Add twelve-days practice exercise by alienx5499 · Pull Request #992 · exercism/cpp

alienx5499 · 2025-07-07T12:59:34Z

Description

This PR adds the missing twelve-days practice exercise to the C++ track, addressing issue #985.

What this PR does

✅ Adds complete twelve-days practice exercise implementation
✅ Includes all required exercise files with proper structure
✅ Provides working example solution in .meta/ directory
✅ Updates config.json with exercise metadata
✅ All tests pass with example solution

Exercise Details

Exercise: Twelve Days of Christmas song lyrics generator
Difficulty: 3 (Medium)
Author: alienx5499

Functions Implemented:

verse(int day) - Returns lyrics for a specific day
lyrics(int start_day, int end_day) - Returns multiple verses
lyrics(int end_day) - Returns verses 1 through end_day

Files Added:

exercises/practice/twelve-days/
├── twelve_days.h # Header with function declarations
├── twelve_days.cpp # Stub implementation for students
├── twelve_days_test.cpp # Complete test suite (15 test cases)
├── CMakeLists.txt # Build configuration
├── .meta/
│ ├── config.json # Exercise metadata
│ ├── example.h/.cpp # Working reference solution
│ └── tests.toml # Canonical test mapping
├── .docs/
│ └── instructions.md # Exercise instructions
└── test/
├── catch.hpp # Test framework
└── tests-main.cpp # Test runner

Testing

✅ Built successfully with CMake
✅ All 15 test cases pass with example solution
✅ Verified with ./bin/configlet sync -e twelve-days (up-to-date)
✅ Follows standard Exercism C++ exercise structure

Implementation Notes

Uses vector-based approach for ordinals and gifts storage
Follows canonical test data exactly for string matching
Implements proper newline handling between verses
Stub implementation guides students with TODO comments

Related Issue

Addresses #985 (adds one of the missing practice exercises)

Ready for review! This exercise follows all Exercism C++ track conventions and is fully functional.

github-actions · 2025-07-07T12:59:43Z

Hello. Thanks for opening a PR on Exercism 🙂

We ask that all changes to Exercism are discussed on our Community Forum before being opened on GitHub. To enforce this, we automatically close all PRs that are submitted. That doesn't mean your PR is rejected but that we want the initial discussion about it to happen on our forum where a wide range of key contributors across the Exercism ecosystem can weigh in.

You can use this link to copy this into a new topic on the forum. If we decide the PR is appropriate, we'll reopen it and continue with it, so please don't delete your local branch.

If you're interested in learning more about this auto-responder, please read this blog post.

Note: If this PR has been pre-approved, please link back to this PR on the forum thread and a maintainer or staff member will reopen it.

marcelweikum · 2025-07-07T13:23:59Z

Asking for review #985 (comment)@ahans @vaeng @siebenschlaefer

alienx5499 · 2025-08-28T05:26:47Z

Hi all — could I please get a review on this PR adding the twelve-days practice exercise (addresses #985)?

Status:

✅ Builds with CMake
✅ Example solution passes all 15 tests
✅ ./bin/configlet sync -e twelve-days OK
✅ Follows standard Exercism C++ track layout

Would appreciate if a maintainer could review and merge.

cc @siebenschlaefer @vaeng @ahans

ahans

Thanks for your contribution and sorry for the long wait! Just some comments to get this more in line with the other exercises ...

…w for verses, add newlines

…riptions, no newlines in verses, use recite function

…operator+= calls

…ple.h

…or compile-time constants

…ring{} constructor

…elve-days example

alienx5499 · 2025-08-29T19:27:31Z

All requested changes have been addressed ✅
Ready for another review 👍

ahans

Thanks for addressing my comments. However, it appears to me you mostly vibe code this. Please don't do this blindly. It leads to inconsistencies and broken code. Also please test your solution locally first. Thank you for your understanding.

ahans · 2025-08-29T20:24:10Z

I also approved the CI runs now, you'll see that they fail.

alienx5499 · 2025-08-30T04:02:41Z

Thanks for the review! I’ll admit I used AI in some cases to speed things up, but I didn’t vibe code blindly, I tried to follow the review points. I see now that some of those changes introduced issues, so I’ll rework them carefully, clean up formatting, and make sure everything passes before pushing again.

…e-days-exercise

…rmatting

alienx5499 · 2025-08-30T05:49:30Z

When I use constexpr std::string_view expected = ... in tests, I get this linker error:

Undefined symbols for architecture arm64:
"Catch::StringMaker<std::__1::basic_string_view<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>>, void>::convert(...)"

That's why in my latest commit I used std::string expected = ... for the tests to compile and run.

ahans · 2025-08-30T08:11:29Z

When I use constexpr std::string_view expected = ... in tests, I get this linker error:
Undefined symbols for architecture arm64:
"Catch::StringMaker<std::__1::basic_string_view<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>>, void>::convert(...)"
That's why in my latest commit I used std::string expected = ... for the tests to compile and run.

That is surprising, but is probably due to our ancient version of Catch2. That old version doesn't support string_view properly yet, it seems. The issue here is with Catch2 code that is used to print differences when test cases fail. Anyway, sticking to std::string is probably the way to go then.

The reason I advocate for std::string_view and the like in tests is that I think it is good to leave students as many options as possible. In the present case, where the exercise is about generating strings, std::string is the only viable choice (at least as long as we only support C++17), so it's acceptable to have that explicitly in the tests. You could still compare it against a std::string_view or even const char*, so students could still return that. There are other exercises, where a student function needs to accept a string. In that case leaving more options and not hinting at some particular choice via the tests is more important.

ahans

We're getting there! Thanks for you patience!

alienx5499 · 2025-08-30T09:09:01Z

I have implemented all your suggested changes: template argument deduction for std::array, updated namespace structure, and added const qualifiers to expected variables. All changes committed and pushed successfully.

ahans

Thanks again for your contribution. I will fix the redundancy in the example and then merge.

ahans · 2025-08-30T10:24:11Z

+ if (start_day == end_day) {
+ // Single verse case
+ auto result = std::string{"On the "} +
+ std::string{ordinals[start_day]} +
+ " day of Christmas my true love gave to me: ";
+
+ for (int i = start_day; i >= 1; --i) {
+ if (i == start_day) {
+ result += std::string{gifts[i]};
+ } else if (i == 1) {
+ result += std::string{", and "} + std::string{gifts[i]};
+ } else {
+ result += std::string{", "} + std::string{gifts[i]};
+ }
+ }
+
+ result += ".\n";
+ return result;
+ } else {
+ // Multiple verses case
+ std::string result = "";
+ for (int i = start_day; i <= end_day; ++i) {
+ if (i > start_day) {
+ result += "\n";
+ }
+
+ auto verse = std::string{"On the "} + std::string{ordinals[i]} +
+ " day of Christmas my true love gave to me: ";
+
+ for (int j = i; j >= 1; --j) {
+ if (j == i) {
+ verse += std::string{gifts[j]};
+ } else if (j == 1) {
+ verse += std::string{", and "} + std::string{gifts[j]};
+ } else {
+ verse += std::string{", "} + std::string{gifts[j]};
+ }
+ }
+
+ verse += ".\n";
+ result += verse;
+ }
+ return result;


There's quite a bit of redundancy in here. You had that better in a previous iteration. But don't worry, I will take care of it.

alienx5499 · 2025-08-30T11:33:23Z

@ahans Thank you for your time, review, and for merging! 🤍

Add twelve-days practice exercise
611f687

github-actionsBot closed this Jul 7, 2025

alienx5499 mentioned this pull request Jul 7, 2025
Add missing practice exercises #985
Open
55 tasks

ahans reopened this Aug 28, 2025

ahans requested changes Aug 28, 2025
View reviewed changes

alienx5499 added 9 commits August 29, 2025 23:48

Remove stub function signatures from twelve-days exercise
ada7fd8

Fix twelve-days test: remove using namespace std, use std::string_vie…
67572b8
…w for verses, add newlines

Update twelve-days test to match canonical data exactly: shorter desc…
af0742e
…riptions, no newlines in verses, use recite function

Fix string concatenation in twelve-days example: split into separate …
cf7438e
…operator+= calls

Fix include in twelve-days example: use twelve_days.h instead of exam…
e65a569
…ple.h

Optimize twelve-days example: use std::array instead of std::vector f…
c237f28
…or compile-time constants

Fix string concatenation in twelve-days example: use auto and std::st…
4007cd4
…ring{} constructor

Add missing EOL character to twelve-days CMakeLists.txt
c58c572

Use std::string{} constructor approach for string concatenation in tw…
2edf9c7
…elve-days example

ahans requested changes Aug 29, 2025
View reviewed changes

alienx5499 added 2 commits August 30, 2025 10:33

Merge branch 'main' ofhttps://github.com/exercism/cppinto add-twelv…
418be26
…e-days-exercise

Implement recite function with constexpr arrays and proper newline fo…
c57cbb5
…rmatting

alienx5499 requested a review from ahans August 30, 2025 05:49

ahans reviewed Aug 30, 2025
View reviewed changes

alienx5499 added 2 commits August 30, 2025 13:57

Add const qualifier to expected variables in twelve-days tests
5184230

Update namespace structure in twelve-days exercise
d3b67ff

alienx5499 requested a review from ahans August 30, 2025 09:09

ahans reviewed Aug 30, 2025
View reviewed changes

ahans added 3 commits August 30, 2025 12:25

Reduce redundancy
3aeda3d

fix formatting
de9e3b2

fix trailing whitespace
24d8f9d

ahans added x:action/create Work on something from scratch x:module/practice-exercise Work on Practice Exercises x:rep/large Large amount of reputation labels Aug 30, 2025

ahans approved these changes Aug 30, 2025
View reviewed changes

ahans merged commit 2bb55dc into exercism:mainAug 30, 2025
8 checks passed

alienx5499 deleted the add-twelve-days-exercise branch February 19, 2026 11:17

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Conversation

alienx5499 commented Jul 7, 2025

Description

What this PR does

Exercise Details

Functions Implemented:

Files Added:

Testing

Implementation Notes

Related Issue

Uh oh!

github-actionsBot commented Jul 7, 2025

Uh oh!

marcelweikum commented Jul 7, 2025

Uh oh!

alienx5499 commented Aug 28, 2025

Uh oh!

ahans left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

alienx5499 commented Aug 29, 2025

Uh oh!

ahans left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ahans commented Aug 29, 2025

Uh oh!

alienx5499 commented Aug 30, 2025

Uh oh!

alienx5499 commented Aug 30, 2025

Uh oh!

ahans commented Aug 30, 2025• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ahans left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

alienx5499 commented Aug 30, 2025

Uh oh!

ahans left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

ahansAug 30, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

alienx5499 commented Aug 30, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

ahans commented Aug 30, 2025•
edited
Loading