Skip to content

Confusion about error.execution #644

Description

@Dolecor

The error.execution is causing me some confusion.

  1. Is it true that when defining the error_execution event in my machine, I must manually give it an id manually usingEvent(..., id="error.execution")?

    Before sending an event to the state machine, I check whether the event can be triggered using sm.allowed_events. Then I needed to catch all unhandled exceptions that could be raised by the listeners (StateChart itself, Model, etc.). I learned from the Error Handling page that this can be done by adding handlers for the error.execution event. But it seems sm.allowed_events and sm.enabled_events() conflicts with the error_execution event.

    I will demonstrate this using the ErrorLogger example from the Error Handling section:

    from statemachine import State, StateChart
    class ErrorLogger(StateChart):
    running = State(initial=True)
    failed = State(final=True)
    process = running.to(running, on="do_process")
    error_execution = running.to(failed, on="log_error")
    def do_process(self):
    raise ValueError("bad data")
    def log_error(self, error):
    self.last_error = error
    

    When I try to get enabled events after the machine reaches a stable configuration:

    sm = ErrorLogger()
    print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
    

    I get the AttributeError exception:

    (.venv) PS <...>> sm-test.exe
    Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "<frozen runpy>", line 203, in _run_module_as_main
    File "<frozen runpy>", line 88, in _run_code
    File "<...>\.venv\Scripts\sm-test.exe\__main__.py", line 5, in <module>
    sys.exit(main())
    ~~~~^^
    File "<...>\src\sm_test\__main__.py", line 57, in main
    print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
    File "<...>\.venv\Lib\site-packages\statemachine\statemachine.py", line 450, in enabled_events
    result = self._engine.enabled_events(*args, **kwargs)
    File "<...>\.venv\Lib\site-packages\statemachine\engines\sync.py", line 191, in enabled_events
    "event": getattr(sm, event),
    ~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^
    AttributeError: 'ErrorLogger' object has no attribute 'error.execution'. Did you mean: 'error_execution'?
    

    I found that the problem disappears if I manually assign the name error.execution to the error_execution event:

    class ErrorLogger(StateChart):
    [...]
    error_execution = Event(running.to(failed, on="log_error"), id="error.execution")
    
  2. Is it true that error_execution event, by design, can be sent to the machine from "outside"?

    When I applied the workaround with Event(..., id="error.execution"), the sm.enabled_events() gives:

    Enabled events: [BoundEvent('process', delay=0, internal=False), BoundEvent('error.execution', delay=0, internal=False)]
    

    Note that error.execution is enabled event, and it can be sent to the machine from main().

    This snippet:

    sm = ErrorLogger()
    print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
    if "error.execution" in sm.enabled_events():
    sm.send("error.execution", error=RuntimeError("Should this be possible?"))
    print(sm.last_error)
    

    gives:

     Enabled events: [BoundEvent('process', delay=0, internal=False), BoundEvent('error.execution', delay=0, internal=False)]
    Should this be possible?
    

    The error.execution event is described as an internal mechanism of the machine, and it’s strange that this event can be sent from "outside".

python-statemachine versions 3.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.0, and 3.2.1 work identically with the specified code snippets.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
     blocks
    (function() {
    function addCopyButtons() {
    document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
    if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
    codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
    var btn = document.createElement('button');
    btn.textContent = 'Copy';
    btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
    btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
    btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
    btn.onclick = function() {
    navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
    btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
    setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
    });
    };
    codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
    codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
    });
    }
    addCopyButtons();
    // Re-run on dynamic content
    var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
    observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
    })();
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    Confusion about `error.execution` · Issue #644 · fgmacedo/python-statemachine · GitHub
    Skip to content

    Confusion about error.execution #644

    Description

    @Dolecor

    The error.execution is causing me some confusion.

    1. Is it true that when defining the error_execution event in my machine, I must manually give it an id manually usingEvent(..., id="error.execution")?

      Before sending an event to the state machine, I check whether the event can be triggered using sm.allowed_events. Then I needed to catch all unhandled exceptions that could be raised by the listeners (StateChart itself, Model, etc.). I learned from the Error Handling page that this can be done by adding handlers for the error.execution event. But it seems sm.allowed_events and sm.enabled_events() conflicts with the error_execution event.

      I will demonstrate this using the ErrorLogger example from the Error Handling section:

      from statemachine import State, StateChart
      class ErrorLogger(StateChart):
      running = State(initial=True)
      failed = State(final=True)
      process = running.to(running, on="do_process")
      error_execution = running.to(failed, on="log_error")
      def do_process(self):
      raise ValueError("bad data")
      def log_error(self, error):
      self.last_error = error
      

      When I try to get enabled events after the machine reaches a stable configuration:

      sm = ErrorLogger()
      print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
      

      I get the AttributeError exception:

      (.venv) PS <...>> sm-test.exe
      Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<frozen runpy>", line 203, in _run_module_as_main
      File "<frozen runpy>", line 88, in _run_code
      File "<...>\.venv\Scripts\sm-test.exe\__main__.py", line 5, in <module>
      sys.exit(main())
      ~~~~^^
      File "<...>\src\sm_test\__main__.py", line 57, in main
      print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
      File "<...>\.venv\Lib\site-packages\statemachine\statemachine.py", line 450, in enabled_events
      result = self._engine.enabled_events(*args, **kwargs)
      File "<...>\.venv\Lib\site-packages\statemachine\engines\sync.py", line 191, in enabled_events
      "event": getattr(sm, event),
      ~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^
      AttributeError: 'ErrorLogger' object has no attribute 'error.execution'. Did you mean: 'error_execution'?
      

      I found that the problem disappears if I manually assign the name error.execution to the error_execution event:

      class ErrorLogger(StateChart):
      [...]
      error_execution = Event(running.to(failed, on="log_error"), id="error.execution")
      
    2. Is it true that error_execution event, by design, can be sent to the machine from "outside"?

      When I applied the workaround with Event(..., id="error.execution"), the sm.enabled_events() gives:

      Enabled events: [BoundEvent('process', delay=0, internal=False), BoundEvent('error.execution', delay=0, internal=False)]
      

      Note that error.execution is enabled event, and it can be sent to the machine from main().

      This snippet:

      sm = ErrorLogger()
      print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
      if "error.execution" in sm.enabled_events():
      sm.send("error.execution", error=RuntimeError("Should this be possible?"))
      print(sm.last_error)
      

      gives:

       Enabled events: [BoundEvent('process', delay=0, internal=False), BoundEvent('error.execution', delay=0, internal=False)]
      Should this be possible?
      

      The error.execution event is described as an internal mechanism of the machine, and it’s strange that this event can be sent from "outside".

    python-statemachine versions 3.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.0, and 3.2.1 work identically with the specified code snippets.

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    No one assigned

      Labels

      Projects

      No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Confusion about `error.execution` · Issue #644 · fgmacedo/python-statemachine · GitHub
      Skip to content

      Confusion about error.execution #644

      Description

      @Dolecor

      The error.execution is causing me some confusion.

      1. Is it true that when defining the error_execution event in my machine, I must manually give it an id manually usingEvent(..., id="error.execution")?

        Before sending an event to the state machine, I check whether the event can be triggered using sm.allowed_events. Then I needed to catch all unhandled exceptions that could be raised by the listeners (StateChart itself, Model, etc.). I learned from the Error Handling page that this can be done by adding handlers for the error.execution event. But it seems sm.allowed_events and sm.enabled_events() conflicts with the error_execution event.

        I will demonstrate this using the ErrorLogger example from the Error Handling section:

        from statemachine import State, StateChart
        class ErrorLogger(StateChart):
        running = State(initial=True)
        failed = State(final=True)
        process = running.to(running, on="do_process")
        error_execution = running.to(failed, on="log_error")
        def do_process(self):
        raise ValueError("bad data")
        def log_error(self, error):
        self.last_error = error
        

        When I try to get enabled events after the machine reaches a stable configuration:

        sm = ErrorLogger()
        print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
        

        I get the AttributeError exception:

        (.venv) PS <...>> sm-test.exe
        Traceback (most recent call last):
        File "<frozen runpy>", line 203, in _run_module_as_main
        File "<frozen runpy>", line 88, in _run_code
        File "<...>\.venv\Scripts\sm-test.exe\__main__.py", line 5, in <module>
        sys.exit(main())
        ~~~~^^
        File "<...>\src\sm_test\__main__.py", line 57, in main
        print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
        File "<...>\.venv\Lib\site-packages\statemachine\statemachine.py", line 450, in enabled_events
        result = self._engine.enabled_events(*args, **kwargs)
        File "<...>\.venv\Lib\site-packages\statemachine\engines\sync.py", line 191, in enabled_events
        "event": getattr(sm, event),
        ~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^
        AttributeError: 'ErrorLogger' object has no attribute 'error.execution'. Did you mean: 'error_execution'?
        

        I found that the problem disappears if I manually assign the name error.execution to the error_execution event:

        class ErrorLogger(StateChart):
        [...]
        error_execution = Event(running.to(failed, on="log_error"), id="error.execution")
        
      2. Is it true that error_execution event, by design, can be sent to the machine from "outside"?

        When I applied the workaround with Event(..., id="error.execution"), the sm.enabled_events() gives:

        Enabled events: [BoundEvent('process', delay=0, internal=False), BoundEvent('error.execution', delay=0, internal=False)]
        

        Note that error.execution is enabled event, and it can be sent to the machine from main().

        This snippet:

        sm = ErrorLogger()
        print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
        if "error.execution" in sm.enabled_events():
        sm.send("error.execution", error=RuntimeError("Should this be possible?"))
        print(sm.last_error)
        

        gives:

         Enabled events: [BoundEvent('process', delay=0, internal=False), BoundEvent('error.execution', delay=0, internal=False)]
        Should this be possible?
        

        The error.execution event is described as an internal mechanism of the machine, and it’s strange that this event can be sent from "outside".

      python-statemachine versions 3.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.0, and 3.2.1 work identically with the specified code snippets.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        Projects

        No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Confusion about `error.execution` · Issue #644 · fgmacedo/python-statemachine · GitHub
        Skip to content

        Confusion about error.execution #644

        Description

        @Dolecor

        The error.execution is causing me some confusion.

        1. Is it true that when defining the error_execution event in my machine, I must manually give it an id manually usingEvent(..., id="error.execution")?

          Before sending an event to the state machine, I check whether the event can be triggered using sm.allowed_events. Then I needed to catch all unhandled exceptions that could be raised by the listeners (StateChart itself, Model, etc.). I learned from the Error Handling page that this can be done by adding handlers for the error.execution event. But it seems sm.allowed_events and sm.enabled_events() conflicts with the error_execution event.

          I will demonstrate this using the ErrorLogger example from the Error Handling section:

          from statemachine import State, StateChart
          class ErrorLogger(StateChart):
          running = State(initial=True)
          failed = State(final=True)
          process = running.to(running, on="do_process")
          error_execution = running.to(failed, on="log_error")
          def do_process(self):
          raise ValueError("bad data")
          def log_error(self, error):
          self.last_error = error
          

          When I try to get enabled events after the machine reaches a stable configuration:

          sm = ErrorLogger()
          print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
          

          I get the AttributeError exception:

          (.venv) PS <...>> sm-test.exe
          Traceback (most recent call last):
          File "<frozen runpy>", line 203, in _run_module_as_main
          File "<frozen runpy>", line 88, in _run_code
          File "<...>\.venv\Scripts\sm-test.exe\__main__.py", line 5, in <module>
          sys.exit(main())
          ~~~~^^
          File "<...>\src\sm_test\__main__.py", line 57, in main
          print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
          File "<...>\.venv\Lib\site-packages\statemachine\statemachine.py", line 450, in enabled_events
          result = self._engine.enabled_events(*args, **kwargs)
          File "<...>\.venv\Lib\site-packages\statemachine\engines\sync.py", line 191, in enabled_events
          "event": getattr(sm, event),
          ~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^
          AttributeError: 'ErrorLogger' object has no attribute 'error.execution'. Did you mean: 'error_execution'?
          

          I found that the problem disappears if I manually assign the name error.execution to the error_execution event:

          class ErrorLogger(StateChart):
          [...]
          error_execution = Event(running.to(failed, on="log_error"), id="error.execution")
          
        2. Is it true that error_execution event, by design, can be sent to the machine from "outside"?

          When I applied the workaround with Event(..., id="error.execution"), the sm.enabled_events() gives:

          Enabled events: [BoundEvent('process', delay=0, internal=False), BoundEvent('error.execution', delay=0, internal=False)]
          

          Note that error.execution is enabled event, and it can be sent to the machine from main().

          This snippet:

          sm = ErrorLogger()
          print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
          if "error.execution" in sm.enabled_events():
          sm.send("error.execution", error=RuntimeError("Should this be possible?"))
          print(sm.last_error)
          

          gives:

           Enabled events: [BoundEvent('process', delay=0, internal=False), BoundEvent('error.execution', delay=0, internal=False)]
          Should this be possible?
          

          The error.execution event is described as an internal mechanism of the machine, and it’s strange that this event can be sent from "outside".

        python-statemachine versions 3.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.0, and 3.2.1 work identically with the specified code snippets.

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Assignees

        No one assigned

          Labels

          Projects

          No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Confusion about `error.execution` · Issue #644 · fgmacedo/python-statemachine · GitHub
          Skip to content

          Confusion about error.execution #644

          Description

          @Dolecor

          The error.execution is causing me some confusion.

          1. Is it true that when defining the error_execution event in my machine, I must manually give it an id manually usingEvent(..., id="error.execution")?

            Before sending an event to the state machine, I check whether the event can be triggered using sm.allowed_events. Then I needed to catch all unhandled exceptions that could be raised by the listeners (StateChart itself, Model, etc.). I learned from the Error Handling page that this can be done by adding handlers for the error.execution event. But it seems sm.allowed_events and sm.enabled_events() conflicts with the error_execution event.

            I will demonstrate this using the ErrorLogger example from the Error Handling section:

            from statemachine import State, StateChart
            class ErrorLogger(StateChart):
            running = State(initial=True)
            failed = State(final=True)
            process = running.to(running, on="do_process")
            error_execution = running.to(failed, on="log_error")
            def do_process(self):
            raise ValueError("bad data")
            def log_error(self, error):
            self.last_error = error
            

            When I try to get enabled events after the machine reaches a stable configuration:

            sm = ErrorLogger()
            print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
            

            I get the AttributeError exception:

            (.venv) PS <...>> sm-test.exe
            Traceback (most recent call last):
            File "<frozen runpy>", line 203, in _run_module_as_main
            File "<frozen runpy>", line 88, in _run_code
            File "<...>\.venv\Scripts\sm-test.exe\__main__.py", line 5, in <module>
            sys.exit(main())
            ~~~~^^
            File "<...>\src\sm_test\__main__.py", line 57, in main
            print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
            File "<...>\.venv\Lib\site-packages\statemachine\statemachine.py", line 450, in enabled_events
            result = self._engine.enabled_events(*args, **kwargs)
            File "<...>\.venv\Lib\site-packages\statemachine\engines\sync.py", line 191, in enabled_events
            "event": getattr(sm, event),
            ~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^
            AttributeError: 'ErrorLogger' object has no attribute 'error.execution'. Did you mean: 'error_execution'?
            

            I found that the problem disappears if I manually assign the name error.execution to the error_execution event:

            class ErrorLogger(StateChart):
            [...]
            error_execution = Event(running.to(failed, on="log_error"), id="error.execution")
            
          2. Is it true that error_execution event, by design, can be sent to the machine from "outside"?

            When I applied the workaround with Event(..., id="error.execution"), the sm.enabled_events() gives:

            Enabled events: [BoundEvent('process', delay=0, internal=False), BoundEvent('error.execution', delay=0, internal=False)]
            

            Note that error.execution is enabled event, and it can be sent to the machine from main().

            This snippet:

            sm = ErrorLogger()
            print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
            if "error.execution" in sm.enabled_events():
            sm.send("error.execution", error=RuntimeError("Should this be possible?"))
            print(sm.last_error)
            

            gives:

             Enabled events: [BoundEvent('process', delay=0, internal=False), BoundEvent('error.execution', delay=0, internal=False)]
            Should this be possible?
            

            The error.execution event is described as an internal mechanism of the machine, and it’s strange that this event can be sent from "outside".

          python-statemachine versions 3.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.0, and 3.2.1 work identically with the specified code snippets.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            Projects

            No projects

            Milestone

            No milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Confusion about `error.execution` · Issue #644 · fgmacedo/python-statemachine · GitHub
            Skip to content

            Confusion about error.execution #644

            Description

            @Dolecor

            The error.execution is causing me some confusion.

            1. Is it true that when defining the error_execution event in my machine, I must manually give it an id manually usingEvent(..., id="error.execution")?

              Before sending an event to the state machine, I check whether the event can be triggered using sm.allowed_events. Then I needed to catch all unhandled exceptions that could be raised by the listeners (StateChart itself, Model, etc.). I learned from the Error Handling page that this can be done by adding handlers for the error.execution event. But it seems sm.allowed_events and sm.enabled_events() conflicts with the error_execution event.

              I will demonstrate this using the ErrorLogger example from the Error Handling section:

              from statemachine import State, StateChart
              class ErrorLogger(StateChart):
              running = State(initial=True)
              failed = State(final=True)
              process = running.to(running, on="do_process")
              error_execution = running.to(failed, on="log_error")
              def do_process(self):
              raise ValueError("bad data")
              def log_error(self, error):
              self.last_error = error
              

              When I try to get enabled events after the machine reaches a stable configuration:

              sm = ErrorLogger()
              print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
              

              I get the AttributeError exception:

              (.venv) PS <...>> sm-test.exe
              Traceback (most recent call last):
              File "<frozen runpy>", line 203, in _run_module_as_main
              File "<frozen runpy>", line 88, in _run_code
              File "<...>\.venv\Scripts\sm-test.exe\__main__.py", line 5, in <module>
              sys.exit(main())
              ~~~~^^
              File "<...>\src\sm_test\__main__.py", line 57, in main
              print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
              File "<...>\.venv\Lib\site-packages\statemachine\statemachine.py", line 450, in enabled_events
              result = self._engine.enabled_events(*args, **kwargs)
              File "<...>\.venv\Lib\site-packages\statemachine\engines\sync.py", line 191, in enabled_events
              "event": getattr(sm, event),
              ~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^
              AttributeError: 'ErrorLogger' object has no attribute 'error.execution'. Did you mean: 'error_execution'?
              

              I found that the problem disappears if I manually assign the name error.execution to the error_execution event:

              class ErrorLogger(StateChart):
              [...]
              error_execution = Event(running.to(failed, on="log_error"), id="error.execution")
              
            2. Is it true that error_execution event, by design, can be sent to the machine from "outside"?

              When I applied the workaround with Event(..., id="error.execution"), the sm.enabled_events() gives:

              Enabled events: [BoundEvent('process', delay=0, internal=False), BoundEvent('error.execution', delay=0, internal=False)]
              

              Note that error.execution is enabled event, and it can be sent to the machine from main().

              This snippet:

              sm = ErrorLogger()
              print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
              if "error.execution" in sm.enabled_events():
              sm.send("error.execution", error=RuntimeError("Should this be possible?"))
              print(sm.last_error)
              

              gives:

               Enabled events: [BoundEvent('process', delay=0, internal=False), BoundEvent('error.execution', delay=0, internal=False)]
              Should this be possible?
              

              The error.execution event is described as an internal mechanism of the machine, and it’s strange that this event can be sent from "outside".

            python-statemachine versions 3.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.0, and 3.2.1 work identically with the specified code snippets.

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Assignees

            No one assigned

              Labels

              Projects

              No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); })(); Confusion about `error.execution` · Issue #644 · fgmacedo/python-statemachine · GitHub
              Skip to content

              Confusion about error.execution #644

              Description

              @Dolecor

              The error.execution is causing me some confusion.

              1. Is it true that when defining the error_execution event in my machine, I must manually give it an id manually usingEvent(..., id="error.execution")?

                Before sending an event to the state machine, I check whether the event can be triggered using sm.allowed_events. Then I needed to catch all unhandled exceptions that could be raised by the listeners (StateChart itself, Model, etc.). I learned from the Error Handling page that this can be done by adding handlers for the error.execution event. But it seems sm.allowed_events and sm.enabled_events() conflicts with the error_execution event.

                I will demonstrate this using the ErrorLogger example from the Error Handling section:

                from statemachine import State, StateChart
                class ErrorLogger(StateChart):
                running = State(initial=True)
                failed = State(final=True)
                process = running.to(running, on="do_process")
                error_execution = running.to(failed, on="log_error")
                def do_process(self):
                raise ValueError("bad data")
                def log_error(self, error):
                self.last_error = error
                

                When I try to get enabled events after the machine reaches a stable configuration:

                sm = ErrorLogger()
                print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
                

                I get the AttributeError exception:

                (.venv) PS <...>> sm-test.exe
                Traceback (most recent call last):
                File "<frozen runpy>", line 203, in _run_module_as_main
                File "<frozen runpy>", line 88, in _run_code
                File "<...>\.venv\Scripts\sm-test.exe\__main__.py", line 5, in <module>
                sys.exit(main())
                ~~~~^^
                File "<...>\src\sm_test\__main__.py", line 57, in main
                print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
                File "<...>\.venv\Lib\site-packages\statemachine\statemachine.py", line 450, in enabled_events
                result = self._engine.enabled_events(*args, **kwargs)
                File "<...>\.venv\Lib\site-packages\statemachine\engines\sync.py", line 191, in enabled_events
                "event": getattr(sm, event),
                ~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^
                AttributeError: 'ErrorLogger' object has no attribute 'error.execution'. Did you mean: 'error_execution'?
                

                I found that the problem disappears if I manually assign the name error.execution to the error_execution event:

                class ErrorLogger(StateChart):
                [...]
                error_execution = Event(running.to(failed, on="log_error"), id="error.execution")
                
              2. Is it true that error_execution event, by design, can be sent to the machine from "outside"?

                When I applied the workaround with Event(..., id="error.execution"), the sm.enabled_events() gives:

                Enabled events: [BoundEvent('process', delay=0, internal=False), BoundEvent('error.execution', delay=0, internal=False)]
                

                Note that error.execution is enabled event, and it can be sent to the machine from main().

                This snippet:

                sm = ErrorLogger()
                print(f" Enabled events: {sm.enabled_events()}")
                if "error.execution" in sm.enabled_events():
                sm.send("error.execution", error=RuntimeError("Should this be possible?"))
                print(sm.last_error)
                

                gives:

                 Enabled events: [BoundEvent('process', delay=0, internal=False), BoundEvent('error.execution', delay=0, internal=False)]
                Should this be possible?
                

                The error.execution event is described as an internal mechanism of the machine, and it’s strange that this event can be sent from "outside".

              python-statemachine versions 3.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.0, and 3.2.1 work identically with the specified code snippets.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                Projects

                No projects

                Milestone

                No milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions