fix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxt - #15473

Merged
s1gr1d merged 2 commits into
getsentry:developfrom
GerryWilko:patch-1
Feb 26, 2025
Merged

fix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxt#15473
s1gr1d merged 2 commits into
getsentry:developfrom
GerryWilko:patch-1

Conversation

@GerryWilko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before submitting a pull request, please take a look at our
Contributing guidelines and verify:

  • If you've added code that should be tested, please add tests.
  • Ensure your code lints and the test suite passes (yarn lint) & (yarn test).

Description

I noticed that Nuxt 300-400 status codes from the app are being reported to Sentry unnecessarily. There appears to be a guard against doing this on the server side errors but client side errors like 404 or 401s are being reported to Sentry.

I have simply added the same guard on the client side error reporter for the Nuxt integration of Sentry.

@GerryWilko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@s1gr1d apologies for the call out but I'm not sure how to get this reviewed. You seem to be the resident Nuxt expert at Sentry looking at previous PRs?

@lforstlforst changed the title fix(nuxt): ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxtfix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in NuxtFeb 25, 2025

@lforstlforst left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems very reasonable to me. @s1gr1d feel free to merge if this also makes sense to you!

Comment on lines +69 to +71
if (isNuxtError(error)) {
// Do not report if status code is 3xx or 4xx
if (error.statusCode >= 300 && error.statusCode < 500) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The 2 conditions could be ANDed.

@s1gr1ds1gr1d left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me. At first I thought this might not make sense as this is a client-only plugin and we would need to create an explicit server plugin (for Nuxt, not Nitro).
Nitro runs only in the server folder, but Nuxt also runs on the server when it does e.g. SSR.

However, I tested this and it seems like the errors from the Nuxt server side are passed to the client and the hook is called on the client as well. So this change is fine.

@s1gr1d
s1gr1d merged commit 2140b53 into getsentry:developFeb 26, 2025
AbhiPrasad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
This PR adds the external contributor to the CHANGELOG.md file, so that
they are credited for their contribution. See #15473
Co-authored-by: s1gr1d <32902192+s1gr1d@users.noreply.github.com>
@GerryWilko
GerryWilko deleted the patch-1 branch March 18, 2025 13:55
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@GerryWilko@lforst@s1gr1d@AbhiPrasad
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxt - #15473

Merged
s1gr1d merged 2 commits into
getsentry:developfrom
GerryWilko:patch-1
Feb 26, 2025
Merged

fix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxt#15473
s1gr1d merged 2 commits into
getsentry:developfrom
GerryWilko:patch-1

Conversation

@GerryWilko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before submitting a pull request, please take a look at our
Contributing guidelines and verify:

  • If you've added code that should be tested, please add tests.
  • Ensure your code lints and the test suite passes (yarn lint) & (yarn test).

Description

I noticed that Nuxt 300-400 status codes from the app are being reported to Sentry unnecessarily. There appears to be a guard against doing this on the server side errors but client side errors like 404 or 401s are being reported to Sentry.

I have simply added the same guard on the client side error reporter for the Nuxt integration of Sentry.

@GerryWilko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@s1gr1d apologies for the call out but I'm not sure how to get this reviewed. You seem to be the resident Nuxt expert at Sentry looking at previous PRs?

@lforstlforst changed the title fix(nuxt): ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxtfix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in NuxtFeb 25, 2025

@lforstlforst left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems very reasonable to me. @s1gr1d feel free to merge if this also makes sense to you!

Comment on lines +69 to +71
if (isNuxtError(error)) {
// Do not report if status code is 3xx or 4xx
if (error.statusCode >= 300 && error.statusCode < 500) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The 2 conditions could be ANDed.

@s1gr1ds1gr1d left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me. At first I thought this might not make sense as this is a client-only plugin and we would need to create an explicit server plugin (for Nuxt, not Nitro).
Nitro runs only in the server folder, but Nuxt also runs on the server when it does e.g. SSR.

However, I tested this and it seems like the errors from the Nuxt server side are passed to the client and the hook is called on the client as well. So this change is fine.

@s1gr1d
s1gr1d merged commit 2140b53 into getsentry:developFeb 26, 2025
AbhiPrasad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
This PR adds the external contributor to the CHANGELOG.md file, so that
they are credited for their contribution. See #15473
Co-authored-by: s1gr1d <32902192+s1gr1d@users.noreply.github.com>
@GerryWilko
GerryWilko deleted the patch-1 branch March 18, 2025 13:55
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@GerryWilko@lforst@s1gr1d@AbhiPrasad
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxt - #15473

Merged
s1gr1d merged 2 commits into
getsentry:developfrom
GerryWilko:patch-1
Feb 26, 2025
Merged

fix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxt#15473
s1gr1d merged 2 commits into
getsentry:developfrom
GerryWilko:patch-1

Conversation

@GerryWilko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before submitting a pull request, please take a look at our
Contributing guidelines and verify:

  • If you've added code that should be tested, please add tests.
  • Ensure your code lints and the test suite passes (yarn lint) & (yarn test).

Description

I noticed that Nuxt 300-400 status codes from the app are being reported to Sentry unnecessarily. There appears to be a guard against doing this on the server side errors but client side errors like 404 or 401s are being reported to Sentry.

I have simply added the same guard on the client side error reporter for the Nuxt integration of Sentry.

@GerryWilko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@s1gr1d apologies for the call out but I'm not sure how to get this reviewed. You seem to be the resident Nuxt expert at Sentry looking at previous PRs?

@lforstlforst changed the title fix(nuxt): ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxtfix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in NuxtFeb 25, 2025

@lforstlforst left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems very reasonable to me. @s1gr1d feel free to merge if this also makes sense to you!

Comment on lines +69 to +71
if (isNuxtError(error)) {
// Do not report if status code is 3xx or 4xx
if (error.statusCode >= 300 && error.statusCode < 500) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The 2 conditions could be ANDed.

@s1gr1ds1gr1d left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me. At first I thought this might not make sense as this is a client-only plugin and we would need to create an explicit server plugin (for Nuxt, not Nitro).
Nitro runs only in the server folder, but Nuxt also runs on the server when it does e.g. SSR.

However, I tested this and it seems like the errors from the Nuxt server side are passed to the client and the hook is called on the client as well. So this change is fine.

@s1gr1d
s1gr1d merged commit 2140b53 into getsentry:developFeb 26, 2025
AbhiPrasad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
This PR adds the external contributor to the CHANGELOG.md file, so that
they are credited for their contribution. See #15473
Co-authored-by: s1gr1d <32902192+s1gr1d@users.noreply.github.com>
@GerryWilko
GerryWilko deleted the patch-1 branch March 18, 2025 13:55
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@GerryWilko@lforst@s1gr1d@AbhiPrasad
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxt - #15473

Merged
s1gr1d merged 2 commits into
getsentry:developfrom
GerryWilko:patch-1
Feb 26, 2025
Merged

fix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxt#15473
s1gr1d merged 2 commits into
getsentry:developfrom
GerryWilko:patch-1

Conversation

@GerryWilko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before submitting a pull request, please take a look at our
Contributing guidelines and verify:

  • If you've added code that should be tested, please add tests.
  • Ensure your code lints and the test suite passes (yarn lint) & (yarn test).

Description

I noticed that Nuxt 300-400 status codes from the app are being reported to Sentry unnecessarily. There appears to be a guard against doing this on the server side errors but client side errors like 404 or 401s are being reported to Sentry.

I have simply added the same guard on the client side error reporter for the Nuxt integration of Sentry.

@GerryWilko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@s1gr1d apologies for the call out but I'm not sure how to get this reviewed. You seem to be the resident Nuxt expert at Sentry looking at previous PRs?

@lforstlforst changed the title fix(nuxt): ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxtfix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in NuxtFeb 25, 2025

@lforstlforst left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems very reasonable to me. @s1gr1d feel free to merge if this also makes sense to you!

Comment on lines +69 to +71
if (isNuxtError(error)) {
// Do not report if status code is 3xx or 4xx
if (error.statusCode >= 300 && error.statusCode < 500) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The 2 conditions could be ANDed.

@s1gr1ds1gr1d left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me. At first I thought this might not make sense as this is a client-only plugin and we would need to create an explicit server plugin (for Nuxt, not Nitro).
Nitro runs only in the server folder, but Nuxt also runs on the server when it does e.g. SSR.

However, I tested this and it seems like the errors from the Nuxt server side are passed to the client and the hook is called on the client as well. So this change is fine.

@s1gr1d
s1gr1d merged commit 2140b53 into getsentry:developFeb 26, 2025
AbhiPrasad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
This PR adds the external contributor to the CHANGELOG.md file, so that
they are credited for their contribution. See #15473
Co-authored-by: s1gr1d <32902192+s1gr1d@users.noreply.github.com>
@GerryWilko
GerryWilko deleted the patch-1 branch March 18, 2025 13:55
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@GerryWilko@lforst@s1gr1d@AbhiPrasad
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxt - #15473

Merged
s1gr1d merged 2 commits into
getsentry:developfrom
GerryWilko:patch-1
Feb 26, 2025
Merged

fix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxt#15473
s1gr1d merged 2 commits into
getsentry:developfrom
GerryWilko:patch-1

Conversation

@GerryWilko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before submitting a pull request, please take a look at our
Contributing guidelines and verify:

  • If you've added code that should be tested, please add tests.
  • Ensure your code lints and the test suite passes (yarn lint) & (yarn test).

Description

I noticed that Nuxt 300-400 status codes from the app are being reported to Sentry unnecessarily. There appears to be a guard against doing this on the server side errors but client side errors like 404 or 401s are being reported to Sentry.

I have simply added the same guard on the client side error reporter for the Nuxt integration of Sentry.

@GerryWilko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@s1gr1d apologies for the call out but I'm not sure how to get this reviewed. You seem to be the resident Nuxt expert at Sentry looking at previous PRs?

@lforstlforst changed the title fix(nuxt): ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxtfix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in NuxtFeb 25, 2025

@lforstlforst left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems very reasonable to me. @s1gr1d feel free to merge if this also makes sense to you!

Comment on lines +69 to +71
if (isNuxtError(error)) {
// Do not report if status code is 3xx or 4xx
if (error.statusCode >= 300 && error.statusCode < 500) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The 2 conditions could be ANDed.

@s1gr1ds1gr1d left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me. At first I thought this might not make sense as this is a client-only plugin and we would need to create an explicit server plugin (for Nuxt, not Nitro).
Nitro runs only in the server folder, but Nuxt also runs on the server when it does e.g. SSR.

However, I tested this and it seems like the errors from the Nuxt server side are passed to the client and the hook is called on the client as well. So this change is fine.

@s1gr1d
s1gr1d merged commit 2140b53 into getsentry:developFeb 26, 2025
AbhiPrasad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
This PR adds the external contributor to the CHANGELOG.md file, so that
they are credited for their contribution. See #15473
Co-authored-by: s1gr1d <32902192+s1gr1d@users.noreply.github.com>
@GerryWilko
GerryWilko deleted the patch-1 branch March 18, 2025 13:55
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@GerryWilko@lforst@s1gr1d@AbhiPrasad
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxt - #15473

Merged
s1gr1d merged 2 commits into
getsentry:developfrom
GerryWilko:patch-1
Feb 26, 2025
Merged

fix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxt#15473
s1gr1d merged 2 commits into
getsentry:developfrom
GerryWilko:patch-1

Conversation

@GerryWilko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before submitting a pull request, please take a look at our
Contributing guidelines and verify:

  • If you've added code that should be tested, please add tests.
  • Ensure your code lints and the test suite passes (yarn lint) & (yarn test).

Description

I noticed that Nuxt 300-400 status codes from the app are being reported to Sentry unnecessarily. There appears to be a guard against doing this on the server side errors but client side errors like 404 or 401s are being reported to Sentry.

I have simply added the same guard on the client side error reporter for the Nuxt integration of Sentry.

@GerryWilko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@s1gr1d apologies for the call out but I'm not sure how to get this reviewed. You seem to be the resident Nuxt expert at Sentry looking at previous PRs?

@lforstlforst changed the title fix(nuxt): ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxtfix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in NuxtFeb 25, 2025

@lforstlforst left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems very reasonable to me. @s1gr1d feel free to merge if this also makes sense to you!

Comment on lines +69 to +71
if (isNuxtError(error)) {
// Do not report if status code is 3xx or 4xx
if (error.statusCode >= 300 && error.statusCode < 500) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The 2 conditions could be ANDed.

@s1gr1ds1gr1d left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me. At first I thought this might not make sense as this is a client-only plugin and we would need to create an explicit server plugin (for Nuxt, not Nitro).
Nitro runs only in the server folder, but Nuxt also runs on the server when it does e.g. SSR.

However, I tested this and it seems like the errors from the Nuxt server side are passed to the client and the hook is called on the client as well. So this change is fine.

@s1gr1d
s1gr1d merged commit 2140b53 into getsentry:developFeb 26, 2025
AbhiPrasad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
This PR adds the external contributor to the CHANGELOG.md file, so that
they are credited for their contribution. See #15473
Co-authored-by: s1gr1d <32902192+s1gr1d@users.noreply.github.com>
@GerryWilko
GerryWilko deleted the patch-1 branch March 18, 2025 13:55
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@GerryWilko@lforst@s1gr1d@AbhiPrasad
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxt - #15473

Merged
s1gr1d merged 2 commits into
getsentry:developfrom
GerryWilko:patch-1
Feb 26, 2025
Merged

fix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxt#15473
s1gr1d merged 2 commits into
getsentry:developfrom
GerryWilko:patch-1

Conversation

@GerryWilko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before submitting a pull request, please take a look at our
Contributing guidelines and verify:

  • If you've added code that should be tested, please add tests.
  • Ensure your code lints and the test suite passes (yarn lint) & (yarn test).

Description

I noticed that Nuxt 300-400 status codes from the app are being reported to Sentry unnecessarily. There appears to be a guard against doing this on the server side errors but client side errors like 404 or 401s are being reported to Sentry.

I have simply added the same guard on the client side error reporter for the Nuxt integration of Sentry.

@GerryWilko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@s1gr1d apologies for the call out but I'm not sure how to get this reviewed. You seem to be the resident Nuxt expert at Sentry looking at previous PRs?

@lforstlforst changed the title fix(nuxt): ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxtfix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in NuxtFeb 25, 2025

@lforstlforst left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems very reasonable to me. @s1gr1d feel free to merge if this also makes sense to you!

Comment on lines +69 to +71
if (isNuxtError(error)) {
// Do not report if status code is 3xx or 4xx
if (error.statusCode >= 300 && error.statusCode < 500) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The 2 conditions could be ANDed.

@s1gr1ds1gr1d left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me. At first I thought this might not make sense as this is a client-only plugin and we would need to create an explicit server plugin (for Nuxt, not Nitro).
Nitro runs only in the server folder, but Nuxt also runs on the server when it does e.g. SSR.

However, I tested this and it seems like the errors from the Nuxt server side are passed to the client and the hook is called on the client as well. So this change is fine.

@s1gr1d
s1gr1d merged commit 2140b53 into getsentry:developFeb 26, 2025
AbhiPrasad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
This PR adds the external contributor to the CHANGELOG.md file, so that
they are credited for their contribution. See #15473
Co-authored-by: s1gr1d <32902192+s1gr1d@users.noreply.github.com>
@GerryWilko
GerryWilko deleted the patch-1 branch March 18, 2025 13:55
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@GerryWilko@lforst@s1gr1d@AbhiPrasad
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

fix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxt - #15473

Merged
s1gr1d merged 2 commits into
getsentry:developfrom
GerryWilko:patch-1
Feb 26, 2025
Merged

fix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxt#15473
s1gr1d merged 2 commits into
getsentry:developfrom
GerryWilko:patch-1

Conversation

@GerryWilko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before submitting a pull request, please take a look at our
Contributing guidelines and verify:

  • If you've added code that should be tested, please add tests.
  • Ensure your code lints and the test suite passes (yarn lint) & (yarn test).

Description

I noticed that Nuxt 300-400 status codes from the app are being reported to Sentry unnecessarily. There appears to be a guard against doing this on the server side errors but client side errors like 404 or 401s are being reported to Sentry.

I have simply added the same guard on the client side error reporter for the Nuxt integration of Sentry.

@GerryWilko

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@s1gr1d apologies for the call out but I'm not sure how to get this reviewed. You seem to be the resident Nuxt expert at Sentry looking at previous PRs?

@lforstlforst changed the title fix(nuxt): ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in Nuxtfix(nuxt): Ignore 300-400 status codes on app errors in NuxtFeb 25, 2025

@lforstlforst left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems very reasonable to me. @s1gr1d feel free to merge if this also makes sense to you!

Comment on lines +69 to +71
if (isNuxtError(error)) {
// Do not report if status code is 3xx or 4xx
if (error.statusCode >= 300 && error.statusCode < 500) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The 2 conditions could be ANDed.

@s1gr1ds1gr1d left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me. At first I thought this might not make sense as this is a client-only plugin and we would need to create an explicit server plugin (for Nuxt, not Nitro).
Nitro runs only in the server folder, but Nuxt also runs on the server when it does e.g. SSR.

However, I tested this and it seems like the errors from the Nuxt server side are passed to the client and the hook is called on the client as well. So this change is fine.

@s1gr1d
s1gr1d merged commit 2140b53 into getsentry:developFeb 26, 2025
AbhiPrasad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
This PR adds the external contributor to the CHANGELOG.md file, so that
they are credited for their contribution. See #15473
Co-authored-by: s1gr1d <32902192+s1gr1d@users.noreply.github.com>
@GerryWilko
GerryWilko deleted the patch-1 branch March 18, 2025 13:55
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@GerryWilko@lforst@s1gr1d@AbhiPrasad