🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ - #1607

Merged
tiangolo merged 14 commits into
fastapi:mainfrom
vimota:main
Feb 1, 2026
Merged

🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+#1607
tiangolo merged 14 commits into
fastapi:mainfrom
vimota:main

Conversation

@vimota

@vimotavimota commented Oct 15, 2025•
edited by svlandeg
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes #1597

@stickm4n

stickm4n commented Oct 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is fixed in #1603

@YuriiMotovYuriiMotov mentioned this pull request Oct 27, 2025
Closed
8 tasks
@svlandegsvlandeg self-assigned this Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg linked an issue Oct 30, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
SQLModel fails to create DB constraints when using Annotated types after Pydantic 2.12.0 #1623
Closed
8 tasks
@svlandegsvlandeg added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg changed the title Fix support for Annotated fields by preserving the underlying sqlmode…🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative 2)Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2025
Closed
@svlandegsvlandeg changed the title 🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative 2)🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2025
Closed
@svlandegsvlandeg changed the title 🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative)Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg removed their assignment Oct 30, 2025
@vimota

vimota commented Dec 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Any word on this @svlandeg ? Is @tiangolo leaning towards this solution or the other?

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the conflicts Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict label Dec 23, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added conflicts Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict and removed conflicts Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict labels Dec 23, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the conflicts Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict label Dec 28, 2025
@vimota

vimota commented Dec 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

No merge conflicts and all tests/checks passing 🫡

@tiangolotiangolo changed the title 🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative)🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+Feb 1, 2026
tiangolo
tiangolo approved these changes Feb 1, 2026
View reviewed changes

@tiangolotiangolo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thank you! 🙌

This approach, moving the metadata to its own annotation will allow us (in the future) to stop sub-classing FieldInfo, which the Pydantic team have asked for.

I added a test with stringified annotations (from __future__ import annotations) and this PR fixes/passes that test. ✔️

This will be available in the next few hours in SQLModel 0.0.32 🚀

@tiangolo
tiangolo merged commit 66533c9 into fastapi:mainFeb 1, 2026
25 checks passed
@ogabrielluizogabrielluiz mentioned this pull request Feb 3, 2026
Merged
@svlandegsvlandeg mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2026
Open
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tiangolotiangolotiangolo approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

bugSomething isn't working

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SQLModel fails to create DB constraints when using Annotated types after Pydantic 2.12.0

4 participants

@vimota@stickm4n@tiangolo@svlandeg
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ - #1607
Merged
tiangolo merged 14 commits into
fastapi:mainfrom 
vimota:main
Feb 1, 2026
Merged
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+#1607
tiangolo merged 14 commits into
fastapi:mainfrom 
vimota:main
Conversation
@vimota
@vimotavimota
commented
Oct 15, 2025•

edited by svlandeg

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Fixes #1597
@stickm4n
stickm4n
commented
Oct 20, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This is fixed in #1603
@YuriiMotovYuriiMotov
mentioned this pull request
Oct 27, 2025

Closed

8 tasks
@svlandegsvlandeg
self-assigned this
Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
linked an issue
Oct 30, 2025
that may be
closed
by this pull request


SQLModel fails to create DB constraints when using Annotated types after Pydantic 2.12.0
#1623

Closed

8 tasks
@svlandegsvlandeg
added
the 
bug
Something isn't working
label
Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
Fix support for Annotated fields by preserving the underlying sqlmode…🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative 2)Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
 Closed

@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative 2)🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
 Closed

@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative)Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
removed their assignment
Oct 30, 2025
@vimota
vimota
commented
Dec 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Any word on this @svlandeg ? Is @tiangolo leaning towards this solution or the other?
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added
the 
conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
label
Dec 23, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
and removed

conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
labels
Dec 23, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
removed
the 
conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
label
Dec 28, 2025
@vimota
vimota
commented
Dec 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
No merge conflicts and all tests/checks passing 🫡
@tiangolotiangolo
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative)🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+Feb 1, 2026
tiangolo
tiangolo
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2026
View reviewed changes
@tiangolotiangolo
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thank you! 🙌
This approach, moving the metadata to its own annotation will allow us (in the future) to stop sub-classing FieldInfo, which the Pydantic team have asked for.
I added a test with stringified annotations (from __future__ import annotations) and this PR fixes/passes that test. ✔️
This will be available in the next few hours in SQLModel 0.0.32 🚀
@tiangolo
tiangolo
merged commit 66533c9
into
fastapi:mainFeb 1, 2026

25 checks passed

@ogabrielluizogabrielluiz
mentioned this pull request
Feb 3, 2026
 Merged

@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Mar 3, 2026
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tiangolotiangolotiangolo approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

bugSomething isn't working

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SQLModel fails to create DB constraints when using Annotated types after Pydantic 2.12.0


4 participants

@vimota@stickm4n@tiangolo@svlandeg

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ - #1607
Merged
tiangolo merged 14 commits into
fastapi:mainfrom 
vimota:main
Feb 1, 2026
Merged
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+#1607
tiangolo merged 14 commits into
fastapi:mainfrom 
vimota:main
Conversation
@vimota
@vimotavimota
commented
Oct 15, 2025•

edited by svlandeg

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Fixes #1597
@stickm4n
stickm4n
commented
Oct 20, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This is fixed in #1603
@YuriiMotovYuriiMotov
mentioned this pull request
Oct 27, 2025

Closed

8 tasks
@svlandegsvlandeg
self-assigned this
Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
linked an issue
Oct 30, 2025
that may be
closed
by this pull request


SQLModel fails to create DB constraints when using Annotated types after Pydantic 2.12.0
#1623

Closed

8 tasks
@svlandegsvlandeg
added
the 
bug
Something isn't working
label
Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
Fix support for Annotated fields by preserving the underlying sqlmode…🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative 2)Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
 Closed

@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative 2)🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
 Closed

@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative)Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
removed their assignment
Oct 30, 2025
@vimota
vimota
commented
Dec 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Any word on this @svlandeg ? Is @tiangolo leaning towards this solution or the other?
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added
the 
conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
label
Dec 23, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
and removed

conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
labels
Dec 23, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
removed
the 
conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
label
Dec 28, 2025
@vimota
vimota
commented
Dec 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
No merge conflicts and all tests/checks passing 🫡
@tiangolotiangolo
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative)🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+Feb 1, 2026
tiangolo
tiangolo
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2026
View reviewed changes
@tiangolotiangolo
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thank you! 🙌
This approach, moving the metadata to its own annotation will allow us (in the future) to stop sub-classing FieldInfo, which the Pydantic team have asked for.
I added a test with stringified annotations (from __future__ import annotations) and this PR fixes/passes that test. ✔️
This will be available in the next few hours in SQLModel 0.0.32 🚀
@tiangolo
tiangolo
merged commit 66533c9
into
fastapi:mainFeb 1, 2026

25 checks passed

@ogabrielluizogabrielluiz
mentioned this pull request
Feb 3, 2026
 Merged

@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Mar 3, 2026
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tiangolotiangolotiangolo approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

bugSomething isn't working

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SQLModel fails to create DB constraints when using Annotated types after Pydantic 2.12.0


4 participants

@vimota@stickm4n@tiangolo@svlandeg

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ - #1607
Merged
tiangolo merged 14 commits into
fastapi:mainfrom 
vimota:main
Feb 1, 2026
Merged
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+#1607
tiangolo merged 14 commits into
fastapi:mainfrom 
vimota:main
Conversation
@vimota
@vimotavimota
commented
Oct 15, 2025•

edited by svlandeg

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Fixes #1597
@stickm4n
stickm4n
commented
Oct 20, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This is fixed in #1603
@YuriiMotovYuriiMotov
mentioned this pull request
Oct 27, 2025

Closed

8 tasks
@svlandegsvlandeg
self-assigned this
Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
linked an issue
Oct 30, 2025
that may be
closed
by this pull request


SQLModel fails to create DB constraints when using Annotated types after Pydantic 2.12.0
#1623

Closed

8 tasks
@svlandegsvlandeg
added
the 
bug
Something isn't working
label
Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
Fix support for Annotated fields by preserving the underlying sqlmode…🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative 2)Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
 Closed

@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative 2)🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
 Closed

@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative)Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
removed their assignment
Oct 30, 2025
@vimota
vimota
commented
Dec 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Any word on this @svlandeg ? Is @tiangolo leaning towards this solution or the other?
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added
the 
conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
label
Dec 23, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
and removed

conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
labels
Dec 23, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
removed
the 
conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
label
Dec 28, 2025
@vimota
vimota
commented
Dec 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
No merge conflicts and all tests/checks passing 🫡
@tiangolotiangolo
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative)🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+Feb 1, 2026
tiangolo
tiangolo
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2026
View reviewed changes
@tiangolotiangolo
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thank you! 🙌
This approach, moving the metadata to its own annotation will allow us (in the future) to stop sub-classing FieldInfo, which the Pydantic team have asked for.
I added a test with stringified annotations (from __future__ import annotations) and this PR fixes/passes that test. ✔️
This will be available in the next few hours in SQLModel 0.0.32 🚀
@tiangolo
tiangolo
merged commit 66533c9
into
fastapi:mainFeb 1, 2026

25 checks passed

@ogabrielluizogabrielluiz
mentioned this pull request
Feb 3, 2026
 Merged

@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Mar 3, 2026
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tiangolotiangolotiangolo approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

bugSomething isn't working

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SQLModel fails to create DB constraints when using Annotated types after Pydantic 2.12.0


4 participants

@vimota@stickm4n@tiangolo@svlandeg

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ - #1607
Merged
tiangolo merged 14 commits into
fastapi:mainfrom 
vimota:main
Feb 1, 2026
Merged
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+#1607
tiangolo merged 14 commits into
fastapi:mainfrom 
vimota:main
Conversation
@vimota
@vimotavimota
commented
Oct 15, 2025•

edited by svlandeg

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Fixes #1597
@stickm4n
stickm4n
commented
Oct 20, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This is fixed in #1603
@YuriiMotovYuriiMotov
mentioned this pull request
Oct 27, 2025

Closed

8 tasks
@svlandegsvlandeg
self-assigned this
Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
linked an issue
Oct 30, 2025
that may be
closed
by this pull request


SQLModel fails to create DB constraints when using Annotated types after Pydantic 2.12.0
#1623

Closed

8 tasks
@svlandegsvlandeg
added
the 
bug
Something isn't working
label
Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
Fix support for Annotated fields by preserving the underlying sqlmode…🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative 2)Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
 Closed

@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative 2)🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
 Closed

@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative)Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
removed their assignment
Oct 30, 2025
@vimota
vimota
commented
Dec 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Any word on this @svlandeg ? Is @tiangolo leaning towards this solution or the other?
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added
the 
conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
label
Dec 23, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
and removed

conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
labels
Dec 23, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
removed
the 
conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
label
Dec 28, 2025
@vimota
vimota
commented
Dec 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
No merge conflicts and all tests/checks passing 🫡
@tiangolotiangolo
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative)🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+Feb 1, 2026
tiangolo
tiangolo
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2026
View reviewed changes
@tiangolotiangolo
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thank you! 🙌
This approach, moving the metadata to its own annotation will allow us (in the future) to stop sub-classing FieldInfo, which the Pydantic team have asked for.
I added a test with stringified annotations (from __future__ import annotations) and this PR fixes/passes that test. ✔️
This will be available in the next few hours in SQLModel 0.0.32 🚀
@tiangolo
tiangolo
merged commit 66533c9
into
fastapi:mainFeb 1, 2026

25 checks passed

@ogabrielluizogabrielluiz
mentioned this pull request
Feb 3, 2026
 Merged

@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Mar 3, 2026
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tiangolotiangolotiangolo approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

bugSomething isn't working

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SQLModel fails to create DB constraints when using Annotated types after Pydantic 2.12.0


4 participants

@vimota@stickm4n@tiangolo@svlandeg

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ - #1607
Merged
tiangolo merged 14 commits into
fastapi:mainfrom 
vimota:main
Feb 1, 2026
Merged
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+#1607
tiangolo merged 14 commits into
fastapi:mainfrom 
vimota:main
Conversation
@vimota
@vimotavimota
commented
Oct 15, 2025•

edited by svlandeg

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Fixes #1597
@stickm4n
stickm4n
commented
Oct 20, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This is fixed in #1603
@YuriiMotovYuriiMotov
mentioned this pull request
Oct 27, 2025

Closed

8 tasks
@svlandegsvlandeg
self-assigned this
Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
linked an issue
Oct 30, 2025
that may be
closed
by this pull request


SQLModel fails to create DB constraints when using Annotated types after Pydantic 2.12.0
#1623

Closed

8 tasks
@svlandegsvlandeg
added
the 
bug
Something isn't working
label
Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
Fix support for Annotated fields by preserving the underlying sqlmode…🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative 2)Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
 Closed

@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative 2)🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
 Closed

@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative)Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
removed their assignment
Oct 30, 2025
@vimota
vimota
commented
Dec 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Any word on this @svlandeg ? Is @tiangolo leaning towards this solution or the other?
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added
the 
conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
label
Dec 23, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
and removed

conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
labels
Dec 23, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
removed
the 
conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
label
Dec 28, 2025
@vimota
vimota
commented
Dec 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
No merge conflicts and all tests/checks passing 🫡
@tiangolotiangolo
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative)🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+Feb 1, 2026
tiangolo
tiangolo
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2026
View reviewed changes
@tiangolotiangolo
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thank you! 🙌
This approach, moving the metadata to its own annotation will allow us (in the future) to stop sub-classing FieldInfo, which the Pydantic team have asked for.
I added a test with stringified annotations (from __future__ import annotations) and this PR fixes/passes that test. ✔️
This will be available in the next few hours in SQLModel 0.0.32 🚀
@tiangolo
tiangolo
merged commit 66533c9
into
fastapi:mainFeb 1, 2026

25 checks passed

@ogabrielluizogabrielluiz
mentioned this pull request
Feb 3, 2026
 Merged

@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Mar 3, 2026
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tiangolotiangolotiangolo approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

bugSomething isn't working

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SQLModel fails to create DB constraints when using Annotated types after Pydantic 2.12.0


4 participants

@vimota@stickm4n@tiangolo@svlandeg

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ - #1607
Merged
tiangolo merged 14 commits into
fastapi:mainfrom 
vimota:main
Feb 1, 2026
Merged
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+#1607
tiangolo merged 14 commits into
fastapi:mainfrom 
vimota:main
Conversation
@vimota
@vimotavimota
commented
Oct 15, 2025•

edited by svlandeg

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Fixes #1597
@stickm4n
stickm4n
commented
Oct 20, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This is fixed in #1603
@YuriiMotovYuriiMotov
mentioned this pull request
Oct 27, 2025

Closed

8 tasks
@svlandegsvlandeg
self-assigned this
Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
linked an issue
Oct 30, 2025
that may be
closed
by this pull request


SQLModel fails to create DB constraints when using Annotated types after Pydantic 2.12.0
#1623

Closed

8 tasks
@svlandegsvlandeg
added
the 
bug
Something isn't working
label
Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
Fix support for Annotated fields by preserving the underlying sqlmode…🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative 2)Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
 Closed

@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative 2)🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
 Closed

@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative)Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
removed their assignment
Oct 30, 2025
@vimota
vimota
commented
Dec 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Any word on this @svlandeg ? Is @tiangolo leaning towards this solution or the other?
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added
the 
conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
label
Dec 23, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
and removed

conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
labels
Dec 23, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
removed
the 
conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
label
Dec 28, 2025
@vimota
vimota
commented
Dec 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
No merge conflicts and all tests/checks passing 🫡
@tiangolotiangolo
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative)🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+Feb 1, 2026
tiangolo
tiangolo
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2026
View reviewed changes
@tiangolotiangolo
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thank you! 🙌
This approach, moving the metadata to its own annotation will allow us (in the future) to stop sub-classing FieldInfo, which the Pydantic team have asked for.
I added a test with stringified annotations (from __future__ import annotations) and this PR fixes/passes that test. ✔️
This will be available in the next few hours in SQLModel 0.0.32 🚀
@tiangolo
tiangolo
merged commit 66533c9
into
fastapi:mainFeb 1, 2026

25 checks passed

@ogabrielluizogabrielluiz
mentioned this pull request
Feb 3, 2026
 Merged

@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Mar 3, 2026
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tiangolotiangolotiangolo approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

bugSomething isn't working

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SQLModel fails to create DB constraints when using Annotated types after Pydantic 2.12.0


4 participants

@vimota@stickm4n@tiangolo@svlandeg

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ - #1607
Merged
tiangolo merged 14 commits into
fastapi:mainfrom 
vimota:main
Feb 1, 2026
Merged
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+#1607
tiangolo merged 14 commits into
fastapi:mainfrom 
vimota:main
Conversation
@vimota
@vimotavimota
commented
Oct 15, 2025•

edited by svlandeg

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Fixes #1597
@stickm4n
stickm4n
commented
Oct 20, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
This is fixed in #1603
@YuriiMotovYuriiMotov
mentioned this pull request
Oct 27, 2025

Closed

8 tasks
@svlandegsvlandeg
self-assigned this
Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
linked an issue
Oct 30, 2025
that may be
closed
by this pull request


SQLModel fails to create DB constraints when using Annotated types after Pydantic 2.12.0
#1623

Closed

8 tasks
@svlandegsvlandeg
added
the 
bug
Something isn't working
label
Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
Fix support for Annotated fields by preserving the underlying sqlmode…🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative 2)Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
 Closed

@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative 2)🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
 Closed

@svlandegsvlandeg
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative)Oct 30, 2025
@svlandegsvlandeg
removed their assignment
Oct 30, 2025
@vimota
vimota
commented
Dec 19, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Any word on this @svlandeg ? Is @tiangolo leaning towards this solution or the other?
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added
the 
conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
label
Dec 23, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
added

conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
and removed

conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
labels
Dec 23, 2025
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot
removed
the 
conflicts
Automatically generated when a PR has a merge conflict
label
Dec 28, 2025
@vimota
vimota
commented
Dec 28, 2025

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
No merge conflicts and all tests/checks passing 🫡
@tiangolotiangolo
changed the title
🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+ (alternative)🐛 Fix support for Annotated fields with Pydantic 2.12+Feb 1, 2026
tiangolo
tiangolo
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2026
View reviewed changes
@tiangolotiangolo
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thank you! 🙌
This approach, moving the metadata to its own annotation will allow us (in the future) to stop sub-classing FieldInfo, which the Pydantic team have asked for.
I added a test with stringified annotations (from __future__ import annotations) and this PR fixes/passes that test. ✔️
This will be available in the next few hours in SQLModel 0.0.32 🚀
@tiangolo
tiangolo
merged commit 66533c9
into
fastapi:mainFeb 1, 2026

25 checks passed

@ogabrielluizogabrielluiz
mentioned this pull request
Feb 3, 2026
 Merged

@svlandegsvlandeg
mentioned this pull request
Mar 3, 2026
 Open

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tiangolotiangolotiangolo approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

bugSomething isn't working

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SQLModel fails to create DB constraints when using Annotated types after Pydantic 2.12.0


4 participants

@vimota@stickm4n@tiangolo@svlandeg