Add error check for skipped tests in merged groups - #84284

Merged
markples merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
markples:not-in-group
Apr 4, 2023
Merged

Add error check for skipped tests in merged groups#84284
markples merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
markples:not-in-group

Conversation

@markples

@markplesmarkples commented Apr 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If I test is written in the old style (with a Main and OutputType==Exe without an attribute such as RequiresProcessIsolation) in a merged test group directory, it will be skipped. This change adds a check to detect those cases.

I have struggled with ways to automatically set OutputType. Directory.Build.props is too early (the test project file will override it). Directory.Build.targets is too late as the C# targets files will already have been processed and set other variables based on the value of OutputType. This Target doesn't execute until later, but since it is an error it doesn't matter how those additional properties were set.

Since this adds more boilerplate to each merged test directory, I created a src/tests/Directory.Merged.props to share all of that.

This catches 3 tests that aren't currently executing.

Unrelated:

  • Use GetPathOfFileAbove in nearby locations for Directory.Build.props chaining rather than specific paths
  • Fix two easy IL warnings that appeared in my local build of all tests

Resolves#84182

@markplesmarkples added the test-enhancement Improvements of test source code label Apr 4, 2023
@markplesmarkples added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Apr 4, 2023
@markplesmarkples self-assigned this Apr 4, 2023
@ghostghost added the area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues label Apr 4, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Apr 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

If I test is written in the old style (with a Main and OutputType==Exe without an attribute such as RequiresProcessIsolation) in a merged test group directory, it will be skipped. This change adds a check to detect those cases.

I have struggled with ways to automatically set OutputType. Directory.Build.props is too early (the test project file will override it). Directory.Build.targets is too late as the C# targets files will already have been processed and set other variables based on the value of OutputType. This Target doesn't execute until later, but since it is an error it doesn't matter how those additional properties were set.

Since this adds more boilerplate to each merged test directory, I created a src/tests/Directory.Merged.props to share all of that.

This catches 3 tests that aren't currently executing.

Unrelated:

  • Use GetPathOfFileAbove in nearby locations for Directory.Build.props chaining rather than specific paths
  • Fix two easy IL warnings that appeared in my local build of all tests

Completes #84182

Author:markples
Assignees:markples
Labels:

test-enhancement, area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:8.0.0

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

PTAL @trylek@jkoritzinsky
cc @dotnet/jit-contrib - I think the process of going through this (D.B.props/targets, etc.) may help with fixing BuildAsStandalone

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-coreclr outerloop

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@trylektrylek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great to me, thanks Mark for cleaning this up and for fixing the previously overlooked cases!

<InMergedTestDirectory>true</InMergedTestDirectory>
<BuildAsStandalone Condition="'$(BuildAsStandalone)' == ''">false</BuildAsStandalone>

<AssemblyName Condition="'$(BuildAsStandalone)' != 'true'">$(MSBuildProjectName.Replace('_il_d', '').Replace('_il_r', ''))</AssemblyName>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO, it would be helpful to have some comments. Especially, to describe why we need this weird _il_d/_il_r handling.

@trylek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Both errors you are seeing in the outerloop run should be fixed now by my and Michal's PR

#84268

I merged it in earlier today but after you triggered the outerloop runs.

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you all. @BruceForstall I will fold that into my next changes (to merge immediately since a new check and new tests are a race condition in the repo)

@markples
markples merged commit 735ddea into dotnet:mainApr 4, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 4, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issuestest-enhancementImprovements of test source code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Merged test groups - check behavior when a test with incorrect settings is added to a merged directory

4 participants

@markples@trylek@jkoritzinsky@BruceForstall
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Add error check for skipped tests in merged groups - #84284

Merged
markples merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
markples:not-in-group
Apr 4, 2023
Merged

Add error check for skipped tests in merged groups#84284
markples merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
markples:not-in-group

Conversation

@markples

@markplesmarkples commented Apr 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If I test is written in the old style (with a Main and OutputType==Exe without an attribute such as RequiresProcessIsolation) in a merged test group directory, it will be skipped. This change adds a check to detect those cases.

I have struggled with ways to automatically set OutputType. Directory.Build.props is too early (the test project file will override it). Directory.Build.targets is too late as the C# targets files will already have been processed and set other variables based on the value of OutputType. This Target doesn't execute until later, but since it is an error it doesn't matter how those additional properties were set.

Since this adds more boilerplate to each merged test directory, I created a src/tests/Directory.Merged.props to share all of that.

This catches 3 tests that aren't currently executing.

Unrelated:

  • Use GetPathOfFileAbove in nearby locations for Directory.Build.props chaining rather than specific paths
  • Fix two easy IL warnings that appeared in my local build of all tests

Resolves#84182

@markplesmarkples added the test-enhancement Improvements of test source code label Apr 4, 2023
@markplesmarkples added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Apr 4, 2023
@markplesmarkples self-assigned this Apr 4, 2023
@ghostghost added the area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues label Apr 4, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Apr 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

If I test is written in the old style (with a Main and OutputType==Exe without an attribute such as RequiresProcessIsolation) in a merged test group directory, it will be skipped. This change adds a check to detect those cases.

I have struggled with ways to automatically set OutputType. Directory.Build.props is too early (the test project file will override it). Directory.Build.targets is too late as the C# targets files will already have been processed and set other variables based on the value of OutputType. This Target doesn't execute until later, but since it is an error it doesn't matter how those additional properties were set.

Since this adds more boilerplate to each merged test directory, I created a src/tests/Directory.Merged.props to share all of that.

This catches 3 tests that aren't currently executing.

Unrelated:

  • Use GetPathOfFileAbove in nearby locations for Directory.Build.props chaining rather than specific paths
  • Fix two easy IL warnings that appeared in my local build of all tests

Completes #84182

Author:markples
Assignees:markples
Labels:

test-enhancement, area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:8.0.0

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

PTAL @trylek@jkoritzinsky
cc @dotnet/jit-contrib - I think the process of going through this (D.B.props/targets, etc.) may help with fixing BuildAsStandalone

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-coreclr outerloop

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@trylektrylek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great to me, thanks Mark for cleaning this up and for fixing the previously overlooked cases!

<InMergedTestDirectory>true</InMergedTestDirectory>
<BuildAsStandalone Condition="'$(BuildAsStandalone)' == ''">false</BuildAsStandalone>

<AssemblyName Condition="'$(BuildAsStandalone)' != 'true'">$(MSBuildProjectName.Replace('_il_d', '').Replace('_il_r', ''))</AssemblyName>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO, it would be helpful to have some comments. Especially, to describe why we need this weird _il_d/_il_r handling.

@trylek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Both errors you are seeing in the outerloop run should be fixed now by my and Michal's PR

#84268

I merged it in earlier today but after you triggered the outerloop runs.

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you all. @BruceForstall I will fold that into my next changes (to merge immediately since a new check and new tests are a race condition in the repo)

@markples
markples merged commit 735ddea into dotnet:mainApr 4, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 4, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issuestest-enhancementImprovements of test source code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Merged test groups - check behavior when a test with incorrect settings is added to a merged directory

4 participants

@markples@trylek@jkoritzinsky@BruceForstall
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add error check for skipped tests in merged groups - #84284

Merged
markples merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
markples:not-in-group
Apr 4, 2023
Merged

Add error check for skipped tests in merged groups#84284
markples merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
markples:not-in-group

Conversation

@markples

@markplesmarkples commented Apr 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If I test is written in the old style (with a Main and OutputType==Exe without an attribute such as RequiresProcessIsolation) in a merged test group directory, it will be skipped. This change adds a check to detect those cases.

I have struggled with ways to automatically set OutputType. Directory.Build.props is too early (the test project file will override it). Directory.Build.targets is too late as the C# targets files will already have been processed and set other variables based on the value of OutputType. This Target doesn't execute until later, but since it is an error it doesn't matter how those additional properties were set.

Since this adds more boilerplate to each merged test directory, I created a src/tests/Directory.Merged.props to share all of that.

This catches 3 tests that aren't currently executing.

Unrelated:

  • Use GetPathOfFileAbove in nearby locations for Directory.Build.props chaining rather than specific paths
  • Fix two easy IL warnings that appeared in my local build of all tests

Resolves#84182

@markplesmarkples added the test-enhancement Improvements of test source code label Apr 4, 2023
@markplesmarkples added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Apr 4, 2023
@markplesmarkples self-assigned this Apr 4, 2023
@ghostghost added the area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues label Apr 4, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Apr 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

If I test is written in the old style (with a Main and OutputType==Exe without an attribute such as RequiresProcessIsolation) in a merged test group directory, it will be skipped. This change adds a check to detect those cases.

I have struggled with ways to automatically set OutputType. Directory.Build.props is too early (the test project file will override it). Directory.Build.targets is too late as the C# targets files will already have been processed and set other variables based on the value of OutputType. This Target doesn't execute until later, but since it is an error it doesn't matter how those additional properties were set.

Since this adds more boilerplate to each merged test directory, I created a src/tests/Directory.Merged.props to share all of that.

This catches 3 tests that aren't currently executing.

Unrelated:

  • Use GetPathOfFileAbove in nearby locations for Directory.Build.props chaining rather than specific paths
  • Fix two easy IL warnings that appeared in my local build of all tests

Completes #84182

Author:markples
Assignees:markples
Labels:

test-enhancement, area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:8.0.0

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

PTAL @trylek@jkoritzinsky
cc @dotnet/jit-contrib - I think the process of going through this (D.B.props/targets, etc.) may help with fixing BuildAsStandalone

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-coreclr outerloop

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@trylektrylek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great to me, thanks Mark for cleaning this up and for fixing the previously overlooked cases!

<InMergedTestDirectory>true</InMergedTestDirectory>
<BuildAsStandalone Condition="'$(BuildAsStandalone)' == ''">false</BuildAsStandalone>

<AssemblyName Condition="'$(BuildAsStandalone)' != 'true'">$(MSBuildProjectName.Replace('_il_d', '').Replace('_il_r', ''))</AssemblyName>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO, it would be helpful to have some comments. Especially, to describe why we need this weird _il_d/_il_r handling.

@trylek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Both errors you are seeing in the outerloop run should be fixed now by my and Michal's PR

#84268

I merged it in earlier today but after you triggered the outerloop runs.

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you all. @BruceForstall I will fold that into my next changes (to merge immediately since a new check and new tests are a race condition in the repo)

@markples
markples merged commit 735ddea into dotnet:mainApr 4, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 4, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issuestest-enhancementImprovements of test source code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Merged test groups - check behavior when a test with incorrect settings is added to a merged directory

4 participants

@markples@trylek@jkoritzinsky@BruceForstall
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add error check for skipped tests in merged groups - #84284

Merged
markples merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
markples:not-in-group
Apr 4, 2023
Merged

Add error check for skipped tests in merged groups#84284
markples merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
markples:not-in-group

Conversation

@markples

@markplesmarkples commented Apr 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If I test is written in the old style (with a Main and OutputType==Exe without an attribute such as RequiresProcessIsolation) in a merged test group directory, it will be skipped. This change adds a check to detect those cases.

I have struggled with ways to automatically set OutputType. Directory.Build.props is too early (the test project file will override it). Directory.Build.targets is too late as the C# targets files will already have been processed and set other variables based on the value of OutputType. This Target doesn't execute until later, but since it is an error it doesn't matter how those additional properties were set.

Since this adds more boilerplate to each merged test directory, I created a src/tests/Directory.Merged.props to share all of that.

This catches 3 tests that aren't currently executing.

Unrelated:

  • Use GetPathOfFileAbove in nearby locations for Directory.Build.props chaining rather than specific paths
  • Fix two easy IL warnings that appeared in my local build of all tests

Resolves#84182

@markplesmarkples added the test-enhancement Improvements of test source code label Apr 4, 2023
@markplesmarkples added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Apr 4, 2023
@markplesmarkples self-assigned this Apr 4, 2023
@ghostghost added the area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues label Apr 4, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Apr 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

If I test is written in the old style (with a Main and OutputType==Exe without an attribute such as RequiresProcessIsolation) in a merged test group directory, it will be skipped. This change adds a check to detect those cases.

I have struggled with ways to automatically set OutputType. Directory.Build.props is too early (the test project file will override it). Directory.Build.targets is too late as the C# targets files will already have been processed and set other variables based on the value of OutputType. This Target doesn't execute until later, but since it is an error it doesn't matter how those additional properties were set.

Since this adds more boilerplate to each merged test directory, I created a src/tests/Directory.Merged.props to share all of that.

This catches 3 tests that aren't currently executing.

Unrelated:

  • Use GetPathOfFileAbove in nearby locations for Directory.Build.props chaining rather than specific paths
  • Fix two easy IL warnings that appeared in my local build of all tests

Completes #84182

Author:markples
Assignees:markples
Labels:

test-enhancement, area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:8.0.0

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

PTAL @trylek@jkoritzinsky
cc @dotnet/jit-contrib - I think the process of going through this (D.B.props/targets, etc.) may help with fixing BuildAsStandalone

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-coreclr outerloop

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@trylektrylek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great to me, thanks Mark for cleaning this up and for fixing the previously overlooked cases!

<InMergedTestDirectory>true</InMergedTestDirectory>
<BuildAsStandalone Condition="'$(BuildAsStandalone)' == ''">false</BuildAsStandalone>

<AssemblyName Condition="'$(BuildAsStandalone)' != 'true'">$(MSBuildProjectName.Replace('_il_d', '').Replace('_il_r', ''))</AssemblyName>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO, it would be helpful to have some comments. Especially, to describe why we need this weird _il_d/_il_r handling.

@trylek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Both errors you are seeing in the outerloop run should be fixed now by my and Michal's PR

#84268

I merged it in earlier today but after you triggered the outerloop runs.

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you all. @BruceForstall I will fold that into my next changes (to merge immediately since a new check and new tests are a race condition in the repo)

@markples
markples merged commit 735ddea into dotnet:mainApr 4, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 4, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issuestest-enhancementImprovements of test source code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Merged test groups - check behavior when a test with incorrect settings is added to a merged directory

4 participants

@markples@trylek@jkoritzinsky@BruceForstall
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Add error check for skipped tests in merged groups - #84284

Merged
markples merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
markples:not-in-group
Apr 4, 2023
Merged

Add error check for skipped tests in merged groups#84284
markples merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
markples:not-in-group

Conversation

@markples

@markplesmarkples commented Apr 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If I test is written in the old style (with a Main and OutputType==Exe without an attribute such as RequiresProcessIsolation) in a merged test group directory, it will be skipped. This change adds a check to detect those cases.

I have struggled with ways to automatically set OutputType. Directory.Build.props is too early (the test project file will override it). Directory.Build.targets is too late as the C# targets files will already have been processed and set other variables based on the value of OutputType. This Target doesn't execute until later, but since it is an error it doesn't matter how those additional properties were set.

Since this adds more boilerplate to each merged test directory, I created a src/tests/Directory.Merged.props to share all of that.

This catches 3 tests that aren't currently executing.

Unrelated:

  • Use GetPathOfFileAbove in nearby locations for Directory.Build.props chaining rather than specific paths
  • Fix two easy IL warnings that appeared in my local build of all tests

Resolves#84182

@markplesmarkples added the test-enhancement Improvements of test source code label Apr 4, 2023
@markplesmarkples added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Apr 4, 2023
@markplesmarkples self-assigned this Apr 4, 2023
@ghostghost added the area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues label Apr 4, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Apr 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

If I test is written in the old style (with a Main and OutputType==Exe without an attribute such as RequiresProcessIsolation) in a merged test group directory, it will be skipped. This change adds a check to detect those cases.

I have struggled with ways to automatically set OutputType. Directory.Build.props is too early (the test project file will override it). Directory.Build.targets is too late as the C# targets files will already have been processed and set other variables based on the value of OutputType. This Target doesn't execute until later, but since it is an error it doesn't matter how those additional properties were set.

Since this adds more boilerplate to each merged test directory, I created a src/tests/Directory.Merged.props to share all of that.

This catches 3 tests that aren't currently executing.

Unrelated:

  • Use GetPathOfFileAbove in nearby locations for Directory.Build.props chaining rather than specific paths
  • Fix two easy IL warnings that appeared in my local build of all tests

Completes #84182

Author:markples
Assignees:markples
Labels:

test-enhancement, area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:8.0.0

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

PTAL @trylek@jkoritzinsky
cc @dotnet/jit-contrib - I think the process of going through this (D.B.props/targets, etc.) may help with fixing BuildAsStandalone

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-coreclr outerloop

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@trylektrylek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great to me, thanks Mark for cleaning this up and for fixing the previously overlooked cases!

<InMergedTestDirectory>true</InMergedTestDirectory>
<BuildAsStandalone Condition="'$(BuildAsStandalone)' == ''">false</BuildAsStandalone>

<AssemblyName Condition="'$(BuildAsStandalone)' != 'true'">$(MSBuildProjectName.Replace('_il_d', '').Replace('_il_r', ''))</AssemblyName>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO, it would be helpful to have some comments. Especially, to describe why we need this weird _il_d/_il_r handling.

@trylek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Both errors you are seeing in the outerloop run should be fixed now by my and Michal's PR

#84268

I merged it in earlier today but after you triggered the outerloop runs.

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you all. @BruceForstall I will fold that into my next changes (to merge immediately since a new check and new tests are a race condition in the repo)

@markples
markples merged commit 735ddea into dotnet:mainApr 4, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 4, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issuestest-enhancementImprovements of test source code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Merged test groups - check behavior when a test with incorrect settings is added to a merged directory

4 participants

@markples@trylek@jkoritzinsky@BruceForstall
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add error check for skipped tests in merged groups - #84284

Merged
markples merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
markples:not-in-group
Apr 4, 2023
Merged

Add error check for skipped tests in merged groups#84284
markples merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
markples:not-in-group

Conversation

@markples

@markplesmarkples commented Apr 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If I test is written in the old style (with a Main and OutputType==Exe without an attribute such as RequiresProcessIsolation) in a merged test group directory, it will be skipped. This change adds a check to detect those cases.

I have struggled with ways to automatically set OutputType. Directory.Build.props is too early (the test project file will override it). Directory.Build.targets is too late as the C# targets files will already have been processed and set other variables based on the value of OutputType. This Target doesn't execute until later, but since it is an error it doesn't matter how those additional properties were set.

Since this adds more boilerplate to each merged test directory, I created a src/tests/Directory.Merged.props to share all of that.

This catches 3 tests that aren't currently executing.

Unrelated:

  • Use GetPathOfFileAbove in nearby locations for Directory.Build.props chaining rather than specific paths
  • Fix two easy IL warnings that appeared in my local build of all tests

Resolves#84182

@markplesmarkples added the test-enhancement Improvements of test source code label Apr 4, 2023
@markplesmarkples added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Apr 4, 2023
@markplesmarkples self-assigned this Apr 4, 2023
@ghostghost added the area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues label Apr 4, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Apr 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

If I test is written in the old style (with a Main and OutputType==Exe without an attribute such as RequiresProcessIsolation) in a merged test group directory, it will be skipped. This change adds a check to detect those cases.

I have struggled with ways to automatically set OutputType. Directory.Build.props is too early (the test project file will override it). Directory.Build.targets is too late as the C# targets files will already have been processed and set other variables based on the value of OutputType. This Target doesn't execute until later, but since it is an error it doesn't matter how those additional properties were set.

Since this adds more boilerplate to each merged test directory, I created a src/tests/Directory.Merged.props to share all of that.

This catches 3 tests that aren't currently executing.

Unrelated:

  • Use GetPathOfFileAbove in nearby locations for Directory.Build.props chaining rather than specific paths
  • Fix two easy IL warnings that appeared in my local build of all tests

Completes #84182

Author:markples
Assignees:markples
Labels:

test-enhancement, area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:8.0.0

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

PTAL @trylek@jkoritzinsky
cc @dotnet/jit-contrib - I think the process of going through this (D.B.props/targets, etc.) may help with fixing BuildAsStandalone

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-coreclr outerloop

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@trylektrylek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great to me, thanks Mark for cleaning this up and for fixing the previously overlooked cases!

<InMergedTestDirectory>true</InMergedTestDirectory>
<BuildAsStandalone Condition="'$(BuildAsStandalone)' == ''">false</BuildAsStandalone>

<AssemblyName Condition="'$(BuildAsStandalone)' != 'true'">$(MSBuildProjectName.Replace('_il_d', '').Replace('_il_r', ''))</AssemblyName>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO, it would be helpful to have some comments. Especially, to describe why we need this weird _il_d/_il_r handling.

@trylek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Both errors you are seeing in the outerloop run should be fixed now by my and Michal's PR

#84268

I merged it in earlier today but after you triggered the outerloop runs.

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you all. @BruceForstall I will fold that into my next changes (to merge immediately since a new check and new tests are a race condition in the repo)

@markples
markples merged commit 735ddea into dotnet:mainApr 4, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 4, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issuestest-enhancementImprovements of test source code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Merged test groups - check behavior when a test with incorrect settings is added to a merged directory

4 participants

@markples@trylek@jkoritzinsky@BruceForstall
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add error check for skipped tests in merged groups - #84284

Merged
markples merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
markples:not-in-group
Apr 4, 2023
Merged

Add error check for skipped tests in merged groups#84284
markples merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
markples:not-in-group

Conversation

@markples

@markplesmarkples commented Apr 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If I test is written in the old style (with a Main and OutputType==Exe without an attribute such as RequiresProcessIsolation) in a merged test group directory, it will be skipped. This change adds a check to detect those cases.

I have struggled with ways to automatically set OutputType. Directory.Build.props is too early (the test project file will override it). Directory.Build.targets is too late as the C# targets files will already have been processed and set other variables based on the value of OutputType. This Target doesn't execute until later, but since it is an error it doesn't matter how those additional properties were set.

Since this adds more boilerplate to each merged test directory, I created a src/tests/Directory.Merged.props to share all of that.

This catches 3 tests that aren't currently executing.

Unrelated:

  • Use GetPathOfFileAbove in nearby locations for Directory.Build.props chaining rather than specific paths
  • Fix two easy IL warnings that appeared in my local build of all tests

Resolves#84182

@markplesmarkples added the test-enhancement Improvements of test source code label Apr 4, 2023
@markplesmarkples added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Apr 4, 2023
@markplesmarkples self-assigned this Apr 4, 2023
@ghostghost added the area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues label Apr 4, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Apr 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

If I test is written in the old style (with a Main and OutputType==Exe without an attribute such as RequiresProcessIsolation) in a merged test group directory, it will be skipped. This change adds a check to detect those cases.

I have struggled with ways to automatically set OutputType. Directory.Build.props is too early (the test project file will override it). Directory.Build.targets is too late as the C# targets files will already have been processed and set other variables based on the value of OutputType. This Target doesn't execute until later, but since it is an error it doesn't matter how those additional properties were set.

Since this adds more boilerplate to each merged test directory, I created a src/tests/Directory.Merged.props to share all of that.

This catches 3 tests that aren't currently executing.

Unrelated:

  • Use GetPathOfFileAbove in nearby locations for Directory.Build.props chaining rather than specific paths
  • Fix two easy IL warnings that appeared in my local build of all tests

Completes #84182

Author:markples
Assignees:markples
Labels:

test-enhancement, area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:8.0.0

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

PTAL @trylek@jkoritzinsky
cc @dotnet/jit-contrib - I think the process of going through this (D.B.props/targets, etc.) may help with fixing BuildAsStandalone

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-coreclr outerloop

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@trylektrylek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great to me, thanks Mark for cleaning this up and for fixing the previously overlooked cases!

<InMergedTestDirectory>true</InMergedTestDirectory>
<BuildAsStandalone Condition="'$(BuildAsStandalone)' == ''">false</BuildAsStandalone>

<AssemblyName Condition="'$(BuildAsStandalone)' != 'true'">$(MSBuildProjectName.Replace('_il_d', '').Replace('_il_r', ''))</AssemblyName>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO, it would be helpful to have some comments. Especially, to describe why we need this weird _il_d/_il_r handling.

@trylek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Both errors you are seeing in the outerloop run should be fixed now by my and Michal's PR

#84268

I merged it in earlier today but after you triggered the outerloop runs.

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you all. @BruceForstall I will fold that into my next changes (to merge immediately since a new check and new tests are a race condition in the repo)

@markples
markples merged commit 735ddea into dotnet:mainApr 4, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 4, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issuestest-enhancementImprovements of test source code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Merged test groups - check behavior when a test with incorrect settings is added to a merged directory

4 participants

@markples@trylek@jkoritzinsky@BruceForstall
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Add error check for skipped tests in merged groups - #84284

Merged
markples merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
markples:not-in-group
Apr 4, 2023
Merged

Add error check for skipped tests in merged groups#84284
markples merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
markples:not-in-group

Conversation

@markples

@markplesmarkples commented Apr 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If I test is written in the old style (with a Main and OutputType==Exe without an attribute such as RequiresProcessIsolation) in a merged test group directory, it will be skipped. This change adds a check to detect those cases.

I have struggled with ways to automatically set OutputType. Directory.Build.props is too early (the test project file will override it). Directory.Build.targets is too late as the C# targets files will already have been processed and set other variables based on the value of OutputType. This Target doesn't execute until later, but since it is an error it doesn't matter how those additional properties were set.

Since this adds more boilerplate to each merged test directory, I created a src/tests/Directory.Merged.props to share all of that.

This catches 3 tests that aren't currently executing.

Unrelated:

  • Use GetPathOfFileAbove in nearby locations for Directory.Build.props chaining rather than specific paths
  • Fix two easy IL warnings that appeared in my local build of all tests

Resolves#84182

@markplesmarkples added the test-enhancement Improvements of test source code label Apr 4, 2023
@markplesmarkples added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Apr 4, 2023
@markplesmarkples self-assigned this Apr 4, 2023
@ghostghost added the area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues label Apr 4, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Apr 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

If I test is written in the old style (with a Main and OutputType==Exe without an attribute such as RequiresProcessIsolation) in a merged test group directory, it will be skipped. This change adds a check to detect those cases.

I have struggled with ways to automatically set OutputType. Directory.Build.props is too early (the test project file will override it). Directory.Build.targets is too late as the C# targets files will already have been processed and set other variables based on the value of OutputType. This Target doesn't execute until later, but since it is an error it doesn't matter how those additional properties were set.

Since this adds more boilerplate to each merged test directory, I created a src/tests/Directory.Merged.props to share all of that.

This catches 3 tests that aren't currently executing.

Unrelated:

  • Use GetPathOfFileAbove in nearby locations for Directory.Build.props chaining rather than specific paths
  • Fix two easy IL warnings that appeared in my local build of all tests

Completes #84182

Author:markples
Assignees:markples
Labels:

test-enhancement, area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:8.0.0

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

PTAL @trylek@jkoritzinsky
cc @dotnet/jit-contrib - I think the process of going through this (D.B.props/targets, etc.) may help with fixing BuildAsStandalone

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-coreclr outerloop

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@trylektrylek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great to me, thanks Mark for cleaning this up and for fixing the previously overlooked cases!

<InMergedTestDirectory>true</InMergedTestDirectory>
<BuildAsStandalone Condition="'$(BuildAsStandalone)' == ''">false</BuildAsStandalone>

<AssemblyName Condition="'$(BuildAsStandalone)' != 'true'">$(MSBuildProjectName.Replace('_il_d', '').Replace('_il_r', ''))</AssemblyName>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO, it would be helpful to have some comments. Especially, to describe why we need this weird _il_d/_il_r handling.

@trylek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Both errors you are seeing in the outerloop run should be fixed now by my and Michal's PR

#84268

I merged it in earlier today but after you triggered the outerloop runs.

@markples

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you all. @BruceForstall I will fold that into my next changes (to merge immediately since a new check and new tests are a race condition in the repo)

@markples
markples merged commit 735ddea into dotnet:mainApr 4, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 4, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issuestest-enhancementImprovements of test source code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Merged test groups - check behavior when a test with incorrect settings is added to a merged directory

4 participants

@markples@trylek@jkoritzinsky@BruceForstall