Skip to content

[release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417) - #84358

Merged
agocke merged 1 commit into
release/7.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging
May 15, 2023
Merged

[release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417)#84358
agocke merged 1 commit into
release/7.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Apr 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #84099 to release/7.0-staging

/cc @agocke

Customer Impact

This is a cleanup PR. I made this change for 6.0, but forgot to put it into 7.0, which was main at the time. That means that there's an appeared regression, such that the linker changes are in 6.0 and not 7.0. This can cause tooling which expects the data to become confused.

Testing

Existing CI.

Risk

Very low. Change already exists in main and in 6.0.

Fixup data can assist native debugging tools in providing more accurate data
(cherry picked from commit 4c814fa)
@ghostghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Apr 5, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agocke today's code complete for the May Servicing Release. Do you intend to get this included in that release?

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Probably won't get it in for May. That's fine.

@jeffhandleyjeffhandley added area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Apr 11, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #84099 to release/7.0-staging

/cc @agocke

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:-

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agocke how's this looking for June?

@agockeagocke added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label May 9, 2023

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. we can treat this as tell mode. once we have code reviewers, let's merge.

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels May 9, 2023
@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added this to the 7.0.7 milestone May 9, 2023
@agocke
agocke requested a review from jkoritzinskyMay 9, 2023 17:07

@jkoritzinskyjkoritzinsky left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Today is Code Complete for the June Release. @agocke if this is good to merge, please do the honors and smash that squash&merge button.

@agocke
agocke merged commit bf7c094 into release/7.0-stagingMay 15, 2023
@agocke
agocke deleted the backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging branch May 15, 2023 21:29
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 15, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issuesServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@carlossanlop@agocke@jkoritzinsky@jeffschwMSFT@hoyosjs@jeffhandley
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
[release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417) by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #84358 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417) - #84358

Merged
agocke merged 1 commit into
release/7.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging
May 15, 2023
Merged

[release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417)#84358
agocke merged 1 commit into
release/7.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Apr 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #84099 to release/7.0-staging

/cc @agocke

Customer Impact

This is a cleanup PR. I made this change for 6.0, but forgot to put it into 7.0, which was main at the time. That means that there's an appeared regression, such that the linker changes are in 6.0 and not 7.0. This can cause tooling which expects the data to become confused.

Testing

Existing CI.

Risk

Very low. Change already exists in main and in 6.0.

Fixup data can assist native debugging tools in providing more accurate data
(cherry picked from commit 4c814fa)
@ghostghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Apr 5, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agocke today's code complete for the May Servicing Release. Do you intend to get this included in that release?

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Probably won't get it in for May. That's fine.

@jeffhandleyjeffhandley added area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Apr 11, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #84099 to release/7.0-staging

/cc @agocke

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:-

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agocke how's this looking for June?

@agockeagocke added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label May 9, 2023

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. we can treat this as tell mode. once we have code reviewers, let's merge.

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels May 9, 2023
@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added this to the 7.0.7 milestone May 9, 2023
@agocke
agocke requested a review from jkoritzinskyMay 9, 2023 17:07

@jkoritzinskyjkoritzinsky left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Today is Code Complete for the June Release. @agocke if this is good to merge, please do the honors and smash that squash&merge button.

@agocke
agocke merged commit bf7c094 into release/7.0-stagingMay 15, 2023
@agocke
agocke deleted the backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging branch May 15, 2023 21:29
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 15, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issuesServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@carlossanlop@agocke@jkoritzinsky@jeffschwMSFT@hoyosjs@jeffhandley
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417) by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #84358 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417) - #84358

Merged
agocke merged 1 commit into
release/7.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging
May 15, 2023
Merged

[release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417)#84358
agocke merged 1 commit into
release/7.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Apr 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #84099 to release/7.0-staging

/cc @agocke

Customer Impact

This is a cleanup PR. I made this change for 6.0, but forgot to put it into 7.0, which was main at the time. That means that there's an appeared regression, such that the linker changes are in 6.0 and not 7.0. This can cause tooling which expects the data to become confused.

Testing

Existing CI.

Risk

Very low. Change already exists in main and in 6.0.

Fixup data can assist native debugging tools in providing more accurate data
(cherry picked from commit 4c814fa)
@ghostghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Apr 5, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agocke today's code complete for the May Servicing Release. Do you intend to get this included in that release?

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Probably won't get it in for May. That's fine.

@jeffhandleyjeffhandley added area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Apr 11, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #84099 to release/7.0-staging

/cc @agocke

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:-

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agocke how's this looking for June?

@agockeagocke added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label May 9, 2023

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. we can treat this as tell mode. once we have code reviewers, let's merge.

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels May 9, 2023
@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added this to the 7.0.7 milestone May 9, 2023
@agocke
agocke requested a review from jkoritzinskyMay 9, 2023 17:07

@jkoritzinskyjkoritzinsky left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Today is Code Complete for the June Release. @agocke if this is good to merge, please do the honors and smash that squash&merge button.

@agocke
agocke merged commit bf7c094 into release/7.0-stagingMay 15, 2023
@agocke
agocke deleted the backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging branch May 15, 2023 21:29
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 15, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issuesServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@carlossanlop@agocke@jkoritzinsky@jeffschwMSFT@hoyosjs@jeffhandley
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417) by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #84358 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417) - #84358

Merged
agocke merged 1 commit into
release/7.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging
May 15, 2023
Merged

[release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417)#84358
agocke merged 1 commit into
release/7.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Apr 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #84099 to release/7.0-staging

/cc @agocke

Customer Impact

This is a cleanup PR. I made this change for 6.0, but forgot to put it into 7.0, which was main at the time. That means that there's an appeared regression, such that the linker changes are in 6.0 and not 7.0. This can cause tooling which expects the data to become confused.

Testing

Existing CI.

Risk

Very low. Change already exists in main and in 6.0.

Fixup data can assist native debugging tools in providing more accurate data
(cherry picked from commit 4c814fa)
@ghostghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Apr 5, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agocke today's code complete for the May Servicing Release. Do you intend to get this included in that release?

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Probably won't get it in for May. That's fine.

@jeffhandleyjeffhandley added area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Apr 11, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #84099 to release/7.0-staging

/cc @agocke

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:-

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agocke how's this looking for June?

@agockeagocke added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label May 9, 2023

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. we can treat this as tell mode. once we have code reviewers, let's merge.

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels May 9, 2023
@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added this to the 7.0.7 milestone May 9, 2023
@agocke
agocke requested a review from jkoritzinskyMay 9, 2023 17:07

@jkoritzinskyjkoritzinsky left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Today is Code Complete for the June Release. @agocke if this is good to merge, please do the honors and smash that squash&merge button.

@agocke
agocke merged commit bf7c094 into release/7.0-stagingMay 15, 2023
@agocke
agocke deleted the backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging branch May 15, 2023 21:29
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 15, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issuesServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@carlossanlop@agocke@jkoritzinsky@jeffschwMSFT@hoyosjs@jeffhandley
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' [release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417) by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #84358 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417) - #84358

Merged
agocke merged 1 commit into
release/7.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging
May 15, 2023
Merged

[release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417)#84358
agocke merged 1 commit into
release/7.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Apr 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #84099 to release/7.0-staging

/cc @agocke

Customer Impact

This is a cleanup PR. I made this change for 6.0, but forgot to put it into 7.0, which was main at the time. That means that there's an appeared regression, such that the linker changes are in 6.0 and not 7.0. This can cause tooling which expects the data to become confused.

Testing

Existing CI.

Risk

Very low. Change already exists in main and in 6.0.

Fixup data can assist native debugging tools in providing more accurate data
(cherry picked from commit 4c814fa)
@ghostghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Apr 5, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agocke today's code complete for the May Servicing Release. Do you intend to get this included in that release?

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Probably won't get it in for May. That's fine.

@jeffhandleyjeffhandley added area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Apr 11, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #84099 to release/7.0-staging

/cc @agocke

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:-

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agocke how's this looking for June?

@agockeagocke added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label May 9, 2023

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. we can treat this as tell mode. once we have code reviewers, let's merge.

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels May 9, 2023
@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added this to the 7.0.7 milestone May 9, 2023
@agocke
agocke requested a review from jkoritzinskyMay 9, 2023 17:07

@jkoritzinskyjkoritzinsky left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Today is Code Complete for the June Release. @agocke if this is good to merge, please do the honors and smash that squash&merge button.

@agocke
agocke merged commit bf7c094 into release/7.0-stagingMay 15, 2023
@agocke
agocke deleted the backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging branch May 15, 2023 21:29
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 15, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issuesServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@carlossanlop@agocke@jkoritzinsky@jeffschwMSFT@hoyosjs@jeffhandley
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417) by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #84358 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417) - #84358

Merged
agocke merged 1 commit into
release/7.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging
May 15, 2023
Merged

[release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417)#84358
agocke merged 1 commit into
release/7.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Apr 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #84099 to release/7.0-staging

/cc @agocke

Customer Impact

This is a cleanup PR. I made this change for 6.0, but forgot to put it into 7.0, which was main at the time. That means that there's an appeared regression, such that the linker changes are in 6.0 and not 7.0. This can cause tooling which expects the data to become confused.

Testing

Existing CI.

Risk

Very low. Change already exists in main and in 6.0.

Fixup data can assist native debugging tools in providing more accurate data
(cherry picked from commit 4c814fa)
@ghostghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Apr 5, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agocke today's code complete for the May Servicing Release. Do you intend to get this included in that release?

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Probably won't get it in for May. That's fine.

@jeffhandleyjeffhandley added area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Apr 11, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #84099 to release/7.0-staging

/cc @agocke

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:-

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agocke how's this looking for June?

@agockeagocke added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label May 9, 2023

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. we can treat this as tell mode. once we have code reviewers, let's merge.

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels May 9, 2023
@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added this to the 7.0.7 milestone May 9, 2023
@agocke
agocke requested a review from jkoritzinskyMay 9, 2023 17:07

@jkoritzinskyjkoritzinsky left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Today is Code Complete for the June Release. @agocke if this is good to merge, please do the honors and smash that squash&merge button.

@agocke
agocke merged commit bf7c094 into release/7.0-stagingMay 15, 2023
@agocke
agocke deleted the backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging branch May 15, 2023 21:29
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 15, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issuesServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@carlossanlop@agocke@jkoritzinsky@jeffschwMSFT@hoyosjs@jeffhandley
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417) by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #84358 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417) - #84358

Merged
agocke merged 1 commit into
release/7.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging
May 15, 2023
Merged

[release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417)#84358
agocke merged 1 commit into
release/7.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Apr 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #84099 to release/7.0-staging

/cc @agocke

Customer Impact

This is a cleanup PR. I made this change for 6.0, but forgot to put it into 7.0, which was main at the time. That means that there's an appeared regression, such that the linker changes are in 6.0 and not 7.0. This can cause tooling which expects the data to become confused.

Testing

Existing CI.

Risk

Very low. Change already exists in main and in 6.0.

Fixup data can assist native debugging tools in providing more accurate data
(cherry picked from commit 4c814fa)
@ghostghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Apr 5, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agocke today's code complete for the May Servicing Release. Do you intend to get this included in that release?

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Probably won't get it in for May. That's fine.

@jeffhandleyjeffhandley added area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Apr 11, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #84099 to release/7.0-staging

/cc @agocke

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:-

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agocke how's this looking for June?

@agockeagocke added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label May 9, 2023

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. we can treat this as tell mode. once we have code reviewers, let's merge.

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels May 9, 2023
@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added this to the 7.0.7 milestone May 9, 2023
@agocke
agocke requested a review from jkoritzinskyMay 9, 2023 17:07

@jkoritzinskyjkoritzinsky left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Today is Code Complete for the June Release. @agocke if this is good to merge, please do the honors and smash that squash&merge button.

@agocke
agocke merged commit bf7c094 into release/7.0-stagingMay 15, 2023
@agocke
agocke deleted the backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging branch May 15, 2023 21:29
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 15, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issuesServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@carlossanlop@agocke@jkoritzinsky@jeffschwMSFT@hoyosjs@jeffhandley
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); [release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417) by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #84358 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417) - #84358

Merged
agocke merged 1 commit into
release/7.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging
May 15, 2023
Merged

[release/7.0-staging] Add linker flags to add fixup data to PDBs (#58417)#84358
agocke merged 1 commit into
release/7.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Apr 5, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #84099 to release/7.0-staging

/cc @agocke

Customer Impact

This is a cleanup PR. I made this change for 6.0, but forgot to put it into 7.0, which was main at the time. That means that there's an appeared regression, such that the linker changes are in 6.0 and not 7.0. This can cause tooling which expects the data to become confused.

Testing

Existing CI.

Risk

Very low. Change already exists in main and in 6.0.

Fixup data can assist native debugging tools in providing more accurate data
(cherry picked from commit 4c814fa)
@ghostghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Apr 5, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agocke today's code complete for the May Servicing Release. Do you intend to get this included in that release?

@agocke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Probably won't get it in for May. That's fine.

@jeffhandleyjeffhandley added area-Infrastructure-coreclr Only use for closed issues and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Apr 11, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #84099 to release/7.0-staging

/cc @agocke

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-coreclr

Milestone:-

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agocke how's this looking for June?

@agockeagocke added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label May 9, 2023

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. we can treat this as tell mode. once we have code reviewers, let's merge.

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels May 9, 2023
@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added this to the 7.0.7 milestone May 9, 2023
@agocke
agocke requested a review from jkoritzinskyMay 9, 2023 17:07

@jkoritzinskyjkoritzinsky left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Today is Code Complete for the June Release. @agocke if this is good to merge, please do the honors and smash that squash&merge button.

@agocke
agocke merged commit bf7c094 into release/7.0-stagingMay 15, 2023
@agocke
agocke deleted the backport/pr-84099-to-release/7.0-staging branch May 15, 2023 21:29
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 15, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Infrastructure-coreclrOnly use for closed issuesServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@carlossanlop@agocke@jkoritzinsky@jeffschwMSFT@hoyosjs@jeffhandley