Skip to content

Change type of HookDelivery.InstallationID to Int64. - #2235

Merged
gmlewis merged 2 commits into
google:masterfrom
watchtowerai:hookdelivery-installationid-to-number
Jan 3, 2022
Merged

Change type of HookDelivery.InstallationID to Int64.#2235
gmlewis merged 2 commits into
google:masterfrom
watchtowerai:hookdelivery-installationid-to-number

Conversation

@pierce-m

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Resolves#2234

@codecov

codecovBot commented Dec 17, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #2235 (8ba2c80) into master (1d9884e) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2235 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.79% 97.79% =======================================
Files 113 113 Lines 10156 10156 =======================================
Hits 9932 9932 Misses 156 156 Partials 68 68 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
github/repos_hooks_deliveries.go90.24% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1d9884e...8ba2c80. Read the comment docs.

@gmlewisgmlewis left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm wondering why these fields are pointers but don't have omitempty?

@gmlewisgmlewis left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've looked through the code and can't find an explanation for why the fields in the HookDelivery do not have an omitempty even though they are all references.

So while we are breaking the API, please go ahead and add omitempty to all the fields in lines 20-30. Thank you!

@gmlewisgmlewis added the Breaking API Change PR will require a bump to the major version num in next release. Look here to see the change(s). label Dec 18, 2021
@pierce-m

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@gmlewis yeah it looks like it was added on the Request and Response fields 🤔, maybe because this struct isn't used as input (as far as I can tell)? Anyways, added! 👍

@gmlewisgmlewis left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @pierce-m !
LGTM.

Awaiting second LGTM from any other repo contributor before merging.

@pierce-m

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Is there anyone else who can provide review? Doesn't seem like @wesleimp is very active any more.

@Parker77Parker77 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@gmlewis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thank you, @Parker77 !
Merging.

@gmlewis
gmlewis merged commit f334d81 into google:masterJan 3, 2022
jlaportebot added a commit to jlaportebot/go-github that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Breaking API ChangePR will require a bump to the major version num in next release. Look here to see the change(s).

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect type in HookDelivery

3 participants

@pierce-m@gmlewis@Parker77