Fix official build after removing win-arm runtime build - #86074

Merged
BruceForstall merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BruceForstall:FixOfficialBuild
May 11, 2023
Merged

Fix official build after removing win-arm runtime build#86074
BruceForstall merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BruceForstall:FixOfficialBuild

Conversation

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

win-arm CI builds were removed with #85947

Hopefully fixes#86073

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I don't know how the mono stuff works, but this removes obvious references to win-arm.

There are a few more in:

Microsoft.NET.Workload.Mono.Toolchain.net6.Manifest\WorkloadManifest.json.in
Microsoft.NET.Workload.Mono.Toolchain.net7.Manifest\WorkloadManifest.json.in

but it makes me nervous to touch something that on the surface appears to be related to servicing.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @directhex
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

win-arm CI builds were removed with #85947

Hopefully fixes #86073

Author:BruceForstall
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-mono

Milestone:-

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Btw, I'm not sure how to test the official build, except to merge and wait. Since it's currently broken, maybe that's the right strategy?

Suggestions?

@sbomersbomer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - at least it's what I would have tried. Would still be good to get mono folks to review. Thanks!

@BruceForstall
BruceForstall merged commit a951e99 into dotnet:mainMay 11, 2023
@BruceForstall
BruceForstall deleted the FixOfficialBuild branch May 11, 2023 04:41
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 10, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Official build fails due to missing windows_arm job

3 participants

@BruceForstall@sbomer@hoyosjs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Fix official build after removing win-arm runtime build - #86074

Merged
BruceForstall merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BruceForstall:FixOfficialBuild
May 11, 2023
Merged

Fix official build after removing win-arm runtime build#86074
BruceForstall merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BruceForstall:FixOfficialBuild

Conversation

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

win-arm CI builds were removed with #85947

Hopefully fixes#86073

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I don't know how the mono stuff works, but this removes obvious references to win-arm.

There are a few more in:

Microsoft.NET.Workload.Mono.Toolchain.net6.Manifest\WorkloadManifest.json.in
Microsoft.NET.Workload.Mono.Toolchain.net7.Manifest\WorkloadManifest.json.in

but it makes me nervous to touch something that on the surface appears to be related to servicing.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @directhex
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

win-arm CI builds were removed with #85947

Hopefully fixes #86073

Author:BruceForstall
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-mono

Milestone:-

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Btw, I'm not sure how to test the official build, except to merge and wait. Since it's currently broken, maybe that's the right strategy?

Suggestions?

@sbomersbomer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - at least it's what I would have tried. Would still be good to get mono folks to review. Thanks!

@BruceForstall
BruceForstall merged commit a951e99 into dotnet:mainMay 11, 2023
@BruceForstall
BruceForstall deleted the FixOfficialBuild branch May 11, 2023 04:41
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 10, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Official build fails due to missing windows_arm job

3 participants

@BruceForstall@sbomer@hoyosjs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix official build after removing win-arm runtime build - #86074

Merged
BruceForstall merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BruceForstall:FixOfficialBuild
May 11, 2023
Merged

Fix official build after removing win-arm runtime build#86074
BruceForstall merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BruceForstall:FixOfficialBuild

Conversation

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

win-arm CI builds were removed with #85947

Hopefully fixes#86073

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I don't know how the mono stuff works, but this removes obvious references to win-arm.

There are a few more in:

Microsoft.NET.Workload.Mono.Toolchain.net6.Manifest\WorkloadManifest.json.in
Microsoft.NET.Workload.Mono.Toolchain.net7.Manifest\WorkloadManifest.json.in

but it makes me nervous to touch something that on the surface appears to be related to servicing.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @directhex
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

win-arm CI builds were removed with #85947

Hopefully fixes #86073

Author:BruceForstall
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-mono

Milestone:-

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Btw, I'm not sure how to test the official build, except to merge and wait. Since it's currently broken, maybe that's the right strategy?

Suggestions?

@sbomersbomer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - at least it's what I would have tried. Would still be good to get mono folks to review. Thanks!

@BruceForstall
BruceForstall merged commit a951e99 into dotnet:mainMay 11, 2023
@BruceForstall
BruceForstall deleted the FixOfficialBuild branch May 11, 2023 04:41
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 10, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Official build fails due to missing windows_arm job

3 participants

@BruceForstall@sbomer@hoyosjs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix official build after removing win-arm runtime build - #86074

Merged
BruceForstall merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BruceForstall:FixOfficialBuild
May 11, 2023
Merged

Fix official build after removing win-arm runtime build#86074
BruceForstall merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BruceForstall:FixOfficialBuild

Conversation

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

win-arm CI builds were removed with #85947

Hopefully fixes#86073

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I don't know how the mono stuff works, but this removes obvious references to win-arm.

There are a few more in:

Microsoft.NET.Workload.Mono.Toolchain.net6.Manifest\WorkloadManifest.json.in
Microsoft.NET.Workload.Mono.Toolchain.net7.Manifest\WorkloadManifest.json.in

but it makes me nervous to touch something that on the surface appears to be related to servicing.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @directhex
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

win-arm CI builds were removed with #85947

Hopefully fixes #86073

Author:BruceForstall
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-mono

Milestone:-

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Btw, I'm not sure how to test the official build, except to merge and wait. Since it's currently broken, maybe that's the right strategy?

Suggestions?

@sbomersbomer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - at least it's what I would have tried. Would still be good to get mono folks to review. Thanks!

@BruceForstall
BruceForstall merged commit a951e99 into dotnet:mainMay 11, 2023
@BruceForstall
BruceForstall deleted the FixOfficialBuild branch May 11, 2023 04:41
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 10, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Official build fails due to missing windows_arm job

3 participants

@BruceForstall@sbomer@hoyosjs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Fix official build after removing win-arm runtime build - #86074

Merged
BruceForstall merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BruceForstall:FixOfficialBuild
May 11, 2023
Merged

Fix official build after removing win-arm runtime build#86074
BruceForstall merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BruceForstall:FixOfficialBuild

Conversation

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

win-arm CI builds were removed with #85947

Hopefully fixes#86073

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I don't know how the mono stuff works, but this removes obvious references to win-arm.

There are a few more in:

Microsoft.NET.Workload.Mono.Toolchain.net6.Manifest\WorkloadManifest.json.in
Microsoft.NET.Workload.Mono.Toolchain.net7.Manifest\WorkloadManifest.json.in

but it makes me nervous to touch something that on the surface appears to be related to servicing.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @directhex
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

win-arm CI builds were removed with #85947

Hopefully fixes #86073

Author:BruceForstall
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-mono

Milestone:-

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Btw, I'm not sure how to test the official build, except to merge and wait. Since it's currently broken, maybe that's the right strategy?

Suggestions?

@sbomersbomer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - at least it's what I would have tried. Would still be good to get mono folks to review. Thanks!

@BruceForstall
BruceForstall merged commit a951e99 into dotnet:mainMay 11, 2023
@BruceForstall
BruceForstall deleted the FixOfficialBuild branch May 11, 2023 04:41
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 10, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Official build fails due to missing windows_arm job

3 participants

@BruceForstall@sbomer@hoyosjs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix official build after removing win-arm runtime build - #86074

Merged
BruceForstall merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BruceForstall:FixOfficialBuild
May 11, 2023
Merged

Fix official build after removing win-arm runtime build#86074
BruceForstall merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BruceForstall:FixOfficialBuild

Conversation

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

win-arm CI builds were removed with #85947

Hopefully fixes#86073

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I don't know how the mono stuff works, but this removes obvious references to win-arm.

There are a few more in:

Microsoft.NET.Workload.Mono.Toolchain.net6.Manifest\WorkloadManifest.json.in
Microsoft.NET.Workload.Mono.Toolchain.net7.Manifest\WorkloadManifest.json.in

but it makes me nervous to touch something that on the surface appears to be related to servicing.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @directhex
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

win-arm CI builds were removed with #85947

Hopefully fixes #86073

Author:BruceForstall
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-mono

Milestone:-

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Btw, I'm not sure how to test the official build, except to merge and wait. Since it's currently broken, maybe that's the right strategy?

Suggestions?

@sbomersbomer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - at least it's what I would have tried. Would still be good to get mono folks to review. Thanks!

@BruceForstall
BruceForstall merged commit a951e99 into dotnet:mainMay 11, 2023
@BruceForstall
BruceForstall deleted the FixOfficialBuild branch May 11, 2023 04:41
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 10, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Official build fails due to missing windows_arm job

3 participants

@BruceForstall@sbomer@hoyosjs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix official build after removing win-arm runtime build - #86074

Merged
BruceForstall merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BruceForstall:FixOfficialBuild
May 11, 2023
Merged

Fix official build after removing win-arm runtime build#86074
BruceForstall merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BruceForstall:FixOfficialBuild

Conversation

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

win-arm CI builds were removed with #85947

Hopefully fixes#86073

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I don't know how the mono stuff works, but this removes obvious references to win-arm.

There are a few more in:

Microsoft.NET.Workload.Mono.Toolchain.net6.Manifest\WorkloadManifest.json.in
Microsoft.NET.Workload.Mono.Toolchain.net7.Manifest\WorkloadManifest.json.in

but it makes me nervous to touch something that on the surface appears to be related to servicing.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @directhex
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

win-arm CI builds were removed with #85947

Hopefully fixes #86073

Author:BruceForstall
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-mono

Milestone:-

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Btw, I'm not sure how to test the official build, except to merge and wait. Since it's currently broken, maybe that's the right strategy?

Suggestions?

@sbomersbomer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - at least it's what I would have tried. Would still be good to get mono folks to review. Thanks!

@BruceForstall
BruceForstall merged commit a951e99 into dotnet:mainMay 11, 2023
@BruceForstall
BruceForstall deleted the FixOfficialBuild branch May 11, 2023 04:41
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 10, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Official build fails due to missing windows_arm job

3 participants

@BruceForstall@sbomer@hoyosjs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Fix official build after removing win-arm runtime build - #86074

Merged
BruceForstall merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BruceForstall:FixOfficialBuild
May 11, 2023
Merged

Fix official build after removing win-arm runtime build#86074
BruceForstall merged 1 commit into
dotnet:mainfrom
BruceForstall:FixOfficialBuild

Conversation

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

win-arm CI builds were removed with #85947

Hopefully fixes#86073

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I don't know how the mono stuff works, but this removes obvious references to win-arm.

There are a few more in:

Microsoft.NET.Workload.Mono.Toolchain.net6.Manifest\WorkloadManifest.json.in
Microsoft.NET.Workload.Mono.Toolchain.net7.Manifest\WorkloadManifest.json.in

but it makes me nervous to touch something that on the surface appears to be related to servicing.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @directhex
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

win-arm CI builds were removed with #85947

Hopefully fixes #86073

Author:BruceForstall
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Infrastructure-mono

Milestone:-

@BruceForstall

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Btw, I'm not sure how to test the official build, except to merge and wait. Since it's currently broken, maybe that's the right strategy?

Suggestions?

@sbomersbomer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - at least it's what I would have tried. Would still be good to get mono folks to review. Thanks!

@BruceForstall
BruceForstall merged commit a951e99 into dotnet:mainMay 11, 2023
@BruceForstall
BruceForstall deleted the FixOfficialBuild branch May 11, 2023 04:41
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 10, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Official build fails due to missing windows_arm job

3 participants

@BruceForstall@sbomer@hoyosjs