Reference live ILLink analyzer - #93259

Merged
sbomer merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:liveAnalyzer
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Reference live ILLink analyzer#93259
sbomer merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:liveAnalyzer

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In #91233 I inadvertently turned off the trim analyzer for libraries, because the analyzer bits don't flow to the consuming project with the ILLink.Tasks ProjectReference. This adds a separate ProjectReference to use the live analyzer. This addresses #88901 for the ILLink analyzers.

Using the live analyzer uncovered some bugs that are fixed in this change:

  • Invalid assert for field initializers with throw statements
  • Invalid cast to IMethodSymbol for the ContainingSymbol of a local. Locals can occur in field initializers, when created from out params.
  • Wrong warning code produced for assignment to annotated property in an initializer. This was being treated as a call to the setter instead of an assignment to the underlying field:
    Type AnnotatedPropertyWithSetter { get; set; } = GetUnknown ();
    (IIRC I hit this one when investigating some related behavior, not via a new warning produced when analyzing runtime)
  • Invalid assert for delegate creation where the delegate is created from anything other than a method (for example, a field that has an Action or Func type).

- Fix some analyzer asserts
- Reference local analyzer
- Fix property initializer behavior
@ghostghost assigned sbomerOct 9, 2023
@ghostghost added the area-Tools-ILLink .NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers label Oct 9, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Oct 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @sbomer, @vitek-karas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

In #91233 I inadvertently turned off the trim analyzer for libraries, because the analyzer bits don't flow to the consuming project with the ILLink.Tasks ProjectReference. This adds a separate ProjectReference to use the live analyzer. This addresses #88901 for the ILLink analyzers.

Using the live analyzer uncovered some bugs that are fixed in this change:

  • Invalid assert for field initializers with throw statements
  • Invalid cast to IMethodSymbol for the ContainingSymbol of a local. Locals can occur in field initializers, when created from out params.
  • Wrong warning code produced for assignment to annotated property in an initializer. This was being treated as a call to the setter instead of an assignment to the underlying field:
    Type AnnotatedPropertyWithSetter { get; set; } = GetUnknown ();
    (IIRC I hit this one when investigating some related behavior, not via a new warning produced when analyzing runtime)
  • Invalid assert for delegate creation where the delegate is created from anything other than a method (for example, a field that has an Action or Func type).
Author:sbomer
Assignees:sbomer
Labels:

area-Tools-ILLink

Milestone:-

Comment threadeng/liveILLink.targets
Comment threadsrc/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/DataFlow/LocalDataFlowVisitor.cs Outdated
@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CI uncovered another assert, which I'm fixing separately in #93420.

sbomer added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
#93259 uncovered an issue
around how the analyzer tracks arrays. It hit an analyzer assert
while trying to create an l-value flow capture of another flow
capture reference, which should never happen as far as I
understand. The assert was firing for
https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/946c5245aea149d9ece53fd0debc18328c29083b/src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/IO/RandomAccess.Windows.cs#L511
Now tested in TestNullCoalescingAssignment:
```csharp
(arr ??= arr2)[0] = typeof (V);
```
The CFG had three flow captures:
- capture 0: an l-value flow capture of `arr`. Used later in the
branch that assigns `arr2` to `arr`.
- capture 1: an r-value flow capture of capture 0. This was
checked for null.
- capture 2: an l-value flow capture representing `arr ??= arr2`,
used to write index 0 of the array.
- In the == null branch, this captured the result of an
assignment (capture 0 = `arr2`)
- In the other branch, it captured "capture 1". This is where
the assert was hit.
The bug, I believe, is that capture 2 should have been an r-value
flow capture instead. Even though it's used for writing to the
array, the assignment doesn't modify the array pointer
represented by this capture - it dereferences this pointer and
modifies the array. This was introduced by my modifications to
the l-value detection logic in
#90287.
This undoes that portion of the change so that capture 2 is now
treated as an r-value capture. This simplifies the array element
assignment logic so that it no longer can see an assignment where
the array is an l-value.
Fixes#93420 by adding an
explicit check for `IsInitialization` so that we don't hit the
related asserts for string interpolation handlers.
@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I fixed a few more asserts that came up after #93420:

  • Assert inside GetFlowCaptureValue for the LHS of a compound assignment. I couldn't think of a case yet where we actually need to model the result of the assignment, so I implemented support for at least visiting the LHS by going through the same path as normal assignments (avoiding GetFlowCaptureValue).
  • Assert inside GetFlowCaptureValue for a flow capture reference passed as an out param.
  • Added a test for deconstruction assignment to flow capture reference.

@ViktorHoferViktorHofer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also verified that this change doesn't require updating our solution files again in src/libraries.

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Test failure looks like #90019

@sbomer
sbomer merged commit de011df into dotnet:mainOct 20, 2023
@sbomer
sbomer deleted the liveAnalyzer branch November 3, 2023 18:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 3, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Tools-ILLink.NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@sbomer@ViktorHofer@vitek-karas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Reference live ILLink analyzer - #93259

Merged
sbomer merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:liveAnalyzer
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Reference live ILLink analyzer#93259
sbomer merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:liveAnalyzer

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In #91233 I inadvertently turned off the trim analyzer for libraries, because the analyzer bits don't flow to the consuming project with the ILLink.Tasks ProjectReference. This adds a separate ProjectReference to use the live analyzer. This addresses #88901 for the ILLink analyzers.

Using the live analyzer uncovered some bugs that are fixed in this change:

  • Invalid assert for field initializers with throw statements
  • Invalid cast to IMethodSymbol for the ContainingSymbol of a local. Locals can occur in field initializers, when created from out params.
  • Wrong warning code produced for assignment to annotated property in an initializer. This was being treated as a call to the setter instead of an assignment to the underlying field:
    Type AnnotatedPropertyWithSetter { get; set; } = GetUnknown ();
    (IIRC I hit this one when investigating some related behavior, not via a new warning produced when analyzing runtime)
  • Invalid assert for delegate creation where the delegate is created from anything other than a method (for example, a field that has an Action or Func type).

- Fix some analyzer asserts
- Reference local analyzer
- Fix property initializer behavior
@ghostghost assigned sbomerOct 9, 2023
@ghostghost added the area-Tools-ILLink .NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers label Oct 9, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Oct 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @sbomer, @vitek-karas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

In #91233 I inadvertently turned off the trim analyzer for libraries, because the analyzer bits don't flow to the consuming project with the ILLink.Tasks ProjectReference. This adds a separate ProjectReference to use the live analyzer. This addresses #88901 for the ILLink analyzers.

Using the live analyzer uncovered some bugs that are fixed in this change:

  • Invalid assert for field initializers with throw statements
  • Invalid cast to IMethodSymbol for the ContainingSymbol of a local. Locals can occur in field initializers, when created from out params.
  • Wrong warning code produced for assignment to annotated property in an initializer. This was being treated as a call to the setter instead of an assignment to the underlying field:
    Type AnnotatedPropertyWithSetter { get; set; } = GetUnknown ();
    (IIRC I hit this one when investigating some related behavior, not via a new warning produced when analyzing runtime)
  • Invalid assert for delegate creation where the delegate is created from anything other than a method (for example, a field that has an Action or Func type).
Author:sbomer
Assignees:sbomer
Labels:

area-Tools-ILLink

Milestone:-

Comment threadeng/liveILLink.targets
Comment threadsrc/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/DataFlow/LocalDataFlowVisitor.cs Outdated
@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CI uncovered another assert, which I'm fixing separately in #93420.

sbomer added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
#93259 uncovered an issue
around how the analyzer tracks arrays. It hit an analyzer assert
while trying to create an l-value flow capture of another flow
capture reference, which should never happen as far as I
understand. The assert was firing for
https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/946c5245aea149d9ece53fd0debc18328c29083b/src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/IO/RandomAccess.Windows.cs#L511
Now tested in TestNullCoalescingAssignment:
```csharp
(arr ??= arr2)[0] = typeof (V);
```
The CFG had three flow captures:
- capture 0: an l-value flow capture of `arr`. Used later in the
branch that assigns `arr2` to `arr`.
- capture 1: an r-value flow capture of capture 0. This was
checked for null.
- capture 2: an l-value flow capture representing `arr ??= arr2`,
used to write index 0 of the array.
- In the == null branch, this captured the result of an
assignment (capture 0 = `arr2`)
- In the other branch, it captured "capture 1". This is where
the assert was hit.
The bug, I believe, is that capture 2 should have been an r-value
flow capture instead. Even though it's used for writing to the
array, the assignment doesn't modify the array pointer
represented by this capture - it dereferences this pointer and
modifies the array. This was introduced by my modifications to
the l-value detection logic in
#90287.
This undoes that portion of the change so that capture 2 is now
treated as an r-value capture. This simplifies the array element
assignment logic so that it no longer can see an assignment where
the array is an l-value.
Fixes#93420 by adding an
explicit check for `IsInitialization` so that we don't hit the
related asserts for string interpolation handlers.
@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I fixed a few more asserts that came up after #93420:

  • Assert inside GetFlowCaptureValue for the LHS of a compound assignment. I couldn't think of a case yet where we actually need to model the result of the assignment, so I implemented support for at least visiting the LHS by going through the same path as normal assignments (avoiding GetFlowCaptureValue).
  • Assert inside GetFlowCaptureValue for a flow capture reference passed as an out param.
  • Added a test for deconstruction assignment to flow capture reference.

@ViktorHoferViktorHofer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also verified that this change doesn't require updating our solution files again in src/libraries.

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Test failure looks like #90019

@sbomer
sbomer merged commit de011df into dotnet:mainOct 20, 2023
@sbomer
sbomer deleted the liveAnalyzer branch November 3, 2023 18:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 3, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Tools-ILLink.NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@sbomer@ViktorHofer@vitek-karas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Reference live ILLink analyzer - #93259

Merged
sbomer merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:liveAnalyzer
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Reference live ILLink analyzer#93259
sbomer merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:liveAnalyzer

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In #91233 I inadvertently turned off the trim analyzer for libraries, because the analyzer bits don't flow to the consuming project with the ILLink.Tasks ProjectReference. This adds a separate ProjectReference to use the live analyzer. This addresses #88901 for the ILLink analyzers.

Using the live analyzer uncovered some bugs that are fixed in this change:

  • Invalid assert for field initializers with throw statements
  • Invalid cast to IMethodSymbol for the ContainingSymbol of a local. Locals can occur in field initializers, when created from out params.
  • Wrong warning code produced for assignment to annotated property in an initializer. This was being treated as a call to the setter instead of an assignment to the underlying field:
    Type AnnotatedPropertyWithSetter { get; set; } = GetUnknown ();
    (IIRC I hit this one when investigating some related behavior, not via a new warning produced when analyzing runtime)
  • Invalid assert for delegate creation where the delegate is created from anything other than a method (for example, a field that has an Action or Func type).

- Fix some analyzer asserts
- Reference local analyzer
- Fix property initializer behavior
@ghostghost assigned sbomerOct 9, 2023
@ghostghost added the area-Tools-ILLink .NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers label Oct 9, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Oct 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @sbomer, @vitek-karas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

In #91233 I inadvertently turned off the trim analyzer for libraries, because the analyzer bits don't flow to the consuming project with the ILLink.Tasks ProjectReference. This adds a separate ProjectReference to use the live analyzer. This addresses #88901 for the ILLink analyzers.

Using the live analyzer uncovered some bugs that are fixed in this change:

  • Invalid assert for field initializers with throw statements
  • Invalid cast to IMethodSymbol for the ContainingSymbol of a local. Locals can occur in field initializers, when created from out params.
  • Wrong warning code produced for assignment to annotated property in an initializer. This was being treated as a call to the setter instead of an assignment to the underlying field:
    Type AnnotatedPropertyWithSetter { get; set; } = GetUnknown ();
    (IIRC I hit this one when investigating some related behavior, not via a new warning produced when analyzing runtime)
  • Invalid assert for delegate creation where the delegate is created from anything other than a method (for example, a field that has an Action or Func type).
Author:sbomer
Assignees:sbomer
Labels:

area-Tools-ILLink

Milestone:-

Comment threadeng/liveILLink.targets
Comment threadsrc/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/DataFlow/LocalDataFlowVisitor.cs Outdated
@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CI uncovered another assert, which I'm fixing separately in #93420.

sbomer added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
#93259 uncovered an issue
around how the analyzer tracks arrays. It hit an analyzer assert
while trying to create an l-value flow capture of another flow
capture reference, which should never happen as far as I
understand. The assert was firing for
https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/946c5245aea149d9ece53fd0debc18328c29083b/src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/IO/RandomAccess.Windows.cs#L511
Now tested in TestNullCoalescingAssignment:
```csharp
(arr ??= arr2)[0] = typeof (V);
```
The CFG had three flow captures:
- capture 0: an l-value flow capture of `arr`. Used later in the
branch that assigns `arr2` to `arr`.
- capture 1: an r-value flow capture of capture 0. This was
checked for null.
- capture 2: an l-value flow capture representing `arr ??= arr2`,
used to write index 0 of the array.
- In the == null branch, this captured the result of an
assignment (capture 0 = `arr2`)
- In the other branch, it captured "capture 1". This is where
the assert was hit.
The bug, I believe, is that capture 2 should have been an r-value
flow capture instead. Even though it's used for writing to the
array, the assignment doesn't modify the array pointer
represented by this capture - it dereferences this pointer and
modifies the array. This was introduced by my modifications to
the l-value detection logic in
#90287.
This undoes that portion of the change so that capture 2 is now
treated as an r-value capture. This simplifies the array element
assignment logic so that it no longer can see an assignment where
the array is an l-value.
Fixes#93420 by adding an
explicit check for `IsInitialization` so that we don't hit the
related asserts for string interpolation handlers.
@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I fixed a few more asserts that came up after #93420:

  • Assert inside GetFlowCaptureValue for the LHS of a compound assignment. I couldn't think of a case yet where we actually need to model the result of the assignment, so I implemented support for at least visiting the LHS by going through the same path as normal assignments (avoiding GetFlowCaptureValue).
  • Assert inside GetFlowCaptureValue for a flow capture reference passed as an out param.
  • Added a test for deconstruction assignment to flow capture reference.

@ViktorHoferViktorHofer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also verified that this change doesn't require updating our solution files again in src/libraries.

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Test failure looks like #90019

@sbomer
sbomer merged commit de011df into dotnet:mainOct 20, 2023
@sbomer
sbomer deleted the liveAnalyzer branch November 3, 2023 18:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 3, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Tools-ILLink.NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@sbomer@ViktorHofer@vitek-karas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Reference live ILLink analyzer - #93259

Merged
sbomer merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:liveAnalyzer
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Reference live ILLink analyzer#93259
sbomer merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:liveAnalyzer

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In #91233 I inadvertently turned off the trim analyzer for libraries, because the analyzer bits don't flow to the consuming project with the ILLink.Tasks ProjectReference. This adds a separate ProjectReference to use the live analyzer. This addresses #88901 for the ILLink analyzers.

Using the live analyzer uncovered some bugs that are fixed in this change:

  • Invalid assert for field initializers with throw statements
  • Invalid cast to IMethodSymbol for the ContainingSymbol of a local. Locals can occur in field initializers, when created from out params.
  • Wrong warning code produced for assignment to annotated property in an initializer. This was being treated as a call to the setter instead of an assignment to the underlying field:
    Type AnnotatedPropertyWithSetter { get; set; } = GetUnknown ();
    (IIRC I hit this one when investigating some related behavior, not via a new warning produced when analyzing runtime)
  • Invalid assert for delegate creation where the delegate is created from anything other than a method (for example, a field that has an Action or Func type).

- Fix some analyzer asserts
- Reference local analyzer
- Fix property initializer behavior
@ghostghost assigned sbomerOct 9, 2023
@ghostghost added the area-Tools-ILLink .NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers label Oct 9, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Oct 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @sbomer, @vitek-karas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

In #91233 I inadvertently turned off the trim analyzer for libraries, because the analyzer bits don't flow to the consuming project with the ILLink.Tasks ProjectReference. This adds a separate ProjectReference to use the live analyzer. This addresses #88901 for the ILLink analyzers.

Using the live analyzer uncovered some bugs that are fixed in this change:

  • Invalid assert for field initializers with throw statements
  • Invalid cast to IMethodSymbol for the ContainingSymbol of a local. Locals can occur in field initializers, when created from out params.
  • Wrong warning code produced for assignment to annotated property in an initializer. This was being treated as a call to the setter instead of an assignment to the underlying field:
    Type AnnotatedPropertyWithSetter { get; set; } = GetUnknown ();
    (IIRC I hit this one when investigating some related behavior, not via a new warning produced when analyzing runtime)
  • Invalid assert for delegate creation where the delegate is created from anything other than a method (for example, a field that has an Action or Func type).
Author:sbomer
Assignees:sbomer
Labels:

area-Tools-ILLink

Milestone:-

Comment threadeng/liveILLink.targets
Comment threadsrc/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/DataFlow/LocalDataFlowVisitor.cs Outdated
@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CI uncovered another assert, which I'm fixing separately in #93420.

sbomer added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
#93259 uncovered an issue
around how the analyzer tracks arrays. It hit an analyzer assert
while trying to create an l-value flow capture of another flow
capture reference, which should never happen as far as I
understand. The assert was firing for
https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/946c5245aea149d9ece53fd0debc18328c29083b/src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/IO/RandomAccess.Windows.cs#L511
Now tested in TestNullCoalescingAssignment:
```csharp
(arr ??= arr2)[0] = typeof (V);
```
The CFG had three flow captures:
- capture 0: an l-value flow capture of `arr`. Used later in the
branch that assigns `arr2` to `arr`.
- capture 1: an r-value flow capture of capture 0. This was
checked for null.
- capture 2: an l-value flow capture representing `arr ??= arr2`,
used to write index 0 of the array.
- In the == null branch, this captured the result of an
assignment (capture 0 = `arr2`)
- In the other branch, it captured "capture 1". This is where
the assert was hit.
The bug, I believe, is that capture 2 should have been an r-value
flow capture instead. Even though it's used for writing to the
array, the assignment doesn't modify the array pointer
represented by this capture - it dereferences this pointer and
modifies the array. This was introduced by my modifications to
the l-value detection logic in
#90287.
This undoes that portion of the change so that capture 2 is now
treated as an r-value capture. This simplifies the array element
assignment logic so that it no longer can see an assignment where
the array is an l-value.
Fixes#93420 by adding an
explicit check for `IsInitialization` so that we don't hit the
related asserts for string interpolation handlers.
@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I fixed a few more asserts that came up after #93420:

  • Assert inside GetFlowCaptureValue for the LHS of a compound assignment. I couldn't think of a case yet where we actually need to model the result of the assignment, so I implemented support for at least visiting the LHS by going through the same path as normal assignments (avoiding GetFlowCaptureValue).
  • Assert inside GetFlowCaptureValue for a flow capture reference passed as an out param.
  • Added a test for deconstruction assignment to flow capture reference.

@ViktorHoferViktorHofer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also verified that this change doesn't require updating our solution files again in src/libraries.

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Test failure looks like #90019

@sbomer
sbomer merged commit de011df into dotnet:mainOct 20, 2023
@sbomer
sbomer deleted the liveAnalyzer branch November 3, 2023 18:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 3, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Tools-ILLink.NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@sbomer@ViktorHofer@vitek-karas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Reference live ILLink analyzer - #93259

Merged
sbomer merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:liveAnalyzer
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Reference live ILLink analyzer#93259
sbomer merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:liveAnalyzer

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In #91233 I inadvertently turned off the trim analyzer for libraries, because the analyzer bits don't flow to the consuming project with the ILLink.Tasks ProjectReference. This adds a separate ProjectReference to use the live analyzer. This addresses #88901 for the ILLink analyzers.

Using the live analyzer uncovered some bugs that are fixed in this change:

  • Invalid assert for field initializers with throw statements
  • Invalid cast to IMethodSymbol for the ContainingSymbol of a local. Locals can occur in field initializers, when created from out params.
  • Wrong warning code produced for assignment to annotated property in an initializer. This was being treated as a call to the setter instead of an assignment to the underlying field:
    Type AnnotatedPropertyWithSetter { get; set; } = GetUnknown ();
    (IIRC I hit this one when investigating some related behavior, not via a new warning produced when analyzing runtime)
  • Invalid assert for delegate creation where the delegate is created from anything other than a method (for example, a field that has an Action or Func type).

- Fix some analyzer asserts
- Reference local analyzer
- Fix property initializer behavior
@ghostghost assigned sbomerOct 9, 2023
@ghostghost added the area-Tools-ILLink .NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers label Oct 9, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Oct 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @sbomer, @vitek-karas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

In #91233 I inadvertently turned off the trim analyzer for libraries, because the analyzer bits don't flow to the consuming project with the ILLink.Tasks ProjectReference. This adds a separate ProjectReference to use the live analyzer. This addresses #88901 for the ILLink analyzers.

Using the live analyzer uncovered some bugs that are fixed in this change:

  • Invalid assert for field initializers with throw statements
  • Invalid cast to IMethodSymbol for the ContainingSymbol of a local. Locals can occur in field initializers, when created from out params.
  • Wrong warning code produced for assignment to annotated property in an initializer. This was being treated as a call to the setter instead of an assignment to the underlying field:
    Type AnnotatedPropertyWithSetter { get; set; } = GetUnknown ();
    (IIRC I hit this one when investigating some related behavior, not via a new warning produced when analyzing runtime)
  • Invalid assert for delegate creation where the delegate is created from anything other than a method (for example, a field that has an Action or Func type).
Author:sbomer
Assignees:sbomer
Labels:

area-Tools-ILLink

Milestone:-

Comment threadeng/liveILLink.targets
Comment threadsrc/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/DataFlow/LocalDataFlowVisitor.cs Outdated
@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CI uncovered another assert, which I'm fixing separately in #93420.

sbomer added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
#93259 uncovered an issue
around how the analyzer tracks arrays. It hit an analyzer assert
while trying to create an l-value flow capture of another flow
capture reference, which should never happen as far as I
understand. The assert was firing for
https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/946c5245aea149d9ece53fd0debc18328c29083b/src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/IO/RandomAccess.Windows.cs#L511
Now tested in TestNullCoalescingAssignment:
```csharp
(arr ??= arr2)[0] = typeof (V);
```
The CFG had three flow captures:
- capture 0: an l-value flow capture of `arr`. Used later in the
branch that assigns `arr2` to `arr`.
- capture 1: an r-value flow capture of capture 0. This was
checked for null.
- capture 2: an l-value flow capture representing `arr ??= arr2`,
used to write index 0 of the array.
- In the == null branch, this captured the result of an
assignment (capture 0 = `arr2`)
- In the other branch, it captured "capture 1". This is where
the assert was hit.
The bug, I believe, is that capture 2 should have been an r-value
flow capture instead. Even though it's used for writing to the
array, the assignment doesn't modify the array pointer
represented by this capture - it dereferences this pointer and
modifies the array. This was introduced by my modifications to
the l-value detection logic in
#90287.
This undoes that portion of the change so that capture 2 is now
treated as an r-value capture. This simplifies the array element
assignment logic so that it no longer can see an assignment where
the array is an l-value.
Fixes#93420 by adding an
explicit check for `IsInitialization` so that we don't hit the
related asserts for string interpolation handlers.
@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I fixed a few more asserts that came up after #93420:

  • Assert inside GetFlowCaptureValue for the LHS of a compound assignment. I couldn't think of a case yet where we actually need to model the result of the assignment, so I implemented support for at least visiting the LHS by going through the same path as normal assignments (avoiding GetFlowCaptureValue).
  • Assert inside GetFlowCaptureValue for a flow capture reference passed as an out param.
  • Added a test for deconstruction assignment to flow capture reference.

@ViktorHoferViktorHofer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also verified that this change doesn't require updating our solution files again in src/libraries.

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Test failure looks like #90019

@sbomer
sbomer merged commit de011df into dotnet:mainOct 20, 2023
@sbomer
sbomer deleted the liveAnalyzer branch November 3, 2023 18:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 3, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Tools-ILLink.NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@sbomer@ViktorHofer@vitek-karas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Reference live ILLink analyzer - #93259

Merged
sbomer merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:liveAnalyzer
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Reference live ILLink analyzer#93259
sbomer merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:liveAnalyzer

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In #91233 I inadvertently turned off the trim analyzer for libraries, because the analyzer bits don't flow to the consuming project with the ILLink.Tasks ProjectReference. This adds a separate ProjectReference to use the live analyzer. This addresses #88901 for the ILLink analyzers.

Using the live analyzer uncovered some bugs that are fixed in this change:

  • Invalid assert for field initializers with throw statements
  • Invalid cast to IMethodSymbol for the ContainingSymbol of a local. Locals can occur in field initializers, when created from out params.
  • Wrong warning code produced for assignment to annotated property in an initializer. This was being treated as a call to the setter instead of an assignment to the underlying field:
    Type AnnotatedPropertyWithSetter { get; set; } = GetUnknown ();
    (IIRC I hit this one when investigating some related behavior, not via a new warning produced when analyzing runtime)
  • Invalid assert for delegate creation where the delegate is created from anything other than a method (for example, a field that has an Action or Func type).

- Fix some analyzer asserts
- Reference local analyzer
- Fix property initializer behavior
@ghostghost assigned sbomerOct 9, 2023
@ghostghost added the area-Tools-ILLink .NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers label Oct 9, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Oct 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @sbomer, @vitek-karas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

In #91233 I inadvertently turned off the trim analyzer for libraries, because the analyzer bits don't flow to the consuming project with the ILLink.Tasks ProjectReference. This adds a separate ProjectReference to use the live analyzer. This addresses #88901 for the ILLink analyzers.

Using the live analyzer uncovered some bugs that are fixed in this change:

  • Invalid assert for field initializers with throw statements
  • Invalid cast to IMethodSymbol for the ContainingSymbol of a local. Locals can occur in field initializers, when created from out params.
  • Wrong warning code produced for assignment to annotated property in an initializer. This was being treated as a call to the setter instead of an assignment to the underlying field:
    Type AnnotatedPropertyWithSetter { get; set; } = GetUnknown ();
    (IIRC I hit this one when investigating some related behavior, not via a new warning produced when analyzing runtime)
  • Invalid assert for delegate creation where the delegate is created from anything other than a method (for example, a field that has an Action or Func type).
Author:sbomer
Assignees:sbomer
Labels:

area-Tools-ILLink

Milestone:-

Comment threadeng/liveILLink.targets
Comment threadsrc/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/DataFlow/LocalDataFlowVisitor.cs Outdated
@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CI uncovered another assert, which I'm fixing separately in #93420.

sbomer added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
#93259 uncovered an issue
around how the analyzer tracks arrays. It hit an analyzer assert
while trying to create an l-value flow capture of another flow
capture reference, which should never happen as far as I
understand. The assert was firing for
https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/946c5245aea149d9ece53fd0debc18328c29083b/src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/IO/RandomAccess.Windows.cs#L511
Now tested in TestNullCoalescingAssignment:
```csharp
(arr ??= arr2)[0] = typeof (V);
```
The CFG had three flow captures:
- capture 0: an l-value flow capture of `arr`. Used later in the
branch that assigns `arr2` to `arr`.
- capture 1: an r-value flow capture of capture 0. This was
checked for null.
- capture 2: an l-value flow capture representing `arr ??= arr2`,
used to write index 0 of the array.
- In the == null branch, this captured the result of an
assignment (capture 0 = `arr2`)
- In the other branch, it captured "capture 1". This is where
the assert was hit.
The bug, I believe, is that capture 2 should have been an r-value
flow capture instead. Even though it's used for writing to the
array, the assignment doesn't modify the array pointer
represented by this capture - it dereferences this pointer and
modifies the array. This was introduced by my modifications to
the l-value detection logic in
#90287.
This undoes that portion of the change so that capture 2 is now
treated as an r-value capture. This simplifies the array element
assignment logic so that it no longer can see an assignment where
the array is an l-value.
Fixes#93420 by adding an
explicit check for `IsInitialization` so that we don't hit the
related asserts for string interpolation handlers.
@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I fixed a few more asserts that came up after #93420:

  • Assert inside GetFlowCaptureValue for the LHS of a compound assignment. I couldn't think of a case yet where we actually need to model the result of the assignment, so I implemented support for at least visiting the LHS by going through the same path as normal assignments (avoiding GetFlowCaptureValue).
  • Assert inside GetFlowCaptureValue for a flow capture reference passed as an out param.
  • Added a test for deconstruction assignment to flow capture reference.

@ViktorHoferViktorHofer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also verified that this change doesn't require updating our solution files again in src/libraries.

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Test failure looks like #90019

@sbomer
sbomer merged commit de011df into dotnet:mainOct 20, 2023
@sbomer
sbomer deleted the liveAnalyzer branch November 3, 2023 18:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 3, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Tools-ILLink.NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@sbomer@ViktorHofer@vitek-karas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Reference live ILLink analyzer - #93259

Merged
sbomer merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:liveAnalyzer
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Reference live ILLink analyzer#93259
sbomer merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:liveAnalyzer

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In #91233 I inadvertently turned off the trim analyzer for libraries, because the analyzer bits don't flow to the consuming project with the ILLink.Tasks ProjectReference. This adds a separate ProjectReference to use the live analyzer. This addresses #88901 for the ILLink analyzers.

Using the live analyzer uncovered some bugs that are fixed in this change:

  • Invalid assert for field initializers with throw statements
  • Invalid cast to IMethodSymbol for the ContainingSymbol of a local. Locals can occur in field initializers, when created from out params.
  • Wrong warning code produced for assignment to annotated property in an initializer. This was being treated as a call to the setter instead of an assignment to the underlying field:
    Type AnnotatedPropertyWithSetter { get; set; } = GetUnknown ();
    (IIRC I hit this one when investigating some related behavior, not via a new warning produced when analyzing runtime)
  • Invalid assert for delegate creation where the delegate is created from anything other than a method (for example, a field that has an Action or Func type).

- Fix some analyzer asserts
- Reference local analyzer
- Fix property initializer behavior
@ghostghost assigned sbomerOct 9, 2023
@ghostghost added the area-Tools-ILLink .NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers label Oct 9, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Oct 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @sbomer, @vitek-karas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

In #91233 I inadvertently turned off the trim analyzer for libraries, because the analyzer bits don't flow to the consuming project with the ILLink.Tasks ProjectReference. This adds a separate ProjectReference to use the live analyzer. This addresses #88901 for the ILLink analyzers.

Using the live analyzer uncovered some bugs that are fixed in this change:

  • Invalid assert for field initializers with throw statements
  • Invalid cast to IMethodSymbol for the ContainingSymbol of a local. Locals can occur in field initializers, when created from out params.
  • Wrong warning code produced for assignment to annotated property in an initializer. This was being treated as a call to the setter instead of an assignment to the underlying field:
    Type AnnotatedPropertyWithSetter { get; set; } = GetUnknown ();
    (IIRC I hit this one when investigating some related behavior, not via a new warning produced when analyzing runtime)
  • Invalid assert for delegate creation where the delegate is created from anything other than a method (for example, a field that has an Action or Func type).
Author:sbomer
Assignees:sbomer
Labels:

area-Tools-ILLink

Milestone:-

Comment threadeng/liveILLink.targets
Comment threadsrc/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/DataFlow/LocalDataFlowVisitor.cs Outdated
@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CI uncovered another assert, which I'm fixing separately in #93420.

sbomer added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
#93259 uncovered an issue
around how the analyzer tracks arrays. It hit an analyzer assert
while trying to create an l-value flow capture of another flow
capture reference, which should never happen as far as I
understand. The assert was firing for
https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/946c5245aea149d9ece53fd0debc18328c29083b/src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/IO/RandomAccess.Windows.cs#L511
Now tested in TestNullCoalescingAssignment:
```csharp
(arr ??= arr2)[0] = typeof (V);
```
The CFG had three flow captures:
- capture 0: an l-value flow capture of `arr`. Used later in the
branch that assigns `arr2` to `arr`.
- capture 1: an r-value flow capture of capture 0. This was
checked for null.
- capture 2: an l-value flow capture representing `arr ??= arr2`,
used to write index 0 of the array.
- In the == null branch, this captured the result of an
assignment (capture 0 = `arr2`)
- In the other branch, it captured "capture 1". This is where
the assert was hit.
The bug, I believe, is that capture 2 should have been an r-value
flow capture instead. Even though it's used for writing to the
array, the assignment doesn't modify the array pointer
represented by this capture - it dereferences this pointer and
modifies the array. This was introduced by my modifications to
the l-value detection logic in
#90287.
This undoes that portion of the change so that capture 2 is now
treated as an r-value capture. This simplifies the array element
assignment logic so that it no longer can see an assignment where
the array is an l-value.
Fixes#93420 by adding an
explicit check for `IsInitialization` so that we don't hit the
related asserts for string interpolation handlers.
@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I fixed a few more asserts that came up after #93420:

  • Assert inside GetFlowCaptureValue for the LHS of a compound assignment. I couldn't think of a case yet where we actually need to model the result of the assignment, so I implemented support for at least visiting the LHS by going through the same path as normal assignments (avoiding GetFlowCaptureValue).
  • Assert inside GetFlowCaptureValue for a flow capture reference passed as an out param.
  • Added a test for deconstruction assignment to flow capture reference.

@ViktorHoferViktorHofer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also verified that this change doesn't require updating our solution files again in src/libraries.

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Test failure looks like #90019

@sbomer
sbomer merged commit de011df into dotnet:mainOct 20, 2023
@sbomer
sbomer deleted the liveAnalyzer branch November 3, 2023 18:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 3, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Tools-ILLink.NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@sbomer@ViktorHofer@vitek-karas
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Reference live ILLink analyzer - #93259

Merged
sbomer merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:liveAnalyzer
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Reference live ILLink analyzer#93259
sbomer merged 14 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
sbomer:liveAnalyzer

Conversation

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In #91233 I inadvertently turned off the trim analyzer for libraries, because the analyzer bits don't flow to the consuming project with the ILLink.Tasks ProjectReference. This adds a separate ProjectReference to use the live analyzer. This addresses #88901 for the ILLink analyzers.

Using the live analyzer uncovered some bugs that are fixed in this change:

  • Invalid assert for field initializers with throw statements
  • Invalid cast to IMethodSymbol for the ContainingSymbol of a local. Locals can occur in field initializers, when created from out params.
  • Wrong warning code produced for assignment to annotated property in an initializer. This was being treated as a call to the setter instead of an assignment to the underlying field:
    Type AnnotatedPropertyWithSetter { get; set; } = GetUnknown ();
    (IIRC I hit this one when investigating some related behavior, not via a new warning produced when analyzing runtime)
  • Invalid assert for delegate creation where the delegate is created from anything other than a method (for example, a field that has an Action or Func type).

- Fix some analyzer asserts
- Reference local analyzer
- Fix property initializer behavior
@ghostghost assigned sbomerOct 9, 2023
@ghostghost added the area-Tools-ILLink .NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers label Oct 9, 2023
@ghost

ghost commented Oct 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @sbomer, @vitek-karas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

In #91233 I inadvertently turned off the trim analyzer for libraries, because the analyzer bits don't flow to the consuming project with the ILLink.Tasks ProjectReference. This adds a separate ProjectReference to use the live analyzer. This addresses #88901 for the ILLink analyzers.

Using the live analyzer uncovered some bugs that are fixed in this change:

  • Invalid assert for field initializers with throw statements
  • Invalid cast to IMethodSymbol for the ContainingSymbol of a local. Locals can occur in field initializers, when created from out params.
  • Wrong warning code produced for assignment to annotated property in an initializer. This was being treated as a call to the setter instead of an assignment to the underlying field:
    Type AnnotatedPropertyWithSetter { get; set; } = GetUnknown ();
    (IIRC I hit this one when investigating some related behavior, not via a new warning produced when analyzing runtime)
  • Invalid assert for delegate creation where the delegate is created from anything other than a method (for example, a field that has an Action or Func type).
Author:sbomer
Assignees:sbomer
Labels:

area-Tools-ILLink

Milestone:-

Comment threadeng/liveILLink.targets
Comment threadsrc/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/DataFlow/LocalDataFlowVisitor.cs Outdated
@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CI uncovered another assert, which I'm fixing separately in #93420.

sbomer added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
#93259 uncovered an issue
around how the analyzer tracks arrays. It hit an analyzer assert
while trying to create an l-value flow capture of another flow
capture reference, which should never happen as far as I
understand. The assert was firing for
https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/946c5245aea149d9ece53fd0debc18328c29083b/src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/IO/RandomAccess.Windows.cs#L511
Now tested in TestNullCoalescingAssignment:
```csharp
(arr ??= arr2)[0] = typeof (V);
```
The CFG had three flow captures:
- capture 0: an l-value flow capture of `arr`. Used later in the
branch that assigns `arr2` to `arr`.
- capture 1: an r-value flow capture of capture 0. This was
checked for null.
- capture 2: an l-value flow capture representing `arr ??= arr2`,
used to write index 0 of the array.
- In the == null branch, this captured the result of an
assignment (capture 0 = `arr2`)
- In the other branch, it captured "capture 1". This is where
the assert was hit.
The bug, I believe, is that capture 2 should have been an r-value
flow capture instead. Even though it's used for writing to the
array, the assignment doesn't modify the array pointer
represented by this capture - it dereferences this pointer and
modifies the array. This was introduced by my modifications to
the l-value detection logic in
#90287.
This undoes that portion of the change so that capture 2 is now
treated as an r-value capture. This simplifies the array element
assignment logic so that it no longer can see an assignment where
the array is an l-value.
Fixes#93420 by adding an
explicit check for `IsInitialization` so that we don't hit the
related asserts for string interpolation handlers.
@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I fixed a few more asserts that came up after #93420:

  • Assert inside GetFlowCaptureValue for the LHS of a compound assignment. I couldn't think of a case yet where we actually need to model the result of the assignment, so I implemented support for at least visiting the LHS by going through the same path as normal assignments (avoiding GetFlowCaptureValue).
  • Assert inside GetFlowCaptureValue for a flow capture reference passed as an out param.
  • Added a test for deconstruction assignment to flow capture reference.

@ViktorHoferViktorHofer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also verified that this change doesn't require updating our solution files again in src/libraries.

@sbomer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Test failure looks like #90019

@sbomer
sbomer merged commit de011df into dotnet:mainOct 20, 2023
@sbomer
sbomer deleted the liveAnalyzer branch November 3, 2023 18:39
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 3, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Tools-ILLink.NET linker development as well as trimming analyzers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@sbomer@ViktorHofer@vitek-karas