Skip to content

Simplify logging - #233

Merged
ktoso merged 22 commits into
git-commit-id:masterfrom
autayeu:simplify-logging
Mar 12, 2016
Merged

Simplify logging#233
ktoso merged 22 commits into
git-commit-id:masterfrom
autayeu:simplify-logging

Conversation

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull contains the following changes (in addition to logging simplification itself)

  • logging is now standard Maven (no separation of logs to stderr, no shading)
  • docs (formatting mostly) improved
  • various typos fixed
  • updated dependencies (project and plugins, relevant for Update jgit version to v4.0.1.201506240215-r #216)
  • various clean-ups (diamonds, Java 7, try with resources, etc)
  • some clean-ups of testing rigs in production code
  • thread safety violation via static variable is fixed

Comment threadREADME.md

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

funny one, thanks (and for all the other typos too, thanks)

Comment threadpom.xml

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could be even shortened to <encoding>UTF-8</encoding> if I remember correctly.

@mvitz

mvitz commented Jan 3, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I like most of this PR but (maybe just as a note to myself) this makes the modularisation effort (see #92 for the discussion) even harder as now everything is dependent on maven.

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you for a thorough review!

I've addressed the comments above. Namely, logging bridges now are improved. In addition, I've refactored exception handling to favor modularization, removed few remaining static collection constructors, added project encoding handling to avoid hard-coded charsets.

It turns out property="session" removed earlier is needed. This case stresses the need for proper integration testing: I only got this one with manual testing. It should have been done by integration tests.

Please, review and merge. Thank you!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Is there any other outstanding issues with this branch which we need to consider?

@ktoso

ktoso commented Jan 7, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'll need to find time to review again – we don't want to make the modularisation effort harder, as mentioned by @mvitz. Please bear with me :)

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

OK!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, please, can you take a look at this pull request? Thank you!

@autayeuautayeu mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2016
@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, what are the chances of seeing this merged?

@ktoso

ktoso commented Feb 9, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'll review again today or tomorrow, was traveling and now sick. Thanks for your patience

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, how do I interpret the situation with this pull? You're saying you'll merge it, but months later it is still not merged.

@ktoso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Please don't assume malice where none is intended – i was very sick for a few weeks and then had work travel, was unable to catch up on all things. Thanks for the ping here (that was all that's needed) – will go over it now and merge if all good :)

@ktoso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Minor nitpicks but no reason to delay merging, thanks again for your patience :)

ktoso added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2016
@ktoso
ktoso merged commit 80abddb into git-commit-id:masterMar 12, 2016
@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you for merging! And for useful review! Now the next step - release ;)

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

By the way, your above comments are not nitpicking - there were few things in the pull which were touched by me "passing by", minor refactorings, which strictly speaking should have been separated from this pull.

@ktosoktoso mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2016
void setVerbose(boolean verbose);

/*
The following borrowed from SLF4J Logger.java

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had to check license compatibility... seems we're good though - MIT

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@autayeu@ktoso@mvitz@TheSnoozer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Simplify logging by autayeu · Pull Request #233 · git-commit-id/git-commit-id-maven-plugin · GitHub
Skip to content

Simplify logging - #233

Merged
ktoso merged 22 commits into
git-commit-id:masterfrom
autayeu:simplify-logging
Mar 12, 2016
Merged

Simplify logging#233
ktoso merged 22 commits into
git-commit-id:masterfrom
autayeu:simplify-logging

Conversation

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull contains the following changes (in addition to logging simplification itself)

  • logging is now standard Maven (no separation of logs to stderr, no shading)
  • docs (formatting mostly) improved
  • various typos fixed
  • updated dependencies (project and plugins, relevant for Update jgit version to v4.0.1.201506240215-r #216)
  • various clean-ups (diamonds, Java 7, try with resources, etc)
  • some clean-ups of testing rigs in production code
  • thread safety violation via static variable is fixed

Comment threadREADME.md

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

funny one, thanks (and for all the other typos too, thanks)

Comment threadpom.xml

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could be even shortened to <encoding>UTF-8</encoding> if I remember correctly.

@mvitz

mvitz commented Jan 3, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I like most of this PR but (maybe just as a note to myself) this makes the modularisation effort (see #92 for the discussion) even harder as now everything is dependent on maven.

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you for a thorough review!

I've addressed the comments above. Namely, logging bridges now are improved. In addition, I've refactored exception handling to favor modularization, removed few remaining static collection constructors, added project encoding handling to avoid hard-coded charsets.

It turns out property="session" removed earlier is needed. This case stresses the need for proper integration testing: I only got this one with manual testing. It should have been done by integration tests.

Please, review and merge. Thank you!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Is there any other outstanding issues with this branch which we need to consider?

@ktoso

ktoso commented Jan 7, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'll need to find time to review again – we don't want to make the modularisation effort harder, as mentioned by @mvitz. Please bear with me :)

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

OK!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, please, can you take a look at this pull request? Thank you!

@autayeuautayeu mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2016
@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, what are the chances of seeing this merged?

@ktoso

ktoso commented Feb 9, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'll review again today or tomorrow, was traveling and now sick. Thanks for your patience

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, how do I interpret the situation with this pull? You're saying you'll merge it, but months later it is still not merged.

@ktoso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Please don't assume malice where none is intended – i was very sick for a few weeks and then had work travel, was unable to catch up on all things. Thanks for the ping here (that was all that's needed) – will go over it now and merge if all good :)

@ktoso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Minor nitpicks but no reason to delay merging, thanks again for your patience :)

ktoso added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2016
@ktoso
ktoso merged commit 80abddb into git-commit-id:masterMar 12, 2016
@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you for merging! And for useful review! Now the next step - release ;)

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

By the way, your above comments are not nitpicking - there were few things in the pull which were touched by me "passing by", minor refactorings, which strictly speaking should have been separated from this pull.

@ktosoktoso mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2016
void setVerbose(boolean verbose);

/*
The following borrowed from SLF4J Logger.java

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had to check license compatibility... seems we're good though - MIT

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@autayeu@ktoso@mvitz@TheSnoozer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Simplify logging by autayeu · Pull Request #233 · git-commit-id/git-commit-id-maven-plugin · GitHub
Skip to content

Simplify logging - #233

Merged
ktoso merged 22 commits into
git-commit-id:masterfrom
autayeu:simplify-logging
Mar 12, 2016
Merged

Simplify logging#233
ktoso merged 22 commits into
git-commit-id:masterfrom
autayeu:simplify-logging

Conversation

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull contains the following changes (in addition to logging simplification itself)

  • logging is now standard Maven (no separation of logs to stderr, no shading)
  • docs (formatting mostly) improved
  • various typos fixed
  • updated dependencies (project and plugins, relevant for Update jgit version to v4.0.1.201506240215-r #216)
  • various clean-ups (diamonds, Java 7, try with resources, etc)
  • some clean-ups of testing rigs in production code
  • thread safety violation via static variable is fixed

Comment threadREADME.md

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

funny one, thanks (and for all the other typos too, thanks)

Comment threadpom.xml

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could be even shortened to <encoding>UTF-8</encoding> if I remember correctly.

@mvitz

mvitz commented Jan 3, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I like most of this PR but (maybe just as a note to myself) this makes the modularisation effort (see #92 for the discussion) even harder as now everything is dependent on maven.

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you for a thorough review!

I've addressed the comments above. Namely, logging bridges now are improved. In addition, I've refactored exception handling to favor modularization, removed few remaining static collection constructors, added project encoding handling to avoid hard-coded charsets.

It turns out property="session" removed earlier is needed. This case stresses the need for proper integration testing: I only got this one with manual testing. It should have been done by integration tests.

Please, review and merge. Thank you!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Is there any other outstanding issues with this branch which we need to consider?

@ktoso

ktoso commented Jan 7, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'll need to find time to review again – we don't want to make the modularisation effort harder, as mentioned by @mvitz. Please bear with me :)

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

OK!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, please, can you take a look at this pull request? Thank you!

@autayeuautayeu mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2016
@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, what are the chances of seeing this merged?

@ktoso

ktoso commented Feb 9, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'll review again today or tomorrow, was traveling and now sick. Thanks for your patience

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, how do I interpret the situation with this pull? You're saying you'll merge it, but months later it is still not merged.

@ktoso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Please don't assume malice where none is intended – i was very sick for a few weeks and then had work travel, was unable to catch up on all things. Thanks for the ping here (that was all that's needed) – will go over it now and merge if all good :)

@ktoso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Minor nitpicks but no reason to delay merging, thanks again for your patience :)

ktoso added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2016
@ktoso
ktoso merged commit 80abddb into git-commit-id:masterMar 12, 2016
@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you for merging! And for useful review! Now the next step - release ;)

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

By the way, your above comments are not nitpicking - there were few things in the pull which were touched by me "passing by", minor refactorings, which strictly speaking should have been separated from this pull.

@ktosoktoso mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2016
void setVerbose(boolean verbose);

/*
The following borrowed from SLF4J Logger.java

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had to check license compatibility... seems we're good though - MIT

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@autayeu@ktoso@mvitz@TheSnoozer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Simplify logging by autayeu · Pull Request #233 · git-commit-id/git-commit-id-maven-plugin · GitHub
Skip to content

Simplify logging - #233

Merged
ktoso merged 22 commits into
git-commit-id:masterfrom
autayeu:simplify-logging
Mar 12, 2016
Merged

Simplify logging#233
ktoso merged 22 commits into
git-commit-id:masterfrom
autayeu:simplify-logging

Conversation

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull contains the following changes (in addition to logging simplification itself)

  • logging is now standard Maven (no separation of logs to stderr, no shading)
  • docs (formatting mostly) improved
  • various typos fixed
  • updated dependencies (project and plugins, relevant for Update jgit version to v4.0.1.201506240215-r #216)
  • various clean-ups (diamonds, Java 7, try with resources, etc)
  • some clean-ups of testing rigs in production code
  • thread safety violation via static variable is fixed

Comment threadREADME.md

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

funny one, thanks (and for all the other typos too, thanks)

Comment threadpom.xml

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could be even shortened to <encoding>UTF-8</encoding> if I remember correctly.

@mvitz

mvitz commented Jan 3, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I like most of this PR but (maybe just as a note to myself) this makes the modularisation effort (see #92 for the discussion) even harder as now everything is dependent on maven.

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you for a thorough review!

I've addressed the comments above. Namely, logging bridges now are improved. In addition, I've refactored exception handling to favor modularization, removed few remaining static collection constructors, added project encoding handling to avoid hard-coded charsets.

It turns out property="session" removed earlier is needed. This case stresses the need for proper integration testing: I only got this one with manual testing. It should have been done by integration tests.

Please, review and merge. Thank you!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Is there any other outstanding issues with this branch which we need to consider?

@ktoso

ktoso commented Jan 7, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'll need to find time to review again – we don't want to make the modularisation effort harder, as mentioned by @mvitz. Please bear with me :)

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

OK!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, please, can you take a look at this pull request? Thank you!

@autayeuautayeu mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2016
@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, what are the chances of seeing this merged?

@ktoso

ktoso commented Feb 9, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'll review again today or tomorrow, was traveling and now sick. Thanks for your patience

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, how do I interpret the situation with this pull? You're saying you'll merge it, but months later it is still not merged.

@ktoso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Please don't assume malice where none is intended – i was very sick for a few weeks and then had work travel, was unable to catch up on all things. Thanks for the ping here (that was all that's needed) – will go over it now and merge if all good :)

@ktoso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Minor nitpicks but no reason to delay merging, thanks again for your patience :)

ktoso added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2016
@ktoso
ktoso merged commit 80abddb into git-commit-id:masterMar 12, 2016
@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you for merging! And for useful review! Now the next step - release ;)

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

By the way, your above comments are not nitpicking - there were few things in the pull which were touched by me "passing by", minor refactorings, which strictly speaking should have been separated from this pull.

@ktosoktoso mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2016
void setVerbose(boolean verbose);

/*
The following borrowed from SLF4J Logger.java

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had to check license compatibility... seems we're good though - MIT

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@autayeu@ktoso@mvitz@TheSnoozer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Simplify logging by autayeu · Pull Request #233 · git-commit-id/git-commit-id-maven-plugin · GitHub
Skip to content

Simplify logging - #233

Merged
ktoso merged 22 commits into
git-commit-id:masterfrom
autayeu:simplify-logging
Mar 12, 2016
Merged

Simplify logging#233
ktoso merged 22 commits into
git-commit-id:masterfrom
autayeu:simplify-logging

Conversation

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull contains the following changes (in addition to logging simplification itself)

  • logging is now standard Maven (no separation of logs to stderr, no shading)
  • docs (formatting mostly) improved
  • various typos fixed
  • updated dependencies (project and plugins, relevant for Update jgit version to v4.0.1.201506240215-r #216)
  • various clean-ups (diamonds, Java 7, try with resources, etc)
  • some clean-ups of testing rigs in production code
  • thread safety violation via static variable is fixed

Comment threadREADME.md

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

funny one, thanks (and for all the other typos too, thanks)

Comment threadpom.xml

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could be even shortened to <encoding>UTF-8</encoding> if I remember correctly.

@mvitz

mvitz commented Jan 3, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I like most of this PR but (maybe just as a note to myself) this makes the modularisation effort (see #92 for the discussion) even harder as now everything is dependent on maven.

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you for a thorough review!

I've addressed the comments above. Namely, logging bridges now are improved. In addition, I've refactored exception handling to favor modularization, removed few remaining static collection constructors, added project encoding handling to avoid hard-coded charsets.

It turns out property="session" removed earlier is needed. This case stresses the need for proper integration testing: I only got this one with manual testing. It should have been done by integration tests.

Please, review and merge. Thank you!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Is there any other outstanding issues with this branch which we need to consider?

@ktoso

ktoso commented Jan 7, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'll need to find time to review again – we don't want to make the modularisation effort harder, as mentioned by @mvitz. Please bear with me :)

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

OK!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, please, can you take a look at this pull request? Thank you!

@autayeuautayeu mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2016
@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, what are the chances of seeing this merged?

@ktoso

ktoso commented Feb 9, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'll review again today or tomorrow, was traveling and now sick. Thanks for your patience

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, how do I interpret the situation with this pull? You're saying you'll merge it, but months later it is still not merged.

@ktoso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Please don't assume malice where none is intended – i was very sick for a few weeks and then had work travel, was unable to catch up on all things. Thanks for the ping here (that was all that's needed) – will go over it now and merge if all good :)

@ktoso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Minor nitpicks but no reason to delay merging, thanks again for your patience :)

ktoso added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2016
@ktoso
ktoso merged commit 80abddb into git-commit-id:masterMar 12, 2016
@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you for merging! And for useful review! Now the next step - release ;)

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

By the way, your above comments are not nitpicking - there were few things in the pull which were touched by me "passing by", minor refactorings, which strictly speaking should have been separated from this pull.

@ktosoktoso mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2016
void setVerbose(boolean verbose);

/*
The following borrowed from SLF4J Logger.java

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had to check license compatibility... seems we're good though - MIT

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@autayeu@ktoso@mvitz@TheSnoozer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Simplify logging by autayeu · Pull Request #233 · git-commit-id/git-commit-id-maven-plugin · GitHub
Skip to content

Simplify logging - #233

Merged
ktoso merged 22 commits into
git-commit-id:masterfrom
autayeu:simplify-logging
Mar 12, 2016
Merged

Simplify logging#233
ktoso merged 22 commits into
git-commit-id:masterfrom
autayeu:simplify-logging

Conversation

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull contains the following changes (in addition to logging simplification itself)

  • logging is now standard Maven (no separation of logs to stderr, no shading)
  • docs (formatting mostly) improved
  • various typos fixed
  • updated dependencies (project and plugins, relevant for Update jgit version to v4.0.1.201506240215-r #216)
  • various clean-ups (diamonds, Java 7, try with resources, etc)
  • some clean-ups of testing rigs in production code
  • thread safety violation via static variable is fixed

Comment threadREADME.md

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

funny one, thanks (and for all the other typos too, thanks)

Comment threadpom.xml

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could be even shortened to <encoding>UTF-8</encoding> if I remember correctly.

@mvitz

mvitz commented Jan 3, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I like most of this PR but (maybe just as a note to myself) this makes the modularisation effort (see #92 for the discussion) even harder as now everything is dependent on maven.

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you for a thorough review!

I've addressed the comments above. Namely, logging bridges now are improved. In addition, I've refactored exception handling to favor modularization, removed few remaining static collection constructors, added project encoding handling to avoid hard-coded charsets.

It turns out property="session" removed earlier is needed. This case stresses the need for proper integration testing: I only got this one with manual testing. It should have been done by integration tests.

Please, review and merge. Thank you!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Is there any other outstanding issues with this branch which we need to consider?

@ktoso

ktoso commented Jan 7, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'll need to find time to review again – we don't want to make the modularisation effort harder, as mentioned by @mvitz. Please bear with me :)

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

OK!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, please, can you take a look at this pull request? Thank you!

@autayeuautayeu mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2016
@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, what are the chances of seeing this merged?

@ktoso

ktoso commented Feb 9, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'll review again today or tomorrow, was traveling and now sick. Thanks for your patience

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, how do I interpret the situation with this pull? You're saying you'll merge it, but months later it is still not merged.

@ktoso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Please don't assume malice where none is intended – i was very sick for a few weeks and then had work travel, was unable to catch up on all things. Thanks for the ping here (that was all that's needed) – will go over it now and merge if all good :)

@ktoso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Minor nitpicks but no reason to delay merging, thanks again for your patience :)

ktoso added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2016
@ktoso
ktoso merged commit 80abddb into git-commit-id:masterMar 12, 2016
@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you for merging! And for useful review! Now the next step - release ;)

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

By the way, your above comments are not nitpicking - there were few things in the pull which were touched by me "passing by", minor refactorings, which strictly speaking should have been separated from this pull.

@ktosoktoso mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2016
void setVerbose(boolean verbose);

/*
The following borrowed from SLF4J Logger.java

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had to check license compatibility... seems we're good though - MIT

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@autayeu@ktoso@mvitz@TheSnoozer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); })(); Simplify logging by autayeu · Pull Request #233 · git-commit-id/git-commit-id-maven-plugin · GitHub
Skip to content

Simplify logging - #233

Merged
ktoso merged 22 commits into
git-commit-id:masterfrom
autayeu:simplify-logging
Mar 12, 2016
Merged

Simplify logging#233
ktoso merged 22 commits into
git-commit-id:masterfrom
autayeu:simplify-logging

Conversation

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull contains the following changes (in addition to logging simplification itself)

  • logging is now standard Maven (no separation of logs to stderr, no shading)
  • docs (formatting mostly) improved
  • various typos fixed
  • updated dependencies (project and plugins, relevant for Update jgit version to v4.0.1.201506240215-r #216)
  • various clean-ups (diamonds, Java 7, try with resources, etc)
  • some clean-ups of testing rigs in production code
  • thread safety violation via static variable is fixed

Comment threadREADME.md

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

funny one, thanks (and for all the other typos too, thanks)

Comment threadpom.xml

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could be even shortened to <encoding>UTF-8</encoding> if I remember correctly.

@mvitz

mvitz commented Jan 3, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I like most of this PR but (maybe just as a note to myself) this makes the modularisation effort (see #92 for the discussion) even harder as now everything is dependent on maven.

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you for a thorough review!

I've addressed the comments above. Namely, logging bridges now are improved. In addition, I've refactored exception handling to favor modularization, removed few remaining static collection constructors, added project encoding handling to avoid hard-coded charsets.

It turns out property="session" removed earlier is needed. This case stresses the need for proper integration testing: I only got this one with manual testing. It should have been done by integration tests.

Please, review and merge. Thank you!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Is there any other outstanding issues with this branch which we need to consider?

@ktoso

ktoso commented Jan 7, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'll need to find time to review again – we don't want to make the modularisation effort harder, as mentioned by @mvitz. Please bear with me :)

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

OK!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, please, can you take a look at this pull request? Thank you!

@autayeuautayeu mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2016
@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, what are the chances of seeing this merged?

@ktoso

ktoso commented Feb 9, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'll review again today or tomorrow, was traveling and now sick. Thanks for your patience

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you!

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Konrad, how do I interpret the situation with this pull? You're saying you'll merge it, but months later it is still not merged.

@ktoso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Please don't assume malice where none is intended – i was very sick for a few weeks and then had work travel, was unable to catch up on all things. Thanks for the ping here (that was all that's needed) – will go over it now and merge if all good :)

@ktoso

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Minor nitpicks but no reason to delay merging, thanks again for your patience :)

ktoso added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2016
@ktoso
ktoso merged commit 80abddb into git-commit-id:masterMar 12, 2016
@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thank you for merging! And for useful review! Now the next step - release ;)

@autayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

By the way, your above comments are not nitpicking - there were few things in the pull which were touched by me "passing by", minor refactorings, which strictly speaking should have been separated from this pull.

@ktosoktoso mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2016
void setVerbose(boolean verbose);

/*
The following borrowed from SLF4J Logger.java

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had to check license compatibility... seems we're good though - MIT

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@autayeu@ktoso@mvitz@TheSnoozer