Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Fixed ID type deserialization - #410
Conversation
d9061cf to
8fd8170Compare
xperiandri
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@njlr any opinions?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
a024d30 to
48c7715Comparexperiandri
commented
Dec 17, 2022
@njlr review, please |
48c7715 to
d2a746eComparemickhansen
commented
Dec 28, 2022
How did this fail prior to this PR? |
njlr
commented
Dec 30, 2022
LGTM 👍 |
ivelten
commented
Jan 11, 2023
@njlr can you approve again? I accidentally closed the Pull Request. |
njlr
commented
Jan 11, 2023
@ivelten I don't have permissions @xperiandri Can you help? |
xperiandri
commented
Jan 12, 2023
This needs to be rebased or applied on top of #418 |
ee9baf6 to
5e02ca2Comparec8b3525 to
0810527Compare14aa27a to
3ba4016Compare1737829 to
246d6c0Compare0dd4372 to
81bc85eCompare5e02ca2 to
99dc46bCompare99dc46b to
8f459abCompared90f0e9 to
434b4beComparef3a1bf8 to
9d4b950Compare6dc591e to
85a9d8cCompareDeserialization of ID types caused an exception if the field was nullable.
8f459ab to
f3cc3dbComparexperiandri
commented
Jun 13, 2026
@copilot type provider tests must be only in the integration tests project |
Co-authored-by: xperiandri <2365592+xperiandri@users.noreply.github.com>
Done in 70fd40b: |
Rebase of #262