Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Expression RFC - #52
Conversation
40219a4 to
cd74a9bComparerlivsey
commented
May 17, 2015
Huge 👍 |
jamesarosen
commented
May 18, 2015
Will there be a way to register expressions that don't have a |
tikotzky
commented
May 18, 2015
Whats the reasoning behind requiring a |
mixonic
commented
May 18, 2015
After discussion and consideration, I've decided to advocate for another direction. Instead of a wholly new type of template api, I'd like to introduce class-based helpers with a PR forthcoming, likely tomorrow morning at this point. |
mixonic
commented
May 18, 2015
Regarding the dash- the new proposal will put the burden to change that requirement back on helpers themselves. With the glimmer refactor I think it is possible, will bring it up in discussion. |
mixonic
commented
May 18, 2015
Supplanted by #53 |
View as HTML
This has been replaced by #53