Skip to content

Changes for Etherlink 6.next - #423

Open
NicNomadic wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
nic@v6.2
Open

Changes for Etherlink 6.next#423
NicNomadic wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
nic@v6.2

Conversation

@NicNomadic

@NicNomadicNicNomadic commented Feb 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Update the doc according to the 6.26.36.46.5 6.next upgrade proposal.

NB: merge only when (and if) the proposal is voted successfully.

@vercel

vercelBot commented Feb 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
docs-etherlinkReadyReadyPreview, CommentMar 18, 2026 9:10am

Request Review

Comment threaddocs/bridging/bridging-tezos.md Outdated
This change to the bridge introduces a breaking change in the events that are emitted as part of the bridging process.
The `deposit` event is now emitted by the [Tezos bridge precompiled contract](https://explorer.etherlink.com/address/0xff00000000000000000000000000000000000001) (`0xff0...0001`), not the null/system address.

For more information, see TODO BLOG POST.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mind inserting the link

@NicNomadicNicNomadic changed the title Squashed changes for Etherlink 6.2Changes for Etherlink 6.2Feb 20, 2026
Comment threaddocs/bridging/bridging-fa-how.md Outdated
Comment threaddocs/bridging/bridging-tezos.md
Comment threaddocs/bridging/bridging-tezos.md Outdated
@rodibozman

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The rest lgtm w.r.t. Etherlink 6.2's changelog.

@rodibozman

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I can't resolve the threads but latest version looks good to me.


At the end of the period, if a proposal has enough voting power to meet a certain percentage of the total voting power, it moves to the next phase.
As of the Ebisu update, the leading proposal must gather support from at least 1% of the total voting power to move to the next phase.
As of Etherlink 6.2, the leading proposal must gather support from at least 1% of the total voting power to move to the next phase.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have to replace all 6.2 by (probably) 6.3, right?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done everywhere.

@NicNomadicNicNomadic changed the title Changes for Etherlink 6.2Changes for Etherlink 6.3Mar 18, 2026
@NicNomadicNicNomadic changed the title Changes for Etherlink 6.3Changes for Etherlink 6.4May 18, 2026
@NicNomadicNicNomadic changed the title Changes for Etherlink 6.4Changes for Etherlink 6.5Jun 18, 2026
@NicNomadicNicNomadic changed the title Changes for Etherlink 6.5Changes for Etherlink 6.nextJun 30, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@NicNomadic@rodibozman