Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions packages/bun/src/index.ts
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ export {
consoleLoggingIntegration,
createConsolaReporter,
createSentryWinstonTransport,
pinoIntegration,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: The PR exports pinoIntegration for Bun, but a test file marks it as unsupported. This will cause CI failure and likely runtime errors due to missing runtime APIs.
Severity: HIGH

Suggested Fix

Either remove the pinoIntegration export from packages/bun/src/index.ts if it is indeed unsupported by Bun, or, if it is now supported, remove pinoIntegration from the ignoreExports array in dev-packages/e2e-tests/test-applications/node-exports-test-app/scripts/consistentExports.ts and provide evidence that the underlying diagnosticsChannel API works correctly in Bun.

Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.
Location: packages/bun/src/index.ts#L169
Potential issue: The pull request adds `pinoIntegration` to the `@sentry/bun` package
exports. However, the test file `consistentExports.ts` still lists `pinoIntegration` in
its `ignoreExports` array with a comment stating it is "not supported in bun". This will
cause the `consistentExports` CI test to fail. More critically, the `pinoIntegration`
relies on the Node.js `diagnosticsChannel` API, which is likely unsupported in the Bun
runtime. Exporting this integration without verifying its compatibility will lead to a
broken feature that causes runtime errors for any user who attempts to use it.

Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stale ignoreExports entry undermines test coverage for new export

Medium Severity

pinoIntegration is now exported from @sentry/bun, but consistentExports.ts still lists it in ignoreExports with the comment "not supported in bun." This means the consistency check skips verifying this export exists, so if someone accidentally removes it later, no test will catch the regression. The ignoreExports entry needs to be removed to get proper test coverage. Additionally, this is a fix PR with no test that actually validates the fix — updating consistentExports.ts would serve as that regression test.

Fix in CursorFix in Web

Triggered by project rule: PR Review Guidelines for Cursor Bot

wrapMcpServerWithSentry,
featureFlagsIntegration,
launchDarklyIntegration,
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all \u003cpre\u003e\u003ccode\u003e blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "github.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions packages/bun/src/index.ts
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ export {
consoleLoggingIntegration,
createConsolaReporter,
createSentryWinstonTransport,
pinoIntegration,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: The PR exports pinoIntegration for Bun, but a test file marks it as unsupported. This will cause CI failure and likely runtime errors due to missing runtime APIs.
Severity: HIGH

Suggested Fix

Either remove the pinoIntegration export from packages/bun/src/index.ts if it is indeed unsupported by Bun, or, if it is now supported, remove pinoIntegration from the ignoreExports array in dev-packages/e2e-tests/test-applications/node-exports-test-app/scripts/consistentExports.ts and provide evidence that the underlying diagnosticsChannel API works correctly in Bun.

Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.
Location: packages/bun/src/index.ts#L169
Potential issue: The pull request adds `pinoIntegration` to the `@sentry/bun` package
exports. However, the test file `consistentExports.ts` still lists `pinoIntegration` in
its `ignoreExports` array with a comment stating it is "not supported in bun". This will
cause the `consistentExports` CI test to fail. More critically, the `pinoIntegration`
relies on the Node.js `diagnosticsChannel` API, which is likely unsupported in the Bun
runtime. Exporting this integration without verifying its compatibility will lead to a
broken feature that causes runtime errors for any user who attempts to use it.

Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stale ignoreExports entry undermines test coverage for new export

Medium Severity

pinoIntegration is now exported from @sentry/bun, but consistentExports.ts still lists it in ignoreExports with the comment "not supported in bun." This means the consistency check skips verifying this export exists, so if someone accidentally removes it later, no test will catch the regression. The ignoreExports entry needs to be removed to get proper test coverage. Additionally, this is a fix PR with no test that actually validates the fix — updating consistentExports.ts would serve as that regression test.

Fix in CursorFix in Web

Triggered by project rule: PR Review Guidelines for Cursor Bot

wrapMcpServerWithSentry,
featureFlagsIntegration,
launchDarklyIntegration,
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions packages/bun/src/index.ts
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ export {
consoleLoggingIntegration,
createConsolaReporter,
createSentryWinstonTransport,
pinoIntegration,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: The PR exports pinoIntegration for Bun, but a test file marks it as unsupported. This will cause CI failure and likely runtime errors due to missing runtime APIs.
Severity: HIGH

Suggested Fix

Either remove the pinoIntegration export from packages/bun/src/index.ts if it is indeed unsupported by Bun, or, if it is now supported, remove pinoIntegration from the ignoreExports array in dev-packages/e2e-tests/test-applications/node-exports-test-app/scripts/consistentExports.ts and provide evidence that the underlying diagnosticsChannel API works correctly in Bun.

Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.
Location: packages/bun/src/index.ts#L169
Potential issue: The pull request adds `pinoIntegration` to the `@sentry/bun` package
exports. However, the test file `consistentExports.ts` still lists `pinoIntegration` in
its `ignoreExports` array with a comment stating it is "not supported in bun". This will
cause the `consistentExports` CI test to fail. More critically, the `pinoIntegration`
relies on the Node.js `diagnosticsChannel` API, which is likely unsupported in the Bun
runtime. Exporting this integration without verifying its compatibility will lead to a
broken feature that causes runtime errors for any user who attempts to use it.

Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stale ignoreExports entry undermines test coverage for new export

Medium Severity

pinoIntegration is now exported from @sentry/bun, but consistentExports.ts still lists it in ignoreExports with the comment "not supported in bun." This means the consistency check skips verifying this export exists, so if someone accidentally removes it later, no test will catch the regression. The ignoreExports entry needs to be removed to get proper test coverage. Additionally, this is a fix PR with no test that actually validates the fix — updating consistentExports.ts would serve as that regression test.

Fix in CursorFix in Web

Triggered by project rule: PR Review Guidelines for Cursor Bot

wrapMcpServerWithSentry,
featureFlagsIntegration,
launchDarklyIntegration,
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length \u003e 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions packages/bun/src/index.ts
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ export {
consoleLoggingIntegration,
createConsolaReporter,
createSentryWinstonTransport,
pinoIntegration,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: The PR exports pinoIntegration for Bun, but a test file marks it as unsupported. This will cause CI failure and likely runtime errors due to missing runtime APIs.
Severity: HIGH

Suggested Fix

Either remove the pinoIntegration export from packages/bun/src/index.ts if it is indeed unsupported by Bun, or, if it is now supported, remove pinoIntegration from the ignoreExports array in dev-packages/e2e-tests/test-applications/node-exports-test-app/scripts/consistentExports.ts and provide evidence that the underlying diagnosticsChannel API works correctly in Bun.

Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.
Location: packages/bun/src/index.ts#L169
Potential issue: The pull request adds `pinoIntegration` to the `@sentry/bun` package
exports. However, the test file `consistentExports.ts` still lists `pinoIntegration` in
its `ignoreExports` array with a comment stating it is "not supported in bun". This will
cause the `consistentExports` CI test to fail. More critically, the `pinoIntegration`
relies on the Node.js `diagnosticsChannel` API, which is likely unsupported in the Bun
runtime. Exporting this integration without verifying its compatibility will lead to a
broken feature that causes runtime errors for any user who attempts to use it.

Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stale ignoreExports entry undermines test coverage for new export

Medium Severity

pinoIntegration is now exported from @sentry/bun, but consistentExports.ts still lists it in ignoreExports with the comment "not supported in bun." This means the consistency check skips verifying this export exists, so if someone accidentally removes it later, no test will catch the regression. The ignoreExports entry needs to be removed to get proper test coverage. Additionally, this is a fix PR with no test that actually validates the fix — updating consistentExports.ts would serve as that regression test.

Fix in CursorFix in Web

Triggered by project rule: PR Review Guidelines for Cursor Bot

wrapMcpServerWithSentry,
featureFlagsIntegration,
launchDarklyIntegration,
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions packages/bun/src/index.ts
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ export {
consoleLoggingIntegration,
createConsolaReporter,
createSentryWinstonTransport,
pinoIntegration,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: The PR exports pinoIntegration for Bun, but a test file marks it as unsupported. This will cause CI failure and likely runtime errors due to missing runtime APIs.
Severity: HIGH

Suggested Fix

Either remove the pinoIntegration export from packages/bun/src/index.ts if it is indeed unsupported by Bun, or, if it is now supported, remove pinoIntegration from the ignoreExports array in dev-packages/e2e-tests/test-applications/node-exports-test-app/scripts/consistentExports.ts and provide evidence that the underlying diagnosticsChannel API works correctly in Bun.

Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.
Location: packages/bun/src/index.ts#L169
Potential issue: The pull request adds `pinoIntegration` to the `@sentry/bun` package
exports. However, the test file `consistentExports.ts` still lists `pinoIntegration` in
its `ignoreExports` array with a comment stating it is "not supported in bun". This will
cause the `consistentExports` CI test to fail. More critically, the `pinoIntegration`
relies on the Node.js `diagnosticsChannel` API, which is likely unsupported in the Bun
runtime. Exporting this integration without verifying its compatibility will lead to a
broken feature that causes runtime errors for any user who attempts to use it.

Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stale ignoreExports entry undermines test coverage for new export

Medium Severity

pinoIntegration is now exported from @sentry/bun, but consistentExports.ts still lists it in ignoreExports with the comment "not supported in bun." This means the consistency check skips verifying this export exists, so if someone accidentally removes it later, no test will catch the regression. The ignoreExports entry needs to be removed to get proper test coverage. Additionally, this is a fix PR with no test that actually validates the fix — updating consistentExports.ts would serve as that regression test.

Fix in CursorFix in Web

Triggered by project rule: PR Review Guidelines for Cursor Bot

wrapMcpServerWithSentry,
featureFlagsIntegration,
launchDarklyIntegration,
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions packages/bun/src/index.ts
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ export {
consoleLoggingIntegration,
createConsolaReporter,
createSentryWinstonTransport,
pinoIntegration,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: The PR exports pinoIntegration for Bun, but a test file marks it as unsupported. This will cause CI failure and likely runtime errors due to missing runtime APIs.
Severity: HIGH

Suggested Fix

Either remove the pinoIntegration export from packages/bun/src/index.ts if it is indeed unsupported by Bun, or, if it is now supported, remove pinoIntegration from the ignoreExports array in dev-packages/e2e-tests/test-applications/node-exports-test-app/scripts/consistentExports.ts and provide evidence that the underlying diagnosticsChannel API works correctly in Bun.

Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.
Location: packages/bun/src/index.ts#L169
Potential issue: The pull request adds `pinoIntegration` to the `@sentry/bun` package
exports. However, the test file `consistentExports.ts` still lists `pinoIntegration` in
its `ignoreExports` array with a comment stating it is "not supported in bun". This will
cause the `consistentExports` CI test to fail. More critically, the `pinoIntegration`
relies on the Node.js `diagnosticsChannel` API, which is likely unsupported in the Bun
runtime. Exporting this integration without verifying its compatibility will lead to a
broken feature that causes runtime errors for any user who attempts to use it.

Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stale ignoreExports entry undermines test coverage for new export

Medium Severity

pinoIntegration is now exported from @sentry/bun, but consistentExports.ts still lists it in ignoreExports with the comment "not supported in bun." This means the consistency check skips verifying this export exists, so if someone accidentally removes it later, no test will catch the regression. The ignoreExports entry needs to be removed to get proper test coverage. Additionally, this is a fix PR with no test that actually validates the fix — updating consistentExports.ts would serve as that regression test.

Fix in CursorFix in Web

Triggered by project rule: PR Review Guidelines for Cursor Bot

wrapMcpServerWithSentry,
featureFlagsIntegration,
launchDarklyIntegration,
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions packages/bun/src/index.ts
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ export {
consoleLoggingIntegration,
createConsolaReporter,
createSentryWinstonTransport,
pinoIntegration,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: The PR exports pinoIntegration for Bun, but a test file marks it as unsupported. This will cause CI failure and likely runtime errors due to missing runtime APIs.
Severity: HIGH

Suggested Fix

Either remove the pinoIntegration export from packages/bun/src/index.ts if it is indeed unsupported by Bun, or, if it is now supported, remove pinoIntegration from the ignoreExports array in dev-packages/e2e-tests/test-applications/node-exports-test-app/scripts/consistentExports.ts and provide evidence that the underlying diagnosticsChannel API works correctly in Bun.

Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.
Location: packages/bun/src/index.ts#L169
Potential issue: The pull request adds `pinoIntegration` to the `@sentry/bun` package
exports. However, the test file `consistentExports.ts` still lists `pinoIntegration` in
its `ignoreExports` array with a comment stating it is "not supported in bun". This will
cause the `consistentExports` CI test to fail. More critically, the `pinoIntegration`
relies on the Node.js `diagnosticsChannel` API, which is likely unsupported in the Bun
runtime. Exporting this integration without verifying its compatibility will lead to a
broken feature that causes runtime errors for any user who attempts to use it.

Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stale ignoreExports entry undermines test coverage for new export

Medium Severity

pinoIntegration is now exported from @sentry/bun, but consistentExports.ts still lists it in ignoreExports with the comment "not supported in bun." This means the consistency check skips verifying this export exists, so if someone accidentally removes it later, no test will catch the regression. The ignoreExports entry needs to be removed to get proper test coverage. Additionally, this is a fix PR with no test that actually validates the fix — updating consistentExports.ts would serve as that regression test.

Fix in CursorFix in Web

Triggered by project rule: PR Review Guidelines for Cursor Bot

wrapMcpServerWithSentry,
featureFlagsIntegration,
launchDarklyIntegration,
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions packages/bun/src/index.ts
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ export {
consoleLoggingIntegration,
createConsolaReporter,
createSentryWinstonTransport,
pinoIntegration,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: The PR exports pinoIntegration for Bun, but a test file marks it as unsupported. This will cause CI failure and likely runtime errors due to missing runtime APIs.
Severity: HIGH

Suggested Fix

Either remove the pinoIntegration export from packages/bun/src/index.ts if it is indeed unsupported by Bun, or, if it is now supported, remove pinoIntegration from the ignoreExports array in dev-packages/e2e-tests/test-applications/node-exports-test-app/scripts/consistentExports.ts and provide evidence that the underlying diagnosticsChannel API works correctly in Bun.

Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.
Location: packages/bun/src/index.ts#L169
Potential issue: The pull request adds `pinoIntegration` to the `@sentry/bun` package
exports. However, the test file `consistentExports.ts` still lists `pinoIntegration` in
its `ignoreExports` array with a comment stating it is "not supported in bun". This will
cause the `consistentExports` CI test to fail. More critically, the `pinoIntegration`
relies on the Node.js `diagnosticsChannel` API, which is likely unsupported in the Bun
runtime. Exporting this integration without verifying its compatibility will lead to a
broken feature that causes runtime errors for any user who attempts to use it.

Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stale ignoreExports entry undermines test coverage for new export

Medium Severity

pinoIntegration is now exported from @sentry/bun, but consistentExports.ts still lists it in ignoreExports with the comment "not supported in bun." This means the consistency check skips verifying this export exists, so if someone accidentally removes it later, no test will catch the regression. The ignoreExports entry needs to be removed to get proper test coverage. Additionally, this is a fix PR with no test that actually validates the fix — updating consistentExports.ts would serve as that regression test.

Fix in CursorFix in Web

Triggered by project rule: PR Review Guidelines for Cursor Bot

wrapMcpServerWithSentry,
featureFlagsIntegration,
launchDarklyIntegration,
Expand Down
Loading