder. For this, we will follow the steps denoted below:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Our newly built" was confusing to me. I removed that and aimed to add clarity that it should have been built already (and where it exists so that can be confirmed).

# Also, replace the ';' with ':' if on Linux or macOS.
$Env:PATH += ';<repo_root>\artifacts\tests\coreclr\windows.x64.Debug\Tests\Core_Root'
.\corerun HelloWorld.dll
corerun HelloWorld.dll

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

corerun is found via path, not from the current folder.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
set __Exclude=%__RepoRootDir%\src\tests\issues.targets

REM __UnprocessedBuildArgs are args that we pass to msbuild (e.g. /p:TargetArchitecture=x64)
set __commandName=%~nx0

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Down in Usage, we need to print the command name, but we've already shifted the args by then. This will grab the file name and extension before we do any shifting.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%1" == "-help" goto Usage
if /i "%1" == "--help" goto Usage
@REM All arguments following this tag will be passed directly to msbuild (as unprocessed arguments)
if /i "%1" == "--" (set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto ArgsDone)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, handling of -- seemed broken. It was just continuing the loop, which could then recognize and process arguments that were expected to be passed through. Chances are, such args were going unrecognized and by happenstance, they were still getting passed through. But this changes the behavior to match the Usage notes.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%arg%" == "skipgeneratelayout" (set __SkipGenerateLayout=1&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

if /i "%arg%" == "copynativeonly" (set __CopyNativeTestBinaries=1&set __SkipNative=1&set __CopyNativeProjectsAfterCombinedTestBuild=false&set __SkipGenerateLayout=1&set __SkipTestWrappers=1&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "generatelayoutonly" (set __GenerateLayoutOnly=1&set __SkipManaged=1&set __SkipNative=1&set __CopyNativeProjectsAfterCombinedTestBuild=false&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, the generatelayoutonly argument didn't set __GenerateLayoutOnly=1, which made it do more work than intended when specified.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
if /i "%arg%" == "tree" (set __BuildTestTree=!__BuildTestTree!%2%%3B&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "log" (set __BuildLogRootName=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "Exclude" (set __Exclude=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "priority" (set __Priority=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1=%2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Despite a comment about priority above that it needs special handling; it was still incorrect. It was shifting at the wrong place, and it was resulting in the processed/unprocessed args not being correct.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%arg%" == "priority" (set __Priority=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1=%2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

@REM The following arguments also consume two subsequent arguments
if /i "%arg%" == "cmakeargs" (set __CMakeArgs="%2=%3" %__CMakeArgs%&set "processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2 %3"&shift&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The cmakeargs argument was also not correctly shifting the arguments, so extra/incorrect arguments would end up flowing through to msbuild.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
@@ -130,7 +150,40 @@ if [!processedArgs!]==[] (
)
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This logic was unexpectedly above the :ArgsDone label and was being hit whenever there was an unrecognized argument (vs. when we were done processing arguments).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was working by coincidence that argument parsing aborts upon the first unrecognized argument. There are existing pipelines relying on that behavior.

Nonetheless, the logic is moved below the label now, even though we still exit processing upon the first unrecognized argument.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
@jkotas
jkotas requested review from a team and trylekFebruary 8, 2023 15:03

@trylektrylek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice, thanks Jeff for all the fixes, improvements and documentation updates!

@jeffhandley
jeffhandley merged commit 1166bba into dotnet:mainFeb 8, 2023
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley deleted the jeffhandley/test-instructions branch February 11, 2023 03:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 13, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jeffhandley@jkotas@trylek
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Refine corerun instructions. Improve argument parsing in src/tests/build. - #81733

Merged
jeffhandley merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jeffhandley:jeffhandley/test-instructions
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

Refine corerun instructions. Improve argument parsing in src/tests/build.#81733
jeffhandley merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jeffhandley:jeffhandley/test-instructions

Conversation

@jeffhandley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

While working through the corerun instructions, I got tripped up in a few ways.

  1. Some of the instructions were confusing to me
  2. There were places where the path to corerun was unclear or misleading
  3. The argument parsing of src/tests/build.cmd was not behaving the same as src/tests/build.sh
    • There seemed to be a few bugs lurking in there too

This PR updates the instructions and also improves the argument parsing in src/tests/build based on these findings. For the argument parsing, I also introduced a mechanism for testing the results of the argument parsing for better maintainability going forward.

@ghostghost added the area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues label Feb 7, 2023
@ghostghost assigned jeffhandleyFeb 7, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Feb 7, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

While working through the corerun instructions, I got tripped up in a few ways.

  1. Some of the instructions were confusing to me
  2. There were places where the path to corerun was unclear or misleading
  3. The argument parsing of src/tests/build.cmd was not behaving the same as src/tests/build.sh
    • There seemed to be a few bugs lurking in there too

This PR updates the instructions and also improves the argument parsing in src/tests/build based on these findings. For the argument parsing, I also introduced a mechanism for testing the results of the argument parsing for better maintainability going forward.

Author:jeffhandley
Assignees:jeffhandley
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:-


```bash
./corerun /runtime/artifacts/bin/coreclr/Linux.x64.Release/crossgen2/crossgen2.dll
corerun /runtime/artifacts/bin/coreclr/Linux.x64.Release/crossgen2/crossgen2.dll

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

corerun is executed from $PATH, not from the current folder

```

Now, instead of running our app the usual way, we will use our newly built `corerun` to execute it using our build of the runtime. For this, we will follow the steps denoted below:
Now, instead of running our app the usual way, we will use `corerun` to execute it using our build of the runtime. The `corerun` executable is created as part of building the `clr` subset, and it will exist in the `<repo root>/artifacts/bin/coreclr/<OS>.<Arch>.<Configuration>` folder. For this, we will follow the steps denoted below:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Our newly built" was confusing to me. I removed that and aimed to add clarity that it should have been built already (and where it exists so that can be confirmed).

# Also, replace the ';' with ':' if on Linux or macOS.
$Env:PATH += ';<repo_root>\artifacts\tests\coreclr\windows.x64.Debug\Tests\Core_Root'
.\corerun HelloWorld.dll
corerun HelloWorld.dll

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

corerun is found via path, not from the current folder.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
set __Exclude=%__RepoRootDir%\src\tests\issues.targets

REM __UnprocessedBuildArgs are args that we pass to msbuild (e.g. /p:TargetArchitecture=x64)
set __commandName=%~nx0

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Down in Usage, we need to print the command name, but we've already shifted the args by then. This will grab the file name and extension before we do any shifting.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%1" == "-help" goto Usage
if /i "%1" == "--help" goto Usage
@REM All arguments following this tag will be passed directly to msbuild (as unprocessed arguments)
if /i "%1" == "--" (set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto ArgsDone)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, handling of -- seemed broken. It was just continuing the loop, which could then recognize and process arguments that were expected to be passed through. Chances are, such args were going unrecognized and by happenstance, they were still getting passed through. But this changes the behavior to match the Usage notes.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%arg%" == "skipgeneratelayout" (set __SkipGenerateLayout=1&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

if /i "%arg%" == "copynativeonly" (set __CopyNativeTestBinaries=1&set __SkipNative=1&set __CopyNativeProjectsAfterCombinedTestBuild=false&set __SkipGenerateLayout=1&set __SkipTestWrappers=1&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "generatelayoutonly" (set __GenerateLayoutOnly=1&set __SkipManaged=1&set __SkipNative=1&set __CopyNativeProjectsAfterCombinedTestBuild=false&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, the generatelayoutonly argument didn't set __GenerateLayoutOnly=1, which made it do more work than intended when specified.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
if /i "%arg%" == "tree" (set __BuildTestTree=!__BuildTestTree!%2%%3B&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "log" (set __BuildLogRootName=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "Exclude" (set __Exclude=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "priority" (set __Priority=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1=%2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Despite a comment about priority above that it needs special handling; it was still incorrect. It was shifting at the wrong place, and it was resulting in the processed/unprocessed args not being correct.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%arg%" == "priority" (set __Priority=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1=%2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

@REM The following arguments also consume two subsequent arguments
if /i "%arg%" == "cmakeargs" (set __CMakeArgs="%2=%3" %__CMakeArgs%&set "processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2 %3"&shift&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The cmakeargs argument was also not correctly shifting the arguments, so extra/incorrect arguments would end up flowing through to msbuild.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
@@ -130,7 +150,40 @@ if [!processedArgs!]==[] (
)
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This logic was unexpectedly above the :ArgsDone label and was being hit whenever there was an unrecognized argument (vs. when we were done processing arguments).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was working by coincidence that argument parsing aborts upon the first unrecognized argument. There are existing pipelines relying on that behavior.

Nonetheless, the logic is moved below the label now, even though we still exit processing upon the first unrecognized argument.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
@jkotas
jkotas requested review from a team and trylekFebruary 8, 2023 15:03

@trylektrylek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice, thanks Jeff for all the fixes, improvements and documentation updates!

@jeffhandley
jeffhandley merged commit 1166bba into dotnet:mainFeb 8, 2023
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley deleted the jeffhandley/test-instructions branch February 11, 2023 03:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 13, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jeffhandley@jkotas@trylek
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Refine corerun instructions. Improve argument parsing in src/tests/build. - #81733

Merged
jeffhandley merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jeffhandley:jeffhandley/test-instructions
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

Refine corerun instructions. Improve argument parsing in src/tests/build.#81733
jeffhandley merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jeffhandley:jeffhandley/test-instructions

Conversation

@jeffhandley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

While working through the corerun instructions, I got tripped up in a few ways.

  1. Some of the instructions were confusing to me
  2. There were places where the path to corerun was unclear or misleading
  3. The argument parsing of src/tests/build.cmd was not behaving the same as src/tests/build.sh
    • There seemed to be a few bugs lurking in there too

This PR updates the instructions and also improves the argument parsing in src/tests/build based on these findings. For the argument parsing, I also introduced a mechanism for testing the results of the argument parsing for better maintainability going forward.

@ghostghost added the area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues label Feb 7, 2023
@ghostghost assigned jeffhandleyFeb 7, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Feb 7, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

While working through the corerun instructions, I got tripped up in a few ways.

  1. Some of the instructions were confusing to me
  2. There were places where the path to corerun was unclear or misleading
  3. The argument parsing of src/tests/build.cmd was not behaving the same as src/tests/build.sh
    • There seemed to be a few bugs lurking in there too

This PR updates the instructions and also improves the argument parsing in src/tests/build based on these findings. For the argument parsing, I also introduced a mechanism for testing the results of the argument parsing for better maintainability going forward.

Author:jeffhandley
Assignees:jeffhandley
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:-


```bash
./corerun /runtime/artifacts/bin/coreclr/Linux.x64.Release/crossgen2/crossgen2.dll
corerun /runtime/artifacts/bin/coreclr/Linux.x64.Release/crossgen2/crossgen2.dll

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

corerun is executed from $PATH, not from the current folder

```

Now, instead of running our app the usual way, we will use our newly built `corerun` to execute it using our build of the runtime. For this, we will follow the steps denoted below:
Now, instead of running our app the usual way, we will use `corerun` to execute it using our build of the runtime. The `corerun` executable is created as part of building the `clr` subset, and it will exist in the `<repo root>/artifacts/bin/coreclr/<OS>.<Arch>.<Configuration>` folder. For this, we will follow the steps denoted below:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Our newly built" was confusing to me. I removed that and aimed to add clarity that it should have been built already (and where it exists so that can be confirmed).

# Also, replace the ';' with ':' if on Linux or macOS.
$Env:PATH += ';<repo_root>\artifacts\tests\coreclr\windows.x64.Debug\Tests\Core_Root'
.\corerun HelloWorld.dll
corerun HelloWorld.dll

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

corerun is found via path, not from the current folder.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
set __Exclude=%__RepoRootDir%\src\tests\issues.targets

REM __UnprocessedBuildArgs are args that we pass to msbuild (e.g. /p:TargetArchitecture=x64)
set __commandName=%~nx0

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Down in Usage, we need to print the command name, but we've already shifted the args by then. This will grab the file name and extension before we do any shifting.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%1" == "-help" goto Usage
if /i "%1" == "--help" goto Usage
@REM All arguments following this tag will be passed directly to msbuild (as unprocessed arguments)
if /i "%1" == "--" (set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto ArgsDone)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, handling of -- seemed broken. It was just continuing the loop, which could then recognize and process arguments that were expected to be passed through. Chances are, such args were going unrecognized and by happenstance, they were still getting passed through. But this changes the behavior to match the Usage notes.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%arg%" == "skipgeneratelayout" (set __SkipGenerateLayout=1&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

if /i "%arg%" == "copynativeonly" (set __CopyNativeTestBinaries=1&set __SkipNative=1&set __CopyNativeProjectsAfterCombinedTestBuild=false&set __SkipGenerateLayout=1&set __SkipTestWrappers=1&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "generatelayoutonly" (set __GenerateLayoutOnly=1&set __SkipManaged=1&set __SkipNative=1&set __CopyNativeProjectsAfterCombinedTestBuild=false&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, the generatelayoutonly argument didn't set __GenerateLayoutOnly=1, which made it do more work than intended when specified.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
if /i "%arg%" == "tree" (set __BuildTestTree=!__BuildTestTree!%2%%3B&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "log" (set __BuildLogRootName=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "Exclude" (set __Exclude=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "priority" (set __Priority=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1=%2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Despite a comment about priority above that it needs special handling; it was still incorrect. It was shifting at the wrong place, and it was resulting in the processed/unprocessed args not being correct.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%arg%" == "priority" (set __Priority=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1=%2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

@REM The following arguments also consume two subsequent arguments
if /i "%arg%" == "cmakeargs" (set __CMakeArgs="%2=%3" %__CMakeArgs%&set "processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2 %3"&shift&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The cmakeargs argument was also not correctly shifting the arguments, so extra/incorrect arguments would end up flowing through to msbuild.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
@@ -130,7 +150,40 @@ if [!processedArgs!]==[] (
)
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This logic was unexpectedly above the :ArgsDone label and was being hit whenever there was an unrecognized argument (vs. when we were done processing arguments).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was working by coincidence that argument parsing aborts upon the first unrecognized argument. There are existing pipelines relying on that behavior.

Nonetheless, the logic is moved below the label now, even though we still exit processing upon the first unrecognized argument.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
@jkotas
jkotas requested review from a team and trylekFebruary 8, 2023 15:03

@trylektrylek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice, thanks Jeff for all the fixes, improvements and documentation updates!

@jeffhandley
jeffhandley merged commit 1166bba into dotnet:mainFeb 8, 2023
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley deleted the jeffhandley/test-instructions branch February 11, 2023 03:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 13, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jeffhandley@jkotas@trylek
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Refine corerun instructions. Improve argument parsing in src/tests/build. - #81733

Merged
jeffhandley merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jeffhandley:jeffhandley/test-instructions
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

Refine corerun instructions. Improve argument parsing in src/tests/build.#81733
jeffhandley merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
jeffhandley:jeffhandley/test-instructions

Conversation

@jeffhandley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

While working through the corerun instructions, I got tripped up in a few ways.

  1. Some of the instructions were confusing to me
  2. There were places where the path to corerun was unclear or misleading
  3. The argument parsing of src/tests/build.cmd was not behaving the same as src/tests/build.sh
    • There seemed to be a few bugs lurking in there too

This PR updates the instructions and also improves the argument parsing in src/tests/build based on these findings. For the argument parsing, I also introduced a mechanism for testing the results of the argument parsing for better maintainability going forward.

@ghostghost added the area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues label Feb 7, 2023
@ghostghost assigned jeffhandleyFeb 7, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Feb 7, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

While working through the corerun instructions, I got tripped up in a few ways.

  1. Some of the instructions were confusing to me
  2. There were places where the path to corerun was unclear or misleading
  3. The argument parsing of src/tests/build.cmd was not behaving the same as src/tests/build.sh
    • There seemed to be a few bugs lurking in there too

This PR updates the instructions and also improves the argument parsing in src/tests/build based on these findings. For the argument parsing, I also introduced a mechanism for testing the results of the argument parsing for better maintainability going forward.

Author:jeffhandley
Assignees:jeffhandley
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:-


```bash
./corerun /runtime/artifacts/bin/coreclr/Linux.x64.Release/crossgen2/crossgen2.dll
corerun /runtime/artifacts/bin/coreclr/Linux.x64.Release/crossgen2/crossgen2.dll

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

corerun is executed from $PATH, not from the current folder

```

Now, instead of running our app the usual way, we will use our newly built `corerun` to execute it using our build of the runtime. For this, we will follow the steps denoted below:
Now, instead of running our app the usual way, we will use `corerun` to execute it using our build of the runtime. The `corerun` executable is created as part of building the `clr` subset, and it will exist in the `<repo root>/artifacts/bin/coreclr/<OS>.<Arch>.<Configuration>` folder. For this, we will follow the steps denoted below:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Our newly built" was confusing to me. I removed that and aimed to add clarity that it should have been built already (and where it exists so that can be confirmed).

# Also, replace the ';' with ':' if on Linux or macOS.
$Env:PATH += ';<repo_root>\artifacts\tests\coreclr\windows.x64.Debug\Tests\Core_Root'
.\corerun HelloWorld.dll
corerun HelloWorld.dll

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

corerun is found via path, not from the current folder.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
set __Exclude=%__RepoRootDir%\src\tests\issues.targets

REM __UnprocessedBuildArgs are args that we pass to msbuild (e.g. /p:TargetArchitecture=x64)
set __commandName=%~nx0

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Down in Usage, we need to print the command name, but we've already shifted the args by then. This will grab the file name and extension before we do any shifting.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%1" == "-help" goto Usage
if /i "%1" == "--help" goto Usage
@REM All arguments following this tag will be passed directly to msbuild (as unprocessed arguments)
if /i "%1" == "--" (set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto ArgsDone)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, handling of -- seemed broken. It was just continuing the loop, which could then recognize and process arguments that were expected to be passed through. Chances are, such args were going unrecognized and by happenstance, they were still getting passed through. But this changes the behavior to match the Usage notes.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%arg%" == "skipgeneratelayout" (set __SkipGenerateLayout=1&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

if /i "%arg%" == "copynativeonly" (set __CopyNativeTestBinaries=1&set __SkipNative=1&set __CopyNativeProjectsAfterCombinedTestBuild=false&set __SkipGenerateLayout=1&set __SkipTestWrappers=1&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "generatelayoutonly" (set __GenerateLayoutOnly=1&set __SkipManaged=1&set __SkipNative=1&set __CopyNativeProjectsAfterCombinedTestBuild=false&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, the generatelayoutonly argument didn't set __GenerateLayoutOnly=1, which made it do more work than intended when specified.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
if /i "%arg%" == "tree" (set __BuildTestTree=!__BuildTestTree!%2%%3B&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "log" (set __BuildLogRootName=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "Exclude" (set __Exclude=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)
if /i "%arg%" == "priority" (set __Priority=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1=%2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Despite a comment about priority above that it needs special handling; it was still incorrect. It was shifting at the wrong place, and it was resulting in the processed/unprocessed args not being correct.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
if /i "%arg%" == "priority" (set __Priority=%2&set processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1=%2&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

@REM The following arguments also consume two subsequent arguments
if /i "%arg%" == "cmakeargs" (set __CMakeArgs="%2=%3" %__CMakeArgs%&set "processedArgs=!processedArgs! %1 %2 %3"&shift&shift&shift&goto Arg_Loop)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The cmakeargs argument was also not correctly shifting the arguments, so extra/incorrect arguments would end up flowing through to msbuild.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd
@@ -130,7 +150,40 @@ if [!processedArgs!]==[] (
)
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This logic was unexpectedly above the :ArgsDone label and was being hit whenever there was an unrecognized argument (vs. when we were done processing arguments).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was working by coincidence that argument parsing aborts upon the first unrecognized argument. There are existing pipelines relying on that behavior.

Nonetheless, the logic is moved below the label now, even though we still exit processing upon the first unrecognized argument.

Comment threadsrc/tests/build.cmd Outdated
@jkotas
jkotas requested review from a team and trylekFebruary 8, 2023 15:03

@trylektrylek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice, thanks Jeff for all the fixes, improvements and documentation updates!

@jeffhandley
jeffhandley merged commit 1166bba into dotnet:mainFeb 8, 2023
@jeffhandley
jeffhandley deleted the jeffhandley/test-instructions branch February 11, 2023 03:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 13, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jeffhandley@jkotas@trylek