Skip to content

docs: Add DCO - #6048

Merged
UlisesGascon merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ulises/DCO
Oct 29, 2024
Merged

docs: Add DCO#6048
UlisesGascon merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ulises/DCO

Conversation

@UlisesGascon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@UlisesGascon
UlisesGascon requested a review from a teamOctober 13, 2024 12:43
@UlisesGasconUlisesGascon self-assigned this Oct 13, 2024
@UlisesGascon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

ping: @expressjs/express-tc

@bjohansebas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It could be added as a comment in the PR messages like pkgjs does.

ref: https://github.com/pkgjs/.github/blob/main/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md?plain=1

@UlisesGascon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Great idea @bjohansebas. Would you mind to do a PR for that? :)

Comment threadContributing.md
Co-authored-by: Chris de Almeida <ctcpip@users.noreply.github.com>
@UlisesGascon
UlisesGascon merged commit b31910c into masterOct 29, 2024
@UlisesGasconUlisesGascon changed the title Add DCOdocs: Add DCOOct 29, 2024
@UlisesGascon
UlisesGascon deleted the ulises/DCO branch October 29, 2024 12:35
@UlisesGasconUlisesGascon mentioned this pull request Oct 29, 2024
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/nvm that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
imo this shouldn‘t be necessary, as it should be implied by the act of making a PR.
Following the example in expressjs/express#6048
See https://github.com/openjs-foundation/project-status/issues/2
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/nvm that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
imo this shouldn‘t be necessary, as it should be implied by the act of making a PR.
Following the example in expressjs/express#6048
See https://github.com/openjs-foundation/project-status/issues/2
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/nvm that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
imo this shouldn‘t be necessary, as it should be implied by the act of making a PR.
Following the example in expressjs/express#6048
See https://github.com/openjs-foundation/project-status/issues/2
@ljharbljharb mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2024
ljharb added a commit to ljharb/nvm that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
imo this shouldn‘t be necessary, as it should be implied by the act of making a PR.
Following the example in expressjs/express#6048
See https://github.com/openjs-foundation/project-status/issues/2
@UlisesGasconUlisesGascon mentioned this pull request Mar 23, 2025
68 tasks
@wesleytoddwesleytodd mentioned this pull request Mar 28, 2025
Merged
ljharb added a commit to browserify/resolve that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2025
imo this shouldn‘t be necessary, as it should be implied by the act of making a PR.
Following the example in expressjs/express#6048 / nvm-sh/nvm#3456
ljharb added a commit to browserify/resolve that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2026
imo this shouldn‘t be necessary, as it should be implied by the act of making a PR.
Following the example in expressjs/express#6048 / nvm-sh/nvm#3456
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@UlisesGascon@bjohansebas@ctcpip