Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Welcome to my introductory text about naive set theory and the mathematical writing. It has minimal prerequisites and should work for self study, but the experience will be better if you are able to get feedback when you do the exercises. This could also be suitable for an introductory proofs course in an undergraduate math program, which is how I used it as an instructor.

This text is intended to be a first treatment of foundations in math. It uses logic and set theory to introduce mathematics and mathematical writing, but it is not about metamathematically studying foundations. If you know enough to care about the difference between an axiom and an axiom schema, then this might not be what you're looking for. If you are eager to transition from "lower division" undergraduate math to "upper division" proof-based math, then this text might be for you.

Excerpt:

We need to find a good balance between rigor and efficient communication. Finding that balance is one of the great challenges when you first learn how to write proofs. If we sacrifice too much rigor in an argument, then we can lose confidence in its correctness. Or worse, we can start to prove false things! When developing a new mathematical theory, it’s generally good to err on the side of being more rigorous. Then, as the theory develops and common patterns of arguments become routine, one can slowly relax the rigor in favor of efficiency.

Editing

Please see COPYING.txt for license info.

There are ample hints in make.sh and create_thms_only.py as to how I compile the text.

It's the ramshackle mess you'd expect from a years old latex doc.

About

A text about mathematical proofs and mathematical writing.

Topics

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
GitHub - ebrahimebrahim/proof-notes: A text about mathematical proofs and mathematical writing. · GitHub
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Welcome to my introductory text about naive set theory and the mathematical writing. It has minimal prerequisites and should work for self study, but the experience will be better if you are able to get feedback when you do the exercises. This could also be suitable for an introductory proofs course in an undergraduate math program, which is how I used it as an instructor.

This text is intended to be a first treatment of foundations in math. It uses logic and set theory to introduce mathematics and mathematical writing, but it is not about metamathematically studying foundations. If you know enough to care about the difference between an axiom and an axiom schema, then this might not be what you're looking for. If you are eager to transition from "lower division" undergraduate math to "upper division" proof-based math, then this text might be for you.

Excerpt:

We need to find a good balance between rigor and efficient communication. Finding that balance is one of the great challenges when you first learn how to write proofs. If we sacrifice too much rigor in an argument, then we can lose confidence in its correctness. Or worse, we can start to prove false things! When developing a new mathematical theory, it’s generally good to err on the side of being more rigorous. Then, as the theory develops and common patterns of arguments become routine, one can slowly relax the rigor in favor of efficiency.

Editing

Please see COPYING.txt for license info.

There are ample hints in make.sh and create_thms_only.py as to how I compile the text.

It's the ramshackle mess you'd expect from a years old latex doc.

About

A text about mathematical proofs and mathematical writing.

Topics

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' GitHub - ebrahimebrahim/proof-notes: A text about mathematical proofs and mathematical writing. · GitHub
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Welcome to my introductory text about naive set theory and the mathematical writing. It has minimal prerequisites and should work for self study, but the experience will be better if you are able to get feedback when you do the exercises. This could also be suitable for an introductory proofs course in an undergraduate math program, which is how I used it as an instructor.

This text is intended to be a first treatment of foundations in math. It uses logic and set theory to introduce mathematics and mathematical writing, but it is not about metamathematically studying foundations. If you know enough to care about the difference between an axiom and an axiom schema, then this might not be what you're looking for. If you are eager to transition from "lower division" undergraduate math to "upper division" proof-based math, then this text might be for you.

Excerpt:

We need to find a good balance between rigor and efficient communication. Finding that balance is one of the great challenges when you first learn how to write proofs. If we sacrifice too much rigor in an argument, then we can lose confidence in its correctness. Or worse, we can start to prove false things! When developing a new mathematical theory, it’s generally good to err on the side of being more rigorous. Then, as the theory develops and common patterns of arguments become routine, one can slowly relax the rigor in favor of efficiency.

Editing

Please see COPYING.txt for license info.

There are ample hints in make.sh and create_thms_only.py as to how I compile the text.

It's the ramshackle mess you'd expect from a years old latex doc.

About

A text about mathematical proofs and mathematical writing.

Topics

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' GitHub - ebrahimebrahim/proof-notes: A text about mathematical proofs and mathematical writing. · GitHub
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Welcome to my introductory text about naive set theory and the mathematical writing. It has minimal prerequisites and should work for self study, but the experience will be better if you are able to get feedback when you do the exercises. This could also be suitable for an introductory proofs course in an undergraduate math program, which is how I used it as an instructor.

This text is intended to be a first treatment of foundations in math. It uses logic and set theory to introduce mathematics and mathematical writing, but it is not about metamathematically studying foundations. If you know enough to care about the difference between an axiom and an axiom schema, then this might not be what you're looking for. If you are eager to transition from "lower division" undergraduate math to "upper division" proof-based math, then this text might be for you.

Excerpt:

We need to find a good balance between rigor and efficient communication. Finding that balance is one of the great challenges when you first learn how to write proofs. If we sacrifice too much rigor in an argument, then we can lose confidence in its correctness. Or worse, we can start to prove false things! When developing a new mathematical theory, it’s generally good to err on the side of being more rigorous. Then, as the theory develops and common patterns of arguments become routine, one can slowly relax the rigor in favor of efficiency.

Editing

Please see COPYING.txt for license info.

There are ample hints in make.sh and create_thms_only.py as to how I compile the text.

It's the ramshackle mess you'd expect from a years old latex doc.

About

A text about mathematical proofs and mathematical writing.

Topics

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' GitHub - ebrahimebrahim/proof-notes: A text about mathematical proofs and mathematical writing. · GitHub
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Welcome to my introductory text about naive set theory and the mathematical writing. It has minimal prerequisites and should work for self study, but the experience will be better if you are able to get feedback when you do the exercises. This could also be suitable for an introductory proofs course in an undergraduate math program, which is how I used it as an instructor.

This text is intended to be a first treatment of foundations in math. It uses logic and set theory to introduce mathematics and mathematical writing, but it is not about metamathematically studying foundations. If you know enough to care about the difference between an axiom and an axiom schema, then this might not be what you're looking for. If you are eager to transition from "lower division" undergraduate math to "upper division" proof-based math, then this text might be for you.

Excerpt:

We need to find a good balance between rigor and efficient communication. Finding that balance is one of the great challenges when you first learn how to write proofs. If we sacrifice too much rigor in an argument, then we can lose confidence in its correctness. Or worse, we can start to prove false things! When developing a new mathematical theory, it’s generally good to err on the side of being more rigorous. Then, as the theory develops and common patterns of arguments become routine, one can slowly relax the rigor in favor of efficiency.

Editing

Please see COPYING.txt for license info.

There are ample hints in make.sh and create_thms_only.py as to how I compile the text.

It's the ramshackle mess you'd expect from a years old latex doc.

About

A text about mathematical proofs and mathematical writing.

Topics

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' GitHub - ebrahimebrahim/proof-notes: A text about mathematical proofs and mathematical writing. · GitHub
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Welcome to my introductory text about naive set theory and the mathematical writing. It has minimal prerequisites and should work for self study, but the experience will be better if you are able to get feedback when you do the exercises. This could also be suitable for an introductory proofs course in an undergraduate math program, which is how I used it as an instructor.

This text is intended to be a first treatment of foundations in math. It uses logic and set theory to introduce mathematics and mathematical writing, but it is not about metamathematically studying foundations. If you know enough to care about the difference between an axiom and an axiom schema, then this might not be what you're looking for. If you are eager to transition from "lower division" undergraduate math to "upper division" proof-based math, then this text might be for you.

Excerpt:

We need to find a good balance between rigor and efficient communication. Finding that balance is one of the great challenges when you first learn how to write proofs. If we sacrifice too much rigor in an argument, then we can lose confidence in its correctness. Or worse, we can start to prove false things! When developing a new mathematical theory, it’s generally good to err on the side of being more rigorous. Then, as the theory develops and common patterns of arguments become routine, one can slowly relax the rigor in favor of efficiency.

Editing

Please see COPYING.txt for license info.

There are ample hints in make.sh and create_thms_only.py as to how I compile the text.

It's the ramshackle mess you'd expect from a years old latex doc.

About

A text about mathematical proofs and mathematical writing.

Topics

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' GitHub - ebrahimebrahim/proof-notes: A text about mathematical proofs and mathematical writing. · GitHub
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Welcome to my introductory text about naive set theory and the mathematical writing. It has minimal prerequisites and should work for self study, but the experience will be better if you are able to get feedback when you do the exercises. This could also be suitable for an introductory proofs course in an undergraduate math program, which is how I used it as an instructor.

This text is intended to be a first treatment of foundations in math. It uses logic and set theory to introduce mathematics and mathematical writing, but it is not about metamathematically studying foundations. If you know enough to care about the difference between an axiom and an axiom schema, then this might not be what you're looking for. If you are eager to transition from "lower division" undergraduate math to "upper division" proof-based math, then this text might be for you.

Excerpt:

We need to find a good balance between rigor and efficient communication. Finding that balance is one of the great challenges when you first learn how to write proofs. If we sacrifice too much rigor in an argument, then we can lose confidence in its correctness. Or worse, we can start to prove false things! When developing a new mathematical theory, it’s generally good to err on the side of being more rigorous. Then, as the theory develops and common patterns of arguments become routine, one can slowly relax the rigor in favor of efficiency.

Editing

Please see COPYING.txt for license info.

There are ample hints in make.sh and create_thms_only.py as to how I compile the text.

It's the ramshackle mess you'd expect from a years old latex doc.

About

A text about mathematical proofs and mathematical writing.

Topics

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Contributors

Languages

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); GitHub - ebrahimebrahim/proof-notes: A text about mathematical proofs and mathematical writing. · GitHub
Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Welcome to my introductory text about naive set theory and the mathematical writing. It has minimal prerequisites and should work for self study, but the experience will be better if you are able to get feedback when you do the exercises. This could also be suitable for an introductory proofs course in an undergraduate math program, which is how I used it as an instructor.

This text is intended to be a first treatment of foundations in math. It uses logic and set theory to introduce mathematics and mathematical writing, but it is not about metamathematically studying foundations. If you know enough to care about the difference between an axiom and an axiom schema, then this might not be what you're looking for. If you are eager to transition from "lower division" undergraduate math to "upper division" proof-based math, then this text might be for you.

Excerpt:

We need to find a good balance between rigor and efficient communication. Finding that balance is one of the great challenges when you first learn how to write proofs. If we sacrifice too much rigor in an argument, then we can lose confidence in its correctness. Or worse, we can start to prove false things! When developing a new mathematical theory, it’s generally good to err on the side of being more rigorous. Then, as the theory develops and common patterns of arguments become routine, one can slowly relax the rigor in favor of efficiency.

Editing

Please see COPYING.txt for license info.

There are ample hints in make.sh and create_thms_only.py as to how I compile the text.

It's the ramshackle mess you'd expect from a years old latex doc.

About

A text about mathematical proofs and mathematical writing.

Topics

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Contributors

Languages