Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The current implementation of
_make_json_serializabledoesn't handle PydanticBaseModelinstances, which are not directly serializable by the standardjsonlibrary. If a Pydantic model is present in the state, it will be incorrectly marked as non-serializable (<not serializable: ...>), leading to data that could have been persisted being lost.To make this more robust, you should add a specific check for
BaseModelinstances and serialize them usingobj.model_dump()before proceeding with the recursive serialization. This will ensure that Pydantic models within the state are correctly persisted.