ref(browser): Improve browserMetrics collection by horochx · Pull Request #13062 · getsentry/sentry-javascript

horochx · 2024-07-26T03:34:50Z

Before submitting a pull request, please take a look at our
Contributing guidelines and verify:

If you've added code that should be tested, please add tests.
Ensure your code lints and the test suite passes (yarn lint) & (yarn test).

Lms24

Hey @horochx thanks for opening this PR!

(heads-up: I'm only assigning myself for internal tracking purposes since I'm reviewing this PR)

If I understand the changes correctly, moving the getActiveSpan checks out of the loop is meant as a slight performance improvement, correct? I think that's okay (though only marginally faster because we'd return in the first iteration anyway).

I still had one question but after it is addressed, we can merge this.

For the future as well as for this PR: Please add a brief description of the changes to the PR description. That would be much appreciated, especially if there's no issue with more context. Thanks!

Lms24 · 2024-07-26T06:54:16Z

- }
 if (!entry.scripts[0]) {
-return;
+break;


This is a behaviour change. Would you mind explaining why we should break here?

Thank you for pointing that out. It was a typo, and I have corrected it to continue. The change from return to continue is to ensure that the remaining entry containing initialScript in list.getEntries() are not skipped and are reported properly.

Lms24 · 2024-07-26T13:18:02Z

- }
 if (!entry.scripts[0]) {
-return;
+continue;


Is there a bug that this change fixes? I think it's probably fine to go through all entries but I'm curious.

@KevinL10 would you mind checking if this is fine? I believe you added the long animation frame instrumentation so I'd like to run it by you.

Sorry, I'm currently on a bus and can't reply promptly.
Here's my use case:
I asynchronously load Sentry and have just started optimizing performance. Upon initial execution of the LoAF callback, I found that the entry in the callback contains items with scripts and items without scripts. The current behavior skips reporting the remaining items with scripts after encountering one without scripts, so I've modified this behavior.
Once again, thank you for your review.

Thanks! This fix makes sense to me.

AbhiPrasad · 2024-07-29T15:22:01Z

- if (sourceCharPosition !== -1) {
- attributes['browser.script.source_char_position'] = sourceCharPosition;
- }
+ const { invoker, invokerType, sourceURL, sourceFunctionName, sourceCharPosition } = initialScript;


why was this guard removed?
We kept this here intentionally to ensure that we wouldn't do assignment unless the array item was defined.

Hello,
At line 136,
sentry-javascript/packages/browser-utils/src/metrics/browserMetrics.ts
Line 136 in 407862d
if(!entry.scripts[0]){

already checks for scripts, so I have removed the redundant check here.

Lms24

Thanks for contributing and also thanks @KevinL10 for reviewing! We'll merge this soon. Expect it to be released later this week with the next version after 8.21.0.

This PR adds the external contributor to the CHANGELOG.md file, so that they are credited for their contribution. See #13062 Co-authored-by: Lms24 <8420481+Lms24@users.noreply.github.com>

horochx · 2024-07-26T03:34:50Z

Before submitting a pull request, please take a look at our
Contributing guidelines and verify:

If you've added code that should be tested, please add tests.
Ensure your code lints and the test suite passes (yarn lint) & (yarn test).

Lms24

Hey @horochx thanks for opening this PR!

(heads-up: I'm only assigning myself for internal tracking purposes since I'm reviewing this PR)

If I understand the changes correctly, moving the getActiveSpan checks out of the loop is meant as a slight performance improvement, correct? I think that's okay (though only marginally faster because we'd return in the first iteration anyway).

I still had one question but after it is addressed, we can merge this.

For the future as well as for this PR: Please add a brief description of the changes to the PR description. That would be much appreciated, especially if there's no issue with more context. Thanks!

Lms24 · 2024-07-26T06:54:16Z

- }
 if (!entry.scripts[0]) {
-return;
+break;


This is a behaviour change. Would you mind explaining why we should break here?

Thank you for pointing that out. It was a typo, and I have corrected it to continue. The change from return to continue is to ensure that the remaining entry containing initialScript in list.getEntries() are not skipped and are reported properly.

Lms24 · 2024-07-26T13:18:02Z

- }
 if (!entry.scripts[0]) {
-return;
+continue;


Is there a bug that this change fixes? I think it's probably fine to go through all entries but I'm curious.

@KevinL10 would you mind checking if this is fine? I believe you added the long animation frame instrumentation so I'd like to run it by you.

Sorry, I'm currently on a bus and can't reply promptly.
Here's my use case:
I asynchronously load Sentry and have just started optimizing performance. Upon initial execution of the LoAF callback, I found that the entry in the callback contains items with scripts and items without scripts. The current behavior skips reporting the remaining items with scripts after encountering one without scripts, so I've modified this behavior.
Once again, thank you for your review.

Thanks! This fix makes sense to me.

AbhiPrasad · 2024-07-29T15:22:01Z

- if (sourceCharPosition !== -1) {
- attributes['browser.script.source_char_position'] = sourceCharPosition;
- }
+ const { invoker, invokerType, sourceURL, sourceFunctionName, sourceCharPosition } = initialScript;


why was this guard removed?
We kept this here intentionally to ensure that we wouldn't do assignment unless the array item was defined.

Hello,
At line 136,
sentry-javascript/packages/browser-utils/src/metrics/browserMetrics.ts
Line 136 in 407862d
if(!entry.scripts[0]){

already checks for scripts, so I have removed the redundant check here.

Lms24

Thanks for contributing and also thanks @KevinL10 for reviewing! We'll merge this soon. Expect it to be released later this week with the next version after 8.21.0.

This PR adds the external contributor to the CHANGELOG.md file, so that they are credited for their contribution. See #13062 Co-authored-by: Lms24 <8420481+Lms24@users.noreply.github.com>

horochx · 2024-07-26T03:34:50Z

Before submitting a pull request, please take a look at our
Contributing guidelines and verify:

If you've added code that should be tested, please add tests.
Ensure your code lints and the test suite passes (yarn lint) & (yarn test).

Lms24

Hey @horochx thanks for opening this PR!

(heads-up: I'm only assigning myself for internal tracking purposes since I'm reviewing this PR)

If I understand the changes correctly, moving the getActiveSpan checks out of the loop is meant as a slight performance improvement, correct? I think that's okay (though only marginally faster because we'd return in the first iteration anyway).

I still had one question but after it is addressed, we can merge this.

For the future as well as for this PR: Please add a brief description of the changes to the PR description. That would be much appreciated, especially if there's no issue with more context. Thanks!

Lms24 · 2024-07-26T06:54:16Z

- }
 if (!entry.scripts[0]) {
-return;
+break;


This is a behaviour change. Would you mind explaining why we should break here?

Thank you for pointing that out. It was a typo, and I have corrected it to continue. The change from return to continue is to ensure that the remaining entry containing initialScript in list.getEntries() are not skipped and are reported properly.

Lms24 · 2024-07-26T13:18:02Z

- }
 if (!entry.scripts[0]) {
-return;
+continue;


Is there a bug that this change fixes? I think it's probably fine to go through all entries but I'm curious.

@KevinL10 would you mind checking if this is fine? I believe you added the long animation frame instrumentation so I'd like to run it by you.

Sorry, I'm currently on a bus and can't reply promptly.
Here's my use case:
I asynchronously load Sentry and have just started optimizing performance. Upon initial execution of the LoAF callback, I found that the entry in the callback contains items with scripts and items without scripts. The current behavior skips reporting the remaining items with scripts after encountering one without scripts, so I've modified this behavior.
Once again, thank you for your review.

Thanks! This fix makes sense to me.

AbhiPrasad · 2024-07-29T15:22:01Z

- if (sourceCharPosition !== -1) {
- attributes['browser.script.source_char_position'] = sourceCharPosition;
- }
+ const { invoker, invokerType, sourceURL, sourceFunctionName, sourceCharPosition } = initialScript;


why was this guard removed?
We kept this here intentionally to ensure that we wouldn't do assignment unless the array item was defined.

Hello,
At line 136,
sentry-javascript/packages/browser-utils/src/metrics/browserMetrics.ts
Line 136 in 407862d
if(!entry.scripts[0]){

already checks for scripts, so I have removed the redundant check here.

Lms24

Thanks for contributing and also thanks @KevinL10 for reviewing! We'll merge this soon. Expect it to be released later this week with the next version after 8.21.0.

This PR adds the external contributor to the CHANGELOG.md file, so that they are credited for their contribution. See #13062 Co-authored-by: Lms24 <8420481+Lms24@users.noreply.github.com>

horochx · 2024-07-26T03:34:50Z

Before submitting a pull request, please take a look at our
Contributing guidelines and verify:

If you've added code that should be tested, please add tests.
Ensure your code lints and the test suite passes (yarn lint) & (yarn test).

Lms24

Hey @horochx thanks for opening this PR!

(heads-up: I'm only assigning myself for internal tracking purposes since I'm reviewing this PR)

If I understand the changes correctly, moving the getActiveSpan checks out of the loop is meant as a slight performance improvement, correct? I think that's okay (though only marginally faster because we'd return in the first iteration anyway).

I still had one question but after it is addressed, we can merge this.

For the future as well as for this PR: Please add a brief description of the changes to the PR description. That would be much appreciated, especially if there's no issue with more context. Thanks!

Lms24 · 2024-07-26T06:54:16Z

- }
 if (!entry.scripts[0]) {
-return;
+break;


This is a behaviour change. Would you mind explaining why we should break here?

Thank you for pointing that out. It was a typo, and I have corrected it to continue. The change from return to continue is to ensure that the remaining entry containing initialScript in list.getEntries() are not skipped and are reported properly.

Lms24 · 2024-07-26T13:18:02Z

- }
 if (!entry.scripts[0]) {
-return;
+continue;


Is there a bug that this change fixes? I think it's probably fine to go through all entries but I'm curious.

@KevinL10 would you mind checking if this is fine? I believe you added the long animation frame instrumentation so I'd like to run it by you.

Sorry, I'm currently on a bus and can't reply promptly.
Here's my use case:
I asynchronously load Sentry and have just started optimizing performance. Upon initial execution of the LoAF callback, I found that the entry in the callback contains items with scripts and items without scripts. The current behavior skips reporting the remaining items with scripts after encountering one without scripts, so I've modified this behavior.
Once again, thank you for your review.

Thanks! This fix makes sense to me.

AbhiPrasad · 2024-07-29T15:22:01Z

- if (sourceCharPosition !== -1) {
- attributes['browser.script.source_char_position'] = sourceCharPosition;
- }
+ const { invoker, invokerType, sourceURL, sourceFunctionName, sourceCharPosition } = initialScript;


why was this guard removed?
We kept this here intentionally to ensure that we wouldn't do assignment unless the array item was defined.

Hello,
At line 136,
sentry-javascript/packages/browser-utils/src/metrics/browserMetrics.ts
Line 136 in 407862d
if(!entry.scripts[0]){

already checks for scripts, so I have removed the redundant check here.

Lms24

Thanks for contributing and also thanks @KevinL10 for reviewing! We'll merge this soon. Expect it to be released later this week with the next version after 8.21.0.

This PR adds the external contributor to the CHANGELOG.md file, so that they are credited for their contribution. See #13062 Co-authored-by: Lms24 <8420481+Lms24@users.noreply.github.com>

horochx · 2024-07-26T03:34:50Z

Before submitting a pull request, please take a look at our
Contributing guidelines and verify:

If you've added code that should be tested, please add tests.
Ensure your code lints and the test suite passes (yarn lint) & (yarn test).

Lms24

Hey @horochx thanks for opening this PR!

(heads-up: I'm only assigning myself for internal tracking purposes since I'm reviewing this PR)

If I understand the changes correctly, moving the getActiveSpan checks out of the loop is meant as a slight performance improvement, correct? I think that's okay (though only marginally faster because we'd return in the first iteration anyway).

I still had one question but after it is addressed, we can merge this.

For the future as well as for this PR: Please add a brief description of the changes to the PR description. That would be much appreciated, especially if there's no issue with more context. Thanks!

Lms24 · 2024-07-26T06:54:16Z

- }
 if (!entry.scripts[0]) {
-return;
+break;


This is a behaviour change. Would you mind explaining why we should break here?

Thank you for pointing that out. It was a typo, and I have corrected it to continue. The change from return to continue is to ensure that the remaining entry containing initialScript in list.getEntries() are not skipped and are reported properly.

Lms24 · 2024-07-26T13:18:02Z

- }
 if (!entry.scripts[0]) {
-return;
+continue;


Is there a bug that this change fixes? I think it's probably fine to go through all entries but I'm curious.

@KevinL10 would you mind checking if this is fine? I believe you added the long animation frame instrumentation so I'd like to run it by you.

Sorry, I'm currently on a bus and can't reply promptly.
Here's my use case:
I asynchronously load Sentry and have just started optimizing performance. Upon initial execution of the LoAF callback, I found that the entry in the callback contains items with scripts and items without scripts. The current behavior skips reporting the remaining items with scripts after encountering one without scripts, so I've modified this behavior.
Once again, thank you for your review.

Thanks! This fix makes sense to me.

AbhiPrasad · 2024-07-29T15:22:01Z

- if (sourceCharPosition !== -1) {
- attributes['browser.script.source_char_position'] = sourceCharPosition;
- }
+ const { invoker, invokerType, sourceURL, sourceFunctionName, sourceCharPosition } = initialScript;


why was this guard removed?
We kept this here intentionally to ensure that we wouldn't do assignment unless the array item was defined.

Hello,
At line 136,
sentry-javascript/packages/browser-utils/src/metrics/browserMetrics.ts
Line 136 in 407862d
if(!entry.scripts[0]){

already checks for scripts, so I have removed the redundant check here.

Lms24

Thanks for contributing and also thanks @KevinL10 for reviewing! We'll merge this soon. Expect it to be released later this week with the next version after 8.21.0.

This PR adds the external contributor to the CHANGELOG.md file, so that they are credited for their contribution. See #13062 Co-authored-by: Lms24 <8420481+Lms24@users.noreply.github.com>

horochx · 2024-07-26T03:34:50Z

Before submitting a pull request, please take a look at our
Contributing guidelines and verify:

If you've added code that should be tested, please add tests.
Ensure your code lints and the test suite passes (yarn lint) & (yarn test).

Lms24

Hey @horochx thanks for opening this PR!

(heads-up: I'm only assigning myself for internal tracking purposes since I'm reviewing this PR)

If I understand the changes correctly, moving the getActiveSpan checks out of the loop is meant as a slight performance improvement, correct? I think that's okay (though only marginally faster because we'd return in the first iteration anyway).

I still had one question but after it is addressed, we can merge this.

For the future as well as for this PR: Please add a brief description of the changes to the PR description. That would be much appreciated, especially if there's no issue with more context. Thanks!

Lms24 · 2024-07-26T06:54:16Z

- }
 if (!entry.scripts[0]) {
-return;
+break;


This is a behaviour change. Would you mind explaining why we should break here?

Thank you for pointing that out. It was a typo, and I have corrected it to continue. The change from return to continue is to ensure that the remaining entry containing initialScript in list.getEntries() are not skipped and are reported properly.

Lms24 · 2024-07-26T13:18:02Z

- }
 if (!entry.scripts[0]) {
-return;
+continue;


Is there a bug that this change fixes? I think it's probably fine to go through all entries but I'm curious.

@KevinL10 would you mind checking if this is fine? I believe you added the long animation frame instrumentation so I'd like to run it by you.

Sorry, I'm currently on a bus and can't reply promptly.
Here's my use case:
I asynchronously load Sentry and have just started optimizing performance. Upon initial execution of the LoAF callback, I found that the entry in the callback contains items with scripts and items without scripts. The current behavior skips reporting the remaining items with scripts after encountering one without scripts, so I've modified this behavior.
Once again, thank you for your review.

Thanks! This fix makes sense to me.

AbhiPrasad · 2024-07-29T15:22:01Z

- if (sourceCharPosition !== -1) {
- attributes['browser.script.source_char_position'] = sourceCharPosition;
- }
+ const { invoker, invokerType, sourceURL, sourceFunctionName, sourceCharPosition } = initialScript;


why was this guard removed?
We kept this here intentionally to ensure that we wouldn't do assignment unless the array item was defined.

Hello,
At line 136,
sentry-javascript/packages/browser-utils/src/metrics/browserMetrics.ts
Line 136 in 407862d
if(!entry.scripts[0]){

already checks for scripts, so I have removed the redundant check here.

Lms24

Thanks for contributing and also thanks @KevinL10 for reviewing! We'll merge this soon. Expect it to be released later this week with the next version after 8.21.0.

This PR adds the external contributor to the CHANGELOG.md file, so that they are credited for their contribution. See #13062 Co-authored-by: Lms24 <8420481+Lms24@users.noreply.github.com>

horochx · 2024-07-26T03:34:50Z

Before submitting a pull request, please take a look at our
Contributing guidelines and verify:

If you've added code that should be tested, please add tests.
Ensure your code lints and the test suite passes (yarn lint) & (yarn test).

Lms24

Hey @horochx thanks for opening this PR!

(heads-up: I'm only assigning myself for internal tracking purposes since I'm reviewing this PR)

If I understand the changes correctly, moving the getActiveSpan checks out of the loop is meant as a slight performance improvement, correct? I think that's okay (though only marginally faster because we'd return in the first iteration anyway).

I still had one question but after it is addressed, we can merge this.

For the future as well as for this PR: Please add a brief description of the changes to the PR description. That would be much appreciated, especially if there's no issue with more context. Thanks!

Lms24 · 2024-07-26T06:54:16Z

- }
 if (!entry.scripts[0]) {
-return;
+break;


This is a behaviour change. Would you mind explaining why we should break here?

Thank you for pointing that out. It was a typo, and I have corrected it to continue. The change from return to continue is to ensure that the remaining entry containing initialScript in list.getEntries() are not skipped and are reported properly.

Lms24 · 2024-07-26T13:18:02Z

- }
 if (!entry.scripts[0]) {
-return;
+continue;


Is there a bug that this change fixes? I think it's probably fine to go through all entries but I'm curious.

@KevinL10 would you mind checking if this is fine? I believe you added the long animation frame instrumentation so I'd like to run it by you.

Sorry, I'm currently on a bus and can't reply promptly.
Here's my use case:
I asynchronously load Sentry and have just started optimizing performance. Upon initial execution of the LoAF callback, I found that the entry in the callback contains items with scripts and items without scripts. The current behavior skips reporting the remaining items with scripts after encountering one without scripts, so I've modified this behavior.
Once again, thank you for your review.

Thanks! This fix makes sense to me.

AbhiPrasad · 2024-07-29T15:22:01Z

- if (sourceCharPosition !== -1) {
- attributes['browser.script.source_char_position'] = sourceCharPosition;
- }
+ const { invoker, invokerType, sourceURL, sourceFunctionName, sourceCharPosition } = initialScript;


why was this guard removed?
We kept this here intentionally to ensure that we wouldn't do assignment unless the array item was defined.

Hello,
At line 136,
sentry-javascript/packages/browser-utils/src/metrics/browserMetrics.ts
Line 136 in 407862d
if(!entry.scripts[0]){

already checks for scripts, so I have removed the redundant check here.

Lms24

Thanks for contributing and also thanks @KevinL10 for reviewing! We'll merge this soon. Expect it to be released later this week with the next version after 8.21.0.

This PR adds the external contributor to the CHANGELOG.md file, so that they are credited for their contribution. See #13062 Co-authored-by: Lms24 <8420481+Lms24@users.noreply.github.com>

horochx · 2024-07-26T03:34:50Z

Before submitting a pull request, please take a look at our
Contributing guidelines and verify:

If you've added code that should be tested, please add tests.
Ensure your code lints and the test suite passes (yarn lint) & (yarn test).

Lms24

Hey @horochx thanks for opening this PR!

(heads-up: I'm only assigning myself for internal tracking purposes since I'm reviewing this PR)

If I understand the changes correctly, moving the getActiveSpan checks out of the loop is meant as a slight performance improvement, correct? I think that's okay (though only marginally faster because we'd return in the first iteration anyway).

I still had one question but after it is addressed, we can merge this.

For the future as well as for this PR: Please add a brief description of the changes to the PR description. That would be much appreciated, especially if there's no issue with more context. Thanks!

Lms24 · 2024-07-26T06:54:16Z

- }
 if (!entry.scripts[0]) {
-return;
+break;


This is a behaviour change. Would you mind explaining why we should break here?

Thank you for pointing that out. It was a typo, and I have corrected it to continue. The change from return to continue is to ensure that the remaining entry containing initialScript in list.getEntries() are not skipped and are reported properly.

Lms24 · 2024-07-26T13:18:02Z

- }
 if (!entry.scripts[0]) {
-return;
+continue;


Is there a bug that this change fixes? I think it's probably fine to go through all entries but I'm curious.

@KevinL10 would you mind checking if this is fine? I believe you added the long animation frame instrumentation so I'd like to run it by you.

Sorry, I'm currently on a bus and can't reply promptly.
Here's my use case:
I asynchronously load Sentry and have just started optimizing performance. Upon initial execution of the LoAF callback, I found that the entry in the callback contains items with scripts and items without scripts. The current behavior skips reporting the remaining items with scripts after encountering one without scripts, so I've modified this behavior.
Once again, thank you for your review.

Thanks! This fix makes sense to me.

AbhiPrasad · 2024-07-29T15:22:01Z

- if (sourceCharPosition !== -1) {
- attributes['browser.script.source_char_position'] = sourceCharPosition;
- }
+ const { invoker, invokerType, sourceURL, sourceFunctionName, sourceCharPosition } = initialScript;


why was this guard removed?
We kept this here intentionally to ensure that we wouldn't do assignment unless the array item was defined.

Hello,
At line 136,
sentry-javascript/packages/browser-utils/src/metrics/browserMetrics.ts
Line 136 in 407862d
if(!entry.scripts[0]){

already checks for scripts, so I have removed the redundant check here.

Lms24

Thanks for contributing and also thanks @KevinL10 for reviewing! We'll merge this soon. Expect it to be released later this week with the next version after 8.21.0.

This PR adds the external contributor to the CHANGELOG.md file, so that they are credited for their contribution. See #13062 Co-authored-by: Lms24 <8420481+Lms24@users.noreply.github.com>

Lms24 reviewed Jul 26, 2024
View reviewed changes

Lms24 self-assigned this Jul 26, 2024

fix: browserMetrics.ts LoAF for loop
407862d

Lms24 reviewed Jul 26, 2024
View reviewed changes

Lms24 requested a review from KevinL10 July 26, 2024 13:22

AbhiPrasad reviewed Jul 29, 2024
View reviewed changes

Lms24 approved these changes Jul 30, 2024
View reviewed changes

Lms24 changed the title ~~Update browserMetrics.ts~~ref(browser): Improve browserMetrics collectionAug 2, 2024

Lms24 merged commit 2b7fa21 into getsentry:developAug 2, 2024

github-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Aug 2, 2024
ref: Add external contributor to CHANGELOG.md #13195
Merged

horochx deleted the patch-1 branch August 5, 2024 02:14

q1blue mentioned this pull request Aug 27, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/react from 7.16.0 to 8.23.0 https-quantumblockchainai-atlassian-net/ossinsight#820
Open

gokulk16 mentioned this pull request Aug 27, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/browser from 8.20.0 to 8.23.0 gokulk16/type-to-calculate-web#35
Closed

voidedstarlight mentioned this pull request Aug 27, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/browser from 8.22.0 to 8.23.0 climatechangeinformation-org/website#195
Closed

This was referenced Aug 27, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/nextjs from 8.22.0 to 8.23.0 dupipcom/hypnos#52
Open
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/nextjs from 8.20.0 to 8.23.0 dupipcom/hygieia#1
Merged

sleidig mentioned this pull request Aug 27, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/node from 8.22.0 to 8.23.0 Aam-Digital/account-backend#39
Closed

tomwwinter mentioned this pull request Aug 27, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/angular from 8.20.0 to 8.23.0 Aam-Digital/ndb-core#2537
Closed

aam-digital-ci mentioned this pull request Aug 27, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/node from 8.22.0 to 8.23.0 Aam-Digital/replication-backend#152
Closed

chaitanyapotti mentioned this pull request Aug 27, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/types from 8.23.0 to 8.24.0 torusresearch/CustomAuth#351
Open

gokulk16 mentioned this pull request Aug 28, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/browser from 8.20.0 to 8.24.0 gokulk16/type-to-calculate-web#36
Closed

This was referenced Aug 28, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/nextjs from 8.20.0 to 8.24.0 dupipcom/hygieia#3
Open
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/nextjs from 8.22.0 to 8.24.0 dupipcom/hypnos#53
Open

q1blue mentioned this pull request Aug 28, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/react from 7.16.0 to 8.24.0 https-quantumblockchainai-atlassian-net/ossinsight#833
Open

This was referenced Aug 29, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/nextjs from 8.22.0 to 8.24.0 dupipcom/hypnos#54
Open
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/nextjs from 8.20.0 to 8.24.0 dupipcom/hygieia#4
Open

sleidig mentioned this pull request Aug 29, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/node from 8.22.0 to 8.24.0 Aam-Digital/account-backend#40
Closed

gokulk16 mentioned this pull request Aug 30, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/browser from 8.20.0 to 8.25.0 gokulk16/type-to-calculate-web#38
Merged

angeloreale mentioned this pull request Aug 30, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/nextjs from 8.22.0 to 8.25.0 dupipcom/hypnos#55
Open

angeloreale mentioned this pull request Aug 30, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/nextjs from 8.20.0 to 8.25.0 dupipcom/hygieia#5
Open

This was referenced Aug 30, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/node from 8.22.0 to 8.25.0 Aam-Digital/replication-backend#154
Closed
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/node from 8.22.0 to 8.25.0 Aam-Digital/account-backend#41
Closed

q1blue mentioned this pull request Aug 30, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/react from 7.16.0 to 8.25.0 https-quantumblockchainai-atlassian-net/ossinsight#835
Open

angeloreale mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/nextjs from 8.22.0 to 8.25.0 dupipcom/hypnos#60
Open

FengShangWuQi mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/gatsby from 7.20.0 to 8.25.0 FengShangWuQi/fengshangwuqi.github.io#1918
Closed

PierreGode mentioned this pull request Sep 4, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/node from 8.9.2 to 8.25.0 PierreGode/shields#1
Closed

This was referenced Sep 4, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/node from 8.22.0 to 8.26.0 Aam-Digital/account-backend#42
Closed
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/node from 8.22.0 to 8.26.0 Aam-Digital/replication-backend#158
Closed

q1blue mentioned this pull request Sep 7, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/react from 7.16.0 to 8.26.0 https-quantumblockchainai-atlassian-net/ossinsight#846
Open

FengShangWuQi mentioned this pull request Sep 8, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade @sentry/gatsby from 7.20.0 to 8.26.0 FengShangWuQi/fengshangwuqi.github.io#1919
Closed

This was referenced Sep 8, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade: , , chart.js, classnames, cytoscape, typescript bagulm123/komiser#18
Open
[Snyk] Upgrade: , , chart.js, classnames, cytoscape, next, typescript bagulm123/komiser#19
Open

bagulm123 mentioned this pull request Sep 18, 2024
[Snyk] Upgrade: , , , chart.js, classnames, cytoscape, next, typescript bagulm123/komiser#20
Open