Get value_shape from FunctionSpace - #3862
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
|
pbrubeck
force-pushed
the
pbrubeck/value_shape
branch
2 times, most recently
from
November 12, 2024 15:39
e33bd64 to
4c5f7db
Compare
pbrubeck
commented
Nov 12, 2024
pbrubeck
force-pushed
the
pbrubeck/value_shape
branch
2 times, most recently
from
November 13, 2024 10:26
a2537dc to
20342a6
Compare
pbrubeck
force-pushed
the
pbrubeck/value_shape
branch
from
November 13, 2024 10:47
20342a6 to
adb93f4
Compare
dham
marked this pull request as draft
November 13, 2024 16:42
pbrubeck
force-pushed
the
pbrubeck/value_shape
branch
from
November 13, 2024 17:33
5ed339e to
47253ea
Compare
pbrubeck
force-pushed
the
pbrubeck/value_shape
branch
2 times, most recently
from
November 13, 2024 22:56
b76ee5e to
3bdaba7
Compare
pbrubeck
commented
Nov 13, 2024
pbrubeck
force-pushed
the
pbrubeck/value_shape
branch
from
November 14, 2024 00:11
3bdaba7 to
d6bb2ed
Compare
pbrubeck
force-pushed
the
pbrubeck/value_shape
branch
from
November 14, 2024 01:11
d6bb2ed to
bb5a9bd
Compare
pbrubeck
force-pushed
the
pbrubeck/value_shape
branch
from
November 14, 2024 17:14
11c8ba1 to
0e4c04f
Compare
pbrubeck
commented
Nov 15, 2024
pbrubeck
commented
Nov 15, 2024
pbrubeck
force-pushed
the
pbrubeck/value_shape
branch
from
November 15, 2024 11:30
38e7f78 to
a07587e
Compare
connorjward
previously requested changes
Nov 15, 2024
connorjward
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Generally this looks great. @ksagiyam can you also give this a scan to make sure it's the right thing.
pbrubeck
commented
Nov 15, 2024
pbrubeck
force-pushed
the
pbrubeck/value_shape
branch
from
November 15, 2024 12:39
2752f93 to
a674ccf
Compare
ksagiyam
requested changes
Nov 15, 2024
Co-authored-by: ksagiyam <46749170+ksagiyam@users.noreply.github.com>
ksagiyam
previously approved these changes
Nov 15, 2024
pbrubeck
marked this pull request as ready for review
November 15, 2024 15:28
Contributor
pbrubeck
enabled auto-merge (squash)
November 15, 2024 16:36
ksagiyam
approved these changes
Nov 15, 2024
connorjward
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2024
* Get value_shape from FunctionSpace * Define FunctionSpace.block_size as the number of dofs per node * sort_domains --------- Co-authored-by: ksagiyam <k.sagiyama@imperial.ac.uk>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
V.ufl_element().value_shapebyV.value_shape,firedrake.FunctionSpace.value_sizehas been redefined to agree withufl.FunctionSpace.value_size = numpy.prod(value_shape, int), so the old behaviour gets renamed asfiredrake.FunctionSpace.block_sizeDepends on:
firedrakeproject/ufl#52
FInAT/FInAT#118
firedrakeproject/tsfc#307