Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 25, 2025. It is now read-only.

fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i - #669

Merged
ojeytonwilliams merged 2 commits into
freeCodeCamp:masterfrom
ojeytonwilliams:fix/simplify-installation
Jul 28, 2021
Merged

fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i#669
ojeytonwilliams merged 2 commits into
freeCodeCamp:masterfrom
ojeytonwilliams:fix/simplify-installation

Conversation

@ojeytonwilliams

@ojeytonwilliamsojeytonwilliams commented Jul 28, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • I have read Chapter's contributing guidelines.
  • My pull request has a descriptive title (not a vague title like Update README.md).
  • My pull request targets the master branch of Chapter.

Rather than using npx recursive-install I changed the postInstall script to install the client. That way we get a friendlier output (Welcome to Chapter, etc) and sufficient to use npm i to get up and running.

@gitpod-io

gitpod-ioBot commented Jul 28, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@allella

allella commented Jul 28, 2021•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@timmyichen had suggested recursive-install in a previous comment.

It sounds like there was a minor improvement with directory structure, but I'm not sure if it's worth keeping?

@timmyichen

timmyichen commented Jul 28, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OP's solution is much more clean and easier for everyone to use, I'd just use that :)

@ojeytonwilliams

ojeytonwilliams commented Jul 28, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thanks @timmyichen, @allella. Let's get this in, then.

@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams merged commit 28011c0 into freeCodeCamp:masterJul 28, 2021
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams deleted the fix/simplify-installation branch July 28, 2021 16:52
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ojeytonwilliams@allella@timmyichen
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i by ojeytonwilliams · Pull Request #669 · freeCodeCamp/chapter · GitHub
Skip to content

This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 25, 2025. It is now read-only.

fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i - #669
Merged
ojeytonwilliams merged 2 commits into
freeCodeCamp:masterfrom 
ojeytonwilliams:fix/simplify-installation
Jul 28, 2021
Merged
fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i#669
ojeytonwilliams merged 2 commits into
freeCodeCamp:masterfrom 
ojeytonwilliams:fix/simplify-installation
Conversation
@ojeytonwilliams
@ojeytonwilliamsojeytonwilliams
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
  •  I have read Chapter's contributing guidelines.
  •  My pull request has a descriptive title (not a vague title like Update README.md).
  •  My pull request targets the master branch of Chapter.
Rather than using npx recursive-install I changed the postInstall script to install the client. That way we get a friendlier output (Welcome to Chapter, etc) and sufficient to use npm i to get up and running.
@gitpod-io
gitpod-ioBot
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

@allella
allella
commented
Jul 28, 2021•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
@timmyichen had suggested recursive-install in a previous comment.
It sounds like there was a minor improvement with directory structure, but I'm not sure if it's worth keeping?
@timmyichen
timmyichen
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
OP's solution is much more clean and easier for everyone to use, I'd just use that :)
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks @timmyichen, @allella. Let's get this in, then.
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams
merged commit 28011c0
into
freeCodeCamp:masterJul 28, 2021
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams
deleted the

fix/simplify-installation

branch
July 28, 2021 16:52
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ojeytonwilliams@allella@timmyichen

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i by ojeytonwilliams · Pull Request #669 · freeCodeCamp/chapter · GitHub
Skip to content

This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 25, 2025. It is now read-only.

fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i - #669
Merged
ojeytonwilliams merged 2 commits into
freeCodeCamp:masterfrom 
ojeytonwilliams:fix/simplify-installation
Jul 28, 2021
Merged
fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i#669
ojeytonwilliams merged 2 commits into
freeCodeCamp:masterfrom 
ojeytonwilliams:fix/simplify-installation
Conversation
@ojeytonwilliams
@ojeytonwilliamsojeytonwilliams
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
  •  I have read Chapter's contributing guidelines.
  •  My pull request has a descriptive title (not a vague title like Update README.md).
  •  My pull request targets the master branch of Chapter.
Rather than using npx recursive-install I changed the postInstall script to install the client. That way we get a friendlier output (Welcome to Chapter, etc) and sufficient to use npm i to get up and running.
@gitpod-io
gitpod-ioBot
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

@allella
allella
commented
Jul 28, 2021•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
@timmyichen had suggested recursive-install in a previous comment.
It sounds like there was a minor improvement with directory structure, but I'm not sure if it's worth keeping?
@timmyichen
timmyichen
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
OP's solution is much more clean and easier for everyone to use, I'd just use that :)
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks @timmyichen, @allella. Let's get this in, then.
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams
merged commit 28011c0
into
freeCodeCamp:masterJul 28, 2021
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams
deleted the

fix/simplify-installation

branch
July 28, 2021 16:52
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ojeytonwilliams@allella@timmyichen

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i by ojeytonwilliams · Pull Request #669 · freeCodeCamp/chapter · GitHub
Skip to content

This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 25, 2025. It is now read-only.

fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i - #669
Merged
ojeytonwilliams merged 2 commits into
freeCodeCamp:masterfrom 
ojeytonwilliams:fix/simplify-installation
Jul 28, 2021
Merged
fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i#669
ojeytonwilliams merged 2 commits into
freeCodeCamp:masterfrom 
ojeytonwilliams:fix/simplify-installation
Conversation
@ojeytonwilliams
@ojeytonwilliamsojeytonwilliams
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
  •  I have read Chapter's contributing guidelines.
  •  My pull request has a descriptive title (not a vague title like Update README.md).
  •  My pull request targets the master branch of Chapter.
Rather than using npx recursive-install I changed the postInstall script to install the client. That way we get a friendlier output (Welcome to Chapter, etc) and sufficient to use npm i to get up and running.
@gitpod-io
gitpod-ioBot
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

@allella
allella
commented
Jul 28, 2021•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
@timmyichen had suggested recursive-install in a previous comment.
It sounds like there was a minor improvement with directory structure, but I'm not sure if it's worth keeping?
@timmyichen
timmyichen
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
OP's solution is much more clean and easier for everyone to use, I'd just use that :)
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks @timmyichen, @allella. Let's get this in, then.
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams
merged commit 28011c0
into
freeCodeCamp:masterJul 28, 2021
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams
deleted the

fix/simplify-installation

branch
July 28, 2021 16:52
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ojeytonwilliams@allella@timmyichen

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i by ojeytonwilliams · Pull Request #669 · freeCodeCamp/chapter · GitHub
Skip to content

This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 25, 2025. It is now read-only.

fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i - #669
Merged
ojeytonwilliams merged 2 commits into
freeCodeCamp:masterfrom 
ojeytonwilliams:fix/simplify-installation
Jul 28, 2021
Merged
fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i#669
ojeytonwilliams merged 2 commits into
freeCodeCamp:masterfrom 
ojeytonwilliams:fix/simplify-installation
Conversation
@ojeytonwilliams
@ojeytonwilliamsojeytonwilliams
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
  •  I have read Chapter's contributing guidelines.
  •  My pull request has a descriptive title (not a vague title like Update README.md).
  •  My pull request targets the master branch of Chapter.
Rather than using npx recursive-install I changed the postInstall script to install the client. That way we get a friendlier output (Welcome to Chapter, etc) and sufficient to use npm i to get up and running.
@gitpod-io
gitpod-ioBot
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

@allella
allella
commented
Jul 28, 2021•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
@timmyichen had suggested recursive-install in a previous comment.
It sounds like there was a minor improvement with directory structure, but I'm not sure if it's worth keeping?
@timmyichen
timmyichen
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
OP's solution is much more clean and easier for everyone to use, I'd just use that :)
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks @timmyichen, @allella. Let's get this in, then.
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams
merged commit 28011c0
into
freeCodeCamp:masterJul 28, 2021
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams
deleted the

fix/simplify-installation

branch
July 28, 2021 16:52
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ojeytonwilliams@allella@timmyichen

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i by ojeytonwilliams · Pull Request #669 · freeCodeCamp/chapter · GitHub
Skip to content

This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 25, 2025. It is now read-only.

fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i - #669
Merged
ojeytonwilliams merged 2 commits into
freeCodeCamp:masterfrom 
ojeytonwilliams:fix/simplify-installation
Jul 28, 2021
Merged
fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i#669
ojeytonwilliams merged 2 commits into
freeCodeCamp:masterfrom 
ojeytonwilliams:fix/simplify-installation
Conversation
@ojeytonwilliams
@ojeytonwilliamsojeytonwilliams
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
  •  I have read Chapter's contributing guidelines.
  •  My pull request has a descriptive title (not a vague title like Update README.md).
  •  My pull request targets the master branch of Chapter.
Rather than using npx recursive-install I changed the postInstall script to install the client. That way we get a friendlier output (Welcome to Chapter, etc) and sufficient to use npm i to get up and running.
@gitpod-io
gitpod-ioBot
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

@allella
allella
commented
Jul 28, 2021•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
@timmyichen had suggested recursive-install in a previous comment.
It sounds like there was a minor improvement with directory structure, but I'm not sure if it's worth keeping?
@timmyichen
timmyichen
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
OP's solution is much more clean and easier for everyone to use, I'd just use that :)
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks @timmyichen, @allella. Let's get this in, then.
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams
merged commit 28011c0
into
freeCodeCamp:masterJul 28, 2021
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams
deleted the

fix/simplify-installation

branch
July 28, 2021 16:52
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ojeytonwilliams@allella@timmyichen

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
})();
fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i by ojeytonwilliams · Pull Request #669 · freeCodeCamp/chapter · GitHub
Skip to content

This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 25, 2025. It is now read-only.

fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i - #669
Merged
ojeytonwilliams merged 2 commits into
freeCodeCamp:masterfrom 
ojeytonwilliams:fix/simplify-installation
Jul 28, 2021
Merged
fix: standardizes installation to just use npm i#669
ojeytonwilliams merged 2 commits into
freeCodeCamp:masterfrom 
ojeytonwilliams:fix/simplify-installation
Conversation
@ojeytonwilliams
@ojeytonwilliamsojeytonwilliams
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
  •  I have read Chapter's contributing guidelines.
  •  My pull request has a descriptive title (not a vague title like Update README.md).
  •  My pull request targets the master branch of Chapter.
Rather than using npx recursive-install I changed the postInstall script to install the client. That way we get a friendlier output (Welcome to Chapter, etc) and sufficient to use npm i to get up and running.
@gitpod-io
gitpod-ioBot
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

@allella
allella
commented
Jul 28, 2021•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
@timmyichen had suggested recursive-install in a previous comment.
It sounds like there was a minor improvement with directory structure, but I'm not sure if it's worth keeping?
@timmyichen
timmyichen
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
OP's solution is much more clean and easier for everyone to use, I'd just use that :)
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams
commented
Jul 28, 2021

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Thanks @timmyichen, @allella. Let's get this in, then.
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams
merged commit 28011c0
into
freeCodeCamp:masterJul 28, 2021
@ojeytonwilliams
ojeytonwilliams
deleted the

fix/simplify-installation

branch
July 28, 2021 16:52
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.


Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ojeytonwilliams@allella@timmyichen