Skip to content

test(remix): Run tsc before Remix E2E tests - #16345

Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 15 commits into
developfrom
onur/remix-type-tests
May 29, 2025
Merged

test(remix): Run tsc before Remix E2E tests#16345
AbhiPrasad merged 15 commits into
developfrom
onur/remix-type-tests

Conversation

@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Following up: #16336

test('Sends form data with action span', async ({ page }) => {
const formdataActionTransaction = waitForTransaction('create-remix-app-express', transactionEvent => {
return transactionEvent?.spans?.some(span => span.data && span.data['code.function'] === 'action');
return transactionEvent?.spans?.some(span => span.data && span.data['code.function'] === 'action') || false;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

q: What does adding || false do here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

waitForTransaction expects a function returning a boolean, after adding optional chaining, it became boolean | undefined. So, making it false in such cases

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah... of course 😅 thanks

@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@andreiborza - this branch should fail on CI actually. And it does fail on my local. Looks like CI is letting tsc fail. I'm checking the build workflow. Making it draft.

@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkan marked this pull request as draft May 20, 2025 14:42
@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkanforce-pushed the onur/remix-type-tests branch from ab4b1ac to 8fb25f1CompareMay 20, 2025 21:42
@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Update: I was not able to make this fail on CI (with ServerBuild type mismatch) as it looks like the tests use the latest fixed release (v9.22.0) in verdaccio, even if the branch is behind that. Anyway the tests work, I have seen them failing for ServerBuild locally.

@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkan marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2025 21:56
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad merged commit d06b72b into developMay 29, 2025
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad deleted the onur/remix-type-tests branch May 29, 2025 16:32
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@onurtemizkan@andreiborza@AbhiPrasad
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
test(remix): Run `tsc` before Remix E2E tests by onurtemizkan · Pull Request #16345 · getsentry/sentry-javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

test(remix): Run tsc before Remix E2E tests - #16345

Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 15 commits into
developfrom
onur/remix-type-tests
May 29, 2025
Merged

test(remix): Run tsc before Remix E2E tests#16345
AbhiPrasad merged 15 commits into
developfrom
onur/remix-type-tests

Conversation

@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Following up: #16336

test('Sends form data with action span', async ({ page }) => {
const formdataActionTransaction = waitForTransaction('create-remix-app-express', transactionEvent => {
return transactionEvent?.spans?.some(span => span.data && span.data['code.function'] === 'action');
return transactionEvent?.spans?.some(span => span.data && span.data['code.function'] === 'action') || false;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

q: What does adding || false do here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

waitForTransaction expects a function returning a boolean, after adding optional chaining, it became boolean | undefined. So, making it false in such cases

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah... of course 😅 thanks

@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@andreiborza - this branch should fail on CI actually. And it does fail on my local. Looks like CI is letting tsc fail. I'm checking the build workflow. Making it draft.

@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkan marked this pull request as draft May 20, 2025 14:42
@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkanforce-pushed the onur/remix-type-tests branch from ab4b1ac to 8fb25f1CompareMay 20, 2025 21:42
@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Update: I was not able to make this fail on CI (with ServerBuild type mismatch) as it looks like the tests use the latest fixed release (v9.22.0) in verdaccio, even if the branch is behind that. Anyway the tests work, I have seen them failing for ServerBuild locally.

@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkan marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2025 21:56
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad merged commit d06b72b into developMay 29, 2025
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad deleted the onur/remix-type-tests branch May 29, 2025 16:32
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@onurtemizkan@andreiborza@AbhiPrasad
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' test(remix): Run `tsc` before Remix E2E tests by onurtemizkan · Pull Request #16345 · getsentry/sentry-javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

test(remix): Run tsc before Remix E2E tests - #16345

Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 15 commits into
developfrom
onur/remix-type-tests
May 29, 2025
Merged

test(remix): Run tsc before Remix E2E tests#16345
AbhiPrasad merged 15 commits into
developfrom
onur/remix-type-tests

Conversation

@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Following up: #16336

test('Sends form data with action span', async ({ page }) => {
const formdataActionTransaction = waitForTransaction('create-remix-app-express', transactionEvent => {
return transactionEvent?.spans?.some(span => span.data && span.data['code.function'] === 'action');
return transactionEvent?.spans?.some(span => span.data && span.data['code.function'] === 'action') || false;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

q: What does adding || false do here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

waitForTransaction expects a function returning a boolean, after adding optional chaining, it became boolean | undefined. So, making it false in such cases

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah... of course 😅 thanks

@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@andreiborza - this branch should fail on CI actually. And it does fail on my local. Looks like CI is letting tsc fail. I'm checking the build workflow. Making it draft.

@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkan marked this pull request as draft May 20, 2025 14:42
@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkanforce-pushed the onur/remix-type-tests branch from ab4b1ac to 8fb25f1CompareMay 20, 2025 21:42
@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Update: I was not able to make this fail on CI (with ServerBuild type mismatch) as it looks like the tests use the latest fixed release (v9.22.0) in verdaccio, even if the branch is behind that. Anyway the tests work, I have seen them failing for ServerBuild locally.

@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkan marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2025 21:56
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad merged commit d06b72b into developMay 29, 2025
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad deleted the onur/remix-type-tests branch May 29, 2025 16:32
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@onurtemizkan@andreiborza@AbhiPrasad
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' test(remix): Run `tsc` before Remix E2E tests by onurtemizkan · Pull Request #16345 · getsentry/sentry-javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

test(remix): Run tsc before Remix E2E tests - #16345

Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 15 commits into
developfrom
onur/remix-type-tests
May 29, 2025
Merged

test(remix): Run tsc before Remix E2E tests#16345
AbhiPrasad merged 15 commits into
developfrom
onur/remix-type-tests

Conversation

@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Following up: #16336

test('Sends form data with action span', async ({ page }) => {
const formdataActionTransaction = waitForTransaction('create-remix-app-express', transactionEvent => {
return transactionEvent?.spans?.some(span => span.data && span.data['code.function'] === 'action');
return transactionEvent?.spans?.some(span => span.data && span.data['code.function'] === 'action') || false;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

q: What does adding || false do here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

waitForTransaction expects a function returning a boolean, after adding optional chaining, it became boolean | undefined. So, making it false in such cases

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah... of course 😅 thanks

@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@andreiborza - this branch should fail on CI actually. And it does fail on my local. Looks like CI is letting tsc fail. I'm checking the build workflow. Making it draft.

@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkan marked this pull request as draft May 20, 2025 14:42
@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkanforce-pushed the onur/remix-type-tests branch from ab4b1ac to 8fb25f1CompareMay 20, 2025 21:42
@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Update: I was not able to make this fail on CI (with ServerBuild type mismatch) as it looks like the tests use the latest fixed release (v9.22.0) in verdaccio, even if the branch is behind that. Anyway the tests work, I have seen them failing for ServerBuild locally.

@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkan marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2025 21:56
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad merged commit d06b72b into developMay 29, 2025
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad deleted the onur/remix-type-tests branch May 29, 2025 16:32
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@onurtemizkan@andreiborza@AbhiPrasad
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' test(remix): Run `tsc` before Remix E2E tests by onurtemizkan · Pull Request #16345 · getsentry/sentry-javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

test(remix): Run tsc before Remix E2E tests - #16345

Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 15 commits into
developfrom
onur/remix-type-tests
May 29, 2025
Merged

test(remix): Run tsc before Remix E2E tests#16345
AbhiPrasad merged 15 commits into
developfrom
onur/remix-type-tests

Conversation

@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Following up: #16336

test('Sends form data with action span', async ({ page }) => {
const formdataActionTransaction = waitForTransaction('create-remix-app-express', transactionEvent => {
return transactionEvent?.spans?.some(span => span.data && span.data['code.function'] === 'action');
return transactionEvent?.spans?.some(span => span.data && span.data['code.function'] === 'action') || false;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

q: What does adding || false do here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

waitForTransaction expects a function returning a boolean, after adding optional chaining, it became boolean | undefined. So, making it false in such cases

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah... of course 😅 thanks

@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@andreiborza - this branch should fail on CI actually. And it does fail on my local. Looks like CI is letting tsc fail. I'm checking the build workflow. Making it draft.

@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkan marked this pull request as draft May 20, 2025 14:42
@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkanforce-pushed the onur/remix-type-tests branch from ab4b1ac to 8fb25f1CompareMay 20, 2025 21:42
@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Update: I was not able to make this fail on CI (with ServerBuild type mismatch) as it looks like the tests use the latest fixed release (v9.22.0) in verdaccio, even if the branch is behind that. Anyway the tests work, I have seen them failing for ServerBuild locally.

@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkan marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2025 21:56
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad merged commit d06b72b into developMay 29, 2025
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad deleted the onur/remix-type-tests branch May 29, 2025 16:32
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@onurtemizkan@andreiborza@AbhiPrasad
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' test(remix): Run `tsc` before Remix E2E tests by onurtemizkan · Pull Request #16345 · getsentry/sentry-javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

test(remix): Run tsc before Remix E2E tests - #16345

Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 15 commits into
developfrom
onur/remix-type-tests
May 29, 2025
Merged

test(remix): Run tsc before Remix E2E tests#16345
AbhiPrasad merged 15 commits into
developfrom
onur/remix-type-tests

Conversation

@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Following up: #16336

test('Sends form data with action span', async ({ page }) => {
const formdataActionTransaction = waitForTransaction('create-remix-app-express', transactionEvent => {
return transactionEvent?.spans?.some(span => span.data && span.data['code.function'] === 'action');
return transactionEvent?.spans?.some(span => span.data && span.data['code.function'] === 'action') || false;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

q: What does adding || false do here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

waitForTransaction expects a function returning a boolean, after adding optional chaining, it became boolean | undefined. So, making it false in such cases

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah... of course 😅 thanks

@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@andreiborza - this branch should fail on CI actually. And it does fail on my local. Looks like CI is letting tsc fail. I'm checking the build workflow. Making it draft.

@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkan marked this pull request as draft May 20, 2025 14:42
@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkanforce-pushed the onur/remix-type-tests branch from ab4b1ac to 8fb25f1CompareMay 20, 2025 21:42
@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Update: I was not able to make this fail on CI (with ServerBuild type mismatch) as it looks like the tests use the latest fixed release (v9.22.0) in verdaccio, even if the branch is behind that. Anyway the tests work, I have seen them failing for ServerBuild locally.

@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkan marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2025 21:56
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad merged commit d06b72b into developMay 29, 2025
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad deleted the onur/remix-type-tests branch May 29, 2025 16:32
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@onurtemizkan@andreiborza@AbhiPrasad
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' test(remix): Run `tsc` before Remix E2E tests by onurtemizkan · Pull Request #16345 · getsentry/sentry-javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

test(remix): Run tsc before Remix E2E tests - #16345

Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 15 commits into
developfrom
onur/remix-type-tests
May 29, 2025
Merged

test(remix): Run tsc before Remix E2E tests#16345
AbhiPrasad merged 15 commits into
developfrom
onur/remix-type-tests

Conversation

@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Following up: #16336

test('Sends form data with action span', async ({ page }) => {
const formdataActionTransaction = waitForTransaction('create-remix-app-express', transactionEvent => {
return transactionEvent?.spans?.some(span => span.data && span.data['code.function'] === 'action');
return transactionEvent?.spans?.some(span => span.data && span.data['code.function'] === 'action') || false;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

q: What does adding || false do here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

waitForTransaction expects a function returning a boolean, after adding optional chaining, it became boolean | undefined. So, making it false in such cases

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah... of course 😅 thanks

@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@andreiborza - this branch should fail on CI actually. And it does fail on my local. Looks like CI is letting tsc fail. I'm checking the build workflow. Making it draft.

@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkan marked this pull request as draft May 20, 2025 14:42
@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkanforce-pushed the onur/remix-type-tests branch from ab4b1ac to 8fb25f1CompareMay 20, 2025 21:42
@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Update: I was not able to make this fail on CI (with ServerBuild type mismatch) as it looks like the tests use the latest fixed release (v9.22.0) in verdaccio, even if the branch is behind that. Anyway the tests work, I have seen them failing for ServerBuild locally.

@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkan marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2025 21:56
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad merged commit d06b72b into developMay 29, 2025
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad deleted the onur/remix-type-tests branch May 29, 2025 16:32
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@onurtemizkan@andreiborza@AbhiPrasad
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); test(remix): Run `tsc` before Remix E2E tests by onurtemizkan · Pull Request #16345 · getsentry/sentry-javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

test(remix): Run tsc before Remix E2E tests - #16345

Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 15 commits into
developfrom
onur/remix-type-tests
May 29, 2025
Merged

test(remix): Run tsc before Remix E2E tests#16345
AbhiPrasad merged 15 commits into
developfrom
onur/remix-type-tests

Conversation

@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Following up: #16336

test('Sends form data with action span', async ({ page }) => {
const formdataActionTransaction = waitForTransaction('create-remix-app-express', transactionEvent => {
return transactionEvent?.spans?.some(span => span.data && span.data['code.function'] === 'action');
return transactionEvent?.spans?.some(span => span.data && span.data['code.function'] === 'action') || false;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

q: What does adding || false do here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

waitForTransaction expects a function returning a boolean, after adding optional chaining, it became boolean | undefined. So, making it false in such cases

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah... of course 😅 thanks

@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@andreiborza - this branch should fail on CI actually. And it does fail on my local. Looks like CI is letting tsc fail. I'm checking the build workflow. Making it draft.

@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkan marked this pull request as draft May 20, 2025 14:42
@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkanforce-pushed the onur/remix-type-tests branch from ab4b1ac to 8fb25f1CompareMay 20, 2025 21:42
@onurtemizkan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Update: I was not able to make this fail on CI (with ServerBuild type mismatch) as it looks like the tests use the latest fixed release (v9.22.0) in verdaccio, even if the branch is behind that. Anyway the tests work, I have seen them failing for ServerBuild locally.

@onurtemizkan
onurtemizkan marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2025 21:56
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad merged commit d06b72b into developMay 29, 2025
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad deleted the onur/remix-type-tests branch May 29, 2025 16:32
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@onurtemizkan@andreiborza@AbhiPrasad