chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions - #15944

Merged
Lms24 merged 1 commit into
developfrom
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
Apr 2, 2025
Merged

chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions#15944
Lms24 merged 1 commit into
developfrom
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes

Conversation

@Lms24

@Lms24Lms24 commented Apr 1, 2025•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

When running some unit tests locally, I noticed that the coverage summary contained files like vite.config.ts or .eslintrc as well as transpiled code in build. These files shouldn't be in the coverage reports and neither have an influence on the overall coverage score.

@Lms24Lms24 self-assigned this Apr 1, 2025
@Lms24
Lms24 requested review from AbhiPrasad and lforstApril 1, 2025 14:36
@Lms24
Lms24force-pushed the lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes branch from 4f745f9 to 90b4a5aCompareApril 2, 2025 10:56
@Lms24
Lms24 enabled auto-merge (squash) April 2, 2025 10:56
@Lms24
Lms24 merged commit 71409c3 into developApr 2, 2025
@Lms24
Lms24 deleted the lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes branch April 2, 2025 11:07
onurtemizkan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2025
@Lms24@onurtemizkan
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions (#15944)
c8a284f
When running some unit tests locally, I noticed that the coverage
summary contained files like `vite.config.ts` or `.eslintrc` as well as
transpiled code in `build`. These files shouldn't be in the coverage
reports and neither have an influence on the overall coverage score.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@lforstlforstAwaiting requested review from lforst
1 more reviewer
@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@Lms24Lms24

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lms24@AbhiPrasad
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions - #15944
Merged
Lms24 merged 1 commit into
developfrom 
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
Apr 2, 2025
Merged
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions#15944
Lms24 merged 1 commit into
developfrom 
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
Conversation
@Lms24
@Lms24Lms24
commented
Apr 1, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
When running some unit tests locally, I noticed that the coverage summary contained files like vite.config.ts or .eslintrc as well as transpiled code in build. These files shouldn't be in the coverage reports and neither have an influence on the overall coverage score.
@Lms24Lms24
self-assigned this
Apr 1, 2025
@Lms24
Lms24
requested review from
AbhiPrasad and lforstApril 1, 2025 14:36
@Lms24
Lms24force-pushed
the
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
branch
from
4f745f9 to
90b4a5aCompareApril 2, 2025 10:56
@Lms24
Lms24
enabled auto-merge (squash)
April 2, 2025 10:56
@Lms24
Lms24
merged commit 71409c3
into
developApr 2, 2025
@Lms24
Lms24
deleted the

lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes

branch
April 2, 2025 11:07
onurtemizkan pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
@Lms24@onurtemizkan
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions (#15944)
c8a284f
When running some unit tests locally, I noticed that the coverage
summary contained files like `vite.config.ts` or `.eslintrc` as well as
transpiled code in `build`. These files shouldn't be in the coverage
reports and neither have an influence on the overall coverage score.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@lforstlforstAwaiting requested review from lforst

1 more reviewer

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@Lms24Lms24

Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lms24@AbhiPrasad

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions - #15944
Merged
Lms24 merged 1 commit into
developfrom 
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
Apr 2, 2025
Merged
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions#15944
Lms24 merged 1 commit into
developfrom 
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
Conversation
@Lms24
@Lms24Lms24
commented
Apr 1, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
When running some unit tests locally, I noticed that the coverage summary contained files like vite.config.ts or .eslintrc as well as transpiled code in build. These files shouldn't be in the coverage reports and neither have an influence on the overall coverage score.
@Lms24Lms24
self-assigned this
Apr 1, 2025
@Lms24
Lms24
requested review from
AbhiPrasad and lforstApril 1, 2025 14:36
@Lms24
Lms24force-pushed
the
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
branch
from
4f745f9 to
90b4a5aCompareApril 2, 2025 10:56
@Lms24
Lms24
enabled auto-merge (squash)
April 2, 2025 10:56
@Lms24
Lms24
merged commit 71409c3
into
developApr 2, 2025
@Lms24
Lms24
deleted the

lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes

branch
April 2, 2025 11:07
onurtemizkan pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
@Lms24@onurtemizkan
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions (#15944)
c8a284f
When running some unit tests locally, I noticed that the coverage
summary contained files like `vite.config.ts` or `.eslintrc` as well as
transpiled code in `build`. These files shouldn't be in the coverage
reports and neither have an influence on the overall coverage score.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@lforstlforstAwaiting requested review from lforst

1 more reviewer

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@Lms24Lms24

Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lms24@AbhiPrasad

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions - #15944
Merged
Lms24 merged 1 commit into
developfrom 
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
Apr 2, 2025
Merged
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions#15944
Lms24 merged 1 commit into
developfrom 
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
Conversation
@Lms24
@Lms24Lms24
commented
Apr 1, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
When running some unit tests locally, I noticed that the coverage summary contained files like vite.config.ts or .eslintrc as well as transpiled code in build. These files shouldn't be in the coverage reports and neither have an influence on the overall coverage score.
@Lms24Lms24
self-assigned this
Apr 1, 2025
@Lms24
Lms24
requested review from
AbhiPrasad and lforstApril 1, 2025 14:36
@Lms24
Lms24force-pushed
the
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
branch
from
4f745f9 to
90b4a5aCompareApril 2, 2025 10:56
@Lms24
Lms24
enabled auto-merge (squash)
April 2, 2025 10:56
@Lms24
Lms24
merged commit 71409c3
into
developApr 2, 2025
@Lms24
Lms24
deleted the

lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes

branch
April 2, 2025 11:07
onurtemizkan pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
@Lms24@onurtemizkan
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions (#15944)
c8a284f
When running some unit tests locally, I noticed that the coverage
summary contained files like `vite.config.ts` or `.eslintrc` as well as
transpiled code in `build`. These files shouldn't be in the coverage
reports and neither have an influence on the overall coverage score.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@lforstlforstAwaiting requested review from lforst

1 more reviewer

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@Lms24Lms24

Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lms24@AbhiPrasad

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions - #15944
Merged
Lms24 merged 1 commit into
developfrom 
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
Apr 2, 2025
Merged
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions#15944
Lms24 merged 1 commit into
developfrom 
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
Conversation
@Lms24
@Lms24Lms24
commented
Apr 1, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
When running some unit tests locally, I noticed that the coverage summary contained files like vite.config.ts or .eslintrc as well as transpiled code in build. These files shouldn't be in the coverage reports and neither have an influence on the overall coverage score.
@Lms24Lms24
self-assigned this
Apr 1, 2025
@Lms24
Lms24
requested review from
AbhiPrasad and lforstApril 1, 2025 14:36
@Lms24
Lms24force-pushed
the
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
branch
from
4f745f9 to
90b4a5aCompareApril 2, 2025 10:56
@Lms24
Lms24
enabled auto-merge (squash)
April 2, 2025 10:56
@Lms24
Lms24
merged commit 71409c3
into
developApr 2, 2025
@Lms24
Lms24
deleted the

lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes

branch
April 2, 2025 11:07
onurtemizkan pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
@Lms24@onurtemizkan
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions (#15944)
c8a284f
When running some unit tests locally, I noticed that the coverage
summary contained files like `vite.config.ts` or `.eslintrc` as well as
transpiled code in `build`. These files shouldn't be in the coverage
reports and neither have an influence on the overall coverage score.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@lforstlforstAwaiting requested review from lforst

1 more reviewer

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@Lms24Lms24

Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lms24@AbhiPrasad

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions - #15944
Merged
Lms24 merged 1 commit into
developfrom 
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
Apr 2, 2025
Merged
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions#15944
Lms24 merged 1 commit into
developfrom 
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
Conversation
@Lms24
@Lms24Lms24
commented
Apr 1, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
When running some unit tests locally, I noticed that the coverage summary contained files like vite.config.ts or .eslintrc as well as transpiled code in build. These files shouldn't be in the coverage reports and neither have an influence on the overall coverage score.
@Lms24Lms24
self-assigned this
Apr 1, 2025
@Lms24
Lms24
requested review from
AbhiPrasad and lforstApril 1, 2025 14:36
@Lms24
Lms24force-pushed
the
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
branch
from
4f745f9 to
90b4a5aCompareApril 2, 2025 10:56
@Lms24
Lms24
enabled auto-merge (squash)
April 2, 2025 10:56
@Lms24
Lms24
merged commit 71409c3
into
developApr 2, 2025
@Lms24
Lms24
deleted the

lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes

branch
April 2, 2025 11:07
onurtemizkan pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
@Lms24@onurtemizkan
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions (#15944)
c8a284f
When running some unit tests locally, I noticed that the coverage
summary contained files like `vite.config.ts` or `.eslintrc` as well as
transpiled code in `build`. These files shouldn't be in the coverage
reports and neither have an influence on the overall coverage score.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@lforstlforstAwaiting requested review from lforst

1 more reviewer

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@Lms24Lms24

Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lms24@AbhiPrasad

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions - #15944
Merged
Lms24 merged 1 commit into
developfrom 
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
Apr 2, 2025
Merged
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions#15944
Lms24 merged 1 commit into
developfrom 
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
Conversation
@Lms24
@Lms24Lms24
commented
Apr 1, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
When running some unit tests locally, I noticed that the coverage summary contained files like vite.config.ts or .eslintrc as well as transpiled code in build. These files shouldn't be in the coverage reports and neither have an influence on the overall coverage score.
@Lms24Lms24
self-assigned this
Apr 1, 2025
@Lms24
Lms24
requested review from
AbhiPrasad and lforstApril 1, 2025 14:36
@Lms24
Lms24force-pushed
the
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
branch
from
4f745f9 to
90b4a5aCompareApril 2, 2025 10:56
@Lms24
Lms24
enabled auto-merge (squash)
April 2, 2025 10:56
@Lms24
Lms24
merged commit 71409c3
into
developApr 2, 2025
@Lms24
Lms24
deleted the

lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes

branch
April 2, 2025 11:07
onurtemizkan pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
@Lms24@onurtemizkan
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions (#15944)
c8a284f
When running some unit tests locally, I noticed that the coverage
summary contained files like `vite.config.ts` or `.eslintrc` as well as
transpiled code in `build`. These files shouldn't be in the coverage
reports and neither have an influence on the overall coverage score.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@lforstlforstAwaiting requested review from lforst

1 more reviewer

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@Lms24Lms24

Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lms24@AbhiPrasad

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions - #15944
Merged
Lms24 merged 1 commit into
developfrom 
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
Apr 2, 2025
Merged
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions#15944
Lms24 merged 1 commit into
developfrom 
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
Conversation
@Lms24
@Lms24Lms24
commented
Apr 1, 2025•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
When running some unit tests locally, I noticed that the coverage summary contained files like vite.config.ts or .eslintrc as well as transpiled code in build. These files shouldn't be in the coverage reports and neither have an influence on the overall coverage score.
@Lms24Lms24
self-assigned this
Apr 1, 2025
@Lms24
Lms24
requested review from
AbhiPrasad and lforstApril 1, 2025 14:36
@Lms24
Lms24force-pushed
the
lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes
branch
from
4f745f9 to
90b4a5aCompareApril 2, 2025 10:56
@Lms24
Lms24
enabled auto-merge (squash)
April 2, 2025 10:56
@Lms24
Lms24
merged commit 71409c3
into
developApr 2, 2025
@Lms24
Lms24
deleted the

lms/test-fix-coverage-excludes

branch
April 2, 2025 11:07
onurtemizkan pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
@Lms24@onurtemizkan
chore(tests): Fix coverage file exclusions (#15944)
c8a284f
When running some unit tests locally, I noticed that the coverage
summary contained files like `vite.config.ts` or `.eslintrc` as well as
transpiled code in `build`. These files shouldn't be in the coverage
reports and neither have an influence on the overall coverage score.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@lforstlforstAwaiting requested review from lforst

1 more reviewer

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@Lms24Lms24

Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Lms24@AbhiPrasad