[release/8.0] Handle binding to initialized abstract members - #93120

Merged
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0
Oct 12, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Handle binding to initialized abstract members#93120
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Oct 6, 2023•
edited by ericstj
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #93090 to release/8.0

/cc @ericstj

Customer Impact

Cannot bind to abstract types when using the ConfigurationBinder source generator.

When binding to types which contain pre-initialized abstract members the ConfigurationBinder source generator will throw an exception, whereas the reflection-based binder will not. The generator also emits a diagnostic in this case.

We keep the diagnostic because the source generator cannot guarantee that the member will be pre-initialized, but the generator will emit code that uses the pre-initialized value for binding if present.

Testing

Tested real world application to confirm the fix. Added unit tests to cover new behavior.

Risk

There is still a discrepancy with the runtime binder, which is able to see the runtime type. I've filed #93130 to track that discrepancy. TLDR: we bind against the reference type only and not runtime type.

@ericstj
Handle binding to initialized abstract members
f18f8c5
If an abstract member is encountered in an object graph we should only
throw if it's not already initialized.
@ghost

ghost commented Oct 6, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-extensions-configuration
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #93090 to release/8.0

/cc @ericstj

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Extensions-Configuration

Milestone:-

@ericstjericstj added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Oct 6, 2023
@ericstjericstj mentioned this pull request Oct 9, 2023
Closed
@ericstj
ericstj requested a review from artl93October 9, 2023 22:53
@ericstj

ericstj commented Oct 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@artl93 can you please have a look?

artl93
artl93 approved these changes Oct 10, 2023
View reviewed changes

@artl93artl93 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved

@leecowleecow added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Oct 10, 2023
@leecowleecow added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Oct 10, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 2504043 into release/8.0Oct 12, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0 branch October 12, 2023 00:06
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 11, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

@artl93artl93artl93 approved these changes
@tarekghtarekghtarekgh approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area-Extensions-ConfigurationServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Milestone

8.0.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@ericstj@artl93@tarekgh@carlossanlop@leecow
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
[release/8.0] Handle binding to initialized abstract members - #93120
Merged
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from 
backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0
Oct 12, 2023
Merged
[release/8.0] Handle binding to initialized abstract members#93120
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from 
backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0
Conversation
@github-actions
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
commented
Oct 6, 2023•

edited by ericstj

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Backport of #93090 to release/8.0
/cc @ericstj
Customer Impact
Cannot bind to abstract types when using the ConfigurationBinder source generator.
When binding to types which contain pre-initialized abstract members the ConfigurationBinder source generator will throw an exception, whereas the reflection-based binder will not. The generator also emits a diagnostic in this case.
We keep the diagnostic because the source generator cannot guarantee that the member will be pre-initialized, but the generator will emit code that uses the pre-initialized value for binding if present.
Testing
Tested real world application to confirm the fix. Added unit tests to cover new behavior.
Risk
There is still a discrepancy with the runtime binder, which is able to see the runtime type. I've filed #93130 to track that discrepancy. TLDR: we bind against the reference type only and not runtime type.
@ericstj
Handle binding to initialized abstract members
f18f8c5
If an abstract member is encountered in an object graph we should only
throw if it's not already initialized.
@ghost
ghost
commented
Oct 6, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-extensions-configuration

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
Issue Details
Backport of #93090 to release/8.0
/cc @ericstj
Customer Impact
Testing
Risk
IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:
  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.
  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.
Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:
area-Extensions-Configuration
Milestone:-
@ericstjericstj
added
the 
Servicing-consider
Issue for next servicing release review
label
Oct 6, 2023
@ericstjericstj
mentioned this pull request
Oct 9, 2023

Closed

@ericstj
ericstj
requested a review
from artl93October 9, 2023 22:53
@ericstj
ericstj
commented
Oct 9, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@artl93 can you please have a look?
artl93
artl93
approved these changes
Oct 10, 2023
View reviewed changes
@artl93artl93
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved
@leecowleecow
added this to the 8.0.0 milestone
Oct 10, 2023
@leecowleecow
added

Servicing-approved
Approved for servicing release
and removed

Servicing-consider
Issue for next servicing release review
labels
Oct 10, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop
merged commit 2504043
into
release/8.0Oct 12, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop
deleted the

backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0

branch
October 12, 2023 00:06
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Nov 11, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@artl93artl93artl93 approved these changes
@tarekghtarekghtarekgh approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-Extensions-ConfigurationServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects


None yet


Milestone

8.0.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@ericstj@artl93@tarekgh@carlossanlop@leecow

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[release/8.0] Handle binding to initialized abstract members - #93120
Merged
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from 
backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0
Oct 12, 2023
Merged
[release/8.0] Handle binding to initialized abstract members#93120
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from 
backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0
Conversation
@github-actions
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
commented
Oct 6, 2023•

edited by ericstj

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Backport of #93090 to release/8.0
/cc @ericstj
Customer Impact
Cannot bind to abstract types when using the ConfigurationBinder source generator.
When binding to types which contain pre-initialized abstract members the ConfigurationBinder source generator will throw an exception, whereas the reflection-based binder will not. The generator also emits a diagnostic in this case.
We keep the diagnostic because the source generator cannot guarantee that the member will be pre-initialized, but the generator will emit code that uses the pre-initialized value for binding if present.
Testing
Tested real world application to confirm the fix. Added unit tests to cover new behavior.
Risk
There is still a discrepancy with the runtime binder, which is able to see the runtime type. I've filed #93130 to track that discrepancy. TLDR: we bind against the reference type only and not runtime type.
@ericstj
Handle binding to initialized abstract members
f18f8c5
If an abstract member is encountered in an object graph we should only
throw if it's not already initialized.
@ghost
ghost
commented
Oct 6, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-extensions-configuration

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
Issue Details
Backport of #93090 to release/8.0
/cc @ericstj
Customer Impact
Testing
Risk
IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:
  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.
  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.
Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:
area-Extensions-Configuration
Milestone:-
@ericstjericstj
added
the 
Servicing-consider
Issue for next servicing release review
label
Oct 6, 2023
@ericstjericstj
mentioned this pull request
Oct 9, 2023

Closed

@ericstj
ericstj
requested a review
from artl93October 9, 2023 22:53
@ericstj
ericstj
commented
Oct 9, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@artl93 can you please have a look?
artl93
artl93
approved these changes
Oct 10, 2023
View reviewed changes
@artl93artl93
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved
@leecowleecow
added this to the 8.0.0 milestone
Oct 10, 2023
@leecowleecow
added

Servicing-approved
Approved for servicing release
and removed

Servicing-consider
Issue for next servicing release review
labels
Oct 10, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop
merged commit 2504043
into
release/8.0Oct 12, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop
deleted the

backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0

branch
October 12, 2023 00:06
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Nov 11, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@artl93artl93artl93 approved these changes
@tarekghtarekghtarekgh approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-Extensions-ConfigurationServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects


None yet


Milestone

8.0.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@ericstj@artl93@tarekgh@carlossanlop@leecow

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[release/8.0] Handle binding to initialized abstract members - #93120
Merged
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from 
backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0
Oct 12, 2023
Merged
[release/8.0] Handle binding to initialized abstract members#93120
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from 
backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0
Conversation
@github-actions
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
commented
Oct 6, 2023•

edited by ericstj

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Backport of #93090 to release/8.0
/cc @ericstj
Customer Impact
Cannot bind to abstract types when using the ConfigurationBinder source generator.
When binding to types which contain pre-initialized abstract members the ConfigurationBinder source generator will throw an exception, whereas the reflection-based binder will not. The generator also emits a diagnostic in this case.
We keep the diagnostic because the source generator cannot guarantee that the member will be pre-initialized, but the generator will emit code that uses the pre-initialized value for binding if present.
Testing
Tested real world application to confirm the fix. Added unit tests to cover new behavior.
Risk
There is still a discrepancy with the runtime binder, which is able to see the runtime type. I've filed #93130 to track that discrepancy. TLDR: we bind against the reference type only and not runtime type.
@ericstj
Handle binding to initialized abstract members
f18f8c5
If an abstract member is encountered in an object graph we should only
throw if it's not already initialized.
@ghost
ghost
commented
Oct 6, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-extensions-configuration

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
Issue Details
Backport of #93090 to release/8.0
/cc @ericstj
Customer Impact
Testing
Risk
IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:
  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.
  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.
Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:
area-Extensions-Configuration
Milestone:-
@ericstjericstj
added
the 
Servicing-consider
Issue for next servicing release review
label
Oct 6, 2023
@ericstjericstj
mentioned this pull request
Oct 9, 2023

Closed

@ericstj
ericstj
requested a review
from artl93October 9, 2023 22:53
@ericstj
ericstj
commented
Oct 9, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@artl93 can you please have a look?
artl93
artl93
approved these changes
Oct 10, 2023
View reviewed changes
@artl93artl93
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved
@leecowleecow
added this to the 8.0.0 milestone
Oct 10, 2023
@leecowleecow
added

Servicing-approved
Approved for servicing release
and removed

Servicing-consider
Issue for next servicing release review
labels
Oct 10, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop
merged commit 2504043
into
release/8.0Oct 12, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop
deleted the

backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0

branch
October 12, 2023 00:06
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Nov 11, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@artl93artl93artl93 approved these changes
@tarekghtarekghtarekgh approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-Extensions-ConfigurationServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects


None yet


Milestone

8.0.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@ericstj@artl93@tarekgh@carlossanlop@leecow

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
[release/8.0] Handle binding to initialized abstract members - #93120
Merged
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from 
backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0
Oct 12, 2023
Merged
[release/8.0] Handle binding to initialized abstract members#93120
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from 
backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0
Conversation
@github-actions
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
commented
Oct 6, 2023•

edited by ericstj

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Backport of #93090 to release/8.0
/cc @ericstj
Customer Impact
Cannot bind to abstract types when using the ConfigurationBinder source generator.
When binding to types which contain pre-initialized abstract members the ConfigurationBinder source generator will throw an exception, whereas the reflection-based binder will not. The generator also emits a diagnostic in this case.
We keep the diagnostic because the source generator cannot guarantee that the member will be pre-initialized, but the generator will emit code that uses the pre-initialized value for binding if present.
Testing
Tested real world application to confirm the fix. Added unit tests to cover new behavior.
Risk
There is still a discrepancy with the runtime binder, which is able to see the runtime type. I've filed #93130 to track that discrepancy. TLDR: we bind against the reference type only and not runtime type.
@ericstj
Handle binding to initialized abstract members
f18f8c5
If an abstract member is encountered in an object graph we should only
throw if it's not already initialized.
@ghost
ghost
commented
Oct 6, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-extensions-configuration

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
Issue Details
Backport of #93090 to release/8.0
/cc @ericstj
Customer Impact
Testing
Risk
IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:
  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.
  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.
Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:
area-Extensions-Configuration
Milestone:-
@ericstjericstj
added
the 
Servicing-consider
Issue for next servicing release review
label
Oct 6, 2023
@ericstjericstj
mentioned this pull request
Oct 9, 2023

Closed

@ericstj
ericstj
requested a review
from artl93October 9, 2023 22:53
@ericstj
ericstj
commented
Oct 9, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@artl93 can you please have a look?
artl93
artl93
approved these changes
Oct 10, 2023
View reviewed changes
@artl93artl93
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved
@leecowleecow
added this to the 8.0.0 milestone
Oct 10, 2023
@leecowleecow
added

Servicing-approved
Approved for servicing release
and removed

Servicing-consider
Issue for next servicing release review
labels
Oct 10, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop
merged commit 2504043
into
release/8.0Oct 12, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop
deleted the

backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0

branch
October 12, 2023 00:06
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Nov 11, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@artl93artl93artl93 approved these changes
@tarekghtarekghtarekgh approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-Extensions-ConfigurationServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects


None yet


Milestone

8.0.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@ericstj@artl93@tarekgh@carlossanlop@leecow

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[release/8.0] Handle binding to initialized abstract members - #93120
Merged
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from 
backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0
Oct 12, 2023
Merged
[release/8.0] Handle binding to initialized abstract members#93120
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from 
backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0
Conversation
@github-actions
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
commented
Oct 6, 2023•

edited by ericstj

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Backport of #93090 to release/8.0
/cc @ericstj
Customer Impact
Cannot bind to abstract types when using the ConfigurationBinder source generator.
When binding to types which contain pre-initialized abstract members the ConfigurationBinder source generator will throw an exception, whereas the reflection-based binder will not. The generator also emits a diagnostic in this case.
We keep the diagnostic because the source generator cannot guarantee that the member will be pre-initialized, but the generator will emit code that uses the pre-initialized value for binding if present.
Testing
Tested real world application to confirm the fix. Added unit tests to cover new behavior.
Risk
There is still a discrepancy with the runtime binder, which is able to see the runtime type. I've filed #93130 to track that discrepancy. TLDR: we bind against the reference type only and not runtime type.
@ericstj
Handle binding to initialized abstract members
f18f8c5
If an abstract member is encountered in an object graph we should only
throw if it's not already initialized.
@ghost
ghost
commented
Oct 6, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-extensions-configuration

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
Issue Details
Backport of #93090 to release/8.0
/cc @ericstj
Customer Impact
Testing
Risk
IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:
  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.
  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.
Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:
area-Extensions-Configuration
Milestone:-
@ericstjericstj
added
the 
Servicing-consider
Issue for next servicing release review
label
Oct 6, 2023
@ericstjericstj
mentioned this pull request
Oct 9, 2023

Closed

@ericstj
ericstj
requested a review
from artl93October 9, 2023 22:53
@ericstj
ericstj
commented
Oct 9, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@artl93 can you please have a look?
artl93
artl93
approved these changes
Oct 10, 2023
View reviewed changes
@artl93artl93
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved
@leecowleecow
added this to the 8.0.0 milestone
Oct 10, 2023
@leecowleecow
added

Servicing-approved
Approved for servicing release
and removed

Servicing-consider
Issue for next servicing release review
labels
Oct 10, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop
merged commit 2504043
into
release/8.0Oct 12, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop
deleted the

backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0

branch
October 12, 2023 00:06
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Nov 11, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@artl93artl93artl93 approved these changes
@tarekghtarekghtarekgh approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-Extensions-ConfigurationServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects


None yet


Milestone

8.0.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@ericstj@artl93@tarekgh@carlossanlop@leecow

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[release/8.0] Handle binding to initialized abstract members - #93120
Merged
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from 
backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0
Oct 12, 2023
Merged
[release/8.0] Handle binding to initialized abstract members#93120
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from 
backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0
Conversation
@github-actions
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
commented
Oct 6, 2023•

edited by ericstj

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Backport of #93090 to release/8.0
/cc @ericstj
Customer Impact
Cannot bind to abstract types when using the ConfigurationBinder source generator.
When binding to types which contain pre-initialized abstract members the ConfigurationBinder source generator will throw an exception, whereas the reflection-based binder will not. The generator also emits a diagnostic in this case.
We keep the diagnostic because the source generator cannot guarantee that the member will be pre-initialized, but the generator will emit code that uses the pre-initialized value for binding if present.
Testing
Tested real world application to confirm the fix. Added unit tests to cover new behavior.
Risk
There is still a discrepancy with the runtime binder, which is able to see the runtime type. I've filed #93130 to track that discrepancy. TLDR: we bind against the reference type only and not runtime type.
@ericstj
Handle binding to initialized abstract members
f18f8c5
If an abstract member is encountered in an object graph we should only
throw if it's not already initialized.
@ghost
ghost
commented
Oct 6, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-extensions-configuration

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
Issue Details
Backport of #93090 to release/8.0
/cc @ericstj
Customer Impact
Testing
Risk
IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:
  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.
  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.
Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:
area-Extensions-Configuration
Milestone:-
@ericstjericstj
added
the 
Servicing-consider
Issue for next servicing release review
label
Oct 6, 2023
@ericstjericstj
mentioned this pull request
Oct 9, 2023

Closed

@ericstj
ericstj
requested a review
from artl93October 9, 2023 22:53
@ericstj
ericstj
commented
Oct 9, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@artl93 can you please have a look?
artl93
artl93
approved these changes
Oct 10, 2023
View reviewed changes
@artl93artl93
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved
@leecowleecow
added this to the 8.0.0 milestone
Oct 10, 2023
@leecowleecow
added

Servicing-approved
Approved for servicing release
and removed

Servicing-consider
Issue for next servicing release review
labels
Oct 10, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop
merged commit 2504043
into
release/8.0Oct 12, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop
deleted the

backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0

branch
October 12, 2023 00:06
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Nov 11, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@artl93artl93artl93 approved these changes
@tarekghtarekghtarekgh approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-Extensions-ConfigurationServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects


None yet


Milestone

8.0.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@ericstj@artl93@tarekgh@carlossanlop@leecow

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
[release/8.0] Handle binding to initialized abstract members - #93120
Merged
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from 
backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0
Oct 12, 2023
Merged
[release/8.0] Handle binding to initialized abstract members#93120
carlossanlop merged 1 commit into
release/8.0from 
backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0
Conversation
@github-actions
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
commented
Oct 6, 2023•

edited by ericstj

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Backport of #93090 to release/8.0
/cc @ericstj
Customer Impact
Cannot bind to abstract types when using the ConfigurationBinder source generator.
When binding to types which contain pre-initialized abstract members the ConfigurationBinder source generator will throw an exception, whereas the reflection-based binder will not. The generator also emits a diagnostic in this case.
We keep the diagnostic because the source generator cannot guarantee that the member will be pre-initialized, but the generator will emit code that uses the pre-initialized value for binding if present.
Testing
Tested real world application to confirm the fix. Added unit tests to cover new behavior.
Risk
There is still a discrepancy with the runtime binder, which is able to see the runtime type. I've filed #93130 to track that discrepancy. TLDR: we bind against the reference type only and not runtime type.
@ericstj
Handle binding to initialized abstract members
f18f8c5
If an abstract member is encountered in an object graph we should only
throw if it's not already initialized.
@ghost
ghost
commented
Oct 6, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-extensions-configuration

See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.
Issue Details
Backport of #93090 to release/8.0
/cc @ericstj
Customer Impact
Testing
Risk
IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:
  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.
  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.
Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:
area-Extensions-Configuration
Milestone:-
@ericstjericstj
added
the 
Servicing-consider
Issue for next servicing release review
label
Oct 6, 2023
@ericstjericstj
mentioned this pull request
Oct 9, 2023

Closed

@ericstj
ericstj
requested a review
from artl93October 9, 2023 22:53
@ericstj
ericstj
commented
Oct 9, 2023

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
@artl93 can you please have a look?
artl93
artl93
approved these changes
Oct 10, 2023
View reviewed changes
@artl93artl93
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved
@leecowleecow
added this to the 8.0.0 milestone
Oct 10, 2023
@leecowleecow
added

Servicing-approved
Approved for servicing release
and removed

Servicing-consider
Issue for next servicing release review
labels
Oct 10, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop
merged commit 2504043
into
release/8.0Oct 12, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop
deleted the

backport/pr-93090-to-release/8.0

branch
October 12, 2023 00:06
@ghostghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Nov 11, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers

@artl93artl93artl93 approved these changes
@tarekghtarekghtarekgh approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

area-Extensions-ConfigurationServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects


None yet


Milestone

8.0.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@ericstj@artl93@tarekgh@carlossanlop@leecow