Skip to content

[release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods - #91059

Merged
carlossanlop merged 5 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0
Aug 29, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods#91059
carlossanlop merged 5 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Aug 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Backport of #90875 to release/8.0

This PR extends mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods. Prior to this change, when a JIT icall is made from gsharedvt with a constrained static virtual method, the this is not handled properly, resulting with SIGSEGV. This PR adds support for handling static virtual methods, making this argument NULL.

Customer Impact

The issue was discovered by a customer using an iOS Xamarin app. The fix should help resolving #90732.

Testing

Manual testing was performed, ensuring that the JIT icalls can be made from gsharedvt with a constrained static virtual method.

Risk

Low risk. This change extends functionality of the mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

The change doesn't affect code that ships in a NuGet package.

@kotlarmilos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Before merging, we should verify if it resolves the customer issue reported in #90732.

@kotlarmiloskotlarmilos added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Aug 24, 2023
@kotlarmiloskotlarmilos self-assigned this Aug 24, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to 'os-ios': @steveisok, @akoeplinger, @kotlarmilos
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #90875 to release/8.0

/cc @kotlarmilos

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Codegen-AOT-mono, os-ios

Milestone:-

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review blocked Issue/PR is blocked on something - see comments labels Aug 24, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before merging, we should verify if it resolves the customer issue reported in #90732.

Thanks for the heads-up. I added the blocked label until we get that confirmation.

@SamMonoRT@marek-safar in the meanwhile, do you approve of this change?

@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Requesting a review from @lambdageek too (should be on Monday though).

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Aug 28, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Signed-off by both @lambdageek and @marek-safar .

There are two mono failures. Are they related to this PR or can I merge, @kotlarmilos / @SamMonoRT ?

@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

please don't merge today. CI failures are unrelated, but validating manual testing to be sure of fix to customer issue. I'll message once done tomorrow am

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ok no problem. Please add the blocked label to any PRs you'd like me to avoid merging once it's approved and the CI is looking good.

@ivanpovazanivanpovazan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Manually verified that the reported failure has been fixed by building/running the sample on ios-arm64 device.

@SamMonoRTSamMonoRT removed the blocked Issue/PR is blocked on something - see comments label Aug 29, 2023
@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @carlossanlop - this is ready to be merged. Thank you.

@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 2ec0bc7 into release/8.0Aug 29, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0 branch August 29, 2023 17:34
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 28, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Codegen-AOT-monoos-iosApple iOSServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@kotlarmilos@carlossanlop@SamMonoRT@marek-safar@lambdageek@ivanpovazan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
[release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #91059 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods - #91059

Merged
carlossanlop merged 5 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0
Aug 29, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods#91059
carlossanlop merged 5 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Aug 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Backport of #90875 to release/8.0

This PR extends mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods. Prior to this change, when a JIT icall is made from gsharedvt with a constrained static virtual method, the this is not handled properly, resulting with SIGSEGV. This PR adds support for handling static virtual methods, making this argument NULL.

Customer Impact

The issue was discovered by a customer using an iOS Xamarin app. The fix should help resolving #90732.

Testing

Manual testing was performed, ensuring that the JIT icalls can be made from gsharedvt with a constrained static virtual method.

Risk

Low risk. This change extends functionality of the mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

The change doesn't affect code that ships in a NuGet package.

@kotlarmilos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Before merging, we should verify if it resolves the customer issue reported in #90732.

@kotlarmiloskotlarmilos added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Aug 24, 2023
@kotlarmiloskotlarmilos self-assigned this Aug 24, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to 'os-ios': @steveisok, @akoeplinger, @kotlarmilos
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #90875 to release/8.0

/cc @kotlarmilos

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Codegen-AOT-mono, os-ios

Milestone:-

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review blocked Issue/PR is blocked on something - see comments labels Aug 24, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before merging, we should verify if it resolves the customer issue reported in #90732.

Thanks for the heads-up. I added the blocked label until we get that confirmation.

@SamMonoRT@marek-safar in the meanwhile, do you approve of this change?

@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Requesting a review from @lambdageek too (should be on Monday though).

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Aug 28, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Signed-off by both @lambdageek and @marek-safar .

There are two mono failures. Are they related to this PR or can I merge, @kotlarmilos / @SamMonoRT ?

@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

please don't merge today. CI failures are unrelated, but validating manual testing to be sure of fix to customer issue. I'll message once done tomorrow am

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ok no problem. Please add the blocked label to any PRs you'd like me to avoid merging once it's approved and the CI is looking good.

@ivanpovazanivanpovazan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Manually verified that the reported failure has been fixed by building/running the sample on ios-arm64 device.

@SamMonoRTSamMonoRT removed the blocked Issue/PR is blocked on something - see comments label Aug 29, 2023
@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @carlossanlop - this is ready to be merged. Thank you.

@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 2ec0bc7 into release/8.0Aug 29, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0 branch August 29, 2023 17:34
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 28, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Codegen-AOT-monoos-iosApple iOSServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@kotlarmilos@carlossanlop@SamMonoRT@marek-safar@lambdageek@ivanpovazan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #91059 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods - #91059

Merged
carlossanlop merged 5 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0
Aug 29, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods#91059
carlossanlop merged 5 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Aug 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Backport of #90875 to release/8.0

This PR extends mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods. Prior to this change, when a JIT icall is made from gsharedvt with a constrained static virtual method, the this is not handled properly, resulting with SIGSEGV. This PR adds support for handling static virtual methods, making this argument NULL.

Customer Impact

The issue was discovered by a customer using an iOS Xamarin app. The fix should help resolving #90732.

Testing

Manual testing was performed, ensuring that the JIT icalls can be made from gsharedvt with a constrained static virtual method.

Risk

Low risk. This change extends functionality of the mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

The change doesn't affect code that ships in a NuGet package.

@kotlarmilos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Before merging, we should verify if it resolves the customer issue reported in #90732.

@kotlarmiloskotlarmilos added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Aug 24, 2023
@kotlarmiloskotlarmilos self-assigned this Aug 24, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to 'os-ios': @steveisok, @akoeplinger, @kotlarmilos
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #90875 to release/8.0

/cc @kotlarmilos

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Codegen-AOT-mono, os-ios

Milestone:-

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review blocked Issue/PR is blocked on something - see comments labels Aug 24, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before merging, we should verify if it resolves the customer issue reported in #90732.

Thanks for the heads-up. I added the blocked label until we get that confirmation.

@SamMonoRT@marek-safar in the meanwhile, do you approve of this change?

@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Requesting a review from @lambdageek too (should be on Monday though).

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Aug 28, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Signed-off by both @lambdageek and @marek-safar .

There are two mono failures. Are they related to this PR or can I merge, @kotlarmilos / @SamMonoRT ?

@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

please don't merge today. CI failures are unrelated, but validating manual testing to be sure of fix to customer issue. I'll message once done tomorrow am

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ok no problem. Please add the blocked label to any PRs you'd like me to avoid merging once it's approved and the CI is looking good.

@ivanpovazanivanpovazan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Manually verified that the reported failure has been fixed by building/running the sample on ios-arm64 device.

@SamMonoRTSamMonoRT removed the blocked Issue/PR is blocked on something - see comments label Aug 29, 2023
@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @carlossanlop - this is ready to be merged. Thank you.

@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 2ec0bc7 into release/8.0Aug 29, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0 branch August 29, 2023 17:34
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 28, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Codegen-AOT-monoos-iosApple iOSServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@kotlarmilos@carlossanlop@SamMonoRT@marek-safar@lambdageek@ivanpovazan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #91059 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods - #91059

Merged
carlossanlop merged 5 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0
Aug 29, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods#91059
carlossanlop merged 5 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Aug 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Backport of #90875 to release/8.0

This PR extends mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods. Prior to this change, when a JIT icall is made from gsharedvt with a constrained static virtual method, the this is not handled properly, resulting with SIGSEGV. This PR adds support for handling static virtual methods, making this argument NULL.

Customer Impact

The issue was discovered by a customer using an iOS Xamarin app. The fix should help resolving #90732.

Testing

Manual testing was performed, ensuring that the JIT icalls can be made from gsharedvt with a constrained static virtual method.

Risk

Low risk. This change extends functionality of the mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

The change doesn't affect code that ships in a NuGet package.

@kotlarmilos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Before merging, we should verify if it resolves the customer issue reported in #90732.

@kotlarmiloskotlarmilos added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Aug 24, 2023
@kotlarmiloskotlarmilos self-assigned this Aug 24, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to 'os-ios': @steveisok, @akoeplinger, @kotlarmilos
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #90875 to release/8.0

/cc @kotlarmilos

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Codegen-AOT-mono, os-ios

Milestone:-

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review blocked Issue/PR is blocked on something - see comments labels Aug 24, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before merging, we should verify if it resolves the customer issue reported in #90732.

Thanks for the heads-up. I added the blocked label until we get that confirmation.

@SamMonoRT@marek-safar in the meanwhile, do you approve of this change?

@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Requesting a review from @lambdageek too (should be on Monday though).

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Aug 28, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Signed-off by both @lambdageek and @marek-safar .

There are two mono failures. Are they related to this PR or can I merge, @kotlarmilos / @SamMonoRT ?

@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

please don't merge today. CI failures are unrelated, but validating manual testing to be sure of fix to customer issue. I'll message once done tomorrow am

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ok no problem. Please add the blocked label to any PRs you'd like me to avoid merging once it's approved and the CI is looking good.

@ivanpovazanivanpovazan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Manually verified that the reported failure has been fixed by building/running the sample on ios-arm64 device.

@SamMonoRTSamMonoRT removed the blocked Issue/PR is blocked on something - see comments label Aug 29, 2023
@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @carlossanlop - this is ready to be merged. Thank you.

@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 2ec0bc7 into release/8.0Aug 29, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0 branch August 29, 2023 17:34
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 28, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Codegen-AOT-monoos-iosApple iOSServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@kotlarmilos@carlossanlop@SamMonoRT@marek-safar@lambdageek@ivanpovazan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' [release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #91059 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods - #91059

Merged
carlossanlop merged 5 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0
Aug 29, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods#91059
carlossanlop merged 5 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Aug 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Backport of #90875 to release/8.0

This PR extends mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods. Prior to this change, when a JIT icall is made from gsharedvt with a constrained static virtual method, the this is not handled properly, resulting with SIGSEGV. This PR adds support for handling static virtual methods, making this argument NULL.

Customer Impact

The issue was discovered by a customer using an iOS Xamarin app. The fix should help resolving #90732.

Testing

Manual testing was performed, ensuring that the JIT icalls can be made from gsharedvt with a constrained static virtual method.

Risk

Low risk. This change extends functionality of the mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

The change doesn't affect code that ships in a NuGet package.

@kotlarmilos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Before merging, we should verify if it resolves the customer issue reported in #90732.

@kotlarmiloskotlarmilos added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Aug 24, 2023
@kotlarmiloskotlarmilos self-assigned this Aug 24, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to 'os-ios': @steveisok, @akoeplinger, @kotlarmilos
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #90875 to release/8.0

/cc @kotlarmilos

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Codegen-AOT-mono, os-ios

Milestone:-

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review blocked Issue/PR is blocked on something - see comments labels Aug 24, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before merging, we should verify if it resolves the customer issue reported in #90732.

Thanks for the heads-up. I added the blocked label until we get that confirmation.

@SamMonoRT@marek-safar in the meanwhile, do you approve of this change?

@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Requesting a review from @lambdageek too (should be on Monday though).

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Aug 28, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Signed-off by both @lambdageek and @marek-safar .

There are two mono failures. Are they related to this PR or can I merge, @kotlarmilos / @SamMonoRT ?

@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

please don't merge today. CI failures are unrelated, but validating manual testing to be sure of fix to customer issue. I'll message once done tomorrow am

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ok no problem. Please add the blocked label to any PRs you'd like me to avoid merging once it's approved and the CI is looking good.

@ivanpovazanivanpovazan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Manually verified that the reported failure has been fixed by building/running the sample on ios-arm64 device.

@SamMonoRTSamMonoRT removed the blocked Issue/PR is blocked on something - see comments label Aug 29, 2023
@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @carlossanlop - this is ready to be merged. Thank you.

@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 2ec0bc7 into release/8.0Aug 29, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0 branch August 29, 2023 17:34
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 28, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Codegen-AOT-monoos-iosApple iOSServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@kotlarmilos@carlossanlop@SamMonoRT@marek-safar@lambdageek@ivanpovazan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #91059 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods - #91059

Merged
carlossanlop merged 5 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0
Aug 29, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods#91059
carlossanlop merged 5 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Aug 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Backport of #90875 to release/8.0

This PR extends mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods. Prior to this change, when a JIT icall is made from gsharedvt with a constrained static virtual method, the this is not handled properly, resulting with SIGSEGV. This PR adds support for handling static virtual methods, making this argument NULL.

Customer Impact

The issue was discovered by a customer using an iOS Xamarin app. The fix should help resolving #90732.

Testing

Manual testing was performed, ensuring that the JIT icalls can be made from gsharedvt with a constrained static virtual method.

Risk

Low risk. This change extends functionality of the mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

The change doesn't affect code that ships in a NuGet package.

@kotlarmilos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Before merging, we should verify if it resolves the customer issue reported in #90732.

@kotlarmiloskotlarmilos added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Aug 24, 2023
@kotlarmiloskotlarmilos self-assigned this Aug 24, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to 'os-ios': @steveisok, @akoeplinger, @kotlarmilos
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #90875 to release/8.0

/cc @kotlarmilos

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Codegen-AOT-mono, os-ios

Milestone:-

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review blocked Issue/PR is blocked on something - see comments labels Aug 24, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before merging, we should verify if it resolves the customer issue reported in #90732.

Thanks for the heads-up. I added the blocked label until we get that confirmation.

@SamMonoRT@marek-safar in the meanwhile, do you approve of this change?

@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Requesting a review from @lambdageek too (should be on Monday though).

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Aug 28, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Signed-off by both @lambdageek and @marek-safar .

There are two mono failures. Are they related to this PR or can I merge, @kotlarmilos / @SamMonoRT ?

@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

please don't merge today. CI failures are unrelated, but validating manual testing to be sure of fix to customer issue. I'll message once done tomorrow am

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ok no problem. Please add the blocked label to any PRs you'd like me to avoid merging once it's approved and the CI is looking good.

@ivanpovazanivanpovazan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Manually verified that the reported failure has been fixed by building/running the sample on ios-arm64 device.

@SamMonoRTSamMonoRT removed the blocked Issue/PR is blocked on something - see comments label Aug 29, 2023
@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @carlossanlop - this is ready to be merged. Thank you.

@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 2ec0bc7 into release/8.0Aug 29, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0 branch August 29, 2023 17:34
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 28, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Codegen-AOT-monoos-iosApple iOSServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@kotlarmilos@carlossanlop@SamMonoRT@marek-safar@lambdageek@ivanpovazan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #91059 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods - #91059

Merged
carlossanlop merged 5 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0
Aug 29, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods#91059
carlossanlop merged 5 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Aug 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Backport of #90875 to release/8.0

This PR extends mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods. Prior to this change, when a JIT icall is made from gsharedvt with a constrained static virtual method, the this is not handled properly, resulting with SIGSEGV. This PR adds support for handling static virtual methods, making this argument NULL.

Customer Impact

The issue was discovered by a customer using an iOS Xamarin app. The fix should help resolving #90732.

Testing

Manual testing was performed, ensuring that the JIT icalls can be made from gsharedvt with a constrained static virtual method.

Risk

Low risk. This change extends functionality of the mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

The change doesn't affect code that ships in a NuGet package.

@kotlarmilos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Before merging, we should verify if it resolves the customer issue reported in #90732.

@kotlarmiloskotlarmilos added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Aug 24, 2023
@kotlarmiloskotlarmilos self-assigned this Aug 24, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to 'os-ios': @steveisok, @akoeplinger, @kotlarmilos
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #90875 to release/8.0

/cc @kotlarmilos

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Codegen-AOT-mono, os-ios

Milestone:-

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review blocked Issue/PR is blocked on something - see comments labels Aug 24, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before merging, we should verify if it resolves the customer issue reported in #90732.

Thanks for the heads-up. I added the blocked label until we get that confirmation.

@SamMonoRT@marek-safar in the meanwhile, do you approve of this change?

@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Requesting a review from @lambdageek too (should be on Monday though).

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Aug 28, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Signed-off by both @lambdageek and @marek-safar .

There are two mono failures. Are they related to this PR or can I merge, @kotlarmilos / @SamMonoRT ?

@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

please don't merge today. CI failures are unrelated, but validating manual testing to be sure of fix to customer issue. I'll message once done tomorrow am

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ok no problem. Please add the blocked label to any PRs you'd like me to avoid merging once it's approved and the CI is looking good.

@ivanpovazanivanpovazan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Manually verified that the reported failure has been fixed by building/running the sample on ios-arm64 device.

@SamMonoRTSamMonoRT removed the blocked Issue/PR is blocked on something - see comments label Aug 29, 2023
@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @carlossanlop - this is ready to be merged. Thank you.

@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 2ec0bc7 into release/8.0Aug 29, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0 branch August 29, 2023 17:34
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 28, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Codegen-AOT-monoos-iosApple iOSServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@kotlarmilos@carlossanlop@SamMonoRT@marek-safar@lambdageek@ivanpovazan
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); [release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #91059 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods - #91059

Merged
carlossanlop merged 5 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0
Aug 29, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] [mono] Extend mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods#91059
carlossanlop merged 5 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Aug 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Backport of #90875 to release/8.0

This PR extends mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods. Prior to this change, when a JIT icall is made from gsharedvt with a constrained static virtual method, the this is not handled properly, resulting with SIGSEGV. This PR adds support for handling static virtual methods, making this argument NULL.

Customer Impact

The issue was discovered by a customer using an iOS Xamarin app. The fix should help resolving #90732.

Testing

Manual testing was performed, ensuring that the JIT icalls can be made from gsharedvt with a constrained static virtual method.

Risk

Low risk. This change extends functionality of the mono_gsharedvt_constrained_call JIT icall to handle static virtual methods.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

The change doesn't affect code that ships in a NuGet package.

@kotlarmilos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Before merging, we should verify if it resolves the customer issue reported in #90732.

@kotlarmiloskotlarmilos added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Aug 24, 2023
@kotlarmiloskotlarmilos self-assigned this Aug 24, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to 'os-ios': @steveisok, @akoeplinger, @kotlarmilos
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #90875 to release/8.0

/cc @kotlarmilos

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Codegen-AOT-mono, os-ios

Milestone:-

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review blocked Issue/PR is blocked on something - see comments labels Aug 24, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before merging, we should verify if it resolves the customer issue reported in #90732.

Thanks for the heads-up. I added the blocked label until we get that confirmation.

@SamMonoRT@marek-safar in the meanwhile, do you approve of this change?

@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Requesting a review from @lambdageek too (should be on Monday though).

@carlossanlopcarlossanlop added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Aug 28, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Signed-off by both @lambdageek and @marek-safar .

There are two mono failures. Are they related to this PR or can I merge, @kotlarmilos / @SamMonoRT ?

@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

please don't merge today. CI failures are unrelated, but validating manual testing to be sure of fix to customer issue. I'll message once done tomorrow am

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ok no problem. Please add the blocked label to any PRs you'd like me to avoid merging once it's approved and the CI is looking good.

@ivanpovazanivanpovazan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Manually verified that the reported failure has been fixed by building/running the sample on ios-arm64 device.

@SamMonoRTSamMonoRT removed the blocked Issue/PR is blocked on something - see comments label Aug 29, 2023
@SamMonoRT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc @carlossanlop - this is ready to be merged. Thank you.

@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 2ec0bc7 into release/8.0Aug 29, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-90875-to-release/8.0 branch August 29, 2023 17:34
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 28, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Codegen-AOT-monoos-iosApple iOSServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@kotlarmilos@carlossanlop@SamMonoRT@marek-safar@lambdageek@ivanpovazan