chore: minor improvement for comments

[alaningtrump]

Overview

minor improvement for comments

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Clarified and polished several inline comments for cache restore, pruning, and DA submission scenarios.
  • Improved wording around restart-related test descriptions for easier readability.
• Style
  • Fixed minor grammar and punctuation issues in comments without changing behavior.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 03a77ac8-81fe-4623-bd50-1fd46dc799be

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e23f9b8 and c77a63b.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• block/internal/cache/manager_test.go
• block/internal/pruner/pruner.go
• block/internal/submitting/da_submitter.go
• block/internal/submitting/submitter_test.go

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR contains only comment text changes across four files in the cache, pruner, and submitting packages. No executable logic, test assertions, function signatures, or exported entity declarations were modified.

Changes

Comment-only corrections

Layer / File(s)	Summary
DA height cache test comments block/internal/cache/manager_test.go	Comments describing initDAHeightFromStore seeding of DaHeight, in-flight placeholder restore, and finalized-tip metadata behavior are reworded and line-wrapped.
DA submitter and submitter test comments block/internal/submitting/da_submitter.go, block/internal/submitting/submitter_test.go	Comments explaining why AppendDAHint errors are ignored are corrected, and the "simulate restart" test comment is reflowed.
Pruner metadata comment fix block/internal/pruner/pruner.go	Grammar corrected in the comment above pruneMetadata ("limit" → "limits").

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• evstack/ev-node#3164: Both PRs only touch inline comments (grammar/spelling) without changing any code logic.

Suggested reviewers:julienrbrt, tac0turtle

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description only says 'minor improvement for comments' and omits the required context, goal, rationale, and issue reference.	Expand the Overview with the change context, why it was needed, the goal/rationale, and link the related issue or add a clear tl;dr.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title matches the changeset, which only updates comments and wording, and it is concise.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}