Skip to content

Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers - #90796

Merged
steveharter merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
steveharter:InvokerTests
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers#90796
steveharter merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
steveharter:InvokerTests

Conversation

@steveharter

@stevehartersteveharter commented Aug 18, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refactored the existing MethodInfo\ConstructorInfo tests so they can also run under the new invoker classes MethodInvoker\ConstructorInvoker; they are run in both a forced-interpreted and a forced-emit mode for additional coverage.

This uncovered two edge case issues (fixed in this PR) that only affect the new invoker classes that were added in Preview 7:

  • Calling a constructor on an existing instance with a MethodInvoker now works as expected: the obj parameter's constructor is invoked and null is returned; this is consistent with ConstructorInfo.Invoke(obj, ...)
  • Calling a constructor invoker on abstract base class or attempting to call static constructor will now always throw MemberAccessException (same exception type used for similar cases). Calling static constructors can still be done with ConstructorInfo but since that is rare, adds overhead, and is not supported on NativeAOT, support wasn't added to MethodInvoker or ConstructorInvoker.

No tests were removed except for the invoker test "ExistingInstance()" which was already covered in the shared tests.

These changes should be ported to v8\RC2 since they only affect the new APIs added in Preview 7 and will avoid a breaking change in v9.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-reflection
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

[verifying tests]

Author:steveharter
Assignees:steveharter
Labels:

area-System.Reflection

Milestone:-

@steveharter
steveharter marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2023 17:47
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (Please check that the affected tests are passing in the extra-platforms legs before merging.)

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

CI failures in runtime-extra-platforms appear consistent with other recent PRs including #90836 and #90864.

Created some known issues to help filter the errors in the future. Also, there's some infra work needed so failures running runtime-extra-platforms show all of the unknown failures (currently just the first 4 are shown).

@steveharter
steveharter merged commit 6b67caa into dotnet:mainAug 22, 2023
@steveharter
steveharter deleted the InvokerTests branch August 22, 2023 20:51
@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/backport to release/8.0

1 similar comment
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/backport to release/8.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/8.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/5945904726

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@steveharter@jkotas@IDisposable
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers by steveharter · Pull Request #90796 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers - #90796

Merged
steveharter merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
steveharter:InvokerTests
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers#90796
steveharter merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
steveharter:InvokerTests

Conversation

@steveharter

@stevehartersteveharter commented Aug 18, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refactored the existing MethodInfo\ConstructorInfo tests so they can also run under the new invoker classes MethodInvoker\ConstructorInvoker; they are run in both a forced-interpreted and a forced-emit mode for additional coverage.

This uncovered two edge case issues (fixed in this PR) that only affect the new invoker classes that were added in Preview 7:

  • Calling a constructor on an existing instance with a MethodInvoker now works as expected: the obj parameter's constructor is invoked and null is returned; this is consistent with ConstructorInfo.Invoke(obj, ...)
  • Calling a constructor invoker on abstract base class or attempting to call static constructor will now always throw MemberAccessException (same exception type used for similar cases). Calling static constructors can still be done with ConstructorInfo but since that is rare, adds overhead, and is not supported on NativeAOT, support wasn't added to MethodInvoker or ConstructorInvoker.

No tests were removed except for the invoker test "ExistingInstance()" which was already covered in the shared tests.

These changes should be ported to v8\RC2 since they only affect the new APIs added in Preview 7 and will avoid a breaking change in v9.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-reflection
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

[verifying tests]

Author:steveharter
Assignees:steveharter
Labels:

area-System.Reflection

Milestone:-

@steveharter
steveharter marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2023 17:47
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (Please check that the affected tests are passing in the extra-platforms legs before merging.)

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

CI failures in runtime-extra-platforms appear consistent with other recent PRs including #90836 and #90864.

Created some known issues to help filter the errors in the future. Also, there's some infra work needed so failures running runtime-extra-platforms show all of the unknown failures (currently just the first 4 are shown).

@steveharter
steveharter merged commit 6b67caa into dotnet:mainAug 22, 2023
@steveharter
steveharter deleted the InvokerTests branch August 22, 2023 20:51
@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/backport to release/8.0

1 similar comment
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/backport to release/8.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/8.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/5945904726

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@steveharter@jkotas@IDisposable
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers by steveharter · Pull Request #90796 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers - #90796

Merged
steveharter merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
steveharter:InvokerTests
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers#90796
steveharter merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
steveharter:InvokerTests

Conversation

@steveharter

@stevehartersteveharter commented Aug 18, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refactored the existing MethodInfo\ConstructorInfo tests so they can also run under the new invoker classes MethodInvoker\ConstructorInvoker; they are run in both a forced-interpreted and a forced-emit mode for additional coverage.

This uncovered two edge case issues (fixed in this PR) that only affect the new invoker classes that were added in Preview 7:

  • Calling a constructor on an existing instance with a MethodInvoker now works as expected: the obj parameter's constructor is invoked and null is returned; this is consistent with ConstructorInfo.Invoke(obj, ...)
  • Calling a constructor invoker on abstract base class or attempting to call static constructor will now always throw MemberAccessException (same exception type used for similar cases). Calling static constructors can still be done with ConstructorInfo but since that is rare, adds overhead, and is not supported on NativeAOT, support wasn't added to MethodInvoker or ConstructorInvoker.

No tests were removed except for the invoker test "ExistingInstance()" which was already covered in the shared tests.

These changes should be ported to v8\RC2 since they only affect the new APIs added in Preview 7 and will avoid a breaking change in v9.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-reflection
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

[verifying tests]

Author:steveharter
Assignees:steveharter
Labels:

area-System.Reflection

Milestone:-

@steveharter
steveharter marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2023 17:47
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (Please check that the affected tests are passing in the extra-platforms legs before merging.)

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

CI failures in runtime-extra-platforms appear consistent with other recent PRs including #90836 and #90864.

Created some known issues to help filter the errors in the future. Also, there's some infra work needed so failures running runtime-extra-platforms show all of the unknown failures (currently just the first 4 are shown).

@steveharter
steveharter merged commit 6b67caa into dotnet:mainAug 22, 2023
@steveharter
steveharter deleted the InvokerTests branch August 22, 2023 20:51
@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/backport to release/8.0

1 similar comment
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/backport to release/8.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/8.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/5945904726

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@steveharter@jkotas@IDisposable
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers by steveharter · Pull Request #90796 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers - #90796

Merged
steveharter merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
steveharter:InvokerTests
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers#90796
steveharter merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
steveharter:InvokerTests

Conversation

@steveharter

@stevehartersteveharter commented Aug 18, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refactored the existing MethodInfo\ConstructorInfo tests so they can also run under the new invoker classes MethodInvoker\ConstructorInvoker; they are run in both a forced-interpreted and a forced-emit mode for additional coverage.

This uncovered two edge case issues (fixed in this PR) that only affect the new invoker classes that were added in Preview 7:

  • Calling a constructor on an existing instance with a MethodInvoker now works as expected: the obj parameter's constructor is invoked and null is returned; this is consistent with ConstructorInfo.Invoke(obj, ...)
  • Calling a constructor invoker on abstract base class or attempting to call static constructor will now always throw MemberAccessException (same exception type used for similar cases). Calling static constructors can still be done with ConstructorInfo but since that is rare, adds overhead, and is not supported on NativeAOT, support wasn't added to MethodInvoker or ConstructorInvoker.

No tests were removed except for the invoker test "ExistingInstance()" which was already covered in the shared tests.

These changes should be ported to v8\RC2 since they only affect the new APIs added in Preview 7 and will avoid a breaking change in v9.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-reflection
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

[verifying tests]

Author:steveharter
Assignees:steveharter
Labels:

area-System.Reflection

Milestone:-

@steveharter
steveharter marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2023 17:47
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (Please check that the affected tests are passing in the extra-platforms legs before merging.)

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

CI failures in runtime-extra-platforms appear consistent with other recent PRs including #90836 and #90864.

Created some known issues to help filter the errors in the future. Also, there's some infra work needed so failures running runtime-extra-platforms show all of the unknown failures (currently just the first 4 are shown).

@steveharter
steveharter merged commit 6b67caa into dotnet:mainAug 22, 2023
@steveharter
steveharter deleted the InvokerTests branch August 22, 2023 20:51
@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/backport to release/8.0

1 similar comment
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/backport to release/8.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/8.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/5945904726

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@steveharter@jkotas@IDisposable
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers by steveharter · Pull Request #90796 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers - #90796

Merged
steveharter merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
steveharter:InvokerTests
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers#90796
steveharter merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
steveharter:InvokerTests

Conversation

@steveharter

@stevehartersteveharter commented Aug 18, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refactored the existing MethodInfo\ConstructorInfo tests so they can also run under the new invoker classes MethodInvoker\ConstructorInvoker; they are run in both a forced-interpreted and a forced-emit mode for additional coverage.

This uncovered two edge case issues (fixed in this PR) that only affect the new invoker classes that were added in Preview 7:

  • Calling a constructor on an existing instance with a MethodInvoker now works as expected: the obj parameter's constructor is invoked and null is returned; this is consistent with ConstructorInfo.Invoke(obj, ...)
  • Calling a constructor invoker on abstract base class or attempting to call static constructor will now always throw MemberAccessException (same exception type used for similar cases). Calling static constructors can still be done with ConstructorInfo but since that is rare, adds overhead, and is not supported on NativeAOT, support wasn't added to MethodInvoker or ConstructorInvoker.

No tests were removed except for the invoker test "ExistingInstance()" which was already covered in the shared tests.

These changes should be ported to v8\RC2 since they only affect the new APIs added in Preview 7 and will avoid a breaking change in v9.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-reflection
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

[verifying tests]

Author:steveharter
Assignees:steveharter
Labels:

area-System.Reflection

Milestone:-

@steveharter
steveharter marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2023 17:47
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (Please check that the affected tests are passing in the extra-platforms legs before merging.)

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

CI failures in runtime-extra-platforms appear consistent with other recent PRs including #90836 and #90864.

Created some known issues to help filter the errors in the future. Also, there's some infra work needed so failures running runtime-extra-platforms show all of the unknown failures (currently just the first 4 are shown).

@steveharter
steveharter merged commit 6b67caa into dotnet:mainAug 22, 2023
@steveharter
steveharter deleted the InvokerTests branch August 22, 2023 20:51
@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/backport to release/8.0

1 similar comment
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/backport to release/8.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/8.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/5945904726

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@steveharter@jkotas@IDisposable
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers by steveharter · Pull Request #90796 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers - #90796

Merged
steveharter merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
steveharter:InvokerTests
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers#90796
steveharter merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
steveharter:InvokerTests

Conversation

@steveharter

@stevehartersteveharter commented Aug 18, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refactored the existing MethodInfo\ConstructorInfo tests so they can also run under the new invoker classes MethodInvoker\ConstructorInvoker; they are run in both a forced-interpreted and a forced-emit mode for additional coverage.

This uncovered two edge case issues (fixed in this PR) that only affect the new invoker classes that were added in Preview 7:

  • Calling a constructor on an existing instance with a MethodInvoker now works as expected: the obj parameter's constructor is invoked and null is returned; this is consistent with ConstructorInfo.Invoke(obj, ...)
  • Calling a constructor invoker on abstract base class or attempting to call static constructor will now always throw MemberAccessException (same exception type used for similar cases). Calling static constructors can still be done with ConstructorInfo but since that is rare, adds overhead, and is not supported on NativeAOT, support wasn't added to MethodInvoker or ConstructorInvoker.

No tests were removed except for the invoker test "ExistingInstance()" which was already covered in the shared tests.

These changes should be ported to v8\RC2 since they only affect the new APIs added in Preview 7 and will avoid a breaking change in v9.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-reflection
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

[verifying tests]

Author:steveharter
Assignees:steveharter
Labels:

area-System.Reflection

Milestone:-

@steveharter
steveharter marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2023 17:47
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (Please check that the affected tests are passing in the extra-platforms legs before merging.)

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

CI failures in runtime-extra-platforms appear consistent with other recent PRs including #90836 and #90864.

Created some known issues to help filter the errors in the future. Also, there's some infra work needed so failures running runtime-extra-platforms show all of the unknown failures (currently just the first 4 are shown).

@steveharter
steveharter merged commit 6b67caa into dotnet:mainAug 22, 2023
@steveharter
steveharter deleted the InvokerTests branch August 22, 2023 20:51
@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/backport to release/8.0

1 similar comment
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/backport to release/8.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/8.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/5945904726

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@steveharter@jkotas@IDisposable
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers by steveharter · Pull Request #90796 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers - #90796

Merged
steveharter merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
steveharter:InvokerTests
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers#90796
steveharter merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
steveharter:InvokerTests

Conversation

@steveharter

@stevehartersteveharter commented Aug 18, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refactored the existing MethodInfo\ConstructorInfo tests so they can also run under the new invoker classes MethodInvoker\ConstructorInvoker; they are run in both a forced-interpreted and a forced-emit mode for additional coverage.

This uncovered two edge case issues (fixed in this PR) that only affect the new invoker classes that were added in Preview 7:

  • Calling a constructor on an existing instance with a MethodInvoker now works as expected: the obj parameter's constructor is invoked and null is returned; this is consistent with ConstructorInfo.Invoke(obj, ...)
  • Calling a constructor invoker on abstract base class or attempting to call static constructor will now always throw MemberAccessException (same exception type used for similar cases). Calling static constructors can still be done with ConstructorInfo but since that is rare, adds overhead, and is not supported on NativeAOT, support wasn't added to MethodInvoker or ConstructorInvoker.

No tests were removed except for the invoker test "ExistingInstance()" which was already covered in the shared tests.

These changes should be ported to v8\RC2 since they only affect the new APIs added in Preview 7 and will avoid a breaking change in v9.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-reflection
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

[verifying tests]

Author:steveharter
Assignees:steveharter
Labels:

area-System.Reflection

Milestone:-

@steveharter
steveharter marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2023 17:47
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (Please check that the affected tests are passing in the extra-platforms legs before merging.)

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

CI failures in runtime-extra-platforms appear consistent with other recent PRs including #90836 and #90864.

Created some known issues to help filter the errors in the future. Also, there's some infra work needed so failures running runtime-extra-platforms show all of the unknown failures (currently just the first 4 are shown).

@steveharter
steveharter merged commit 6b67caa into dotnet:mainAug 22, 2023
@steveharter
steveharter deleted the InvokerTests branch August 22, 2023 20:51
@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/backport to release/8.0

1 similar comment
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/backport to release/8.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/8.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/5945904726

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@steveharter@jkotas@IDisposable
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers by steveharter · Pull Request #90796 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers - #90796

Merged
steveharter merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
steveharter:InvokerTests
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

Fix calling existing ctor with MethodInvoker; share tests with invokers#90796
steveharter merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
steveharter:InvokerTests

Conversation

@steveharter

@stevehartersteveharter commented Aug 18, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refactored the existing MethodInfo\ConstructorInfo tests so they can also run under the new invoker classes MethodInvoker\ConstructorInvoker; they are run in both a forced-interpreted and a forced-emit mode for additional coverage.

This uncovered two edge case issues (fixed in this PR) that only affect the new invoker classes that were added in Preview 7:

  • Calling a constructor on an existing instance with a MethodInvoker now works as expected: the obj parameter's constructor is invoked and null is returned; this is consistent with ConstructorInfo.Invoke(obj, ...)
  • Calling a constructor invoker on abstract base class or attempting to call static constructor will now always throw MemberAccessException (same exception type used for similar cases). Calling static constructors can still be done with ConstructorInfo but since that is rare, adds overhead, and is not supported on NativeAOT, support wasn't added to MethodInvoker or ConstructorInvoker.

No tests were removed except for the invoker test "ExistingInstance()" which was already covered in the shared tests.

These changes should be ported to v8\RC2 since they only affect the new APIs added in Preview 7 and will avoid a breaking change in v9.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-reflection
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

[verifying tests]

Author:steveharter
Assignees:steveharter
Labels:

area-System.Reflection

Milestone:-

@steveharter
steveharter marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2023 17:47
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@jkotasjkotas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (Please check that the affected tests are passing in the extra-platforms legs before merging.)

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/azp run runtime-extra-platforms

@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

CI failures in runtime-extra-platforms appear consistent with other recent PRs including #90836 and #90864.

Created some known issues to help filter the errors in the future. Also, there's some infra work needed so failures running runtime-extra-platforms show all of the unknown failures (currently just the first 4 are shown).

@steveharter
steveharter merged commit 6b67caa into dotnet:mainAug 22, 2023
@steveharter
steveharter deleted the InvokerTests branch August 22, 2023 20:51
@steveharter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/backport to release/8.0

1 similar comment
@jkotas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/backport to release/8.0

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Started backporting to release/8.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/5945904726

@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@steveharter@jkotas@IDisposable