Skip to content

[release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers - #91439

Merged
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0
Sep 1, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers#91439
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #91382 to release/8.0

/cc @MichalStrehovsky

Customer Impact

This was a customer reported regression from 7.0 reported at #91065. LINQ expression trees referencing methods that have custom modifiers in the signature would not work.

Testing

All of our NativeAOT testing. Verified the customer app is fixed with this.

Risk

Low, this is a low risk fix specifically for 8.0 (ignore custom modifiers to restore 7.0 behavior).

We'll need a more comprehensive fix to be able to distinguish corner cases (that were already broken in 7.0 but people are very unlikely to hit because they'd need a class with two methods where the signature of the methods only differ in modifiers - AFAIK this is only reachable with C# if one has two methods that take function pointers as parameters and they differ only in calling conventions).

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

When we started generating custom modifiers into metadata format to support new function pointer APIs in #85504, we should have also added it to native layout format. We currently have a mismatch. This is a low risk bugfix to ignore modifiers on the metadata side. We'll want to do a full fix to actually emit and compare this. Tracked in a .NET 9 bug at #91381.
No regression test because I spent too much time being puzzled at why https://github.com/Handlebars-Net/Handlebars.Net/blob/50614fd844e5360eb10e76154aa74da4d7bf12ce/source/Handlebars/Helpers/IHelperDescriptor.cs#L13 is generated as a custom modifier (`[in] !TOptions& modreq([netstandard]System.Runtime.InteropServices.InAttribute) options`) whereas if I do it, I get `[in] !T& 'value'` with a custom attribute. We'll want to write a proper set of tests with ambiguities for the bug I opened anyway.
@ghost

ghost commented Sep 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #91382 to release/8.0

/cc @MichalStrehovsky

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. once ready this can be merged

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Sep 1, 2023
@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 1, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Failure is #90434

@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 62b57fc into release/8.0Sep 1, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0 branch September 1, 2023 18:39
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 1, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-NativeAOT-coreclrServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@carlossanlop@jkotas@jeffschwMSFT@MichalStrehovsky
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
[release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #91439 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers - #91439

Merged
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0
Sep 1, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers#91439
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #91382 to release/8.0

/cc @MichalStrehovsky

Customer Impact

This was a customer reported regression from 7.0 reported at #91065. LINQ expression trees referencing methods that have custom modifiers in the signature would not work.

Testing

All of our NativeAOT testing. Verified the customer app is fixed with this.

Risk

Low, this is a low risk fix specifically for 8.0 (ignore custom modifiers to restore 7.0 behavior).

We'll need a more comprehensive fix to be able to distinguish corner cases (that were already broken in 7.0 but people are very unlikely to hit because they'd need a class with two methods where the signature of the methods only differ in modifiers - AFAIK this is only reachable with C# if one has two methods that take function pointers as parameters and they differ only in calling conventions).

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

When we started generating custom modifiers into metadata format to support new function pointer APIs in #85504, we should have also added it to native layout format. We currently have a mismatch. This is a low risk bugfix to ignore modifiers on the metadata side. We'll want to do a full fix to actually emit and compare this. Tracked in a .NET 9 bug at #91381.
No regression test because I spent too much time being puzzled at why https://github.com/Handlebars-Net/Handlebars.Net/blob/50614fd844e5360eb10e76154aa74da4d7bf12ce/source/Handlebars/Helpers/IHelperDescriptor.cs#L13 is generated as a custom modifier (`[in] !TOptions& modreq([netstandard]System.Runtime.InteropServices.InAttribute) options`) whereas if I do it, I get `[in] !T& 'value'` with a custom attribute. We'll want to write a proper set of tests with ambiguities for the bug I opened anyway.
@ghost

ghost commented Sep 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #91382 to release/8.0

/cc @MichalStrehovsky

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. once ready this can be merged

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Sep 1, 2023
@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 1, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Failure is #90434

@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 62b57fc into release/8.0Sep 1, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0 branch September 1, 2023 18:39
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 1, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-NativeAOT-coreclrServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@carlossanlop@jkotas@jeffschwMSFT@MichalStrehovsky
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #91439 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers - #91439

Merged
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0
Sep 1, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers#91439
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #91382 to release/8.0

/cc @MichalStrehovsky

Customer Impact

This was a customer reported regression from 7.0 reported at #91065. LINQ expression trees referencing methods that have custom modifiers in the signature would not work.

Testing

All of our NativeAOT testing. Verified the customer app is fixed with this.

Risk

Low, this is a low risk fix specifically for 8.0 (ignore custom modifiers to restore 7.0 behavior).

We'll need a more comprehensive fix to be able to distinguish corner cases (that were already broken in 7.0 but people are very unlikely to hit because they'd need a class with two methods where the signature of the methods only differ in modifiers - AFAIK this is only reachable with C# if one has two methods that take function pointers as parameters and they differ only in calling conventions).

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

When we started generating custom modifiers into metadata format to support new function pointer APIs in #85504, we should have also added it to native layout format. We currently have a mismatch. This is a low risk bugfix to ignore modifiers on the metadata side. We'll want to do a full fix to actually emit and compare this. Tracked in a .NET 9 bug at #91381.
No regression test because I spent too much time being puzzled at why https://github.com/Handlebars-Net/Handlebars.Net/blob/50614fd844e5360eb10e76154aa74da4d7bf12ce/source/Handlebars/Helpers/IHelperDescriptor.cs#L13 is generated as a custom modifier (`[in] !TOptions& modreq([netstandard]System.Runtime.InteropServices.InAttribute) options`) whereas if I do it, I get `[in] !T& 'value'` with a custom attribute. We'll want to write a proper set of tests with ambiguities for the bug I opened anyway.
@ghost

ghost commented Sep 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #91382 to release/8.0

/cc @MichalStrehovsky

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. once ready this can be merged

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Sep 1, 2023
@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 1, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Failure is #90434

@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 62b57fc into release/8.0Sep 1, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0 branch September 1, 2023 18:39
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 1, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-NativeAOT-coreclrServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@carlossanlop@jkotas@jeffschwMSFT@MichalStrehovsky
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #91439 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers - #91439

Merged
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0
Sep 1, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers#91439
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #91382 to release/8.0

/cc @MichalStrehovsky

Customer Impact

This was a customer reported regression from 7.0 reported at #91065. LINQ expression trees referencing methods that have custom modifiers in the signature would not work.

Testing

All of our NativeAOT testing. Verified the customer app is fixed with this.

Risk

Low, this is a low risk fix specifically for 8.0 (ignore custom modifiers to restore 7.0 behavior).

We'll need a more comprehensive fix to be able to distinguish corner cases (that were already broken in 7.0 but people are very unlikely to hit because they'd need a class with two methods where the signature of the methods only differ in modifiers - AFAIK this is only reachable with C# if one has two methods that take function pointers as parameters and they differ only in calling conventions).

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

When we started generating custom modifiers into metadata format to support new function pointer APIs in #85504, we should have also added it to native layout format. We currently have a mismatch. This is a low risk bugfix to ignore modifiers on the metadata side. We'll want to do a full fix to actually emit and compare this. Tracked in a .NET 9 bug at #91381.
No regression test because I spent too much time being puzzled at why https://github.com/Handlebars-Net/Handlebars.Net/blob/50614fd844e5360eb10e76154aa74da4d7bf12ce/source/Handlebars/Helpers/IHelperDescriptor.cs#L13 is generated as a custom modifier (`[in] !TOptions& modreq([netstandard]System.Runtime.InteropServices.InAttribute) options`) whereas if I do it, I get `[in] !T& 'value'` with a custom attribute. We'll want to write a proper set of tests with ambiguities for the bug I opened anyway.
@ghost

ghost commented Sep 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #91382 to release/8.0

/cc @MichalStrehovsky

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. once ready this can be merged

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Sep 1, 2023
@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 1, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Failure is #90434

@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 62b57fc into release/8.0Sep 1, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0 branch September 1, 2023 18:39
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 1, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-NativeAOT-coreclrServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@carlossanlop@jkotas@jeffschwMSFT@MichalStrehovsky
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' [release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #91439 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers - #91439

Merged
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0
Sep 1, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers#91439
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #91382 to release/8.0

/cc @MichalStrehovsky

Customer Impact

This was a customer reported regression from 7.0 reported at #91065. LINQ expression trees referencing methods that have custom modifiers in the signature would not work.

Testing

All of our NativeAOT testing. Verified the customer app is fixed with this.

Risk

Low, this is a low risk fix specifically for 8.0 (ignore custom modifiers to restore 7.0 behavior).

We'll need a more comprehensive fix to be able to distinguish corner cases (that were already broken in 7.0 but people are very unlikely to hit because they'd need a class with two methods where the signature of the methods only differ in modifiers - AFAIK this is only reachable with C# if one has two methods that take function pointers as parameters and they differ only in calling conventions).

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

When we started generating custom modifiers into metadata format to support new function pointer APIs in #85504, we should have also added it to native layout format. We currently have a mismatch. This is a low risk bugfix to ignore modifiers on the metadata side. We'll want to do a full fix to actually emit and compare this. Tracked in a .NET 9 bug at #91381.
No regression test because I spent too much time being puzzled at why https://github.com/Handlebars-Net/Handlebars.Net/blob/50614fd844e5360eb10e76154aa74da4d7bf12ce/source/Handlebars/Helpers/IHelperDescriptor.cs#L13 is generated as a custom modifier (`[in] !TOptions& modreq([netstandard]System.Runtime.InteropServices.InAttribute) options`) whereas if I do it, I get `[in] !T& 'value'` with a custom attribute. We'll want to write a proper set of tests with ambiguities for the bug I opened anyway.
@ghost

ghost commented Sep 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #91382 to release/8.0

/cc @MichalStrehovsky

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. once ready this can be merged

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Sep 1, 2023
@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 1, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Failure is #90434

@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 62b57fc into release/8.0Sep 1, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0 branch September 1, 2023 18:39
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 1, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-NativeAOT-coreclrServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@carlossanlop@jkotas@jeffschwMSFT@MichalStrehovsky
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #91439 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers - #91439

Merged
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0
Sep 1, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers#91439
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #91382 to release/8.0

/cc @MichalStrehovsky

Customer Impact

This was a customer reported regression from 7.0 reported at #91065. LINQ expression trees referencing methods that have custom modifiers in the signature would not work.

Testing

All of our NativeAOT testing. Verified the customer app is fixed with this.

Risk

Low, this is a low risk fix specifically for 8.0 (ignore custom modifiers to restore 7.0 behavior).

We'll need a more comprehensive fix to be able to distinguish corner cases (that were already broken in 7.0 but people are very unlikely to hit because they'd need a class with two methods where the signature of the methods only differ in modifiers - AFAIK this is only reachable with C# if one has two methods that take function pointers as parameters and they differ only in calling conventions).

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

When we started generating custom modifiers into metadata format to support new function pointer APIs in #85504, we should have also added it to native layout format. We currently have a mismatch. This is a low risk bugfix to ignore modifiers on the metadata side. We'll want to do a full fix to actually emit and compare this. Tracked in a .NET 9 bug at #91381.
No regression test because I spent too much time being puzzled at why https://github.com/Handlebars-Net/Handlebars.Net/blob/50614fd844e5360eb10e76154aa74da4d7bf12ce/source/Handlebars/Helpers/IHelperDescriptor.cs#L13 is generated as a custom modifier (`[in] !TOptions& modreq([netstandard]System.Runtime.InteropServices.InAttribute) options`) whereas if I do it, I get `[in] !T& 'value'` with a custom attribute. We'll want to write a proper set of tests with ambiguities for the bug I opened anyway.
@ghost

ghost commented Sep 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #91382 to release/8.0

/cc @MichalStrehovsky

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. once ready this can be merged

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Sep 1, 2023
@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 1, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Failure is #90434

@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 62b57fc into release/8.0Sep 1, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0 branch September 1, 2023 18:39
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 1, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-NativeAOT-coreclrServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@carlossanlop@jkotas@jeffschwMSFT@MichalStrehovsky
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #91439 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers - #91439

Merged
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0
Sep 1, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers#91439
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #91382 to release/8.0

/cc @MichalStrehovsky

Customer Impact

This was a customer reported regression from 7.0 reported at #91065. LINQ expression trees referencing methods that have custom modifiers in the signature would not work.

Testing

All of our NativeAOT testing. Verified the customer app is fixed with this.

Risk

Low, this is a low risk fix specifically for 8.0 (ignore custom modifiers to restore 7.0 behavior).

We'll need a more comprehensive fix to be able to distinguish corner cases (that were already broken in 7.0 but people are very unlikely to hit because they'd need a class with two methods where the signature of the methods only differ in modifiers - AFAIK this is only reachable with C# if one has two methods that take function pointers as parameters and they differ only in calling conventions).

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

When we started generating custom modifiers into metadata format to support new function pointer APIs in #85504, we should have also added it to native layout format. We currently have a mismatch. This is a low risk bugfix to ignore modifiers on the metadata side. We'll want to do a full fix to actually emit and compare this. Tracked in a .NET 9 bug at #91381.
No regression test because I spent too much time being puzzled at why https://github.com/Handlebars-Net/Handlebars.Net/blob/50614fd844e5360eb10e76154aa74da4d7bf12ce/source/Handlebars/Helpers/IHelperDescriptor.cs#L13 is generated as a custom modifier (`[in] !TOptions& modreq([netstandard]System.Runtime.InteropServices.InAttribute) options`) whereas if I do it, I get `[in] !T& 'value'` with a custom attribute. We'll want to write a proper set of tests with ambiguities for the bug I opened anyway.
@ghost

ghost commented Sep 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #91382 to release/8.0

/cc @MichalStrehovsky

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. once ready this can be merged

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Sep 1, 2023
@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 1, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Failure is #90434

@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 62b57fc into release/8.0Sep 1, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0 branch September 1, 2023 18:39
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 1, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-NativeAOT-coreclrServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@carlossanlop@jkotas@jeffschwMSFT@MichalStrehovsky
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); [release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #91439 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers - #91439

Merged
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0
Sep 1, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Fix LDTOKEN of methods that have modifiers#91439
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #91382 to release/8.0

/cc @MichalStrehovsky

Customer Impact

This was a customer reported regression from 7.0 reported at #91065. LINQ expression trees referencing methods that have custom modifiers in the signature would not work.

Testing

All of our NativeAOT testing. Verified the customer app is fixed with this.

Risk

Low, this is a low risk fix specifically for 8.0 (ignore custom modifiers to restore 7.0 behavior).

We'll need a more comprehensive fix to be able to distinguish corner cases (that were already broken in 7.0 but people are very unlikely to hit because they'd need a class with two methods where the signature of the methods only differ in modifiers - AFAIK this is only reachable with C# if one has two methods that take function pointers as parameters and they differ only in calling conventions).

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

When we started generating custom modifiers into metadata format to support new function pointer APIs in #85504, we should have also added it to native layout format. We currently have a mismatch. This is a low risk bugfix to ignore modifiers on the metadata side. We'll want to do a full fix to actually emit and compare this. Tracked in a .NET 9 bug at #91381.
No regression test because I spent too much time being puzzled at why https://github.com/Handlebars-Net/Handlebars.Net/blob/50614fd844e5360eb10e76154aa74da4d7bf12ce/source/Handlebars/Helpers/IHelperDescriptor.cs#L13 is generated as a custom modifier (`[in] !TOptions& modreq([netstandard]System.Runtime.InteropServices.InAttribute) options`) whereas if I do it, I get `[in] !T& 'value'` with a custom attribute. We'll want to write a proper set of tests with ambiguities for the bug I opened anyway.
@ghost

ghost commented Sep 1, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #91382 to release/8.0

/cc @MichalStrehovsky

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-NativeAOT-coreclr

Milestone:-

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. once ready this can be merged

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Sep 1, 2023
@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 1, 2023
@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Failure is #90434

@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 62b57fc into release/8.0Sep 1, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-91382-to-release/8.0 branch September 1, 2023 18:39
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 1, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-NativeAOT-coreclrServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@carlossanlop@jkotas@jeffschwMSFT@MichalStrehovsky