[Bug] The presence of `ol.contains-task-list li.task-list-item input.task-list-item-checkbox`s cause `h4 ul > li`s' `ul`s to be moved to the last entrant.

[beedell-roke]

Similarly to issues/1857, checkboxed lists that contain CommonMark-adherent child list entries, without checkboxes, render in incorrect places. Consider:

This renders.

1. This renders.

2. This renders.

   1. This renders.

      This renders.

      • This does not render.

      • This does not render.

      This renders.

      1. This renders.

      2. This renders.

   2. This renders.

This renders.

This renders.

The markup of it is:

#### This renders.

1. [ ] This renders.

1. [ ] This renders.

 1. [ ] This renders.

 #### This renders.

 - This does not render.

 - This does not render.

 #### This renders.

 1. [ ] This renders.

 1. [ ] This renders.

 1. [ ] This renders.

#### This renders.

This renders.

It renders as expected in the previewer:

Previewed	Actual

[juncas2205-debug]

Similarly to issues/1857, checkboxed lists that contain CommonMark-adherent child list entries, without checkboxes, render in incorrect places. Consider:

This renders.

1. [ ]
   [ ] This renders.
   2. [ ]
   [ ] This renders.

   1. [ ]
      [ ] This renders.

      This renders.

      This renders.

      1. This does not render.2. This does not render.3. [ ]
         [ ] This renders.4. [ ]
         [ ] This renders.2. [ ]
         [ ] This renders.

This renders.

This renders.

The markup of it is:

This renders.

1. This renders.

2. This renders.

   1. This renders.

      This renders.

      • This does not render.

      • This does not render.

      This renders.

      1. This renders.

      2. This renders.

   2. This renders.

This renders.

This renders.
It renders as expected in the previewer:

Previewed Actual

[juncas2205-debug]

Si aras algo porfavor expesificar el problema

• [ ]

[beedell-roke]

@juncas2205-debug, your comments are nonsensical. I shall block you, for spam.

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[beedell-roke]

See actions/stale/issues/719#issuecomment-1135116982.