Skip to content

Bump acorn from 5.7.3 to 5.7.4 - #6

Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
dependabot/npm_and_yarn/acorn-5.7.4
Closed

Bump acorn from 5.7.3 to 5.7.4#6
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
dependabot/npm_and_yarn/acorn-5.7.4

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabotdependabotBot commented on behalf of githubMar 26, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bumps acorn from 5.7.3 to 5.7.4.

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot use these labels will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these reviewers will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these assignees will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use this milestone will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language

You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

Bumps [acorn](https://github.com/acornjs/acorn) from 5.7.3 to 5.7.4.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/acornjs/acorn/releases)
- [Commits](acornjs/acorn@5.7.3...5.7.4)
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabotdependabotBot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Mar 26, 2020
fredericd pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2022
Issue #6
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
@dependabot@github

dependabotBot commented on behalf of githubNov 10, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Looks like acorn is up-to-date now, so this is no longer needed.

@dependabotdependabotBot closed this Nov 10, 2022
@dependabot
dependabotBot deleted the dependabot/npm_and_yarn/acorn-5.7.4 branch November 10, 2022 08:04
fredericd pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2023
This simply adds a row to the config page for configuring a mapping for Control
number, without this patch you cannot configure the feild, and the default is 'any'
I used the first record here for testing:
http://lx2.loc.gov:210/NAF?operation=searchRetrieve&version=1.1&query=query=bath.personalName=%22butler%20octavia%22&maximumRecords=20&recordSchema=marcxml
Enter SRU server using settings here:
https://www.loc.gov/z3950/lcserver.html#serv
host: lx2.loc.gov
port: 210
db: NAF
userid:
password:
servername: LOC SRU
checked: NULL
rank: NULL
syntax: USMARC
timeout: 0
servertype: sru
encoding: utf8
recordtype: authority
To test:
1 - Setup SRU server using settings above
2 - In the server config click 'Modify' under 'SRU search fields mapping'
3 - Note you don't have an option for 'Control number'
4 - Go to Authorities
5 - New from Z39.50/SRU
6 - Search 'Control number' field with: PS3552.U827
7 - You get the record noted above as all fields are searched
8 - Search 'Control number' field with: 79056654
9 - You get the record noted above as all fields are searched
10 - Apply patch
11 - In the server config click 'Modify' under 'SRU search fields mapping'
12 - Note you now have a config for 'Control number'
13 - Enter 'bath.lccn'
14 - Save
15 - Repeat search from #6 - no result
16 - Repeat search from #8 - correct result as only lccn fields are search
17 - Modify server config ans set 'Control number' to 'bath.lcCallNumber'
18 - Repeat search from #6 - correct results as call number field is now search
19 - Repeast search from #8 - no result
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
fredericd pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2023
This simply adds a row to the config page for configuring a mapping for Control
number, without this patch you cannot configure the feild, and the default is 'any'
I used the first record here for testing:
http://lx2.loc.gov:210/NAF?operation=searchRetrieve&version=1.1&query=query=bath.personalName=%22butler%20octavia%22&maximumRecords=20&recordSchema=marcxml
Enter SRU server using settings here:
https://www.loc.gov/z3950/lcserver.html#serv
host: lx2.loc.gov
port: 210
db: NAF
userid:
password:
servername: LOC SRU
checked: NULL
rank: NULL
syntax: USMARC
timeout: 0
servertype: sru
encoding: utf8
recordtype: authority
To test:
1 - Setup SRU server using settings above
2 - In the server config click 'Modify' under 'SRU search fields mapping'
3 - Note you don't have an option for 'Control number'
4 - Go to Authorities
5 - New from Z39.50/SRU
6 - Search 'Control number' field with: PS3552.U827
7 - You get the record noted above as all fields are searched
8 - Search 'Control number' field with: 79056654
9 - You get the record noted above as all fields are searched
10 - Apply patch
11 - In the server config click 'Modify' under 'SRU search fields mapping'
12 - Note you now have a config for 'Control number'
13 - Enter 'bath.lccn'
14 - Save
15 - Repeat search from #6 - no result
16 - Repeat search from #8 - correct result as only lccn fields are search
17 - Modify server config ans set 'Control number' to 'bath.lcCallNumber'
18 - Repeat search from #6 - correct results as call number field is now search
19 - Repeast search from #8 - no result
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
(cherry picked from commit 557a028)
Signed-off-by: Matt Blenkinsop <matt.blenkinsop@ptfs-europe.com>
fredericd pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2025
What this patch does is:
1 - Wraps the existing search code in a a "bool" compound query as a "must". This should not affect
relevancy or results of the existing searches.
2 - Before we clean/truncate terms, loop through the passed in search terms and indexes to build a
new 'should' query, using the 'match' on the specified index/field that is added to the 'bool' query from above.
This means that if a result from the original query is also returned here, that item will be boosted in the result.
For searches on 'keyword' or 'title', or if no index is set, we use 'title-cover' as the most narrow form of title
This query isn't going to help when users enter CCL (i.e. ti:To die for) and it won't boost titles from 505, series, etc
when doing a general search. Nor will it have a detrimental effect, it will only boost field matches
To test:
1 - Add a record with
245 $a novel
2 - Add a record with
245 $a A novel : $b about things / $c by me
3 - Search for: novel
- Above records are returned lower in the list (results #6 and #14 for me)
4 - Search for: a novel
- Above records are returned lower in the list (results #6 and #14 for me)
5 - Apply patch, restart all, enable ESBoostFieldMatch option
6 - Repeat searches, note exact titles are boosted
- For 'novel' record from #1 is #1 result and other is second
- For 'a novel' record form #2 is #1 result and other is third
7 - Disable the new pref and repeat steps 3 and 4 and get results as before patch
8 - Experiment with other searches, turning pref on and off to verify relevant titles are boosted when enabled
9 - Search results when disabled should return as before the patch
Signed-off-by: Matthias Meusburger <matthias.meusburger@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Klausner <domm@plix.at>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependenciesPull requests that update a dependency file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants