Skip to content

Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets - #87108

Merged
MihaZupan merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rhirano0715:issue47472
Aug 9, 2023
Merged

Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets#87108
MihaZupan merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rhirano0715:issue47472

Conversation

@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP. The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.

With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.

Fix#47472

…less sockets
The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP.
The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.
With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.
Fix#47472
@ghostghost added area-System.Net.Sockets community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member labels Jun 4, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Jun 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP. The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.

With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.

Fix #47472

Author:rhirano0715
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Net.Sockets

Milestone:-

@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@dotnet-policy-service agree

@karelz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@antonfirsov ping, can you please take a look?

@antonfirsovantonfirsov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the long delay!

Comment on lines +2341 to +2344
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given that BeginSendFile calls into SendFileAsync, this check is redundant.

if (usePreAndPostbufferOverload)
{
ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<SocketException>(() => SendFileAsync(client, tempFile.Path, Array.Empty<byte>(), Array.Empty<byte>(), TransmitFileOptions.UseDefaultWorkerThread));
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<NotSupportedException>(() => SendFileAsync(client, tempFile.Path, Array.Empty<byte>(), Array.Empty<byte>(), TransmitFileOptions.UseDefaultWorkerThread));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test case should not be [PlatformSpecific(TestPlatforms.Windows)] anymore.

Comment on lines +673 to +676
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

@antonfirsovantonfirsovJul 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't the check if (!IsConnectionOriented) do the job already? In #47472 I only tested the sync overload.

Comment on lines +1257 to +1260
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The async variant checks for if (!IsConnectionOriented) while the sync version checks (!Connected). I think that - instead of limiting the error case explicitly to UDP - we should consolidate these checks, throwing in case of (!IsConnectionOriented || !Connected).

@karelz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rhirano0715 will you have time to look at the CR feedback from @antonfirsov please?

rhirano0715and others added 3 commits July 19, 2023 18:06
…r `!Connected`.
Before:.
Throws `NotSupportedException` on UDP.
After:
Throws `NotSupportedException` if `!IsConnectionOriented` or `!Connected`.
@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@karelz@antonfirsov
I'm sorry for not being able to respond.
Thank you for your review.
I have committed the correction.

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Sockets/src/System/Net/Sockets/Socket.Tasks.cs Outdated
….Tasks.cs
Co-authored-by: Karel Zikmund <karelz@microsoft.com>
@antonfirsovantonfirsov added the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Aug 4, 2023
@antonfirsov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run runtime

@antonfirsov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

1 similar comment
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@antonfirsovantonfirsov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks, and sorry for the slow response. Started some extra CI runs just in case.

@MihaZupan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@MihaZupan
MihaZupan merged commit 24f1513 into dotnet:mainAug 9, 2023
@karelzkarelz added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Aug 10, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 9, 2023
@antonfirsovantonfirsov removed the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 17, 2023
@rhirano0715
rhirano0715 deleted the issue47472 branch December 6, 2023 08:21
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Net.Socketscommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Socket.SendFile() should fail with a consistent exception for connectionless sockets

4 participants

@rhirano0715@karelz@antonfirsov@MihaZupan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets by rhirano0715 · Pull Request #87108 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets - #87108

Merged
MihaZupan merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rhirano0715:issue47472
Aug 9, 2023
Merged

Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets#87108
MihaZupan merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rhirano0715:issue47472

Conversation

@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP. The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.

With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.

Fix#47472

…less sockets
The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP.
The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.
With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.
Fix#47472
@ghostghost added area-System.Net.Sockets community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member labels Jun 4, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Jun 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP. The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.

With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.

Fix #47472

Author:rhirano0715
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Net.Sockets

Milestone:-

@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@dotnet-policy-service agree

@karelz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@antonfirsov ping, can you please take a look?

@antonfirsovantonfirsov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the long delay!

Comment on lines +2341 to +2344
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given that BeginSendFile calls into SendFileAsync, this check is redundant.

if (usePreAndPostbufferOverload)
{
ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<SocketException>(() => SendFileAsync(client, tempFile.Path, Array.Empty<byte>(), Array.Empty<byte>(), TransmitFileOptions.UseDefaultWorkerThread));
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<NotSupportedException>(() => SendFileAsync(client, tempFile.Path, Array.Empty<byte>(), Array.Empty<byte>(), TransmitFileOptions.UseDefaultWorkerThread));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test case should not be [PlatformSpecific(TestPlatforms.Windows)] anymore.

Comment on lines +673 to +676
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

@antonfirsovantonfirsovJul 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't the check if (!IsConnectionOriented) do the job already? In #47472 I only tested the sync overload.

Comment on lines +1257 to +1260
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The async variant checks for if (!IsConnectionOriented) while the sync version checks (!Connected). I think that - instead of limiting the error case explicitly to UDP - we should consolidate these checks, throwing in case of (!IsConnectionOriented || !Connected).

@karelz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rhirano0715 will you have time to look at the CR feedback from @antonfirsov please?

rhirano0715and others added 3 commits July 19, 2023 18:06
…r `!Connected`.
Before:.
Throws `NotSupportedException` on UDP.
After:
Throws `NotSupportedException` if `!IsConnectionOriented` or `!Connected`.
@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@karelz@antonfirsov
I'm sorry for not being able to respond.
Thank you for your review.
I have committed the correction.

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Sockets/src/System/Net/Sockets/Socket.Tasks.cs Outdated
….Tasks.cs
Co-authored-by: Karel Zikmund <karelz@microsoft.com>
@antonfirsovantonfirsov added the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Aug 4, 2023
@antonfirsov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run runtime

@antonfirsov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

1 similar comment
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@antonfirsovantonfirsov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks, and sorry for the slow response. Started some extra CI runs just in case.

@MihaZupan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@MihaZupan
MihaZupan merged commit 24f1513 into dotnet:mainAug 9, 2023
@karelzkarelz added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Aug 10, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 9, 2023
@antonfirsovantonfirsov removed the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 17, 2023
@rhirano0715
rhirano0715 deleted the issue47472 branch December 6, 2023 08:21
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Net.Socketscommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Socket.SendFile() should fail with a consistent exception for connectionless sockets

4 participants

@rhirano0715@karelz@antonfirsov@MihaZupan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets by rhirano0715 · Pull Request #87108 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets - #87108

Merged
MihaZupan merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rhirano0715:issue47472
Aug 9, 2023
Merged

Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets#87108
MihaZupan merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rhirano0715:issue47472

Conversation

@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP. The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.

With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.

Fix#47472

…less sockets
The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP.
The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.
With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.
Fix#47472
@ghostghost added area-System.Net.Sockets community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member labels Jun 4, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Jun 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP. The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.

With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.

Fix #47472

Author:rhirano0715
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Net.Sockets

Milestone:-

@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@dotnet-policy-service agree

@karelz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@antonfirsov ping, can you please take a look?

@antonfirsovantonfirsov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the long delay!

Comment on lines +2341 to +2344
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given that BeginSendFile calls into SendFileAsync, this check is redundant.

if (usePreAndPostbufferOverload)
{
ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<SocketException>(() => SendFileAsync(client, tempFile.Path, Array.Empty<byte>(), Array.Empty<byte>(), TransmitFileOptions.UseDefaultWorkerThread));
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<NotSupportedException>(() => SendFileAsync(client, tempFile.Path, Array.Empty<byte>(), Array.Empty<byte>(), TransmitFileOptions.UseDefaultWorkerThread));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test case should not be [PlatformSpecific(TestPlatforms.Windows)] anymore.

Comment on lines +673 to +676
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

@antonfirsovantonfirsovJul 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't the check if (!IsConnectionOriented) do the job already? In #47472 I only tested the sync overload.

Comment on lines +1257 to +1260
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The async variant checks for if (!IsConnectionOriented) while the sync version checks (!Connected). I think that - instead of limiting the error case explicitly to UDP - we should consolidate these checks, throwing in case of (!IsConnectionOriented || !Connected).

@karelz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rhirano0715 will you have time to look at the CR feedback from @antonfirsov please?

rhirano0715and others added 3 commits July 19, 2023 18:06
…r `!Connected`.
Before:.
Throws `NotSupportedException` on UDP.
After:
Throws `NotSupportedException` if `!IsConnectionOriented` or `!Connected`.
@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@karelz@antonfirsov
I'm sorry for not being able to respond.
Thank you for your review.
I have committed the correction.

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Sockets/src/System/Net/Sockets/Socket.Tasks.cs Outdated
….Tasks.cs
Co-authored-by: Karel Zikmund <karelz@microsoft.com>
@antonfirsovantonfirsov added the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Aug 4, 2023
@antonfirsov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run runtime

@antonfirsov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

1 similar comment
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@antonfirsovantonfirsov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks, and sorry for the slow response. Started some extra CI runs just in case.

@MihaZupan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@MihaZupan
MihaZupan merged commit 24f1513 into dotnet:mainAug 9, 2023
@karelzkarelz added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Aug 10, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 9, 2023
@antonfirsovantonfirsov removed the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 17, 2023
@rhirano0715
rhirano0715 deleted the issue47472 branch December 6, 2023 08:21
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Net.Socketscommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Socket.SendFile() should fail with a consistent exception for connectionless sockets

4 participants

@rhirano0715@karelz@antonfirsov@MihaZupan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets by rhirano0715 · Pull Request #87108 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets - #87108

Merged
MihaZupan merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rhirano0715:issue47472
Aug 9, 2023
Merged

Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets#87108
MihaZupan merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rhirano0715:issue47472

Conversation

@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP. The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.

With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.

Fix#47472

…less sockets
The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP.
The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.
With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.
Fix#47472
@ghostghost added area-System.Net.Sockets community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member labels Jun 4, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Jun 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP. The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.

With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.

Fix #47472

Author:rhirano0715
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Net.Sockets

Milestone:-

@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@dotnet-policy-service agree

@karelz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@antonfirsov ping, can you please take a look?

@antonfirsovantonfirsov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the long delay!

Comment on lines +2341 to +2344
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given that BeginSendFile calls into SendFileAsync, this check is redundant.

if (usePreAndPostbufferOverload)
{
ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<SocketException>(() => SendFileAsync(client, tempFile.Path, Array.Empty<byte>(), Array.Empty<byte>(), TransmitFileOptions.UseDefaultWorkerThread));
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<NotSupportedException>(() => SendFileAsync(client, tempFile.Path, Array.Empty<byte>(), Array.Empty<byte>(), TransmitFileOptions.UseDefaultWorkerThread));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test case should not be [PlatformSpecific(TestPlatforms.Windows)] anymore.

Comment on lines +673 to +676
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

@antonfirsovantonfirsovJul 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't the check if (!IsConnectionOriented) do the job already? In #47472 I only tested the sync overload.

Comment on lines +1257 to +1260
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The async variant checks for if (!IsConnectionOriented) while the sync version checks (!Connected). I think that - instead of limiting the error case explicitly to UDP - we should consolidate these checks, throwing in case of (!IsConnectionOriented || !Connected).

@karelz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rhirano0715 will you have time to look at the CR feedback from @antonfirsov please?

rhirano0715and others added 3 commits July 19, 2023 18:06
…r `!Connected`.
Before:.
Throws `NotSupportedException` on UDP.
After:
Throws `NotSupportedException` if `!IsConnectionOriented` or `!Connected`.
@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@karelz@antonfirsov
I'm sorry for not being able to respond.
Thank you for your review.
I have committed the correction.

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Sockets/src/System/Net/Sockets/Socket.Tasks.cs Outdated
….Tasks.cs
Co-authored-by: Karel Zikmund <karelz@microsoft.com>
@antonfirsovantonfirsov added the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Aug 4, 2023
@antonfirsov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run runtime

@antonfirsov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

1 similar comment
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@antonfirsovantonfirsov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks, and sorry for the slow response. Started some extra CI runs just in case.

@MihaZupan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@MihaZupan
MihaZupan merged commit 24f1513 into dotnet:mainAug 9, 2023
@karelzkarelz added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Aug 10, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 9, 2023
@antonfirsovantonfirsov removed the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 17, 2023
@rhirano0715
rhirano0715 deleted the issue47472 branch December 6, 2023 08:21
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Net.Socketscommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Socket.SendFile() should fail with a consistent exception for connectionless sockets

4 participants

@rhirano0715@karelz@antonfirsov@MihaZupan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets by rhirano0715 · Pull Request #87108 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets - #87108

Merged
MihaZupan merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rhirano0715:issue47472
Aug 9, 2023
Merged

Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets#87108
MihaZupan merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rhirano0715:issue47472

Conversation

@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP. The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.

With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.

Fix#47472

…less sockets
The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP.
The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.
With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.
Fix#47472
@ghostghost added area-System.Net.Sockets community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member labels Jun 4, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Jun 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP. The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.

With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.

Fix #47472

Author:rhirano0715
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Net.Sockets

Milestone:-

@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@dotnet-policy-service agree

@karelz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@antonfirsov ping, can you please take a look?

@antonfirsovantonfirsov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the long delay!

Comment on lines +2341 to +2344
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given that BeginSendFile calls into SendFileAsync, this check is redundant.

if (usePreAndPostbufferOverload)
{
ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<SocketException>(() => SendFileAsync(client, tempFile.Path, Array.Empty<byte>(), Array.Empty<byte>(), TransmitFileOptions.UseDefaultWorkerThread));
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<NotSupportedException>(() => SendFileAsync(client, tempFile.Path, Array.Empty<byte>(), Array.Empty<byte>(), TransmitFileOptions.UseDefaultWorkerThread));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test case should not be [PlatformSpecific(TestPlatforms.Windows)] anymore.

Comment on lines +673 to +676
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

@antonfirsovantonfirsovJul 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't the check if (!IsConnectionOriented) do the job already? In #47472 I only tested the sync overload.

Comment on lines +1257 to +1260
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The async variant checks for if (!IsConnectionOriented) while the sync version checks (!Connected). I think that - instead of limiting the error case explicitly to UDP - we should consolidate these checks, throwing in case of (!IsConnectionOriented || !Connected).

@karelz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rhirano0715 will you have time to look at the CR feedback from @antonfirsov please?

rhirano0715and others added 3 commits July 19, 2023 18:06
…r `!Connected`.
Before:.
Throws `NotSupportedException` on UDP.
After:
Throws `NotSupportedException` if `!IsConnectionOriented` or `!Connected`.
@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@karelz@antonfirsov
I'm sorry for not being able to respond.
Thank you for your review.
I have committed the correction.

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Sockets/src/System/Net/Sockets/Socket.Tasks.cs Outdated
….Tasks.cs
Co-authored-by: Karel Zikmund <karelz@microsoft.com>
@antonfirsovantonfirsov added the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Aug 4, 2023
@antonfirsov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run runtime

@antonfirsov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

1 similar comment
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@antonfirsovantonfirsov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks, and sorry for the slow response. Started some extra CI runs just in case.

@MihaZupan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@MihaZupan
MihaZupan merged commit 24f1513 into dotnet:mainAug 9, 2023
@karelzkarelz added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Aug 10, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 9, 2023
@antonfirsovantonfirsov removed the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 17, 2023
@rhirano0715
rhirano0715 deleted the issue47472 branch December 6, 2023 08:21
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Net.Socketscommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Socket.SendFile() should fail with a consistent exception for connectionless sockets

4 participants

@rhirano0715@karelz@antonfirsov@MihaZupan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets by rhirano0715 · Pull Request #87108 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets - #87108

Merged
MihaZupan merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rhirano0715:issue47472
Aug 9, 2023
Merged

Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets#87108
MihaZupan merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rhirano0715:issue47472

Conversation

@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP. The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.

With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.

Fix#47472

…less sockets
The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP.
The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.
With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.
Fix#47472
@ghostghost added area-System.Net.Sockets community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member labels Jun 4, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Jun 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP. The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.

With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.

Fix #47472

Author:rhirano0715
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Net.Sockets

Milestone:-

@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@dotnet-policy-service agree

@karelz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@antonfirsov ping, can you please take a look?

@antonfirsovantonfirsov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the long delay!

Comment on lines +2341 to +2344
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given that BeginSendFile calls into SendFileAsync, this check is redundant.

if (usePreAndPostbufferOverload)
{
ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<SocketException>(() => SendFileAsync(client, tempFile.Path, Array.Empty<byte>(), Array.Empty<byte>(), TransmitFileOptions.UseDefaultWorkerThread));
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<NotSupportedException>(() => SendFileAsync(client, tempFile.Path, Array.Empty<byte>(), Array.Empty<byte>(), TransmitFileOptions.UseDefaultWorkerThread));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test case should not be [PlatformSpecific(TestPlatforms.Windows)] anymore.

Comment on lines +673 to +676
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

@antonfirsovantonfirsovJul 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't the check if (!IsConnectionOriented) do the job already? In #47472 I only tested the sync overload.

Comment on lines +1257 to +1260
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The async variant checks for if (!IsConnectionOriented) while the sync version checks (!Connected). I think that - instead of limiting the error case explicitly to UDP - we should consolidate these checks, throwing in case of (!IsConnectionOriented || !Connected).

@karelz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rhirano0715 will you have time to look at the CR feedback from @antonfirsov please?

rhirano0715and others added 3 commits July 19, 2023 18:06
…r `!Connected`.
Before:.
Throws `NotSupportedException` on UDP.
After:
Throws `NotSupportedException` if `!IsConnectionOriented` or `!Connected`.
@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@karelz@antonfirsov
I'm sorry for not being able to respond.
Thank you for your review.
I have committed the correction.

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Sockets/src/System/Net/Sockets/Socket.Tasks.cs Outdated
….Tasks.cs
Co-authored-by: Karel Zikmund <karelz@microsoft.com>
@antonfirsovantonfirsov added the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Aug 4, 2023
@antonfirsov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run runtime

@antonfirsov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

1 similar comment
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@antonfirsovantonfirsov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks, and sorry for the slow response. Started some extra CI runs just in case.

@MihaZupan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@MihaZupan
MihaZupan merged commit 24f1513 into dotnet:mainAug 9, 2023
@karelzkarelz added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Aug 10, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 9, 2023
@antonfirsovantonfirsov removed the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 17, 2023
@rhirano0715
rhirano0715 deleted the issue47472 branch December 6, 2023 08:21
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Net.Socketscommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Socket.SendFile() should fail with a consistent exception for connectionless sockets

4 participants

@rhirano0715@karelz@antonfirsov@MihaZupan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets by rhirano0715 · Pull Request #87108 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets - #87108

Merged
MihaZupan merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rhirano0715:issue47472
Aug 9, 2023
Merged

Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets#87108
MihaZupan merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rhirano0715:issue47472

Conversation

@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP. The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.

With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.

Fix#47472

…less sockets
The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP.
The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.
With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.
Fix#47472
@ghostghost added area-System.Net.Sockets community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member labels Jun 4, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Jun 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP. The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.

With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.

Fix #47472

Author:rhirano0715
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Net.Sockets

Milestone:-

@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@dotnet-policy-service agree

@karelz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@antonfirsov ping, can you please take a look?

@antonfirsovantonfirsov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the long delay!

Comment on lines +2341 to +2344
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given that BeginSendFile calls into SendFileAsync, this check is redundant.

if (usePreAndPostbufferOverload)
{
ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<SocketException>(() => SendFileAsync(client, tempFile.Path, Array.Empty<byte>(), Array.Empty<byte>(), TransmitFileOptions.UseDefaultWorkerThread));
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<NotSupportedException>(() => SendFileAsync(client, tempFile.Path, Array.Empty<byte>(), Array.Empty<byte>(), TransmitFileOptions.UseDefaultWorkerThread));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test case should not be [PlatformSpecific(TestPlatforms.Windows)] anymore.

Comment on lines +673 to +676
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

@antonfirsovantonfirsovJul 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't the check if (!IsConnectionOriented) do the job already? In #47472 I only tested the sync overload.

Comment on lines +1257 to +1260
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The async variant checks for if (!IsConnectionOriented) while the sync version checks (!Connected). I think that - instead of limiting the error case explicitly to UDP - we should consolidate these checks, throwing in case of (!IsConnectionOriented || !Connected).

@karelz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rhirano0715 will you have time to look at the CR feedback from @antonfirsov please?

rhirano0715and others added 3 commits July 19, 2023 18:06
…r `!Connected`.
Before:.
Throws `NotSupportedException` on UDP.
After:
Throws `NotSupportedException` if `!IsConnectionOriented` or `!Connected`.
@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@karelz@antonfirsov
I'm sorry for not being able to respond.
Thank you for your review.
I have committed the correction.

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Sockets/src/System/Net/Sockets/Socket.Tasks.cs Outdated
….Tasks.cs
Co-authored-by: Karel Zikmund <karelz@microsoft.com>
@antonfirsovantonfirsov added the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Aug 4, 2023
@antonfirsov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run runtime

@antonfirsov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

1 similar comment
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@antonfirsovantonfirsov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks, and sorry for the slow response. Started some extra CI runs just in case.

@MihaZupan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@MihaZupan
MihaZupan merged commit 24f1513 into dotnet:mainAug 9, 2023
@karelzkarelz added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Aug 10, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 9, 2023
@antonfirsovantonfirsov removed the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 17, 2023
@rhirano0715
rhirano0715 deleted the issue47472 branch December 6, 2023 08:21
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Net.Socketscommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Socket.SendFile() should fail with a consistent exception for connectionless sockets

4 participants

@rhirano0715@karelz@antonfirsov@MihaZupan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets by rhirano0715 · Pull Request #87108 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets - #87108

Merged
MihaZupan merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rhirano0715:issue47472
Aug 9, 2023
Merged

Unified to throw NotSupportedException when SendFile() for connectionless sockets#87108
MihaZupan merged 5 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
rhirano0715:issue47472

Conversation

@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP. The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.

With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.

Fix#47472

…less sockets
The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP.
The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.
With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.
Fix#47472
@ghostghost added area-System.Net.Sockets community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member labels Jun 4, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Jun 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

The issue was that the Socket.SendFile() threw inconsistent exceptions when the platform was Windows and the protocol was UDP. The first call would throw a SocketException, while the second call would throw a NotSupportedException.

With this commit, SendFile() will consistently throw NotSupportException on all platforms when the protocol is UDP.

Fix #47472

Author:rhirano0715
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-System.Net.Sockets

Milestone:-

@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@dotnet-policy-service agree

@karelz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@antonfirsov ping, can you please take a look?

@antonfirsovantonfirsov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the long delay!

Comment on lines +2341 to +2344
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given that BeginSendFile calls into SendFileAsync, this check is redundant.

if (usePreAndPostbufferOverload)
{
ex = await Assert.ThrowsAsync<SocketException>(() => SendFileAsync(client, tempFile.Path, Array.Empty<byte>(), Array.Empty<byte>(), TransmitFileOptions.UseDefaultWorkerThread));
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<NotSupportedException>(() => SendFileAsync(client, tempFile.Path, Array.Empty<byte>(), Array.Empty<byte>(), TransmitFileOptions.UseDefaultWorkerThread));

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test case should not be [PlatformSpecific(TestPlatforms.Windows)] anymore.

Comment on lines +673 to +676
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

@antonfirsovantonfirsovJul 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't the check if (!IsConnectionOriented) do the job already? In #47472 I only tested the sync overload.

Comment on lines +1257 to +1260
if (_protocolType == ProtocolType.Udp)
{
throw new NotSupportedException(SR.net_notconnected);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The async variant checks for if (!IsConnectionOriented) while the sync version checks (!Connected). I think that - instead of limiting the error case explicitly to UDP - we should consolidate these checks, throwing in case of (!IsConnectionOriented || !Connected).

@karelz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rhirano0715 will you have time to look at the CR feedback from @antonfirsov please?

rhirano0715and others added 3 commits July 19, 2023 18:06
…r `!Connected`.
Before:.
Throws `NotSupportedException` on UDP.
After:
Throws `NotSupportedException` if `!IsConnectionOriented` or `!Connected`.
@rhirano0715

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@karelz@antonfirsov
I'm sorry for not being able to respond.
Thank you for your review.
I have committed the correction.

Comment threadsrc/libraries/System.Net.Sockets/src/System/Net/Sockets/Socket.Tasks.cs Outdated
….Tasks.cs
Co-authored-by: Karel Zikmund <karelz@microsoft.com>
@antonfirsovantonfirsov added the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Aug 4, 2023
@antonfirsov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run runtime

@antonfirsov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

1 similar comment
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@antonfirsovantonfirsov left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks, and sorry for the slow response. Started some extra CI runs just in case.

@MihaZupan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@MihaZupan
MihaZupan merged commit 24f1513 into dotnet:mainAug 9, 2023
@karelzkarelz added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Aug 10, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 9, 2023
@antonfirsovantonfirsov removed the needs-breaking-change-doc-created Breaking changes need an issue opened with https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet label Oct 17, 2023
@rhirano0715
rhirano0715 deleted the issue47472 branch December 6, 2023 08:21
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Net.Socketscommunity-contributionIndicates that the PR has been added by a community member

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Socket.SendFile() should fail with a consistent exception for connectionless sockets

4 participants

@rhirano0715@karelz@antonfirsov@MihaZupan