test(node): Make amqplib v1 integration test order-independent - #21534

Merged
mydea merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

test(node): Make amqplib v1 integration test order-independent#21534
mydea merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Fixes the flaky amqplib v1 auto-instrumentation integration test (suites/tracing/amqplib-v1/test.ts).

Root cause

The test asserted the producer (root span) and consumer (queue1 process) transactions in a fixed order using two sequential .expect() callbacks. The runner matches expected envelopes strictly FIFO (expectedEnvelopes.shift()), so the first callback always runs against whichever transaction envelope arrives first.

The producer and consumer are independent traces flushed independently, so their arrival order at the test server is not guaranteed. When the consumer (queue1 process) envelope arrived before the producer (root span) envelope, the first assertion expect(transaction.transaction).toEqual('root span') failed against the consumer transaction.

This is the same flake — and the same fix — already documented in the kafkajs integration test (suites/tracing/kafkajs/test.ts), which collects both transactions and asserts after both are received.

Fix

Apply the established collect-then-assert pattern: push both transactions into an array, then look them up by transaction name and assert once both have arrived. All original assertions (producer name, span count, PRODUCER span shape, consumer name, CONSUMER trace context) are preserved — only the order dependency is removed.

Fixes#21173

@github-actions
github-actionsBot requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 15, 2026 12:28
@github-actions
github-actionsBot requested review from JPeer264 and mydea and removed request for a teamJune 15, 2026 12:28
@mydea
mydea enabled auto-merge (squash) June 15, 2026 12:45
@mydea
mydea disabled auto-merge June 15, 2026 12:46
@mydea
mydea enabled auto-merge (squash) June 15, 2026 12:49
@mydea
mydea merged commit 31841e4 into developJun 15, 2026
48 checks passed
@mydea
mydea deleted the fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order branch June 15, 2026 13:23
mydea added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2026
## Summary
Applies the same fix as #21534 (amqplib **v1**) to the non-versioned
`amqplib auto-instrumentation` test (`suites/tracing/amqplib/test.ts`),
which has the identical flaky pattern.
## Root cause
The test asserted the producer (`root span`) and consumer (`queue1
process`) transactions in a fixed order using two sequential `.expect()`
callbacks. The runner matches expected envelopes strictly FIFO, but the
producer and consumer are independent traces flushed independently, so
their arrival order at the test server isn't guaranteed. When the
consumer envelope arrived first, the first assertion
(`expect(transaction.transaction).toEqual('root span')`) failed against
the consumer transaction.
## Fix
Use the established collect-then-assert pattern (same as #21534 and the
`kafkajs` test): push both transactions into an array, then look them up
by transaction name and assert once both have arrived. All original
assertions (producer name + span count + PRODUCER span shape, consumer
CONSUMER trace context) are preserved — only the order dependency is
removed.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

1 participant

@mydea
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

test(node): Make amqplib v1 integration test order-independent - #21534

Merged
mydea merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

test(node): Make amqplib v1 integration test order-independent#21534
mydea merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Fixes the flaky amqplib v1 auto-instrumentation integration test (suites/tracing/amqplib-v1/test.ts).

Root cause

The test asserted the producer (root span) and consumer (queue1 process) transactions in a fixed order using two sequential .expect() callbacks. The runner matches expected envelopes strictly FIFO (expectedEnvelopes.shift()), so the first callback always runs against whichever transaction envelope arrives first.

The producer and consumer are independent traces flushed independently, so their arrival order at the test server is not guaranteed. When the consumer (queue1 process) envelope arrived before the producer (root span) envelope, the first assertion expect(transaction.transaction).toEqual('root span') failed against the consumer transaction.

This is the same flake — and the same fix — already documented in the kafkajs integration test (suites/tracing/kafkajs/test.ts), which collects both transactions and asserts after both are received.

Fix

Apply the established collect-then-assert pattern: push both transactions into an array, then look them up by transaction name and assert once both have arrived. All original assertions (producer name, span count, PRODUCER span shape, consumer name, CONSUMER trace context) are preserved — only the order dependency is removed.

Fixes#21173

@github-actions
github-actionsBot requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 15, 2026 12:28
@github-actions
github-actionsBot requested review from JPeer264 and mydea and removed request for a teamJune 15, 2026 12:28
@mydea
mydea enabled auto-merge (squash) June 15, 2026 12:45
@mydea
mydea disabled auto-merge June 15, 2026 12:46
@mydea
mydea enabled auto-merge (squash) June 15, 2026 12:49
@mydea
mydea merged commit 31841e4 into developJun 15, 2026
48 checks passed
@mydea
mydea deleted the fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order branch June 15, 2026 13:23
mydea added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2026
## Summary
Applies the same fix as #21534 (amqplib **v1**) to the non-versioned
`amqplib auto-instrumentation` test (`suites/tracing/amqplib/test.ts`),
which has the identical flaky pattern.
## Root cause
The test asserted the producer (`root span`) and consumer (`queue1
process`) transactions in a fixed order using two sequential `.expect()`
callbacks. The runner matches expected envelopes strictly FIFO, but the
producer and consumer are independent traces flushed independently, so
their arrival order at the test server isn't guaranteed. When the
consumer envelope arrived first, the first assertion
(`expect(transaction.transaction).toEqual('root span')`) failed against
the consumer transaction.
## Fix
Use the established collect-then-assert pattern (same as #21534 and the
`kafkajs` test): push both transactions into an array, then look them up
by transaction name and assert once both have arrived. All original
assertions (producer name + span count + PRODUCER span shape, consumer
CONSUMER trace context) are preserved — only the order dependency is
removed.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

1 participant

@mydea
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

test(node): Make amqplib v1 integration test order-independent - #21534

Merged
mydea merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

test(node): Make amqplib v1 integration test order-independent#21534
mydea merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Fixes the flaky amqplib v1 auto-instrumentation integration test (suites/tracing/amqplib-v1/test.ts).

Root cause

The test asserted the producer (root span) and consumer (queue1 process) transactions in a fixed order using two sequential .expect() callbacks. The runner matches expected envelopes strictly FIFO (expectedEnvelopes.shift()), so the first callback always runs against whichever transaction envelope arrives first.

The producer and consumer are independent traces flushed independently, so their arrival order at the test server is not guaranteed. When the consumer (queue1 process) envelope arrived before the producer (root span) envelope, the first assertion expect(transaction.transaction).toEqual('root span') failed against the consumer transaction.

This is the same flake — and the same fix — already documented in the kafkajs integration test (suites/tracing/kafkajs/test.ts), which collects both transactions and asserts after both are received.

Fix

Apply the established collect-then-assert pattern: push both transactions into an array, then look them up by transaction name and assert once both have arrived. All original assertions (producer name, span count, PRODUCER span shape, consumer name, CONSUMER trace context) are preserved — only the order dependency is removed.

Fixes#21173

@github-actions
github-actionsBot requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 15, 2026 12:28
@github-actions
github-actionsBot requested review from JPeer264 and mydea and removed request for a teamJune 15, 2026 12:28
@mydea
mydea enabled auto-merge (squash) June 15, 2026 12:45
@mydea
mydea disabled auto-merge June 15, 2026 12:46
@mydea
mydea enabled auto-merge (squash) June 15, 2026 12:49
@mydea
mydea merged commit 31841e4 into developJun 15, 2026
48 checks passed
@mydea
mydea deleted the fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order branch June 15, 2026 13:23
mydea added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2026
## Summary
Applies the same fix as #21534 (amqplib **v1**) to the non-versioned
`amqplib auto-instrumentation` test (`suites/tracing/amqplib/test.ts`),
which has the identical flaky pattern.
## Root cause
The test asserted the producer (`root span`) and consumer (`queue1
process`) transactions in a fixed order using two sequential `.expect()`
callbacks. The runner matches expected envelopes strictly FIFO, but the
producer and consumer are independent traces flushed independently, so
their arrival order at the test server isn't guaranteed. When the
consumer envelope arrived first, the first assertion
(`expect(transaction.transaction).toEqual('root span')`) failed against
the consumer transaction.
## Fix
Use the established collect-then-assert pattern (same as #21534 and the
`kafkajs` test): push both transactions into an array, then look them up
by transaction name and assert once both have arrived. All original
assertions (producer name + span count + PRODUCER span shape, consumer
CONSUMER trace context) are preserved — only the order dependency is
removed.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

1 participant

@mydea
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

test(node): Make amqplib v1 integration test order-independent - #21534

Merged
mydea merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

test(node): Make amqplib v1 integration test order-independent#21534
mydea merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Fixes the flaky amqplib v1 auto-instrumentation integration test (suites/tracing/amqplib-v1/test.ts).

Root cause

The test asserted the producer (root span) and consumer (queue1 process) transactions in a fixed order using two sequential .expect() callbacks. The runner matches expected envelopes strictly FIFO (expectedEnvelopes.shift()), so the first callback always runs against whichever transaction envelope arrives first.

The producer and consumer are independent traces flushed independently, so their arrival order at the test server is not guaranteed. When the consumer (queue1 process) envelope arrived before the producer (root span) envelope, the first assertion expect(transaction.transaction).toEqual('root span') failed against the consumer transaction.

This is the same flake — and the same fix — already documented in the kafkajs integration test (suites/tracing/kafkajs/test.ts), which collects both transactions and asserts after both are received.

Fix

Apply the established collect-then-assert pattern: push both transactions into an array, then look them up by transaction name and assert once both have arrived. All original assertions (producer name, span count, PRODUCER span shape, consumer name, CONSUMER trace context) are preserved — only the order dependency is removed.

Fixes#21173

@github-actions
github-actionsBot requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 15, 2026 12:28
@github-actions
github-actionsBot requested review from JPeer264 and mydea and removed request for a teamJune 15, 2026 12:28
@mydea
mydea enabled auto-merge (squash) June 15, 2026 12:45
@mydea
mydea disabled auto-merge June 15, 2026 12:46
@mydea
mydea enabled auto-merge (squash) June 15, 2026 12:49
@mydea
mydea merged commit 31841e4 into developJun 15, 2026
48 checks passed
@mydea
mydea deleted the fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order branch June 15, 2026 13:23
mydea added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2026
## Summary
Applies the same fix as #21534 (amqplib **v1**) to the non-versioned
`amqplib auto-instrumentation` test (`suites/tracing/amqplib/test.ts`),
which has the identical flaky pattern.
## Root cause
The test asserted the producer (`root span`) and consumer (`queue1
process`) transactions in a fixed order using two sequential `.expect()`
callbacks. The runner matches expected envelopes strictly FIFO, but the
producer and consumer are independent traces flushed independently, so
their arrival order at the test server isn't guaranteed. When the
consumer envelope arrived first, the first assertion
(`expect(transaction.transaction).toEqual('root span')`) failed against
the consumer transaction.
## Fix
Use the established collect-then-assert pattern (same as #21534 and the
`kafkajs` test): push both transactions into an array, then look them up
by transaction name and assert once both have arrived. All original
assertions (producer name + span count + PRODUCER span shape, consumer
CONSUMER trace context) are preserved — only the order dependency is
removed.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

1 participant

@mydea
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

test(node): Make amqplib v1 integration test order-independent - #21534

Merged
mydea merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

test(node): Make amqplib v1 integration test order-independent#21534
mydea merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Fixes the flaky amqplib v1 auto-instrumentation integration test (suites/tracing/amqplib-v1/test.ts).

Root cause

The test asserted the producer (root span) and consumer (queue1 process) transactions in a fixed order using two sequential .expect() callbacks. The runner matches expected envelopes strictly FIFO (expectedEnvelopes.shift()), so the first callback always runs against whichever transaction envelope arrives first.

The producer and consumer are independent traces flushed independently, so their arrival order at the test server is not guaranteed. When the consumer (queue1 process) envelope arrived before the producer (root span) envelope, the first assertion expect(transaction.transaction).toEqual('root span') failed against the consumer transaction.

This is the same flake — and the same fix — already documented in the kafkajs integration test (suites/tracing/kafkajs/test.ts), which collects both transactions and asserts after both are received.

Fix

Apply the established collect-then-assert pattern: push both transactions into an array, then look them up by transaction name and assert once both have arrived. All original assertions (producer name, span count, PRODUCER span shape, consumer name, CONSUMER trace context) are preserved — only the order dependency is removed.

Fixes#21173

@github-actions
github-actionsBot requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 15, 2026 12:28
@github-actions
github-actionsBot requested review from JPeer264 and mydea and removed request for a teamJune 15, 2026 12:28
@mydea
mydea enabled auto-merge (squash) June 15, 2026 12:45
@mydea
mydea disabled auto-merge June 15, 2026 12:46
@mydea
mydea enabled auto-merge (squash) June 15, 2026 12:49
@mydea
mydea merged commit 31841e4 into developJun 15, 2026
48 checks passed
@mydea
mydea deleted the fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order branch June 15, 2026 13:23
mydea added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2026
## Summary
Applies the same fix as #21534 (amqplib **v1**) to the non-versioned
`amqplib auto-instrumentation` test (`suites/tracing/amqplib/test.ts`),
which has the identical flaky pattern.
## Root cause
The test asserted the producer (`root span`) and consumer (`queue1
process`) transactions in a fixed order using two sequential `.expect()`
callbacks. The runner matches expected envelopes strictly FIFO, but the
producer and consumer are independent traces flushed independently, so
their arrival order at the test server isn't guaranteed. When the
consumer envelope arrived first, the first assertion
(`expect(transaction.transaction).toEqual('root span')`) failed against
the consumer transaction.
## Fix
Use the established collect-then-assert pattern (same as #21534 and the
`kafkajs` test): push both transactions into an array, then look them up
by transaction name and assert once both have arrived. All original
assertions (producer name + span count + PRODUCER span shape, consumer
CONSUMER trace context) are preserved — only the order dependency is
removed.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

1 participant

@mydea
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

test(node): Make amqplib v1 integration test order-independent - #21534

Merged
mydea merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

test(node): Make amqplib v1 integration test order-independent#21534
mydea merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Fixes the flaky amqplib v1 auto-instrumentation integration test (suites/tracing/amqplib-v1/test.ts).

Root cause

The test asserted the producer (root span) and consumer (queue1 process) transactions in a fixed order using two sequential .expect() callbacks. The runner matches expected envelopes strictly FIFO (expectedEnvelopes.shift()), so the first callback always runs against whichever transaction envelope arrives first.

The producer and consumer are independent traces flushed independently, so their arrival order at the test server is not guaranteed. When the consumer (queue1 process) envelope arrived before the producer (root span) envelope, the first assertion expect(transaction.transaction).toEqual('root span') failed against the consumer transaction.

This is the same flake — and the same fix — already documented in the kafkajs integration test (suites/tracing/kafkajs/test.ts), which collects both transactions and asserts after both are received.

Fix

Apply the established collect-then-assert pattern: push both transactions into an array, then look them up by transaction name and assert once both have arrived. All original assertions (producer name, span count, PRODUCER span shape, consumer name, CONSUMER trace context) are preserved — only the order dependency is removed.

Fixes#21173

@github-actions
github-actionsBot requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 15, 2026 12:28
@github-actions
github-actionsBot requested review from JPeer264 and mydea and removed request for a teamJune 15, 2026 12:28
@mydea
mydea enabled auto-merge (squash) June 15, 2026 12:45
@mydea
mydea disabled auto-merge June 15, 2026 12:46
@mydea
mydea enabled auto-merge (squash) June 15, 2026 12:49
@mydea
mydea merged commit 31841e4 into developJun 15, 2026
48 checks passed
@mydea
mydea deleted the fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order branch June 15, 2026 13:23
mydea added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2026
## Summary
Applies the same fix as #21534 (amqplib **v1**) to the non-versioned
`amqplib auto-instrumentation` test (`suites/tracing/amqplib/test.ts`),
which has the identical flaky pattern.
## Root cause
The test asserted the producer (`root span`) and consumer (`queue1
process`) transactions in a fixed order using two sequential `.expect()`
callbacks. The runner matches expected envelopes strictly FIFO, but the
producer and consumer are independent traces flushed independently, so
their arrival order at the test server isn't guaranteed. When the
consumer envelope arrived first, the first assertion
(`expect(transaction.transaction).toEqual('root span')`) failed against
the consumer transaction.
## Fix
Use the established collect-then-assert pattern (same as #21534 and the
`kafkajs` test): push both transactions into an array, then look them up
by transaction name and assert once both have arrived. All original
assertions (producer name + span count + PRODUCER span shape, consumer
CONSUMER trace context) are preserved — only the order dependency is
removed.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

1 participant

@mydea
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

test(node): Make amqplib v1 integration test order-independent - #21534

Merged
mydea merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

test(node): Make amqplib v1 integration test order-independent#21534
mydea merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Fixes the flaky amqplib v1 auto-instrumentation integration test (suites/tracing/amqplib-v1/test.ts).

Root cause

The test asserted the producer (root span) and consumer (queue1 process) transactions in a fixed order using two sequential .expect() callbacks. The runner matches expected envelopes strictly FIFO (expectedEnvelopes.shift()), so the first callback always runs against whichever transaction envelope arrives first.

The producer and consumer are independent traces flushed independently, so their arrival order at the test server is not guaranteed. When the consumer (queue1 process) envelope arrived before the producer (root span) envelope, the first assertion expect(transaction.transaction).toEqual('root span') failed against the consumer transaction.

This is the same flake — and the same fix — already documented in the kafkajs integration test (suites/tracing/kafkajs/test.ts), which collects both transactions and asserts after both are received.

Fix

Apply the established collect-then-assert pattern: push both transactions into an array, then look them up by transaction name and assert once both have arrived. All original assertions (producer name, span count, PRODUCER span shape, consumer name, CONSUMER trace context) are preserved — only the order dependency is removed.

Fixes#21173

@github-actions
github-actionsBot requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 15, 2026 12:28
@github-actions
github-actionsBot requested review from JPeer264 and mydea and removed request for a teamJune 15, 2026 12:28
@mydea
mydea enabled auto-merge (squash) June 15, 2026 12:45
@mydea
mydea disabled auto-merge June 15, 2026 12:46
@mydea
mydea enabled auto-merge (squash) June 15, 2026 12:49
@mydea
mydea merged commit 31841e4 into developJun 15, 2026
48 checks passed
@mydea
mydea deleted the fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order branch June 15, 2026 13:23
mydea added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2026
## Summary
Applies the same fix as #21534 (amqplib **v1**) to the non-versioned
`amqplib auto-instrumentation` test (`suites/tracing/amqplib/test.ts`),
which has the identical flaky pattern.
## Root cause
The test asserted the producer (`root span`) and consumer (`queue1
process`) transactions in a fixed order using two sequential `.expect()`
callbacks. The runner matches expected envelopes strictly FIFO, but the
producer and consumer are independent traces flushed independently, so
their arrival order at the test server isn't guaranteed. When the
consumer envelope arrived first, the first assertion
(`expect(transaction.transaction).toEqual('root span')`) failed against
the consumer transaction.
## Fix
Use the established collect-then-assert pattern (same as #21534 and the
`kafkajs` test): push both transactions into an array, then look them up
by transaction name and assert once both have arrived. All original
assertions (producer name + span count + PRODUCER span shape, consumer
CONSUMER trace context) are preserved — only the order dependency is
removed.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

1 participant

@mydea
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

test(node): Make amqplib v1 integration test order-independent - #21534

Merged
mydea merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

test(node): Make amqplib v1 integration test order-independent#21534
mydea merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Fixes the flaky amqplib v1 auto-instrumentation integration test (suites/tracing/amqplib-v1/test.ts).

Root cause

The test asserted the producer (root span) and consumer (queue1 process) transactions in a fixed order using two sequential .expect() callbacks. The runner matches expected envelopes strictly FIFO (expectedEnvelopes.shift()), so the first callback always runs against whichever transaction envelope arrives first.

The producer and consumer are independent traces flushed independently, so their arrival order at the test server is not guaranteed. When the consumer (queue1 process) envelope arrived before the producer (root span) envelope, the first assertion expect(transaction.transaction).toEqual('root span') failed against the consumer transaction.

This is the same flake — and the same fix — already documented in the kafkajs integration test (suites/tracing/kafkajs/test.ts), which collects both transactions and asserts after both are received.

Fix

Apply the established collect-then-assert pattern: push both transactions into an array, then look them up by transaction name and assert once both have arrived. All original assertions (producer name, span count, PRODUCER span shape, consumer name, CONSUMER trace context) are preserved — only the order dependency is removed.

Fixes#21173

@github-actions
github-actionsBot requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 15, 2026 12:28
@github-actions
github-actionsBot requested review from JPeer264 and mydea and removed request for a teamJune 15, 2026 12:28
@mydea
mydea enabled auto-merge (squash) June 15, 2026 12:45
@mydea
mydea disabled auto-merge June 15, 2026 12:46
@mydea
mydea enabled auto-merge (squash) June 15, 2026 12:49
@mydea
mydea merged commit 31841e4 into developJun 15, 2026
48 checks passed
@mydea
mydea deleted the fix/amqplib-v1-flaky-transaction-order branch June 15, 2026 13:23
mydea added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2026
## Summary
Applies the same fix as #21534 (amqplib **v1**) to the non-versioned
`amqplib auto-instrumentation` test (`suites/tracing/amqplib/test.ts`),
which has the identical flaky pattern.
## Root cause
The test asserted the producer (`root span`) and consumer (`queue1
process`) transactions in a fixed order using two sequential `.expect()`
callbacks. The runner matches expected envelopes strictly FIFO, but the
producer and consumer are independent traces flushed independently, so
their arrival order at the test server isn't guaranteed. When the
consumer envelope arrived first, the first assertion
(`expect(transaction.transaction).toEqual('root span')`) failed against
the consumer transaction.
## Fix
Use the established collect-then-assert pattern (same as #21534 and the
`kafkajs` test): push both transactions into an array, then look them up
by transaction name and assert once both have arrived. All original
assertions (producer name + span count + PRODUCER span shape, consumer
CONSUMER trace context) are preserved — only the order dependency is
removed.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

1 participant

@mydea