Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
feat!: Support workflow dispatch run details in response#4028
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Changes from all commits
2f504f96817b9ef71d38140a1676File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PSA: I just learned that in the new 2026-03-10 version of the GitHub API, the
return_run_detailsparameter has been removed and the endpoint will always returns200with the workflow run details in the response body.Source: https://docs.github.com/en/rest/about-the-rest-api/breaking-changes?apiVersion=2026-03-10#version-2026-03-10:~:text=Removes%20the%20return_run_details%20parameter.%20The%20endpoint%20now%20always%20returns%20200%20with%20the%20workflow%20run%20details%20in%20the%20response%20body.
I also see there's already a general issue about the new API version: #4077 - so mostly just commenting here to add visibility that this is one of the affected methods.