test(node): Test proxy server - #10156

Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 6 commits into
getsentry:developfrom
timfish:test/node-proxy-server
Jan 16, 2024
Merged

test(node): Test proxy server#10156
AbhiPrasad merged 6 commits into
getsentry:developfrom
timfish:test/node-proxy-server

Conversation

@timfish

@timfishtimfish commented Jan 11, 2024•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR adds an integration that tests the proxy transport option.

To do this I've added a .withMockSentryServer() feature to the test runner.

When optionally enabled, a basic express server is started which listens with an envelope endpoint. Test scenarios can then use the SENTRY_DSN environment variable to set the correct DSN.

Why a Sentry server when we have this new stdout transport for testing?

We need to test the transport and assosiated things like the proxy option which can't use stdout parsing.

Why use the stdout transport at all if we can just use this server?

Resources when running tests in parallel?

Because they use the same test runner, it's relatively simple to migrate tests between the two, so once we have a full test suite we can test this further.

@timfish
timfish marked this pull request as ready for review January 11, 2024 22:23
@timfishtimfish mentioned this pull request Jan 12, 2024
Merged
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad merged commit 29d597f into getsentry:developJan 16, 2024
@timfish
timfish deleted the test/node-proxy-server branch January 17, 2024 11:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Lms24Lms24Lms24 approved these changes
+1 more reviewer
@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@timfish@Lms24@AbhiPrasad
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
test(node): Test proxy server - #10156
Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 6 commits into
getsentry:developfrom 
timfish:test/node-proxy-server
Jan 16, 2024
Merged
test(node): Test proxy server#10156
AbhiPrasad merged 6 commits into
getsentry:developfrom 
timfish:test/node-proxy-server
Conversation
@timfish
@timfishtimfish
commented
Jan 11, 2024•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
This PR adds an integration that tests the proxy transport option.
To do this I've added a .withMockSentryServer() feature to the test runner.
When optionally enabled, a basic express server is started which listens with an envelope endpoint. Test scenarios can then use the SENTRY_DSN environment variable to set the correct DSN.
Why a Sentry server when we have this new stdout transport for testing?
We need to test the transport and assosiated things like the proxy option which can't use stdout parsing.
Why use the stdout transport at all if we can just use this server?
Resources when running tests in parallel?
Because they use the same test runner, it's relatively simple to migrate tests between the two, so once we have a full test suite we can test this further.
@timfish
timfish
marked this pull request as ready for review
January 11, 2024 22:23
@timfishtimfish
mentioned this pull request
Jan 12, 2024
 Merged

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad
merged commit 29d597f
into
getsentry:developJan 16, 2024
@timfish
timfish
deleted the

test/node-proxy-server

branch
January 17, 2024 11:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Lms24Lms24Lms24 approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@timfish@Lms24@AbhiPrasad

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
test(node): Test proxy server - #10156
Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 6 commits into
getsentry:developfrom 
timfish:test/node-proxy-server
Jan 16, 2024
Merged
test(node): Test proxy server#10156
AbhiPrasad merged 6 commits into
getsentry:developfrom 
timfish:test/node-proxy-server
Conversation
@timfish
@timfishtimfish
commented
Jan 11, 2024•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
This PR adds an integration that tests the proxy transport option.
To do this I've added a .withMockSentryServer() feature to the test runner.
When optionally enabled, a basic express server is started which listens with an envelope endpoint. Test scenarios can then use the SENTRY_DSN environment variable to set the correct DSN.
Why a Sentry server when we have this new stdout transport for testing?
We need to test the transport and assosiated things like the proxy option which can't use stdout parsing.
Why use the stdout transport at all if we can just use this server?
Resources when running tests in parallel?
Because they use the same test runner, it's relatively simple to migrate tests between the two, so once we have a full test suite we can test this further.
@timfish
timfish
marked this pull request as ready for review
January 11, 2024 22:23
@timfishtimfish
mentioned this pull request
Jan 12, 2024
 Merged

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad
merged commit 29d597f
into
getsentry:developJan 16, 2024
@timfish
timfish
deleted the

test/node-proxy-server

branch
January 17, 2024 11:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Lms24Lms24Lms24 approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@timfish@Lms24@AbhiPrasad

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
test(node): Test proxy server - #10156
Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 6 commits into
getsentry:developfrom 
timfish:test/node-proxy-server
Jan 16, 2024
Merged
test(node): Test proxy server#10156
AbhiPrasad merged 6 commits into
getsentry:developfrom 
timfish:test/node-proxy-server
Conversation
@timfish
@timfishtimfish
commented
Jan 11, 2024•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
This PR adds an integration that tests the proxy transport option.
To do this I've added a .withMockSentryServer() feature to the test runner.
When optionally enabled, a basic express server is started which listens with an envelope endpoint. Test scenarios can then use the SENTRY_DSN environment variable to set the correct DSN.
Why a Sentry server when we have this new stdout transport for testing?
We need to test the transport and assosiated things like the proxy option which can't use stdout parsing.
Why use the stdout transport at all if we can just use this server?
Resources when running tests in parallel?
Because they use the same test runner, it's relatively simple to migrate tests between the two, so once we have a full test suite we can test this further.
@timfish
timfish
marked this pull request as ready for review
January 11, 2024 22:23
@timfishtimfish
mentioned this pull request
Jan 12, 2024
 Merged

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad
merged commit 29d597f
into
getsentry:developJan 16, 2024
@timfish
timfish
deleted the

test/node-proxy-server

branch
January 17, 2024 11:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Lms24Lms24Lms24 approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@timfish@Lms24@AbhiPrasad

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
test(node): Test proxy server - #10156
Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 6 commits into
getsentry:developfrom 
timfish:test/node-proxy-server
Jan 16, 2024
Merged
test(node): Test proxy server#10156
AbhiPrasad merged 6 commits into
getsentry:developfrom 
timfish:test/node-proxy-server
Conversation
@timfish
@timfishtimfish
commented
Jan 11, 2024•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
This PR adds an integration that tests the proxy transport option.
To do this I've added a .withMockSentryServer() feature to the test runner.
When optionally enabled, a basic express server is started which listens with an envelope endpoint. Test scenarios can then use the SENTRY_DSN environment variable to set the correct DSN.
Why a Sentry server when we have this new stdout transport for testing?
We need to test the transport and assosiated things like the proxy option which can't use stdout parsing.
Why use the stdout transport at all if we can just use this server?
Resources when running tests in parallel?
Because they use the same test runner, it's relatively simple to migrate tests between the two, so once we have a full test suite we can test this further.
@timfish
timfish
marked this pull request as ready for review
January 11, 2024 22:23
@timfishtimfish
mentioned this pull request
Jan 12, 2024
 Merged

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad
merged commit 29d597f
into
getsentry:developJan 16, 2024
@timfish
timfish
deleted the

test/node-proxy-server

branch
January 17, 2024 11:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Lms24Lms24Lms24 approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@timfish@Lms24@AbhiPrasad

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
test(node): Test proxy server - #10156
Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 6 commits into
getsentry:developfrom 
timfish:test/node-proxy-server
Jan 16, 2024
Merged
test(node): Test proxy server#10156
AbhiPrasad merged 6 commits into
getsentry:developfrom 
timfish:test/node-proxy-server
Conversation
@timfish
@timfishtimfish
commented
Jan 11, 2024•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
This PR adds an integration that tests the proxy transport option.
To do this I've added a .withMockSentryServer() feature to the test runner.
When optionally enabled, a basic express server is started which listens with an envelope endpoint. Test scenarios can then use the SENTRY_DSN environment variable to set the correct DSN.
Why a Sentry server when we have this new stdout transport for testing?
We need to test the transport and assosiated things like the proxy option which can't use stdout parsing.
Why use the stdout transport at all if we can just use this server?
Resources when running tests in parallel?
Because they use the same test runner, it's relatively simple to migrate tests between the two, so once we have a full test suite we can test this further.
@timfish
timfish
marked this pull request as ready for review
January 11, 2024 22:23
@timfishtimfish
mentioned this pull request
Jan 12, 2024
 Merged

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad
merged commit 29d597f
into
getsentry:developJan 16, 2024
@timfish
timfish
deleted the

test/node-proxy-server

branch
January 17, 2024 11:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Lms24Lms24Lms24 approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@timfish@Lms24@AbhiPrasad

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
test(node): Test proxy server - #10156
Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 6 commits into
getsentry:developfrom 
timfish:test/node-proxy-server
Jan 16, 2024
Merged
test(node): Test proxy server#10156
AbhiPrasad merged 6 commits into
getsentry:developfrom 
timfish:test/node-proxy-server
Conversation
@timfish
@timfishtimfish
commented
Jan 11, 2024•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
This PR adds an integration that tests the proxy transport option.
To do this I've added a .withMockSentryServer() feature to the test runner.
When optionally enabled, a basic express server is started which listens with an envelope endpoint. Test scenarios can then use the SENTRY_DSN environment variable to set the correct DSN.
Why a Sentry server when we have this new stdout transport for testing?
We need to test the transport and assosiated things like the proxy option which can't use stdout parsing.
Why use the stdout transport at all if we can just use this server?
Resources when running tests in parallel?
Because they use the same test runner, it's relatively simple to migrate tests between the two, so once we have a full test suite we can test this further.
@timfish
timfish
marked this pull request as ready for review
January 11, 2024 22:23
@timfishtimfish
mentioned this pull request
Jan 12, 2024
 Merged

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad
merged commit 29d597f
into
getsentry:developJan 16, 2024
@timfish
timfish
deleted the

test/node-proxy-server

branch
January 17, 2024 11:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Lms24Lms24Lms24 approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@timfish@Lms24@AbhiPrasad

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
test(node): Test proxy server - #10156
Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 6 commits into
getsentry:developfrom 
timfish:test/node-proxy-server
Jan 16, 2024
Merged
test(node): Test proxy server#10156
AbhiPrasad merged 6 commits into
getsentry:developfrom 
timfish:test/node-proxy-server
Conversation
@timfish
@timfishtimfish
commented
Jan 11, 2024•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
This PR adds an integration that tests the proxy transport option.
To do this I've added a .withMockSentryServer() feature to the test runner.
When optionally enabled, a basic express server is started which listens with an envelope endpoint. Test scenarios can then use the SENTRY_DSN environment variable to set the correct DSN.
Why a Sentry server when we have this new stdout transport for testing?
We need to test the transport and assosiated things like the proxy option which can't use stdout parsing.
Why use the stdout transport at all if we can just use this server?
Resources when running tests in parallel?
Because they use the same test runner, it's relatively simple to migrate tests between the two, so once we have a full test suite we can test this further.
@timfish
timfish
marked this pull request as ready for review
January 11, 2024 22:23
@timfishtimfish
mentioned this pull request
Jan 12, 2024
 Merged

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad
merged commit 29d597f
into
getsentry:developJan 16, 2024
@timfish
timfish
deleted the

test/node-proxy-server

branch
January 17, 2024 11:52
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Lms24Lms24Lms24 approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@timfish@Lms24@AbhiPrasad