Add clear distinction for User Namespace and Organization repos regarding what private means

[deiga]

Why:

The current description of private repositories can be unclear that "Member privileges" can grant access to all members

Closes:

What's being changed (if available, include any code snippets, screenshots, or gifs):

Update docs for private repos in GHEC Organizations

Check off the following:

• A subject matter expert (SME) has reviewed the technical accuracy of the content in this PR. In most cases, the author can be the SME. Open source contributions may require an SME review from GitHub staff.
• The changes in this PR meet the docs fundamentals that are required for all content.
• All CI checks are passing and the changes look good in the review environment.

[github-actions]

How to review these changes 👓

Thank you for your contribution. To review these changes, choose one of the following options:

• Spin up a codespace
• Set up a local development environment

A Hubber will need to deploy your changes internally to review.

Table of review links

Note: Please update the URL for your staging server or codespace.

The table shows the files in the content directory that were changed in this pull request. This helps you review your changes on a staging server. Changes to the data directory are not included in this table.

Source	Review	Production	What Changed
repositories/creating-and-managing-repositories/about-repositories.md	fpt ghec ghes@ 3.193.183.173.163.153.14	fpt ghec ghes@ 3.193.183.173.163.153.14

Key: fpt: Free, Pro, Team; ghec: GitHub Enterprise Cloud; ghes: GitHub Enterprise Server

🤖 This comment is automatically generated.

[Sharra-writes]

@deiga I think this is a useful clarification, I just want to check with the rest of the team about terminology.

[github-actions]

A stale label has been added to this pull request because it has been open 30 days with no activity. If you think this pull request should remain open, please add a new comment.

[deiga]

@Sharra-writes Hows that checking going? :)

[subatoi]

@deiga Hello, and please accept my apologies for the late conclusion here

After review, we're not convinced there's enough evidence to add this clarification. In general I'd encourage you to open a community discussion if it's something you'd like to pursue, as this helps us to understand how users are affected by specific articles.

I'm going to close this out, but apologies again for the late reply, and sorry this isn't the answer you were looking for

[deiga]

@subatoi Sure, I understand the decision. Thanks for letting me know 🙏