feat(tracing): Favour client options tracePropagationTargets - #8399

Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 2 commits into
developfrom
abhi-browser-tracing-propagation
Jun 27, 2023
Merged

feat(tracing): Favour client options tracePropagationTargets#8399
AbhiPrasad merged 2 commits into
developfrom
abhi-browser-tracing-propagation

Conversation

@AbhiPrasad

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad commented Jun 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ref #8352

As we work toward adding tracing without performance support, this PR updates the BrowserTracing integration to use and favour the top level tracePropagationTargets option if it exists.

This option was made top level in #8395

tracePropagationTargets is now part of the unified API for distributed tracing. It's also expected that electron/react native will behave the same way as well. This also leaves us the flexibility to extract tracing out of BrowserTracing, or create a new integration that just does tracing but no performance monitoring.

We can make sure this migration is smooth and easy to understand with a good set of docs, which is what I will be working on next. In these docs changes, we'll be updating the automatic instrumentation sections, and formally documented tracePropagationTargets as a high level option.

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad requested review from a team, lforst and mydea and removed request for a teamJune 23, 2023 17:10
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

size-limit report 📦

PathSize
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)21.3 KB (+0.01% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (minified)66.43 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)19.82 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (minified)58.9 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (gzipped + minified)21.43 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (minified)69.87 KB (0%)
@sentry/react - Webpack (gzipped + minified)21.46 KB (0%)
@sentry/nextjs Client - Webpack (gzipped + minified)49.51 KB (+0.26% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)28.91 KB (+0.1% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)27.15 KB (+0.13% 🔺)
@sentry/replay ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)49.34 KB (0%)
@sentry/replay - Webpack (gzipped + minified)43.1 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing + @sentry/replay - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)68.51 KB (+0.06% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/replay - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)61.38 KB (-0.01% 🔽)

_experiments,
} = this.options;

const tracePropagationTargets =

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, does it make sense that the top-level options take precedence? 🤔 I think I would expect the options that are passed directly to the integration to "win", so:

this.options.tracePropagationTargets||(clientOptions&&clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets);

? Not a big thing, as I don't expect this to happen too often, though :) So feel free to ignore.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah that's a fair perspective actually. Let's discuss this at our meeting.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on our meeting we've made two decisions.

  1. We'll be combining the arrays of both top level and integration set tracePropagationTargets
  2. We'll be emitting a warning when both values are set.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Detailed below I decided against the combining array approach, but added the warning in b098188

@AbhiPrasad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I experimented with merging in two arrays - but found it would be confusing to users because of the deprecated tracingOrigins. Since we now have three different configs, I figured having one supercede the others is the easiest way to explain behaviour, and we can document this everywhere as well.

Here's a git patch with the logic I was testing with

diff --git a/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts b/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts
index 202f4fe7a..755aae6a3 100644
--- a/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts+++ b/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts@@ -177,9 +177,15 @@ export class BrowserTracing implements Integration {
private _collectWebVitals: () => void;
+ // See `tracePropagationTargets` in `setupOnce` for why this is commented out.+ // private _hasSetTracePropagationTargets: boolean = false;+
public constructor(_options?: Partial<BrowserTracingOptions>) {
addTracingExtensions();
+ // eslint-disable-next-line deprecation/deprecation+ // this._hasSetTracePropagationTargets = !!(_options && (_options.tracePropagationTargets || _options.tracingOrigins));+
this.options = {
...DEFAULT_BROWSER_TRACING_OPTIONS,
..._options,
@@ -229,8 +235,23 @@ export class BrowserTracing implements Integration {
_experiments,
} = this.options;
- const tracePropagationTargets =- (clientOptions && clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets) || this.options.tracePropagationTargets;+ const clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets = clientOptions && clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets;+ // There are three ways to configure tracePropagationTargets:+ // 1. via top level client option `tracePropagationTargets`+ // 2. via BrowserTracing option `tracePropagationTargets`+ // 3. via BrowserTracing option `tracingOrigins` (deprecated)+ //+ // To avoid confusion, favour top level client option `tracePropagationTargets`, and fallback to+ // BrowserTracing option `tracePropagationTargets` and then `tracingOrigins` (deprecated).+ // This is done as it minimizes bundle size (we don't have to have undefined checks).+ //+ // If both 1 and either one of 2 or 3 are set (from above), we log out a warning.+ const tracePropagationTargets = clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets || this.options.tracePropagationTargets;+ // This warning will be in a future release after 7.57.0 when we formally deprecated the+ // BrowserTracing`tracePropagationTargets` option.+ // if (__DEBUG_BUILD__ && this._hasSetTracePropagationTargets && clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets) {+ // logger.warn('[Tracing] You have set options for tracePropagationTargets in BrowserTracing and top level `Sentry.init`. The SDK is defaulting to use value for top level `tracePropagationTargets` in client.');+ // }
instrumentRouting(
(context: TransactionContext) => {

I'm only going to be adding a warning as a result.

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad requested a review from mydeaJune 26, 2023 17:22
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad merged commit ac435dd into developJun 27, 2023
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad deleted the abhi-browser-tracing-propagation branch June 27, 2023 13:23
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@AbhiPrasad@mydea
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

feat(tracing): Favour client options tracePropagationTargets - #8399

Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 2 commits into
developfrom
abhi-browser-tracing-propagation
Jun 27, 2023
Merged

feat(tracing): Favour client options tracePropagationTargets#8399
AbhiPrasad merged 2 commits into
developfrom
abhi-browser-tracing-propagation

Conversation

@AbhiPrasad

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad commented Jun 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ref #8352

As we work toward adding tracing without performance support, this PR updates the BrowserTracing integration to use and favour the top level tracePropagationTargets option if it exists.

This option was made top level in #8395

tracePropagationTargets is now part of the unified API for distributed tracing. It's also expected that electron/react native will behave the same way as well. This also leaves us the flexibility to extract tracing out of BrowserTracing, or create a new integration that just does tracing but no performance monitoring.

We can make sure this migration is smooth and easy to understand with a good set of docs, which is what I will be working on next. In these docs changes, we'll be updating the automatic instrumentation sections, and formally documented tracePropagationTargets as a high level option.

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad requested review from a team, lforst and mydea and removed request for a teamJune 23, 2023 17:10
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

size-limit report 📦

PathSize
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)21.3 KB (+0.01% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (minified)66.43 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)19.82 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (minified)58.9 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (gzipped + minified)21.43 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (minified)69.87 KB (0%)
@sentry/react - Webpack (gzipped + minified)21.46 KB (0%)
@sentry/nextjs Client - Webpack (gzipped + minified)49.51 KB (+0.26% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)28.91 KB (+0.1% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)27.15 KB (+0.13% 🔺)
@sentry/replay ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)49.34 KB (0%)
@sentry/replay - Webpack (gzipped + minified)43.1 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing + @sentry/replay - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)68.51 KB (+0.06% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/replay - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)61.38 KB (-0.01% 🔽)

_experiments,
} = this.options;

const tracePropagationTargets =

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, does it make sense that the top-level options take precedence? 🤔 I think I would expect the options that are passed directly to the integration to "win", so:

this.options.tracePropagationTargets||(clientOptions&&clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets);

? Not a big thing, as I don't expect this to happen too often, though :) So feel free to ignore.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah that's a fair perspective actually. Let's discuss this at our meeting.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on our meeting we've made two decisions.

  1. We'll be combining the arrays of both top level and integration set tracePropagationTargets
  2. We'll be emitting a warning when both values are set.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Detailed below I decided against the combining array approach, but added the warning in b098188

@AbhiPrasad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I experimented with merging in two arrays - but found it would be confusing to users because of the deprecated tracingOrigins. Since we now have three different configs, I figured having one supercede the others is the easiest way to explain behaviour, and we can document this everywhere as well.

Here's a git patch with the logic I was testing with

diff --git a/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts b/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts
index 202f4fe7a..755aae6a3 100644
--- a/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts+++ b/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts@@ -177,9 +177,15 @@ export class BrowserTracing implements Integration {
private _collectWebVitals: () => void;
+ // See `tracePropagationTargets` in `setupOnce` for why this is commented out.+ // private _hasSetTracePropagationTargets: boolean = false;+
public constructor(_options?: Partial<BrowserTracingOptions>) {
addTracingExtensions();
+ // eslint-disable-next-line deprecation/deprecation+ // this._hasSetTracePropagationTargets = !!(_options && (_options.tracePropagationTargets || _options.tracingOrigins));+
this.options = {
...DEFAULT_BROWSER_TRACING_OPTIONS,
..._options,
@@ -229,8 +235,23 @@ export class BrowserTracing implements Integration {
_experiments,
} = this.options;
- const tracePropagationTargets =- (clientOptions && clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets) || this.options.tracePropagationTargets;+ const clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets = clientOptions && clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets;+ // There are three ways to configure tracePropagationTargets:+ // 1. via top level client option `tracePropagationTargets`+ // 2. via BrowserTracing option `tracePropagationTargets`+ // 3. via BrowserTracing option `tracingOrigins` (deprecated)+ //+ // To avoid confusion, favour top level client option `tracePropagationTargets`, and fallback to+ // BrowserTracing option `tracePropagationTargets` and then `tracingOrigins` (deprecated).+ // This is done as it minimizes bundle size (we don't have to have undefined checks).+ //+ // If both 1 and either one of 2 or 3 are set (from above), we log out a warning.+ const tracePropagationTargets = clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets || this.options.tracePropagationTargets;+ // This warning will be in a future release after 7.57.0 when we formally deprecated the+ // BrowserTracing`tracePropagationTargets` option.+ // if (__DEBUG_BUILD__ && this._hasSetTracePropagationTargets && clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets) {+ // logger.warn('[Tracing] You have set options for tracePropagationTargets in BrowserTracing and top level `Sentry.init`. The SDK is defaulting to use value for top level `tracePropagationTargets` in client.');+ // }
instrumentRouting(
(context: TransactionContext) => {

I'm only going to be adding a warning as a result.

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad requested a review from mydeaJune 26, 2023 17:22
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad merged commit ac435dd into developJun 27, 2023
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad deleted the abhi-browser-tracing-propagation branch June 27, 2023 13:23
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@AbhiPrasad@mydea
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

feat(tracing): Favour client options tracePropagationTargets - #8399

Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 2 commits into
developfrom
abhi-browser-tracing-propagation
Jun 27, 2023
Merged

feat(tracing): Favour client options tracePropagationTargets#8399
AbhiPrasad merged 2 commits into
developfrom
abhi-browser-tracing-propagation

Conversation

@AbhiPrasad

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad commented Jun 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ref #8352

As we work toward adding tracing without performance support, this PR updates the BrowserTracing integration to use and favour the top level tracePropagationTargets option if it exists.

This option was made top level in #8395

tracePropagationTargets is now part of the unified API for distributed tracing. It's also expected that electron/react native will behave the same way as well. This also leaves us the flexibility to extract tracing out of BrowserTracing, or create a new integration that just does tracing but no performance monitoring.

We can make sure this migration is smooth and easy to understand with a good set of docs, which is what I will be working on next. In these docs changes, we'll be updating the automatic instrumentation sections, and formally documented tracePropagationTargets as a high level option.

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad requested review from a team, lforst and mydea and removed request for a teamJune 23, 2023 17:10
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

size-limit report 📦

PathSize
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)21.3 KB (+0.01% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (minified)66.43 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)19.82 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (minified)58.9 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (gzipped + minified)21.43 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (minified)69.87 KB (0%)
@sentry/react - Webpack (gzipped + minified)21.46 KB (0%)
@sentry/nextjs Client - Webpack (gzipped + minified)49.51 KB (+0.26% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)28.91 KB (+0.1% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)27.15 KB (+0.13% 🔺)
@sentry/replay ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)49.34 KB (0%)
@sentry/replay - Webpack (gzipped + minified)43.1 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing + @sentry/replay - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)68.51 KB (+0.06% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/replay - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)61.38 KB (-0.01% 🔽)

_experiments,
} = this.options;

const tracePropagationTargets =

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, does it make sense that the top-level options take precedence? 🤔 I think I would expect the options that are passed directly to the integration to "win", so:

this.options.tracePropagationTargets||(clientOptions&&clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets);

? Not a big thing, as I don't expect this to happen too often, though :) So feel free to ignore.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah that's a fair perspective actually. Let's discuss this at our meeting.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on our meeting we've made two decisions.

  1. We'll be combining the arrays of both top level and integration set tracePropagationTargets
  2. We'll be emitting a warning when both values are set.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Detailed below I decided against the combining array approach, but added the warning in b098188

@AbhiPrasad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I experimented with merging in two arrays - but found it would be confusing to users because of the deprecated tracingOrigins. Since we now have three different configs, I figured having one supercede the others is the easiest way to explain behaviour, and we can document this everywhere as well.

Here's a git patch with the logic I was testing with

diff --git a/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts b/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts
index 202f4fe7a..755aae6a3 100644
--- a/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts+++ b/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts@@ -177,9 +177,15 @@ export class BrowserTracing implements Integration {
private _collectWebVitals: () => void;
+ // See `tracePropagationTargets` in `setupOnce` for why this is commented out.+ // private _hasSetTracePropagationTargets: boolean = false;+
public constructor(_options?: Partial<BrowserTracingOptions>) {
addTracingExtensions();
+ // eslint-disable-next-line deprecation/deprecation+ // this._hasSetTracePropagationTargets = !!(_options && (_options.tracePropagationTargets || _options.tracingOrigins));+
this.options = {
...DEFAULT_BROWSER_TRACING_OPTIONS,
..._options,
@@ -229,8 +235,23 @@ export class BrowserTracing implements Integration {
_experiments,
} = this.options;
- const tracePropagationTargets =- (clientOptions && clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets) || this.options.tracePropagationTargets;+ const clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets = clientOptions && clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets;+ // There are three ways to configure tracePropagationTargets:+ // 1. via top level client option `tracePropagationTargets`+ // 2. via BrowserTracing option `tracePropagationTargets`+ // 3. via BrowserTracing option `tracingOrigins` (deprecated)+ //+ // To avoid confusion, favour top level client option `tracePropagationTargets`, and fallback to+ // BrowserTracing option `tracePropagationTargets` and then `tracingOrigins` (deprecated).+ // This is done as it minimizes bundle size (we don't have to have undefined checks).+ //+ // If both 1 and either one of 2 or 3 are set (from above), we log out a warning.+ const tracePropagationTargets = clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets || this.options.tracePropagationTargets;+ // This warning will be in a future release after 7.57.0 when we formally deprecated the+ // BrowserTracing`tracePropagationTargets` option.+ // if (__DEBUG_BUILD__ && this._hasSetTracePropagationTargets && clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets) {+ // logger.warn('[Tracing] You have set options for tracePropagationTargets in BrowserTracing and top level `Sentry.init`. The SDK is defaulting to use value for top level `tracePropagationTargets` in client.');+ // }
instrumentRouting(
(context: TransactionContext) => {

I'm only going to be adding a warning as a result.

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad requested a review from mydeaJune 26, 2023 17:22
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad merged commit ac435dd into developJun 27, 2023
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad deleted the abhi-browser-tracing-propagation branch June 27, 2023 13:23
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@AbhiPrasad@mydea
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

feat(tracing): Favour client options tracePropagationTargets - #8399

Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 2 commits into
developfrom
abhi-browser-tracing-propagation
Jun 27, 2023
Merged

feat(tracing): Favour client options tracePropagationTargets#8399
AbhiPrasad merged 2 commits into
developfrom
abhi-browser-tracing-propagation

Conversation

@AbhiPrasad

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad commented Jun 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ref #8352

As we work toward adding tracing without performance support, this PR updates the BrowserTracing integration to use and favour the top level tracePropagationTargets option if it exists.

This option was made top level in #8395

tracePropagationTargets is now part of the unified API for distributed tracing. It's also expected that electron/react native will behave the same way as well. This also leaves us the flexibility to extract tracing out of BrowserTracing, or create a new integration that just does tracing but no performance monitoring.

We can make sure this migration is smooth and easy to understand with a good set of docs, which is what I will be working on next. In these docs changes, we'll be updating the automatic instrumentation sections, and formally documented tracePropagationTargets as a high level option.

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad requested review from a team, lforst and mydea and removed request for a teamJune 23, 2023 17:10
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

size-limit report 📦

PathSize
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)21.3 KB (+0.01% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (minified)66.43 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)19.82 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (minified)58.9 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (gzipped + minified)21.43 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (minified)69.87 KB (0%)
@sentry/react - Webpack (gzipped + minified)21.46 KB (0%)
@sentry/nextjs Client - Webpack (gzipped + minified)49.51 KB (+0.26% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)28.91 KB (+0.1% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)27.15 KB (+0.13% 🔺)
@sentry/replay ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)49.34 KB (0%)
@sentry/replay - Webpack (gzipped + minified)43.1 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing + @sentry/replay - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)68.51 KB (+0.06% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/replay - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)61.38 KB (-0.01% 🔽)

_experiments,
} = this.options;

const tracePropagationTargets =

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, does it make sense that the top-level options take precedence? 🤔 I think I would expect the options that are passed directly to the integration to "win", so:

this.options.tracePropagationTargets||(clientOptions&&clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets);

? Not a big thing, as I don't expect this to happen too often, though :) So feel free to ignore.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah that's a fair perspective actually. Let's discuss this at our meeting.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on our meeting we've made two decisions.

  1. We'll be combining the arrays of both top level and integration set tracePropagationTargets
  2. We'll be emitting a warning when both values are set.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Detailed below I decided against the combining array approach, but added the warning in b098188

@AbhiPrasad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I experimented with merging in two arrays - but found it would be confusing to users because of the deprecated tracingOrigins. Since we now have three different configs, I figured having one supercede the others is the easiest way to explain behaviour, and we can document this everywhere as well.

Here's a git patch with the logic I was testing with

diff --git a/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts b/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts
index 202f4fe7a..755aae6a3 100644
--- a/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts+++ b/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts@@ -177,9 +177,15 @@ export class BrowserTracing implements Integration {
private _collectWebVitals: () => void;
+ // See `tracePropagationTargets` in `setupOnce` for why this is commented out.+ // private _hasSetTracePropagationTargets: boolean = false;+
public constructor(_options?: Partial<BrowserTracingOptions>) {
addTracingExtensions();
+ // eslint-disable-next-line deprecation/deprecation+ // this._hasSetTracePropagationTargets = !!(_options && (_options.tracePropagationTargets || _options.tracingOrigins));+
this.options = {
...DEFAULT_BROWSER_TRACING_OPTIONS,
..._options,
@@ -229,8 +235,23 @@ export class BrowserTracing implements Integration {
_experiments,
} = this.options;
- const tracePropagationTargets =- (clientOptions && clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets) || this.options.tracePropagationTargets;+ const clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets = clientOptions && clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets;+ // There are three ways to configure tracePropagationTargets:+ // 1. via top level client option `tracePropagationTargets`+ // 2. via BrowserTracing option `tracePropagationTargets`+ // 3. via BrowserTracing option `tracingOrigins` (deprecated)+ //+ // To avoid confusion, favour top level client option `tracePropagationTargets`, and fallback to+ // BrowserTracing option `tracePropagationTargets` and then `tracingOrigins` (deprecated).+ // This is done as it minimizes bundle size (we don't have to have undefined checks).+ //+ // If both 1 and either one of 2 or 3 are set (from above), we log out a warning.+ const tracePropagationTargets = clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets || this.options.tracePropagationTargets;+ // This warning will be in a future release after 7.57.0 when we formally deprecated the+ // BrowserTracing`tracePropagationTargets` option.+ // if (__DEBUG_BUILD__ && this._hasSetTracePropagationTargets && clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets) {+ // logger.warn('[Tracing] You have set options for tracePropagationTargets in BrowserTracing and top level `Sentry.init`. The SDK is defaulting to use value for top level `tracePropagationTargets` in client.');+ // }
instrumentRouting(
(context: TransactionContext) => {

I'm only going to be adding a warning as a result.

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad requested a review from mydeaJune 26, 2023 17:22
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad merged commit ac435dd into developJun 27, 2023
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad deleted the abhi-browser-tracing-propagation branch June 27, 2023 13:23
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@AbhiPrasad@mydea
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

feat(tracing): Favour client options tracePropagationTargets - #8399

Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 2 commits into
developfrom
abhi-browser-tracing-propagation
Jun 27, 2023
Merged

feat(tracing): Favour client options tracePropagationTargets#8399
AbhiPrasad merged 2 commits into
developfrom
abhi-browser-tracing-propagation

Conversation

@AbhiPrasad

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad commented Jun 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ref #8352

As we work toward adding tracing without performance support, this PR updates the BrowserTracing integration to use and favour the top level tracePropagationTargets option if it exists.

This option was made top level in #8395

tracePropagationTargets is now part of the unified API for distributed tracing. It's also expected that electron/react native will behave the same way as well. This also leaves us the flexibility to extract tracing out of BrowserTracing, or create a new integration that just does tracing but no performance monitoring.

We can make sure this migration is smooth and easy to understand with a good set of docs, which is what I will be working on next. In these docs changes, we'll be updating the automatic instrumentation sections, and formally documented tracePropagationTargets as a high level option.

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad requested review from a team, lforst and mydea and removed request for a teamJune 23, 2023 17:10
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

size-limit report 📦

PathSize
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)21.3 KB (+0.01% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (minified)66.43 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)19.82 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (minified)58.9 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (gzipped + minified)21.43 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (minified)69.87 KB (0%)
@sentry/react - Webpack (gzipped + minified)21.46 KB (0%)
@sentry/nextjs Client - Webpack (gzipped + minified)49.51 KB (+0.26% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)28.91 KB (+0.1% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)27.15 KB (+0.13% 🔺)
@sentry/replay ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)49.34 KB (0%)
@sentry/replay - Webpack (gzipped + minified)43.1 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing + @sentry/replay - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)68.51 KB (+0.06% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/replay - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)61.38 KB (-0.01% 🔽)

_experiments,
} = this.options;

const tracePropagationTargets =

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, does it make sense that the top-level options take precedence? 🤔 I think I would expect the options that are passed directly to the integration to "win", so:

this.options.tracePropagationTargets||(clientOptions&&clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets);

? Not a big thing, as I don't expect this to happen too often, though :) So feel free to ignore.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah that's a fair perspective actually. Let's discuss this at our meeting.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on our meeting we've made two decisions.

  1. We'll be combining the arrays of both top level and integration set tracePropagationTargets
  2. We'll be emitting a warning when both values are set.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Detailed below I decided against the combining array approach, but added the warning in b098188

@AbhiPrasad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I experimented with merging in two arrays - but found it would be confusing to users because of the deprecated tracingOrigins. Since we now have three different configs, I figured having one supercede the others is the easiest way to explain behaviour, and we can document this everywhere as well.

Here's a git patch with the logic I was testing with

diff --git a/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts b/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts
index 202f4fe7a..755aae6a3 100644
--- a/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts+++ b/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts@@ -177,9 +177,15 @@ export class BrowserTracing implements Integration {
private _collectWebVitals: () => void;
+ // See `tracePropagationTargets` in `setupOnce` for why this is commented out.+ // private _hasSetTracePropagationTargets: boolean = false;+
public constructor(_options?: Partial<BrowserTracingOptions>) {
addTracingExtensions();
+ // eslint-disable-next-line deprecation/deprecation+ // this._hasSetTracePropagationTargets = !!(_options && (_options.tracePropagationTargets || _options.tracingOrigins));+
this.options = {
...DEFAULT_BROWSER_TRACING_OPTIONS,
..._options,
@@ -229,8 +235,23 @@ export class BrowserTracing implements Integration {
_experiments,
} = this.options;
- const tracePropagationTargets =- (clientOptions && clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets) || this.options.tracePropagationTargets;+ const clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets = clientOptions && clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets;+ // There are three ways to configure tracePropagationTargets:+ // 1. via top level client option `tracePropagationTargets`+ // 2. via BrowserTracing option `tracePropagationTargets`+ // 3. via BrowserTracing option `tracingOrigins` (deprecated)+ //+ // To avoid confusion, favour top level client option `tracePropagationTargets`, and fallback to+ // BrowserTracing option `tracePropagationTargets` and then `tracingOrigins` (deprecated).+ // This is done as it minimizes bundle size (we don't have to have undefined checks).+ //+ // If both 1 and either one of 2 or 3 are set (from above), we log out a warning.+ const tracePropagationTargets = clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets || this.options.tracePropagationTargets;+ // This warning will be in a future release after 7.57.0 when we formally deprecated the+ // BrowserTracing`tracePropagationTargets` option.+ // if (__DEBUG_BUILD__ && this._hasSetTracePropagationTargets && clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets) {+ // logger.warn('[Tracing] You have set options for tracePropagationTargets in BrowserTracing and top level `Sentry.init`. The SDK is defaulting to use value for top level `tracePropagationTargets` in client.');+ // }
instrumentRouting(
(context: TransactionContext) => {

I'm only going to be adding a warning as a result.

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad requested a review from mydeaJune 26, 2023 17:22
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad merged commit ac435dd into developJun 27, 2023
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad deleted the abhi-browser-tracing-propagation branch June 27, 2023 13:23
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@AbhiPrasad@mydea
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

feat(tracing): Favour client options tracePropagationTargets - #8399

Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 2 commits into
developfrom
abhi-browser-tracing-propagation
Jun 27, 2023
Merged

feat(tracing): Favour client options tracePropagationTargets#8399
AbhiPrasad merged 2 commits into
developfrom
abhi-browser-tracing-propagation

Conversation

@AbhiPrasad

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad commented Jun 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ref #8352

As we work toward adding tracing without performance support, this PR updates the BrowserTracing integration to use and favour the top level tracePropagationTargets option if it exists.

This option was made top level in #8395

tracePropagationTargets is now part of the unified API for distributed tracing. It's also expected that electron/react native will behave the same way as well. This also leaves us the flexibility to extract tracing out of BrowserTracing, or create a new integration that just does tracing but no performance monitoring.

We can make sure this migration is smooth and easy to understand with a good set of docs, which is what I will be working on next. In these docs changes, we'll be updating the automatic instrumentation sections, and formally documented tracePropagationTargets as a high level option.

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad requested review from a team, lforst and mydea and removed request for a teamJune 23, 2023 17:10
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

size-limit report 📦

PathSize
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)21.3 KB (+0.01% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (minified)66.43 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)19.82 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (minified)58.9 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (gzipped + minified)21.43 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (minified)69.87 KB (0%)
@sentry/react - Webpack (gzipped + minified)21.46 KB (0%)
@sentry/nextjs Client - Webpack (gzipped + minified)49.51 KB (+0.26% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)28.91 KB (+0.1% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)27.15 KB (+0.13% 🔺)
@sentry/replay ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)49.34 KB (0%)
@sentry/replay - Webpack (gzipped + minified)43.1 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing + @sentry/replay - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)68.51 KB (+0.06% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/replay - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)61.38 KB (-0.01% 🔽)

_experiments,
} = this.options;

const tracePropagationTargets =

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, does it make sense that the top-level options take precedence? 🤔 I think I would expect the options that are passed directly to the integration to "win", so:

this.options.tracePropagationTargets||(clientOptions&&clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets);

? Not a big thing, as I don't expect this to happen too often, though :) So feel free to ignore.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah that's a fair perspective actually. Let's discuss this at our meeting.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on our meeting we've made two decisions.

  1. We'll be combining the arrays of both top level and integration set tracePropagationTargets
  2. We'll be emitting a warning when both values are set.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Detailed below I decided against the combining array approach, but added the warning in b098188

@AbhiPrasad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I experimented with merging in two arrays - but found it would be confusing to users because of the deprecated tracingOrigins. Since we now have three different configs, I figured having one supercede the others is the easiest way to explain behaviour, and we can document this everywhere as well.

Here's a git patch with the logic I was testing with

diff --git a/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts b/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts
index 202f4fe7a..755aae6a3 100644
--- a/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts+++ b/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts@@ -177,9 +177,15 @@ export class BrowserTracing implements Integration {
private _collectWebVitals: () => void;
+ // See `tracePropagationTargets` in `setupOnce` for why this is commented out.+ // private _hasSetTracePropagationTargets: boolean = false;+
public constructor(_options?: Partial<BrowserTracingOptions>) {
addTracingExtensions();
+ // eslint-disable-next-line deprecation/deprecation+ // this._hasSetTracePropagationTargets = !!(_options && (_options.tracePropagationTargets || _options.tracingOrigins));+
this.options = {
...DEFAULT_BROWSER_TRACING_OPTIONS,
..._options,
@@ -229,8 +235,23 @@ export class BrowserTracing implements Integration {
_experiments,
} = this.options;
- const tracePropagationTargets =- (clientOptions && clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets) || this.options.tracePropagationTargets;+ const clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets = clientOptions && clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets;+ // There are three ways to configure tracePropagationTargets:+ // 1. via top level client option `tracePropagationTargets`+ // 2. via BrowserTracing option `tracePropagationTargets`+ // 3. via BrowserTracing option `tracingOrigins` (deprecated)+ //+ // To avoid confusion, favour top level client option `tracePropagationTargets`, and fallback to+ // BrowserTracing option `tracePropagationTargets` and then `tracingOrigins` (deprecated).+ // This is done as it minimizes bundle size (we don't have to have undefined checks).+ //+ // If both 1 and either one of 2 or 3 are set (from above), we log out a warning.+ const tracePropagationTargets = clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets || this.options.tracePropagationTargets;+ // This warning will be in a future release after 7.57.0 when we formally deprecated the+ // BrowserTracing`tracePropagationTargets` option.+ // if (__DEBUG_BUILD__ && this._hasSetTracePropagationTargets && clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets) {+ // logger.warn('[Tracing] You have set options for tracePropagationTargets in BrowserTracing and top level `Sentry.init`. The SDK is defaulting to use value for top level `tracePropagationTargets` in client.');+ // }
instrumentRouting(
(context: TransactionContext) => {

I'm only going to be adding a warning as a result.

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad requested a review from mydeaJune 26, 2023 17:22
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad merged commit ac435dd into developJun 27, 2023
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad deleted the abhi-browser-tracing-propagation branch June 27, 2023 13:23
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@AbhiPrasad@mydea
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

feat(tracing): Favour client options tracePropagationTargets - #8399

Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 2 commits into
developfrom
abhi-browser-tracing-propagation
Jun 27, 2023
Merged

feat(tracing): Favour client options tracePropagationTargets#8399
AbhiPrasad merged 2 commits into
developfrom
abhi-browser-tracing-propagation

Conversation

@AbhiPrasad

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad commented Jun 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ref #8352

As we work toward adding tracing without performance support, this PR updates the BrowserTracing integration to use and favour the top level tracePropagationTargets option if it exists.

This option was made top level in #8395

tracePropagationTargets is now part of the unified API for distributed tracing. It's also expected that electron/react native will behave the same way as well. This also leaves us the flexibility to extract tracing out of BrowserTracing, or create a new integration that just does tracing but no performance monitoring.

We can make sure this migration is smooth and easy to understand with a good set of docs, which is what I will be working on next. In these docs changes, we'll be updating the automatic instrumentation sections, and formally documented tracePropagationTargets as a high level option.

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad requested review from a team, lforst and mydea and removed request for a teamJune 23, 2023 17:10
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

size-limit report 📦

PathSize
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)21.3 KB (+0.01% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (minified)66.43 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)19.82 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (minified)58.9 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (gzipped + minified)21.43 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (minified)69.87 KB (0%)
@sentry/react - Webpack (gzipped + minified)21.46 KB (0%)
@sentry/nextjs Client - Webpack (gzipped + minified)49.51 KB (+0.26% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)28.91 KB (+0.1% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)27.15 KB (+0.13% 🔺)
@sentry/replay ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)49.34 KB (0%)
@sentry/replay - Webpack (gzipped + minified)43.1 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing + @sentry/replay - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)68.51 KB (+0.06% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/replay - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)61.38 KB (-0.01% 🔽)

_experiments,
} = this.options;

const tracePropagationTargets =

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, does it make sense that the top-level options take precedence? 🤔 I think I would expect the options that are passed directly to the integration to "win", so:

this.options.tracePropagationTargets||(clientOptions&&clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets);

? Not a big thing, as I don't expect this to happen too often, though :) So feel free to ignore.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah that's a fair perspective actually. Let's discuss this at our meeting.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on our meeting we've made two decisions.

  1. We'll be combining the arrays of both top level and integration set tracePropagationTargets
  2. We'll be emitting a warning when both values are set.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Detailed below I decided against the combining array approach, but added the warning in b098188

@AbhiPrasad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I experimented with merging in two arrays - but found it would be confusing to users because of the deprecated tracingOrigins. Since we now have three different configs, I figured having one supercede the others is the easiest way to explain behaviour, and we can document this everywhere as well.

Here's a git patch with the logic I was testing with

diff --git a/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts b/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts
index 202f4fe7a..755aae6a3 100644
--- a/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts+++ b/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts@@ -177,9 +177,15 @@ export class BrowserTracing implements Integration {
private _collectWebVitals: () => void;
+ // See `tracePropagationTargets` in `setupOnce` for why this is commented out.+ // private _hasSetTracePropagationTargets: boolean = false;+
public constructor(_options?: Partial<BrowserTracingOptions>) {
addTracingExtensions();
+ // eslint-disable-next-line deprecation/deprecation+ // this._hasSetTracePropagationTargets = !!(_options && (_options.tracePropagationTargets || _options.tracingOrigins));+
this.options = {
...DEFAULT_BROWSER_TRACING_OPTIONS,
..._options,
@@ -229,8 +235,23 @@ export class BrowserTracing implements Integration {
_experiments,
} = this.options;
- const tracePropagationTargets =- (clientOptions && clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets) || this.options.tracePropagationTargets;+ const clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets = clientOptions && clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets;+ // There are three ways to configure tracePropagationTargets:+ // 1. via top level client option `tracePropagationTargets`+ // 2. via BrowserTracing option `tracePropagationTargets`+ // 3. via BrowserTracing option `tracingOrigins` (deprecated)+ //+ // To avoid confusion, favour top level client option `tracePropagationTargets`, and fallback to+ // BrowserTracing option `tracePropagationTargets` and then `tracingOrigins` (deprecated).+ // This is done as it minimizes bundle size (we don't have to have undefined checks).+ //+ // If both 1 and either one of 2 or 3 are set (from above), we log out a warning.+ const tracePropagationTargets = clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets || this.options.tracePropagationTargets;+ // This warning will be in a future release after 7.57.0 when we formally deprecated the+ // BrowserTracing`tracePropagationTargets` option.+ // if (__DEBUG_BUILD__ && this._hasSetTracePropagationTargets && clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets) {+ // logger.warn('[Tracing] You have set options for tracePropagationTargets in BrowserTracing and top level `Sentry.init`. The SDK is defaulting to use value for top level `tracePropagationTargets` in client.');+ // }
instrumentRouting(
(context: TransactionContext) => {

I'm only going to be adding a warning as a result.

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad requested a review from mydeaJune 26, 2023 17:22
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad merged commit ac435dd into developJun 27, 2023
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad deleted the abhi-browser-tracing-propagation branch June 27, 2023 13:23
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@AbhiPrasad@mydea
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

feat(tracing): Favour client options tracePropagationTargets - #8399

Merged
AbhiPrasad merged 2 commits into
developfrom
abhi-browser-tracing-propagation
Jun 27, 2023
Merged

feat(tracing): Favour client options tracePropagationTargets#8399
AbhiPrasad merged 2 commits into
developfrom
abhi-browser-tracing-propagation

Conversation

@AbhiPrasad

@AbhiPrasadAbhiPrasad commented Jun 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ref #8352

As we work toward adding tracing without performance support, this PR updates the BrowserTracing integration to use and favour the top level tracePropagationTargets option if it exists.

This option was made top level in #8395

tracePropagationTargets is now part of the unified API for distributed tracing. It's also expected that electron/react native will behave the same way as well. This also leaves us the flexibility to extract tracing out of BrowserTracing, or create a new integration that just does tracing but no performance monitoring.

We can make sure this migration is smooth and easy to understand with a good set of docs, which is what I will be working on next. In these docs changes, we'll be updating the automatic instrumentation sections, and formally documented tracePropagationTargets as a high level option.

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad requested review from a team, lforst and mydea and removed request for a teamJune 23, 2023 17:10
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Jun 23, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

size-limit report 📦

PathSize
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)21.3 KB (+0.01% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (minified)66.43 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)19.82 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (minified)58.9 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (gzipped + minified)21.43 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (minified)69.87 KB (0%)
@sentry/react - Webpack (gzipped + minified)21.46 KB (0%)
@sentry/nextjs Client - Webpack (gzipped + minified)49.51 KB (+0.26% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)28.91 KB (+0.1% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)27.15 KB (+0.13% 🔺)
@sentry/replay ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)49.34 KB (0%)
@sentry/replay - Webpack (gzipped + minified)43.1 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing + @sentry/replay - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)68.51 KB (+0.06% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/replay - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified)61.38 KB (-0.01% 🔽)

_experiments,
} = this.options;

const tracePropagationTargets =

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, does it make sense that the top-level options take precedence? 🤔 I think I would expect the options that are passed directly to the integration to "win", so:

this.options.tracePropagationTargets||(clientOptions&&clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets);

? Not a big thing, as I don't expect this to happen too often, though :) So feel free to ignore.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah that's a fair perspective actually. Let's discuss this at our meeting.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on our meeting we've made two decisions.

  1. We'll be combining the arrays of both top level and integration set tracePropagationTargets
  2. We'll be emitting a warning when both values are set.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Detailed below I decided against the combining array approach, but added the warning in b098188

@AbhiPrasad

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I experimented with merging in two arrays - but found it would be confusing to users because of the deprecated tracingOrigins. Since we now have three different configs, I figured having one supercede the others is the easiest way to explain behaviour, and we can document this everywhere as well.

Here's a git patch with the logic I was testing with

diff --git a/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts b/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts
index 202f4fe7a..755aae6a3 100644
--- a/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts+++ b/packages/tracing-internal/src/browser/browsertracing.ts@@ -177,9 +177,15 @@ export class BrowserTracing implements Integration {
private _collectWebVitals: () => void;
+ // See `tracePropagationTargets` in `setupOnce` for why this is commented out.+ // private _hasSetTracePropagationTargets: boolean = false;+
public constructor(_options?: Partial<BrowserTracingOptions>) {
addTracingExtensions();
+ // eslint-disable-next-line deprecation/deprecation+ // this._hasSetTracePropagationTargets = !!(_options && (_options.tracePropagationTargets || _options.tracingOrigins));+
this.options = {
...DEFAULT_BROWSER_TRACING_OPTIONS,
..._options,
@@ -229,8 +235,23 @@ export class BrowserTracing implements Integration {
_experiments,
} = this.options;
- const tracePropagationTargets =- (clientOptions && clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets) || this.options.tracePropagationTargets;+ const clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets = clientOptions && clientOptions.tracePropagationTargets;+ // There are three ways to configure tracePropagationTargets:+ // 1. via top level client option `tracePropagationTargets`+ // 2. via BrowserTracing option `tracePropagationTargets`+ // 3. via BrowserTracing option `tracingOrigins` (deprecated)+ //+ // To avoid confusion, favour top level client option `tracePropagationTargets`, and fallback to+ // BrowserTracing option `tracePropagationTargets` and then `tracingOrigins` (deprecated).+ // This is done as it minimizes bundle size (we don't have to have undefined checks).+ //+ // If both 1 and either one of 2 or 3 are set (from above), we log out a warning.+ const tracePropagationTargets = clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets || this.options.tracePropagationTargets;+ // This warning will be in a future release after 7.57.0 when we formally deprecated the+ // BrowserTracing`tracePropagationTargets` option.+ // if (__DEBUG_BUILD__ && this._hasSetTracePropagationTargets && clientOptionsTracePropagationTargets) {+ // logger.warn('[Tracing] You have set options for tracePropagationTargets in BrowserTracing and top level `Sentry.init`. The SDK is defaulting to use value for top level `tracePropagationTargets` in client.');+ // }
instrumentRouting(
(context: TransactionContext) => {

I'm only going to be adding a warning as a result.

@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad requested a review from mydeaJune 26, 2023 17:22
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad merged commit ac435dd into developJun 27, 2023
@AbhiPrasad
AbhiPrasad deleted the abhi-browser-tracing-propagation branch June 27, 2023 13:23
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@AbhiPrasad@mydea