Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Create 0110-client-user-session.md - #110
Conversation
| > save us a lot of time if we were able to identify evens from that user | ||
| > | ||
| Would the default `userId` work in this case? | ||
| > If you don't provide an `id` the SDK falls back to `installationId`, which the SDK randomly generates once during an app's installation. | ||
| > | ||
| https://docs.sentry.io/platforms/android/enriching-events/identify-user/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
as mentioned below in the cons, installationId persists until the app is re-installed. this means it stays the same for all sessions of the user throughout one installation, which of course can be thousands across multiple weeks/months/years, and would therefore likely also contain multiple app starts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Another con: The default userId can be overwritten once Sentry.setUser() is called, thus loosing the connection before/after a user logged into an app.
I see we have Context->Device->Id on Android, but I'm not sure if this is provided by other platforms.
| 2. Longer term solution: | ||
| 1. react-native SDK | ||
| 1. SDK provides a way for users to generate a sessionID | ||
| 1. could simple be a version of the initializationID |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| 1. could simple be a version of the initializationID | |
| 1. could simply be a version of the `installationId` |
| 5. existing APIs around session may lead to confusion | ||
| 6. client side sampling: SDK should ensure that if an event as part of a session included then all other events within | ||
| that session are included as well | ||
| 1. identifying a unique session default experience, identifying by a particular user requires the user to decide with |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't fully understand this - is this referring to the default experience when looking up sessions on the product?
| 2. Longer term solution: | ||
| 1. react-native SDK | ||
| 1. SDK provides a way for users to generate a sessionID |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
SDK should auto-generate sessions in a meaningful way to works for most apps (e.g. generate unique id on setUser and app start) and ideally provide an API to override this.
| 4. consider a sampling option, | ||
| 1. similar to SR that states if there is an error to have a higher sample rate for those user sessions | ||
| 2. potentially long txn times as a decider in client for deciding |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
to clarify: does that mean that as soon as there is an error or a long txn (tbd how to determine this), the SDK starts to sample everything for that session? which also means that previous events are not available
There was a problem hiding this comment.
+1 on this question
the problem is that error often happens later, and we have already made sampling decisions for the given trace/session on the server at that point
marandaneto
commented
Aug 17, 2023
Can we actually somehow reuse the release health feature for that? each session already has an ID, that ID should be set in the event, and maybe propagate this ID as well similarly to connected errors and distributed tracing. |
| 1. SDK provides a way for users to generate a sessionID | ||
| 1. could simple be a version of the initializationID | ||
| 2. could be experimental flag for now | ||
| 3. automatically propagated this in DSC |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Dynamic sampling could use this to ensure that either all transactions in this session or no transactions in this session are sampled. Nowadays we do the same thing but based on trace id.
| 4. consider a sampling option, | ||
| 1. similar to SR that states if there is an error to have a higher sample rate for those user sessions | ||
| 2. potentially long txn times as a decider in client for deciding |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
+1 on this question
the problem is that error often happens later, and we have already made sampling decisions for the given trace/session on the server at that point
Feature RFC to define and decide on a user session concept for Sentry SDKs. This is focused on client side SDKs, and aims to solve the ability for SDKs to uniquely link all events associated with a unique user sessions. Which would allow to create a link between all events generated by the SDK during the session, to group them in the Sentry UI, and allow the ID to be considered during client and server side sampling to ensure the completeness of user session in sentry.
Rendered RFC